100,000 dead ain't Sheyat compared to 40 million out of work....

[Eric Arthur Blair]

Spent the most of any President by far??
Perhaps you didn't notice the Trump administration spending over his first 2.5 years (pre-pandemic). Even after the nice fat tax cut gift to the 1%.
Deficit was on track to be something in the neighborhood of 1.2 trillion?...Yikes.

Most of any president up to that point, of course. Use your head.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

If you want your family exposed to COVID19, vote Republican.

If you want your family to die in their basement of starvation vote for a democrat turd.

 

[jc456]

People working is more evil

 

[XponentialChaos]

View attachment 340590

Trump minimized the seriousness of this virus. Now 100,000 people have died from it and our economy is a disaster. Good job, conservatives. So much winning.

Your desperation is duly noted. And you have good reason for your desperation but why LIE?

WOW! Chris Wallace CALLS OUT a Stunned Pelosi for Pushing Tourism to Chinatown in Late February (VIDEO)
By Jim Hoft
Published April 19, 2020 at 11:03am

Back in late February, 4 weeks after President Trump banned flights from China from entering the US, Speaker Pelosi was out urging tourists to hit San Francisco’s Chinatown.

Jan 31 — President Trump banned flights from China.
Feb. 5 — Democrats blasted President Trump for his China travel ban.
Feb 24 — Pelosi was pushing tourism to Chinatown.
March 13 — NY Mayor DeBlasio encourages New Yorkers to go about their daily lives as usual.

Last week Pelosi deleted a video of herself on Twitter walking around in Chinatown on February 24 downplaying the Coronavirus and urging people to “come to Chinatown.”

WOW! Chris Wallace CALLS OUT a Stunned Pelosi for Pushing Tourism to Chinatown in Late February (VIDEO)

###

Published March 18, 2020
WHO haunted by January tweet saying China found no human transmission of coronavirus

The World Health Organization (WHO) is now haunted by a tweet it sent earlier this year when it cited Chinese health officials who claimed there had been no human transmissions of the novel coronavirus within the country yet.

The Jan. 14 tweet came less than two months before WHO declared COVID-19 to be a global pandemic.

"Preliminary investigations conducted by the Chinese authorities have found no clear evidence of human-to-human transmission of the novel #coronavirus (2019-nCoV) identified in #Wuhan, #China," the organization had said.

It also relied on information from Chinese health authorities who have been accused of obscuring facts and figures during the course of the outbreak.

WHO haunted by January tweet saying China found no human transmission of coronavirus

Nothing I posted was a lie.

We have plenty of quotes of Trump diminishing the seriousness of this virus. And it blew up in his face.

Feb 25: "CDC & my administration are doing a GREAT job of handling Coronavirus."

Whoops.

And "we" have dozens of quotes with Democrats screaming that President Trump was overreacting.

"
Feb 24 — Pelosi was pushing tourism to Chinatown.
March 13 — NY Mayor DeBlasio encourages New Yorkers to go about their daily lives as usual.

Your childish effort if both childish and counter-productive. Trying to blame President Trump for something that is clearly not, will serve only to show that Democrats are far more interested in bringing down a president than solving problems.

Specifically what were the Democrats doing, spending all their time on between January 2017 and February 5th 2020?

I'll help, here is what Democrats were concentrating all their time and energy upon.

MTP DAILY
House impeachment managers walk articles to Senate
Jan. 15, 2020

• "The seven impeachment managers chosen by Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), who will guide the trial, deliver the articles to the Senate in a historic moment."

House impeachment managers walk articles to Senate

The seven impeachment managers chosen by Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), who will guide the trial, deliver the articles to the Senate in a historic moment.

www.msnbc.com

Your "But Pelosi" is noted.

Doesn't change a thing about Trump's inability to get us prepared for this disaster.

The study is from 2019. You realize this, right? One might want to look at how we have done in the last few months and compare it to this study.

They're using something called the Global Health Security Index. The study ranks systems in place to combat an infection. They use six different categories:

• Prevention: Prevention of the emergence or release of pathogens
• Detection and Reporting: Early detection and reporting for epidemics of potential international concern
• Rapid Response: Rapid response to and mitigation of the spread of an epidemic
• Health System: Sufficient and robust health system to treat the sick and protect health workers
• Compliance with International Norms: Commitments to improving national capacity, financing plans to address gaps, and adhering to global norms
• Risk Environment: Overall risk environment and country vulnerability to biological threats

Based on those categories, we were in good shape to handle this thing. Several months later, we're now leading the world in cases and deaths. By a mile.

Even though we were one of the countries best prepared to handle this thing several months ago, we STILL fucked it up about as bad as humanly possible.

Trump was given an all-star lineup and still somehow managed to lose by 100 points.

 

[Markle]

The study is from 2019. You realize this, right? One might want to look at how we have done in the last few months and compare it to this study.

