1913 Is 1776 For Liberals

Flanders

ARCHCONSERVATIVE
Sep 23, 2010
7,628
748
205
The parasite class and their MSM media pals let the centennial anniversary of the XVI Amendment go by without so much as a thank you for making them tax dollar wealthy beyond their wildest dreams. I can’t blame them for keeping quiet. Other than parasites, who celebrates the income tax! See this thread for a bit more:


In truth, 1913 was the best year progressives ever had. It is their 1776. Nineteen thirteen also gave the country the XVII Amendment and the Federal Reserve. And let’s not forget that Woodrow Wilson, their George Washington, took office in 1913.

Here’s another anniversary Democrats do not want anyone to remember:


Twenty years ago, on February 28th 1993, the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF) launched an assault on the Branch Davidian religious compound just outside Waco, Texas. The resulting siege ended more than seven weeks later, on April 19, but not before claiming the lives of 80 men, women and children -- many burned to death in the final inferno that destroyed the compound.

The justification for the Waco Massacre is very much tied to today’s big push for banning many rifles:

The government claimed it possessed pre-raid evidence that Koresh and his followers were stockpiling illegal, automatic firearms, and was manufacturing illicit drugs within the compound’s several buildings. Ultimately, no evidence was ever revealed establishing that any automatic firearms were located, or being produced, at the Waco compound although this provided the legal basis for the ATF investigation and initial raid.

Think what the federal government can do to law-abiding Americans when so-called assault weapons are banned legally, not to mention what they can do to anyone who uses a rifle to defend themself against the government —— assuming they live long enough to see the inside of a courtroom.

NOTE: The perpetrators of the Waco massacre and their gun control allies would have everybody believe they defecate ice cream because they want to disarm law-abiding Americans. They imply they wouldn’t harm a fly. They claim gun controls will end violence in America while they sneer at Americans who want to hang on to every type of weapon they can get. I’ve yet to hear one of them explain how banning assault rifles guarantees an end to government violence like the Waco Massacre.

Nobody was surprised by this when it was all happening:


In the immediate aftermath of the 1993 Waco siege, then-President Bill Clinton, through Attorney General Janet Reno, accepted “responsibility” for the results of the raid on the Branch Davidian compound. Unfortunately, the difficulty we in the Congress encountered in obtaining answers from Administration witnesses to our many questions regarding its execution of the operation showed the true hollowness of this acceptance of “responsibility.”

XXXXX

The lack of concern for the human cost of the Waco Siege reflected in the refusal by the Clinton Administration ultimately to account for the conduct of the operation, however, is perhaps the darkest and most tragic aftermath of the siege.

Lest We Forget – Lessons From The 1993 Waco Tragedy
Bob Barr
Feb 27, 2013

Lest We Forget ? Lessons From The 1993 Waco Tragedy - Bob Barr - Page 1

Today, the Waco Massacre is never connected to any of the characters who are still in the government. The Clintons are out of government and well-respected. Hillary Clinton is being touted for president in 2016. In the past 20 years no one ever asked her what part she played in the massacre as co-president. Come 2016 it is highly unlikely anyone will ask her about Benghazi; so there isn’t much chance the Waco Massacre will rub off on her.
 
That's why I say the Progressive has not lost a battle in 100 years. We've done NOTHING to roll back the Progressive Jihad on American Founding Principles and that must end
 
I find it interesting that you believe that the FEDERAL RESERVE is a liberal conspiracy.

The reason I find this interesting is because typically LEFT means leaning toward communialism.

The FEDERAL RESERVE BANK is exactly the opposite of communialism.

It gives PRIVATE BANKS control over the money supply.
 
The criminals in Waco killed federal agents

To rightwinger: The Branch Davidians were declared criminals after they were executed. From Bob Barr’s article:

The government claimed it possessed pre-raid evidence that Koresh and his followers were stockpiling illegal, automatic firearms, and was manufacturing illicit drugs within the compound’s several buildings. Ultimately, no evidence was ever revealed establishing that any automatic firearms were located, or being produced, at the Waco compound although this provided the legal basis for the ATF investigation and initial raid.

Similarly, despite government assertions that Koresh and his followers were manufacturing illicit drugs within the compound, no evidence was ever found to support such allegations.

NOTE: Sexually abusing children was one of the first justifications for the attack. Over the years that UNPROVEN charge fell through the cracks. In any event, the children who were not guilty of anything were saved from further abuse when the federal government burned them to death.

In short: Nobody got a day in court. There’s supposed to be a trial followed by punishment if found guilty. That’s the last thing the Clintons wanted. They wanted the siege ended no matter the cost because it was embarrassing them. In case you missed it there was no cost after the government murdered 80-plus “criminals.” Clinton scum and their people got a pass from the media as well as a second term.

