For those who do not know the murders were legal according to Islamic law.
Evidence for your assertion?
Please note the Young Turks were ardently secular, positivist, materialist. Just like Craig Stephen Hicks and so many other atheist murderers.
If you are asking for evidence-----it is because you know nothing about shariah law.
I do know because I learned about it from educated muslims in my early youth. The version I got was very POSITIVE from the POV of muslims. It is very fair. If
a non muslim understands that islam is a religion superior to all others----he can live in a muslim society. My earliest informants were people from south-east asia----young physicians. I would not call them "religious"----but they had a great
PRIDE in islam and its history as they "knew" it I also ---at the same time was
acquainted with lots of hindu physicians ----who did not particularly have much
admiration for islam BUT were highly influenced by the teachings of Mahatma Gandhi who LIKED EVERYTHING. Years past---I learned more. I came into contact with Christians from southeast asia and the middle east and jews from
both southeast asia and the middle east. Over time I did learn just what SHARIAH and DHIMMIA is all about. ------I did not learn it from anti Islamic "propaganda" In fact the propaganda to which I was exposed-----was very PRO-ISLAM I cannot explain shariah and dhimmia to you and the history of islam over the past 1400 years on a messageboard. If you do not know---you do not know. Feel free to ask questions. The ARMENIANS rebelled against their DHIMMI status in the
OTTOMAN EMPIRE-------Rebellion against dhimmi status in Islamic law is seen as
a CAPITAL CRIME. My own present husband was born a "dhimmi" in a classical shariah society. I know about the life issues of dhimmis from his relatives who REMEMBERED it----
A grasp of history is important-----do you know the position of "HELOTS" in
Spartan society? -----dhimmia is similar