They're using something called the Global Health Security Index. The study ranks systems in place to combat an infection. They use six different categories:

• Prevention: Prevention of the emergence or release of pathogens
• Detection and Reporting: Early detection and reporting for epidemics of potential international concern
• Rapid Response: Rapid response to and mitigation of the spread of an epidemic
• Health System: Sufficient and robust health system to treat the sick and protect health workers
• Compliance with International Norms: Commitments to improving national capacity, financing plans to address gaps, and adhering to global norms
• Risk Environment: Overall risk environment and country vulnerability to biological threats

Based on those categories, we were in good shape to handle this thing. Several months later, we're now leading the world in cases and deaths. By a mile.

Even though we were one of the countries best prepared to handle this thing several months ago, we STILL fucked it up about as bad as humanly possible.

Trump was given an all-star lineup and still somehow managed to lose by 100 points.

Yes indeed, the study is from WAY BACK IN 2019!

When did the virus get released in CHINA?

 

[XponentialChaos]

The study is from 2019. You realize this, right? One might want to look at how we have done in the last few months and compare it to this study.

They're using something called the Global Health Security Index. The study ranks systems in place to combat an infection. They use six different categories:

• Prevention: Prevention of the emergence or release of pathogens
• Detection and Reporting: Early detection and reporting for epidemics of potential international concern
• Rapid Response: Rapid response to and mitigation of the spread of an epidemic
• Health System: Sufficient and robust health system to treat the sick and protect health workers
• Compliance with International Norms: Commitments to improving national capacity, financing plans to address gaps, and adhering to global norms
• Risk Environment: Overall risk environment and country vulnerability to biological threats

Based on those categories, we were in good shape to handle this thing. Several months later, we're now leading the world in cases and deaths. By a mile.

Even though we were one of the countries best prepared to handle this thing several months ago, we STILL fucked it up about as bad as humanly possible.

Trump was given an all-star lineup and still somehow managed to lose by 100 points.

Yes indeed, the study is from WAY BACK IN 2019!

When did the virus get released in CHINA?

It's 2020 now. Look at the numbers. We're now leading the world in cases and deaths.

Do you think we've done a good job of handling this?

 

[healthmyths]

• Heart disease: Number of deaths per year: 635,260
• Cancer: Number of deaths per year: 598,038
• Accidents (unintentional injuries): Number of deaths per year: 161,374
• Chronic lower respiratory diseases: Number of deaths per year: 154,596
• Stroke: Number of deaths per year: 142,142
• Alzheimer’s disease: Number of deaths per year: 116,103
• Diabetes: Number of deaths per year: 80,058
• Influenza and pneumonia: Number of deaths per year: 51,537
• Kidney disease: Number of deaths per year: 50,046
• Suicide: Number of deaths per year: 44,965
• Septicemia: Number of deaths per year: 38,940
• Chronic liver disease and cirrhosis: Number of deaths per year: 38,170

Don't leave out abortion. Somewhere in the millions, per year.

I love how you tards just pull totally made up numbers out of your asses. You actually show off your ignorance in public and are proud of yourselves!

Wow.

OK how about this VALID source? I update this daily!
View attachment 340677

You update this chart from 2017 daily?

How?

Leave it to a dumb, ignorant person to ask a very obvious question.
OK idiot... I update the Covid Deaths daily from this spreadsheet I keep!

COVID Live - Coronavirus Statistics - Worldometer

Live statistics and coronavirus news tracking the number of confirmed cases, recovered patients, tests, and death toll due to the COVID-19 coronavirus from Wuhan, China. Coronavirus counter with new cases, deaths, and number of tests per 1 Million population. Historical data and info. Daily...

www.worldometers.info

Also from the CDC web site:The top 10 leading causes of death in the United States
The top 10 leading causes of death in the United States
All figures and percentages provided here come from the most recent data from the CDC, collected in 2017.

 

[Bruce_T_Laney]

I have grown tired of the debate about Trump's bloodguilt toward 100,000 so called COVID deaths...it's bullshit anyway. However from a purely pragmatic point of view I say .... Tough Shit .... life comes with death as an option...it always did. You think you can make a case based on one hundred thousand???....hell you can't even make a case based on one million.... Go ahead...run with that false narrative and pretend that it's true and I'll tell you what.... Even if it was true it doesn't matter because forty million people are not going to sit down and just give up the ghost so they can hate on a President..... The GOP may have one of the strongest rallying cries in the History of modern politics at this point.... " YOU WANT TO GO BACK TO WORK? VOTE REPUBLICAN! "


See ya in November suckers...

JO

C'mon, just say it. Anybody who gets the virus..and who dies, is just an "Acceptable Loss" in the eyes of Republicans and Conservatives. Why can't you just be up front about it?
You bloviate this BS and at the same time, won't back any of the preventative measures (wearing masks, social distancing) that will aid in getting people back to work and out and about.