Finally, blaming the victims says the government had no alternatives like waiting them out, or sending lawyers in to facilitate a surrender, and so on. There were alternatives, instead, Clinton & Company adopted a “We don’t negotiate with terrorists” attitude.


I find it interesting that you believe that the FEDERAL RESERVE is a liberal conspiracy.

The reason I find this interesting is because typically LEFT means leaning toward communialism.

The FEDERAL RESERVE BANK is exactly the opposite of communialism.

It gives PRIVATE BANKS control over the money supply.

To editec: The Left and the bankers have one goal; totalitarian government. The Federal Reserve works hand and glove with any entity that will institute collectivist government. The Fed’s part in creating money out of thin air, the tax on incomes, a devalued dollar, internationalism, and burying Americans in debt strengthens both the bankers and the Socialists/Communists. Basically, in addition to the income tax Socialists spend the money the Fed creates. It’s the perfect partnership for totalitarians.
 
The parasite class and their MSM media pals let the centennial anniversary of the XVI Amendment go by without so much as a thank you for making them tax dollar wealthy beyond their wildest dreams. I can’t blame them for keeping quiet. Other than parasites, who celebrates the income tax! See this thread for a bit more:


In truth, 1913 was the best year progressives ever had. It is their 1776. Nineteen thirteen also gave the country the XVII Amendment and the Federal Reserve. And let’s not forget that Woodrow Wilson, their George Washington, took office in 1913.

Here’s another anniversary Democrats do not want anyone to remember:


Twenty years ago, on February 28th 1993, the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF) launched an assault on the Branch Davidian religious compound just outside Waco, Texas. The resulting siege ended more than seven weeks later, on April 19, but not before claiming the lives of 80 men, women and children -- many burned to death in the final inferno that destroyed the compound.

The justification for the Waco Massacre is very much tied to today’s big push for banning many rifles:

The government claimed it possessed pre-raid evidence that Koresh and his followers were stockpiling illegal, automatic firearms, and was manufacturing illicit drugs within the compound’s several buildings. Ultimately, no evidence was ever revealed establishing that any automatic firearms were located, or being produced, at the Waco compound although this provided the legal basis for the ATF investigation and initial raid.

Think what the federal government can do to law-abiding Americans when so-called assault weapons are banned legally, not to mention what they can do to anyone who uses a rifle to defend themself against the government —— assuming they live long enough to see the inside of a courtroom.

NOTE: The perpetrators of the Waco massacre and their gun control allies would have everybody believe they defecate ice cream because they want to disarm law-abiding Americans. They imply they wouldn’t harm a fly. They claim gun controls will end violence in America while they sneer at Americans who want to hang on to every type of weapon they can get. I’ve yet to hear one of them explain how banning assault rifles guarantees an end to government violence like the Waco Massacre.

Nobody was surprised by this when it was all happening:


In the immediate aftermath of the 1993 Waco siege, then-President Bill Clinton, through Attorney General Janet Reno, accepted “responsibility” for the results of the raid on the Branch Davidian compound. Unfortunately, the difficulty we in the Congress encountered in obtaining answers from Administration witnesses to our many questions regarding its execution of the operation showed the true hollowness of this acceptance of “responsibility.”

XXXXX

The lack of concern for the human cost of the Waco Siege reflected in the refusal by the Clinton Administration ultimately to account for the conduct of the operation, however, is perhaps the darkest and most tragic aftermath of the siege.

Lest We Forget – Lessons From The 1993 Waco Tragedy
Bob Barr
Feb 27, 2013

Lest We Forget ? Lessons From The 1993 Waco Tragedy - Bob Barr - Page 1

Today, the Waco Massacre is never connected to any of the characters who are still in the government. The Clintons are out of government and well-respected. Hillary Clinton is being touted for president in 2016. In the past 20 years no one ever asked her what part she played in the massacre as co-president. Come 2016 it is highly unlikely anyone will ask her about Benghazi; so there isn’t much chance the Waco Massacre will rub off on her.

Either way she owns Benghazi and will go down in history as the worst SOS in American History. I cannot think of someone who has done a worse job can you? She's a disaster with her What does it matter? (* the Truth ) comment and exudes an arrogance reserved for the devil himself. She'll burn eternally for what she's done to the America we knew and loved.
 
Either way she owns Benghazi and will go down in history as the worst SOS in American History. I cannot think of someone who has done a worse job can you?

