200 Executive Orders Will Be Signed

[Billy_Kinetta]

I miss the good old days when conservatives declared executive orders unconstitutional.

You're about to miss them a lot more.

 

[NYcarbineer]

I miss the good old days when conservatives declared executive orders unconstitutional.

You're about to miss them a lot more.

I admit one thing. I admit that I am surprised at how much fun I'm having with the absurdity of a president Trump.

 

[NYcarbineer]

on January 23rd.

Ka-BOOM ...

Why not by Jan. 21st? Didn't *President Drumplethinskin promise to do these things on the 1st day?

That day is Saturday, numskull. Everyone will be home.

Ah....so he lied about the "first day"....not surprising at all.

Just like keeping your doctor and insurance in all 57 states under sniperfire?

Did you lose your doctor?

 

[Rustic]

on January 23rd.

Ka-BOOM ...

Why not by Jan. 21st? Didn't *President Drumplethinskin promise to do these things on the 1st day?

That day is Saturday, numskull. Everyone will be home.

Ah....so he lied about the "first day"....not surprising at all.

Just like keeping your doctor and insurance in all 57 states under sniperfire?

Did you lose your doctor?

No, because I don't rely on insurance whatsoever...

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

I miss the good old days when conservatives declared executive orders unconstitutional.

I bet you do.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Why not by Jan. 21st? Didn't *President Drumplethinskin promise to do these things on the 1st day?

That day is Saturday, numskull. Everyone will be home.

Ah....so he lied about the "first day"....not surprising at all.

Just like keeping your doctor and insurance in all 57 states under sniperfire?

Did you lose your doctor?

No, because I don't rely on insurance whatsoever...

Then you lied when you said the president lied to you.

 

[Rustic]

That day is Saturday, numskull. Everyone will be home.

Ah....so he lied about the "first day"....not surprising at all.

Just like keeping your doctor and insurance in all 57 states under sniperfire?

Did you lose your doctor?

No, because I don't rely on insurance whatsoever...

Then you lied when you said the president lied to you.

He lied to millions of Americans who do rely on insurance that they chose… Not what some fucked up career politician like Barry chooses for them.

 

[Little-Acorn]

I miss the good old days when conservatives declared executive orders unconstitutional.

I miss the days when liberals didn't lie about what conservatives did.

In fact, I can't even remember when that was.

 

[Little-Acorn]

I wouldn't worry. The Democrats will be buried all the same, and a few things will be done on Friday.

You people are going to have a miserable week next week. Save your strength.

How will they get along without government taking care of their every whim from cradle to grave any more?

 

[Little-Acorn]

Remember what Executive Orders are actually for:

There is nothing intrinsically unconstitutional about an Executive Order. But if an EO is used for the wrong thing, then it CAN be unconstitutional.... as many of Obama's are.

Executive Orders are what a President is supposed to use to carry out something passed by Congress (and signed into law by the Prez, of course).

Classic example is, Congress passes something saying that a group of Federal buildings on a corner in DC will be painted brown. The President signs it into law. He then issues an Exec Order to solicit three companies for bids on the painting work, issues another order to check the bidding companies' qualifications etc. The President is issuing Exec Orders pursuant to something Congress passed into law.

If he's issuing Exec Orders to delay implementation of part of Obamacare for a year, that's the equivalent of issuing an EO to paint the buildings red instead of brown. It does NOT carry out what Congress passed. In fact, it's the act of a dictator with no Congressional oversight or adherence to procedures required by the Constitution, at all.

In a nutshell (I love that term), Executive Orders are constitutional if they directly carry out something passed by Congress and signed by the Prez. If they don't, they're unconstitutional.

Clear now, poor little whiny snowflakes?

 

[AntonToo]

Bullshit.

Neopolitano said something about "up to 200" but it's not clear what ass he pulled that out of. Trump transition team stated that there will actually be four or five executive orders signed that Friday.

