$113 Billion spent to defend Ukraine’s border as they lose the war…Dems didn’t want to spend $20B on our own border to protect our own people.

Republicans who blew trillion dollar holes in the budget with tax cuts want to say something about someone spending something?
Are you talking about the tax cuts that led to record revenue for the U.S. treasury?
The tax breaks that ALL productive people took part in while you bottom feeders were left behind?
P.S. your 100+ billion number is bullshit.
You programmer says you’re bullshit.
 
Republicans who blew trillion dollar holes in the budget with tax cuts want to say something about someone spending something?

Nagger please.

P.S. your 100+ billion number is bullshit.

Federal tax revenue went up with the tax cuts dumb ass.
 
Are you talking about the tax cuts that led to record revenue for the U.S. treasury?

Federal tax revenue went up with the tax cuts dumb ass.

Yep, the tax-cut cult is alive and well.

Do you morons not understand that correlation is not a serious proof of causation?

Who in their right mind would be against reducing tax burden if it increased revenues? Whats going on in that stupid head of yours?

No serious economist belives that those tax cuts did anything but reduce revenues. Normal economic expansion and inflation over time are of course higher volumes than the moderate tax-cut effects, but in no way does that prove that tax-cuts (at already low rates) somehow pay for themselves, let alone are some sort of magical free lunch that increases revenues.


In the case of Trump's tax cuts, revenue growth was clearly stunted untill 2020-2022 when government spent trillions of dollars into economy from Covid-19 measures and inflation kicked into high gear.

2023_01_29_SOTU_Set1_Revenue_IG.width-1000.png
 
Last edited:
Yep, the tax-cut cult is alive and well.

Do you morons not understand that correlation is not a serious proof of causation?

Who in their right mind would be against reducing tax burden if it increased revenues? Whats going on in that stupid head of yours?

No serious economist belives that those tax cuts did anything but reduce revenues. Normal economic expansion and inflation over time are of course higher volumes than the moderate tax-cut effects, but in no way does that prove that tax-cuts (at already low rates) somehow pay for themselves, let alone are some sort of magical free lunch that increases revenues.


In the case of Trump's tax cuts, revenue growth was clearly stunted untill 2020-2022 when government spent trillions of dollars into economy from Covid-19 measures and inflation kicked into high gear.

2023_01_29_SOTU_Set1_Revenue_IG.width-1000.png

You’re extremely dumb.
 
Yep, the tax-cut cult is alive and well.

Do you morons not understand that correlation is not a serious proof of causation?

Who in their right mind would be against reducing tax burden if it increased revenues? Whats going on in that stupid head of yours?

No serious economist belives that those tax cuts did anything but reduce revenues. Normal economic expansion and inflation over time are of course higher volumes than the moderate tax-cut effects, but in no way does that prove that tax-cuts (at already low rates) somehow pay for themselves, let alone are some sort of magical free lunch that increases revenues.


In the case of Trump's tax cuts, revenue growth was clearly stunted untill 2020-2022 when government spent trillions of dollars into economy from Covid-19 measures and inflation kicked into high gear.

2023_01_29_SOTU_Set1_Revenue_IG.width-1000.png
You’re trying real hard…that’s cute TDS’er.
Look, your THEORY is just that…I showed you that Trump cut corporate taxes so corporations had more income, more corp income = higher payrolls to employees, higher payrolls = more employees paying more in taxes….See how easy this shit is?
What else can I teach you today SuperTard?
 

Forum List

Back
Top