To Jeremiah: I can make a case for Madam Short Legs:

Look who Democrats wheel out in 'war on women'
Ex-secretary of state was once mistaken for a hotel maid
by Joe Kovacs
Published: 03/27/2012 at 8:40 PM

Look who Democrats wheel out in ?war on women?

But why quibble. Instead, let’s call it a draw.
 
You forgot to mention, Flanders, that Progressives were seen on the grassy knoll, and secretly bombed Pearl Harbor, while flying fake Japanese plans, while wearing makeup consisting of fake buck teeth and eyeglasses....
 
The criminals in Waco killed federal agents

To rightwinger: The Branch Davidians were declared criminals after they were executed. From Bob Barr’s article:

The government claimed it possessed pre-raid evidence that Koresh and his followers were stockpiling illegal, automatic firearms, and was manufacturing illicit drugs within the compound’s several buildings. Ultimately, no evidence was ever revealed establishing that any automatic firearms were located, or being produced, at the Waco compound although this provided the legal basis for the ATF investigation and initial raid.

Similarly, despite government assertions that Koresh and his followers were manufacturing illicit drugs within the compound, no evidence was ever found to support such allegations.

NOTE: Sexually abusing children was one of the first justifications for the attack. Over the years that UNPROVEN charge fell through the cracks. In any event, the children who were not guilty of anything were saved from further abuse when the federal government burned them to death.

In short: Nobody got a day in court. There’s supposed to be a trial followed by punishment if found guilty. That’s the last thing the Clintons wanted. They wanted the siege ended no matter the cost because it was embarrassing them. In case you missed it there was no cost after the government murdered 80-plus “criminals.” Clinton scum and their people got a pass from the media as well as a second term.

Finally, blaming the victims says the government had no alternatives like waiting them out, or sending lawyers in to facilitate a surrender, and so on. There were alternatives, instead, Clinton & Company adopted a “We don’t negotiate with terrorists” attitude.


I find it interesting that you believe that the FEDERAL RESERVE is a liberal conspiracy.

The reason I find this interesting is because typically LEFT means leaning toward communialism.

The FEDERAL RESERVE BANK is exactly the opposite of communialism.

It gives PRIVATE BANKS control over the money supply.

To editec: The Left and the bankers have one goal; totalitarian government. The Federal Reserve works hand and glove with any entity that will institute collectivist government. The Fed’s part in creating money out of thin air, the tax on incomes, a devalued dollar, internationalism, and burying Americans in debt strengthens both the bankers and the Socialists/Communists. Basically, in addition to the income tax Socialists spend the money the Fed creates. It’s the perfect partnership for totalitarians.

They fired on Federal Agents killing four

They used up all their brownie points in terms of getting a break. They could have peacefully surrendered at any time

I fought the law........and the Law won
 
You forgot to mention, Flanders, that Progressives were seen on the grassy knoll, and secretly bombed Pearl Harbor, while flying fake Japanese plans, while wearing makeup consisting of fake buck teeth and eyeglasses....

To Vandalshandle: I didn’t forget anything. I did not want to be accused of piling on.

They fired on Federal Agents killing four

To rightwinger: Who fired first is the pivotal question:

Twenty-five children and scores of adults died as a result of the United States governments assault on a Seventh-Day Adventist sect near Waco, Texas, in 1993. This article examines the government surveillance and search warrant that led to the attack, and finds that the warrant fell far short of proper Constitutional standards. After the deaths of most persons in the Branch Davidian compound in the April 19, 1993, inferno, the Department of the Treasury and the Department of Justice conducted their own internal reviews of governmental actions during the initial attack, the siege, and the final assault on the compound. This article discusses what is revealed, and what is deliberately obscured, in the governmental reports.

XXXXX

Although it is unclear whether Koresh and his followers or the BATF agents fired first, four BATF agents were killed and 14-28 others wounded_some probably struck by "friendly fire"_as were some Branch Davidians.

The Tragedy at Waco
Paul H. Blackman

The Tragedy at Waco

The next article answers the question:

What other findings in the Danforth report did you disagree with?

All the evidence that I’ve seen is that the ATF fired first. And that came out in the trial — that it was the ATF agents who were killing the [Davidians'] dogs. How you would come to an opposite conclusion in their situation — especially with all the obvious — the destruction of evidence, the videotapes, the missing half of the front door — is beyond me. You might remember that the FBI lied over and over and over again that it did not have fragmentation grenades, and then it turns out they had in excess of 240 millimeter fragmentation grenades there. I don’t know of any other reason to have fragmentation grenades unless you plan to kill someone.

In light of the tens of millions of their own people that totalitarian governments slaughtered in the 20th century only fools believe anything our federal government says.

