2024 Antarctic sea ice winter maximum second lowest on record

[Luckyone]

BEAKED BIRDBRAINS care about PARROTING.

SCIENCE is not about PARROTING.

It is about DATA.

The DATA never showed any evidence that increasing atmospheric CO2 causes warming, and had to be FUDGED in 2005 to do so...

Not understanding the difference between DATA and FUDGE = a necessary level of IDIOCY required to fall for CO2 FRAUD

You stated in this post that "Science and DATA never showed any evidence that increasing atmospheric DO2 causes warming"

Well, here is some science and DATA that proves you wrong

According to scientific data, global warming is undeniably happening, and the primary driver is the burning of fossil fuels, which releases significant amounts of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, causing a noticeable rise in global average temperatures; this is supported by consistent data showing increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide levels directly linked to human activities, particularly fossil fuel combustion.

 

[ReinyDays]

Maybe LuckyOne and SSDD can get a hotel room ...

 

[Leo123]

Sure, 2780 scientists and 3000 studies mean nothing because EMH says so, right!

Scientists and studies paid for by the Green segment of Biden's clusterfuck regime. Wasted time, wasted money.

 

[Leo123]

Too much of anything is bad but man made stuff is always more harmful.

Consider sugar vs sweeteners. Sugar is naturally made and taking large quantities causes diabetes to happen. Artificial sweeteners cause cancer if taken in large quantities.

The Earth doesn't make 'too much' CO2 and it makes much more than humans can or ever will. The Earth doesn't make sugar or artificial sweeteners. Try again.

 

[Leo123]

You stated in this post that "Science and DATA never showed any evidence that increasing atmospheric DO2 causes warming"

Well, here is some science and DATA that proves you wrong

According to scientific data, global warming is undeniably happening, and the primary driver is the burning of fossil fuels, which releases significant amounts of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, causing a noticeable rise in global average temperatures; this is supported by consistent data showing increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide levels directly linked to human activities, particularly fossil fuel combustion.

That is not scientific. It's bullshit.

 

[EMH]

You stated in this post that "Science and DATA never showed any evidence that increasing atmospheric DO2 causes warming"

Well, here is some science and DATA that proves you wrong

According to scientific data, global warming is undeniably happening, and the primary driver is the burning of fossil fuels, which releases significant amounts of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, causing a noticeable rise in global average temperatures; this is supported by consistent data showing increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide levels directly linked to human activities, particularly fossil fuel combustion.

Beaked birdbrain.... the link provided IS THE DATA, and what you just parroted calls FUDGE "data" just like the rest of CO2 FRAUd, not "DO2" fraud, you ABSOLUTE SCIENCE INVALID PARROTING MORON...

 

[Luckyone]

Beaked birdbrain.... the link provided IS THE DATA, and what you just parroted calls FUDGE "data" just like the rest of CO2 FRAUd, not "DO2" fraud, you ABSOLUTE SCIENCE INVALID PARROTING MORON...

EMH, congratulations. Your "birdbrain and Moron" comments just put you into the category of being an insulting and degrading of the messenger category. You are well aware that I do not accept communicating with such people.

I have already given you many chances to stop doing it but you have continued to do it. You are now on my ignore list.

 

[ReinyDays]

EMH, congratulations. Your "birdbrain and Moron" comments just put you into the category of being an insulting and degrading of the messenger category. You are well aware that I do not accept communicating with such people.

I have already given you many chances to stop doing it but you have continued to do it. You are now on my ignore list.

What sort of pathetic egotistic moron BRAGS about using the "ignore function" ... we're only insulting because you make it soooooooo easy ... I can't say about EMHDD, but I'M PROUD TO BE ON THE IGNORE LIST ...

One less fool to deal with ...

 

[Sunsettommy]

FYI and as stated in another Forum. I will only respond to posts that include data, statistics and facts that state another view of the data presented.

Opinions (and especially denigrating ones) are a penny per thousand. No reason to even address them. They deserve to be in the garbage.

Your hypocrisy is amusing, remember this....

But according to the Climate Change deniers, it is all Fake Truths and scamming by the people saying that our world is not suffering a game changing Climate Change.

Your post is dishonest since it doesn't materially prove anything for the long dead AGW conjecture.

 

[Sunsettommy]

I do have to say one thing about the members of this message board, they are top-notch in debasing, insulting those that disagree with their views and show such disdain for data, statistics and facts.

It is like sheep

View attachment 1052711

YOU wrote this at post #6,

Opinions (and especially denigrating ones) are a penny per thousand. No reason to even address them. They deserve to be in the garbage.

HA HA HA......, you forget so easily.

 

[Sunsettommy]

Let me make one thing very clear. I have been evaluating things that affect the market and the economy for 47 years and one thing that has worked well consistently, is to go with the experts and the odds. Nothing is ever 100% sure but the experts generally know more than the common person and the favorite/probable always has better odds of being right than the longshot/unlikely.

