Ozone
Silver Member
1. the constitutional amendment and what it means to the ozone layer.
to make the term limits amendment to retrofit the congress with the third department, the library of congress, whereby the secretary of the interior is the president in similar fashion to the manner in which the vice president is the president of the senate. within the library of congress, seats are awarded to the chief officers of the ancient tribal nations of america in the united states. for example, there are indians and there are negros and there are whites, etc. or how do you define what is a civil rights leader among the people? people can vote for somebody. this way there are no more such territorial reservations, but that all the public schools, parks, and libraries in america keep their local district charters by the term limits amendment. and everyone will hate it and vote it out after a while, god bless them.
2. the swamp draining effect.
now, the mysterious third department of congress does all this research on legislation for the house and senate, the ultimate flood-wall against the swamp as the thing is drained out, so to speak. shutting down access to lobbyists and lobbyisms, two-for-one special regulations deal and so forth; the local people from around the country gather all around the capitol to build a beautiful, tremendous wall of books, even many of them written in spanish at mexico's expense, and most importantly, with crenelated shelving and other unspecified battlements to prevent any future lobbiathon incursions.
3. all the rest of it.
figure it out, i don't care. it's about giving the power back to the people, not taking the power away from the people. once every village or city where they have charter schools, they get an honorable way. the idea is to prohibit fly-by-night, snake-oil, or otherwise quacking credibility standards by advancing merit oversight, limiting the charters to the stupidity of congress and no further. so, does it count, one vote per each local district, or what? who knows? all i know is that it can be done, or it can at least bog down the trump administration forever if necessary.
in such an organization, the democrats will tend to accuse the republicans of racism, except racism be obsolete where every public park in america is concerned. in that, freedom of assembly means a lot, because you can appeal to the environment, and to history, and to the arts. it just has to start at a point and spread out from there. an ideal location is the underground railroad memorial, so that everyone understands what it means. so if you say it's racist, then you'll make it racist, though it doesn't have to be. naturally, one or another of any particular skin-tone persuasion is attracted to any particular defining quality of america.
what could it be in america when multi-culturalism is put aside, knowing that each of the several kinds of people throughout all the states have equal access to input on the one culture of the congress itself. so you're going to have to accept something like the King of the Hawaii, or whatever style the chief officer of that ancient tribal nation, as a member of congress, among others, is it okay with you? you don't hate indians, do you? or is the King of the Negro even more controversial, are they only worth 3/5 a classic stereotypical native american to you?
**and to think, i thought of this idea because somebody years ago had the good sense enough to draw maps of ohio in terms of state park regions, to help tourists find campgrounds and boat ramps and whatnots. somebody had to research something meaningful to the public trust to build that system. it's the little things that add up, you know?**
to make the term limits amendment to retrofit the congress with the third department, the library of congress, whereby the secretary of the interior is the president in similar fashion to the manner in which the vice president is the president of the senate. within the library of congress, seats are awarded to the chief officers of the ancient tribal nations of america in the united states. for example, there are indians and there are negros and there are whites, etc. or how do you define what is a civil rights leader among the people? people can vote for somebody. this way there are no more such territorial reservations, but that all the public schools, parks, and libraries in america keep their local district charters by the term limits amendment. and everyone will hate it and vote it out after a while, god bless them.
2. the swamp draining effect.
now, the mysterious third department of congress does all this research on legislation for the house and senate, the ultimate flood-wall against the swamp as the thing is drained out, so to speak. shutting down access to lobbyists and lobbyisms, two-for-one special regulations deal and so forth; the local people from around the country gather all around the capitol to build a beautiful, tremendous wall of books, even many of them written in spanish at mexico's expense, and most importantly, with crenelated shelving and other unspecified battlements to prevent any future lobbiathon incursions.
3. all the rest of it.
figure it out, i don't care. it's about giving the power back to the people, not taking the power away from the people. once every village or city where they have charter schools, they get an honorable way. the idea is to prohibit fly-by-night, snake-oil, or otherwise quacking credibility standards by advancing merit oversight, limiting the charters to the stupidity of congress and no further. so, does it count, one vote per each local district, or what? who knows? all i know is that it can be done, or it can at least bog down the trump administration forever if necessary.
in such an organization, the democrats will tend to accuse the republicans of racism, except racism be obsolete where every public park in america is concerned. in that, freedom of assembly means a lot, because you can appeal to the environment, and to history, and to the arts. it just has to start at a point and spread out from there. an ideal location is the underground railroad memorial, so that everyone understands what it means. so if you say it's racist, then you'll make it racist, though it doesn't have to be. naturally, one or another of any particular skin-tone persuasion is attracted to any particular defining quality of america.
what could it be in america when multi-culturalism is put aside, knowing that each of the several kinds of people throughout all the states have equal access to input on the one culture of the congress itself. so you're going to have to accept something like the King of the Hawaii, or whatever style the chief officer of that ancient tribal nation, as a member of congress, among others, is it okay with you? you don't hate indians, do you? or is the King of the Negro even more controversial, are they only worth 3/5 a classic stereotypical native american to you?
**and to think, i thought of this idea because somebody years ago had the good sense enough to draw maps of ohio in terms of state park regions, to help tourists find campgrounds and boat ramps and whatnots. somebody had to research something meaningful to the public trust to build that system. it's the little things that add up, you know?**