You want reason and sanity? This November, vote Democrat.

People that lose their home, job and then kill themselves is worth it to you as long as it get you the Socialistic Society you want which is Yugoslavian and not Scandinavian...

 

[Montrovant]

Your an idiot

 

[TemplarKormac]

The study is from 2019. You realize this, right? One might want to look at how we have done in the last few months and compare it to this study.

They're using something called the Global Health Security Index. The study ranks systems in place to combat an infection. They use six different categories:

• Prevention: Prevention of the emergence or release of pathogens
• Detection and Reporting: Early detection and reporting for epidemics of potential international concern
• Rapid Response: Rapid response to and mitigation of the spread of an epidemic
• Health System: Sufficient and robust health system to treat the sick and protect health workers
• Compliance with International Norms: Commitments to improving national capacity, financing plans to address gaps, and adhering to global norms
• Risk Environment: Overall risk environment and country vulnerability to biological threats

Based on those categories, we were in good shape to handle this thing. Several months later, we're now leading the world in cases and deaths. By a mile.

Even though we were one of the countries best prepared to handle this thing several months ago, we STILL fucked it up about as bad as humanly possible.

Trump was given an all-star lineup and still somehow managed to lose by 100 points.

Yes, indeed, the study is from WAY BACK IN 2019!

When did the virus get released in CHINA?

It's 2020 now. Look at the numbers. We're now leading the world in cases and deaths.

Do you think we've done a good job of handling this?

Chronological snobbery.

You are employing a chronological fallacy in an attempt to refute another argument.

Even an all-star lineup of scientists can only work with the information they are given, and if China is withholding the information and destroying evidence, it inhibits their ability to act accordingly, thus delaying any response on our part. This virus could have been stopped if for a bit of cooperation on China's part.

Us "leading the world" in cases and deaths is irrelevant.

 

[healthmyths]

Didn't bother to read the article huh?

I read it. The explanation seemed facile and convenient. Especially in an an administration that spent
the most money of any president by far. America's spare tire or emergency first aid kit was simply ignored
because the House refused a 10% increase in budgeting?
Oh well. No big deal, I guess. Just let it go, the Obama-ites figured it looks like.

Spent the most of any President by far??
Perhaps you didn't notice the Trump administration spending over his first 2.5 years (pre-pandemic). Even after the nice fat tax cut gift to the 1%.
Deficit was on track to be something in the neighborhood of 1.2 trillion?...Yikes.

YIKES??? Are you that ignorant about how the USA spends tax dollars???
Obviously you NEVER heard of "MANDATORY Spending have you???
FACTS deal with FACTS ok???

The Federal Budget in 2018: An Infographic | Congressional Budget Office

The federal deficit in 2018 was $779 billion, equal to 3.9 percent of gross domestic product. Learn more about the deficit with a new interactive version of the infographic.

www.cbo.gov

So knowing you are TOO lazy along with grossly ignorant... I don't think you know what "Mandatory spending" which made up 60% of spending!
Because you are dumber than crap..
MANDATORY spending means the CONGRESS has no control of it and DUMMY... NEITHER does Trump!! Dummy!
What makes up "MANDATORY" spending:
Mandatory Spending
Mandatory spending is spending that Congress legislates outside of the annual appropriations process, usually less than once a year. It is dominated by the well-known earned-benefit programs Social Security and Medicare. It also includes widely used safety net programs like the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP, formerly food stamps), and a significant amount of federal spending on transportation, among other things.
Discretionary Spending
Discretionary spending refers to the portion of the budget that is decided by Congress through the annual appropriations process each year. These spending levels are set each year by Congress.

So DUMMIES like you just are amazingly ignorant of how the Federal budget works!

GEEZ do a little research before you show your ignorance!

 

[XponentialChaos]

The study is from 2019. You realize this, right? One might want to look at how we have done in the last few months and compare it to this study.

They're using something called the Global Health Security Index. The study ranks systems in place to combat an infection. They use six different categories:

• Prevention: Prevention of the emergence or release of pathogens
• Detection and Reporting: Early detection and reporting for epidemics of potential international concern
• Rapid Response: Rapid response to and mitigation of the spread of an epidemic
• Health System: Sufficient and robust health system to treat the sick and protect health workers
• Compliance with International Norms: Commitments to improving national capacity, financing plans to address gaps, and adhering to global norms
• Risk Environment: Overall risk environment and country vulnerability to biological threats

Based on those categories, we were in good shape to handle this thing. Several months later, we're now leading the world in cases and deaths. By a mile.

Even though we were one of the countries best prepared to handle this thing several months ago, we STILL fucked it up about as bad as humanly possible.

Trump was given an all-star lineup and still somehow managed to lose by 100 points.