Sean Spicer: Trump to Impose Up to Five Executive Orders on Day One - Breitbart

 

[westwall]

Huh? I thought republicans believed in congress being about legislation and law? Phonies in all things, the illegitimate president Donnie, draft dodger and tax cheat will commute his family own past illegality and commute his own sentence for tax cheating with his first executive order. Who know what the second will be?

"Fred Trump entered his majority by getting himself arrested at age twenty-one for his involvement in a battle between about a hundred New York City police officers and a thousand Ku Klux Klan members and supporters, many of them in white robes. The riot took place in Jamaica, the Queens neighborhood where Fred Trump lived. Police booked him for failure to disperse, but prosecutors later declined to try him and many of the others arrested that day. It was the first of many indications of Fred Trump’s racial enmity.

Almost nine decades later, his son Donald, running for president, tried to deny the whole thing, claiming his father never lived at the address the newspapers had obtained from police records. Other public records verify that it was indeed his father’s address. They also show only one Fred Trump living in Queens during that period.

Cornered in a 2015 interview with The New York Times, Donald Trump bobbed, weaved, and tried to persuade the paper to ignore the arrest, which the website boingboing.?net had written about after uncovering a 1927 New York Times article about it. Trump’s comments went like this:
It never happened. And they said there were no charges, no nothing. It’s unfair to mention it, to be honest, because there were no charges. They said there were charges against other people, but there were absolutely no charges, totally false … Somebody showed me that website—it was a little website and somebody did that. By the way, did you notice that there were no charges? Well, if there are no charges that means it shouldn’t be mentioned … Because my father, there were no charges against him, I don’t know about the other people involved. But there were zero charges against him. So assuming it was him—I don’t even think it was him, I never even heard about it. So it’s really not fair to mention. It never happened … if there are no charges that means it shouldn’t be mentioned."

above from David Cay Johnston, 'The Making of Donald Trump'

They do. Which is why they hope the trumpster will abolish the obama "I have a pen" non congressional rules that he has forced down peoples throats.

 

[NLT]

Libturds loved EO's as long as obummer signed them.. pay back is a bitch

 

[Frankeneinstein]

Undoing eo's is done all the time. It is not the same as undoing a law.

The rest of your post is trolling and spam.

And it is a lie, more fake news, perpetuated by this idiot. From one of the reviewers that doesn't like Trump-
I regard Trump as a dangerous narcissist, but that does not mean I can accept all things written against him.

This author seems to be trying to make a quick buck without doing his homework. After bragging about how great he is, and how thoroughly he knows the dope on Trump, he writes a pretty short but persuasive exposé of Trump's corrupt dealings.

The problem, other than his willingness to brag about himself, is that his sources are sometimes very suspect. He cites articles from very politically biased websites. I may share these political views, but I would not cite information from these sources to build an objective case against Trump.

Worst of all, he cites his own articles as the source for much of his information. In other words, "You can believe this because I wrote it somewhere else too."

Lol and more-

The author is a Reuters columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.

By David Cay Johnston

Readers, I apologize. The premise of my debut column for Reuters, on News Corp's taxes, was wrong, 100 percent dead wrong.

Rupert Murdoch's News Corp did not get a $4.8 billion tax refund for the past four years, as I reported. Instead, it paid that much in cash for corporate income taxes for the years 2007 through 2010 while earning pre-tax profits of $10.4 billion.



Dead wrong, huh? Yeah.
And-

Fred was arrested in civilian clothes at a memorial day March with over 100k attendees, during which the Klan caused a riot. Only 2 of the 7 arrested claimed to be Klan members, and Fred was let go before the other 6.

There were over 100 newspaper articles written about the incident, but NYT and others intentionally ignored them and created their own lies.

Snakes.

.

Huh? I thought republicans believed in congress being about legislation and law? Phonies in all things, the illegitimate president Donnie, draft dodger and tax cheat will commute his family own past illegality and commute his own sentence for tax cheating with his first executive order. Who know what the second will be?