The Republican Congress has been intensely critical of President Clinton and Janet Reno on Waco. Did you find it odd for a Republican leader of Danforth’s status to exonerate 100 percent an administration his party has been so critical of?

The answer is no. Not if this is the same John Danforth that told us that Clarence Thomas would make a great Supreme Court justice, but [Thomas] would then go on to write some of the most police-state friendly opinions in the history of the country. Danforth is an establishment, status quo conservative. I think his heart would be in protecting the reputation of the establishment.

Tuesday, Jul 25, 2000 03:00 PM EDT
“The ATF fired first”
Government critics of the Waco raid won't be silenced by the Danforth report.
By Daryl Lindsey

?The ATF fired first? - Salon.com

That pretty much sums up the federal government protecting the federal government.

They used up all their brownie points in terms of getting a break. They could have peacefully surrendered at any time

To rightwinger: That’s what the Jews did in Nazi Germany, and there were millions of them.
 
Last edited:
You kill Federal Agents...there is a price to pay

The Branch Davidians had every chance to surrender at any time. I rightfully put the blame for the childrens deaths on their parents.
First- For exposing them to a maniac pedophile
Second- For using them as shields
 
Last edited:
I find it amazing how the extreme Right has made martyers out of the Davidians, who were, in fact, pedaphiles, child abusers, killers, and every bit as crazy as the people at Jonestown, armed to the teeth, and suicidal (complete with firebombs they set themselves).
 
"That’s what the Jews did in Nazi Germany, and there were millions of them. "

Oh, PLEASE, spare us the Nazi crap!
__________________
 
You kill Federal Agents...there is a price to pay

To rightwinger: And what price do they pay when they slaughter “innocent until proven guilty” Americans?

Vandalshandle;6885766

I find it amazing how the extreme Right has made martyers out of the Davidians,

To Vandalshandle: It’s not about martyrdom. It’s about governments murdering their citizens.

and every bit as crazy as the people at Jonestown, armed to the teeth, and suicidal

To Vandalshandle: Yeah, right. Let’s kill them before they commit suicide. That makes a lot of sense.

Oh, PLEASE, spare us the Nazi crap!

To Vandalshandle: Okay. Let’s go with Christians in the Ottoman Empire, Russian peasants in the Soviet Union, and Chinese citizens on every level in Mao’s China. The point is that governments kill their own people and get away with it. This is the choice for the rest of us: Die a victim—— or POSSIBLY die defending yourself.
 
I find it interesting that you believe that the FEDERAL RESERVE is a liberal conspiracy.

The reason I find this interesting is because typically LEFT means leaning toward communialism.

The FEDERAL RESERVE BANK is exactly the opposite of communialism.

It gives PRIVATE BANKS control over the money supply.
No, it gives ONE central bank control over the money supply.

It's totally communistic.
 
[
No, it gives ONE central bank control over the money supply.

It's totally communistic.

I think you need to review your history. Initially the power of the Federal Reserve system was predominantly in the regional banks who had locally elected boards. The Board of Governors had very little power. This resulted in the bad performance of the Fed 1928--1934.
 
You kill Federal Agents...there is a price to pay

The Branch Davidians had every chance to surrender at any time. I rightfully put the blame for the childrens deaths on their parents.
First- For exposing them to a maniac pedophile
Second- For using them as shields
The Feds were surveilling him so if they really thought Koresh was hurting kids or dealing illegal weapons they could have just arrested him during one of his many trips into town.

Oh you didn't know about that?
 
The criminals in Waco killed federal agents

Here is a little thought to chew on, the FBI and ATF were well aware that David Koresh jogged every morning, could have picked him up at any time well before the showdown, instead allowed him barricade himself on the compound and force his hand. The question that needs to be addressed, did Janet Reno and ATF purposely stage the event or did one or the other just totally bungle the operation? These "criminals" as you call them would have never been placed in the position if the FBI, DOJ, and ATF, had thought before acting.
 
[
No, it gives ONE central bank control over the money supply.

It's totally communistic.

I think you need to review your history. Initially the power of the Federal Reserve system was predominantly in the regional banks who had locally elected boards. The Board of Governors had very little power. This resulted in the bad performance of the Fed 1928--1934.

To oldfart: You’re putting the cart before the horse. The people who set up the Federal Reserve were not about to give regional banks real authority. Watch this lengthy video to really learn what the Fed is all about:

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=lu_VqX6J93k]The Creature From Jekyll Island (by G. Edward Griffin) - YouTube[/ame]​
 
Flanders,
It really makes no difference. If you lived in Polyneseia, you would be convinced that hula girls where plotting to enslave you.
 

Forum List

Back
Top