Having said that, I will listen to experts and people that dedicate their time to studying climate change before I ever pay attention to the common person having an opinion.

I personally have no knowledge of Climate change but when 97% of all climate experts say there is Global warming I will pay attention more to them than the 3% that say different and always pay more attention to the experts than opinion from people like you that know as much about climate change as I do.............which is nothing.

NOAA is an expert on climate change and I will pay attention to them.

What are YOUR credential for making any contrary statement. As far as your statement about it being my job to PROVE that I am right, that is pure BS. All I have done (and am required to do) is submit the information found/given by a climate expert. If you disagree with their findings, it is YOUR JOB to show data, statistics, and facts that prove that expert being wrong.

I am just a messenger. I am not the company doing the studies. Can they be wrong and I offer the information unfairly? Sure! but then again, 97% of the people that study climate change agree that it is a problem. Who are you to disagree with them?

Wow what a load of word salad that was!

Carry on.

 

[Luckyone]

YOU wrote this at post #6,



HA HA HA......, you forget so easily.

How does any of this negate the OP? It actually supports the OP

 

[Sunsettommy]

You claim no knowledge of this material ... yet you claim my example is idiotic? ... the shame should be yours ...

... but then you claim no knowledge of the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics so of course you wouldn't know who Ludwig Boltzmann was ... he only help found Modern Physics ... the sad part is at these temperatures, Classical Physics gives us satisfactory answers ...

I've offered SB as a start to a debate ... you've rejected that ... you also refuse to answer my question about your so-called "consensus" ... and that is an answer in itself ... you will distort the truth to make your point, and I assume you will lie as well ... starting with "lies of omission" ... why are you counting abstentions as "yes" votes? ... is the answer you're a lair? ...

Aren't you embarrassed coming here proclaiming your ignorance of basic meteorology? ... nevermind radiative physics ... ha ha ha ... which definition of temperature are you using? ... do you even know why there's more than one official scientific definition of temperature? ... maybe old Ludwig has a point eh? ...

He is a perfect example of a brainwashed climate cultist who doesn't know shit about the topic, he is a lemming soldier which is why we are seeing a lot of evasive word salad from this fool.

 

[Sunsettommy]

How does any of this negate the OP? It actually supports the OP

LOL, I haven't disputed post one what I am saying it doesn't pertain to the climate change narrative since there is no climate change there at all.

 

[Luckyone]

Wow what a load of word salad that was!

Carry on.

Well, that "word salad" has proven to be either convincing or tangible. I have had a service since 2007 (18 years) where I charge $30 a month for my chart information on the stock market and on commodities. I started with 13 subscribers and after 18 years, 5 of the original subscribers are with me. That means that they have each paid me $6480. Do you know anyone that would pay amount consistently for "word salad"?

 

[Sunsettommy]

Great debate post but no proof of your opinion has been included. Show me the AI response where it states that "millions upon millions of other scientists agree with us" is shown.

I would be okay is you showed that at least 10% (278 scientists) say the opposite.

I will not be holding my breath waiting for your links to that information, but I would be happy if you provided it so that we could ACTUALLY debate the issue and not fight between us to see who has the strongest OPINION.

Your consensus argument is hilarious as that is what POLITICIANS commonly do not scientists who argue through published research, memo's, e-mail chain and conferences.

 

[westwall]

Well, that "word salad" has proven to be either convincing or tangible. I have had a service since 2007 (18 years) where I charge $30 a month for my chart information on the stock market and on commodities. I started with 13 subscribers and after 18 years, 5 of the original subscribers are with me. That means that they have each paid me $6480. Do you know anyone that would pay amount consistently for "word salad"?

Yeah, stupid people. You were pushing a medical tech stock a while back, the company has never turned a profit, its technology is questionable, but boy you were pushing it hard.

So was another knucklehead down in Carson city.

You frauds are all alike.

 

[Sunsettommy]

View attachment 1056094

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL......

That is mostly WATER VAPOR you moron!!!

 

[Sunsettommy]

View attachment 1056143

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

Galaxy class stupidity on display, the planet loves all that added CO2 in the air as NASA published April 2016,

Carbon Dioxide Fertilization Greening Earth, Study Finds​

Excerpt:

From a quarter to half of Earth’s vegetated lands has shown significant greening over the last 35 years largely due to rising levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide, according to a new study published in the journal Nature Climate Change on April 25.

An international team of 32 authors from 24 institutions in eight countries led the effort, which involved using satellite data from NASA’s Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectrometer and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer instruments to help determine the leaf area index, or amount of leaf cover, over the planet’s vegetated regions. The greening represents an increase in leaves on plants and trees equivalent in area to two times the continental United States.

LINK

 

[Matted Joybeard]

but CO2 is such an insignificant amount of the atmosphere how could it have any effect on the world human activity cannot affect the globe