"Fred Trump entered his majority by getting himself arrested at age twenty-one for his involvement in a battle between about a hundred New York City police officers and a thousand Ku Klux Klan members and supporters, many of them in white robes. The riot took place in Jamaica, the Queens neighborhood where Fred Trump lived. Police booked him for failure to disperse, but prosecutors later declined to try him and many of the others arrested that day. It was the first of many indications of Fred Trump’s racial enmity.

Almost nine decades later, his son Donald, running for president, tried to deny the whole thing, claiming his father never lived at the address the newspapers had obtained from police records. Other public records verify that it was indeed his father’s address. They also show only one Fred Trump living in Queens during that period.

Cornered in a 2015 interview with The New York Times, Donald Trump bobbed, weaved, and tried to persuade the paper to ignore the arrest, which the website boingboing.?net had written about after uncovering a 1927 New York Times article about it. Trump’s comments went like this:
It never happened. And they said there were no charges, no nothing. It’s unfair to mention it, to be honest, because there were no charges. They said there were charges against other people, but there were absolutely no charges, totally false … Somebody showed me that website—it was a little website and somebody did that. By the way, did you notice that there were no charges? Well, if there are no charges that means it shouldn’t be mentioned … Because my father, there were no charges against him, I don’t know about the other people involved. But there were zero charges against him. So assuming it was him—I don’t even think it was him, I never even heard about it. So it’s really not fair to mention. It never happened … if there are no charges that means it shouldn’t be mentioned."

above from David Cay Johnston, 'The Making of Donald Trump'

Ya pretty much exposed and dismantled this...D-CAYing story

 

[depotoo]

Uhmm, the op said on the 23rd- not the 20th, dear.

Bullshit.

Neopolitano said something about "up to 200" but it's not clear what ass he pulled that out of. Trump transition team stated that there will actually be four or five executive orders signed that Friday.

Sean Spicer: Trump to Impose Up to Five Executive Orders on Day One - Breitbart

 

[Little-Acorn]

Uhmm, the op said on the 23rd- not the 20th, dear.

Bullshit.

Neopolitano said something about "up to 200" but it's not clear what ass he pulled that out of. Trump transition team stated that there will actually be four or five executive orders signed that Friday.

Sean Spicer: Trump to Impose Up to Five Executive Orders on Day One - Breitbart

Please stop confusing the liberal losers with facts. They can't handle it.

 

[esthermoon]

200! All on the same day!
Flash couldn't do any better

 

[esthermoon]

Joking aside I hope the new President is gonna do a good work for all his people

 

[depotoo]

Yes, we still do, if they attempt to circumvent the law. Example
In a blow to President Obama, Supreme Court blocks immigration executive action

I miss the good old days when conservatives declared executive orders unconstitutional.

 

[Little-Acorn]

Yes, we still do, if they attempt to circumvent the law. Example
In a blow to President Obama, Supreme Court blocks immigration executive action

Yes, we do. When they are actually unconstitutional.

To reiterate (as is obviously needed):

Remember what Executive Orders are actually for:

There is nothing intrinsically unconstitutional about an Executive Order. But if an EO is used for the wrong thing, then it CAN be unconstitutional.... as many of Obama's are.

A new EO to repeal an unconstitutional one, is not at all unconstitutional itself.

Executive Orders are what a President is supposed to use to carry out something passed by Congress (and signed into law by the Prez, of course).

Classic example is, Congress passes something saying that a group of Federal buildings on a corner in DC will be painted brown. The President signs it into law. He then issues an Exec Order to solicit three companies for bids on the painting work, issues another order to check the bidding companies' qualifications etc. The President is issuing Exec Orders pursuant to something Congress passed into law.

If he's issuing Exec Orders to delay implementation of part of Obamacare for a year, that's the equivalent of issuing an EO to paint the buildings red instead of brown. It does NOT carry out what Congress passed. In fact, it's the act of a dictator with no Congressional oversight or adherence to procedures required by the Constitution, at all.

In a nutshell (I love that term), Executive Orders are constitutional if they directly carry out something passed by Congress and signed by the Prez. If they don't, they're unconstitutional.

Clear now, poor little whiny snowflakes?