Yes, indeed, the study is from WAY BACK IN 2019!

When did the virus get released in CHINA?

It's 2020 now. Look at the numbers. We're now leading the world in cases and deaths.

Do you think we've done a good job of handling this?

Chronological snobbery.

You are employing a chronological fallacy in an attempt to refute another argument.

Even an all-star lineup of scientists can only work with the information they are given, and if China is withholding the information and destroying evidence, it inhibits their ability to act accordingly, thus delaying any response on our part. This virus could have been stopped if for a bit of cooperation on China's part.

Us "leading the world" in cases and deaths is irrelevant.

You're just embarrassing yourself now. He brought up an old study. We can look back on that study to see how it turned out. Pretty simple stuff.

I'm going to make this as simple as I possibly can: We were well-prepared to handle the pandemic. Then we fucked it up.

We have about 30% of the cases and deaths in the world despite being only 5% of the world population. Our economy is a complete disaster. Do you think we handled this virus well?

 

[Crepitus]

• Heart disease: Number of deaths per year: 635,260
• Cancer: Number of deaths per year: 598,038
• Accidents (unintentional injuries): Number of deaths per year: 161,374
• Chronic lower respiratory diseases: Number of deaths per year: 154,596
• Stroke: Number of deaths per year: 142,142
• Alzheimer’s disease: Number of deaths per year: 116,103
• Diabetes: Number of deaths per year: 80,058
• Influenza and pneumonia: Number of deaths per year: 51,537
• Kidney disease: Number of deaths per year: 50,046
• Suicide: Number of deaths per year: 44,965
• Septicemia: Number of deaths per year: 38,940
• Chronic liver disease and cirrhosis: Number of deaths per year: 38,170

Don't leave out abortion. Somewhere in the millions, per year.

I love how you tards just pull totally made up numbers out of your asses. You actually show off your ignorance in public and are proud of yourselves!

Wow.

OK how about this VALID source? I update this daily!
View attachment 340677

You update this chart from 2017 daily?

How?

Leave it to a dumb, ignorant person to ask a very obvious question.
OK idiot... I update the Covid Deaths daily from this spreadsheet I keep!

COVID Live - Coronavirus Statistics - Worldometer

Live statistics and coronavirus news tracking the number of confirmed cases, recovered patients, tests, and death toll due to the COVID-19 coronavirus from Wuhan, China. Coronavirus counter with new cases, deaths, and number of tests per 1 Million population. Historical data and info. Daily...

www.worldometers.info

Also from the CDC web site:The top 10 leading causes of death in the United States
The top 10 leading causes of death in the United States
All figures and percentages provided here come from the most recent data from the CDC, collected in 2017.


View attachment 340771

I'm not sure you understand. That chart says "data compiled from 2017, the latest year available.

 

[Montrovant]

• Heart disease: Number of deaths per year: 635,260
• Cancer: Number of deaths per year: 598,038
• Accidents (unintentional injuries): Number of deaths per year: 161,374
• Chronic lower respiratory diseases: Number of deaths per year: 154,596
• Stroke: Number of deaths per year: 142,142
• Alzheimer’s disease: Number of deaths per year: 116,103
• Diabetes: Number of deaths per year: 80,058
• Influenza and pneumonia: Number of deaths per year: 51,537
• Kidney disease: Number of deaths per year: 50,046
• Suicide: Number of deaths per year: 44,965
• Septicemia: Number of deaths per year: 38,940
• Chronic liver disease and cirrhosis: Number of deaths per year: 38,170

Don't leave out abortion. Somewhere in the millions, per year.

I love how you tards just pull totally made up numbers out of your asses. You actually show off your ignorance in public and are proud of yourselves!

Wow.

OK how about this VALID source? I update this daily!
View attachment 340677

I think he may have been talking about the millions of abortions per year, and possibly the 30%, 20%, and 10% figures from the first post. I don't think the cause of death chart was necessarily the issue.

 

[healthmyths]

The study is from 2019. You realize this, right? One might want to look at how we have done in the last few months and compare it to this study.

They're using something called the Global Health Security Index. The study ranks systems in place to combat an infection. They use six different categories:

• Prevention: Prevention of the emergence or release of pathogens
• Detection and Reporting: Early detection and reporting for epidemics of potential international concern
• Rapid Response: Rapid response to and mitigation of the spread of an epidemic
• Health System: Sufficient and robust health system to treat the sick and protect health workers
• Compliance with International Norms: Commitments to improving national capacity, financing plans to address gaps, and adhering to global norms
• Risk Environment: Overall risk environment and country vulnerability to biological threats

Based on those categories, we were in good shape to handle this thing. Several months later, we're now leading the world in cases and deaths. By a mile.

Even though we were one of the countries best prepared to handle this thing several months ago, we STILL fucked it up about as bad as humanly possible.

Trump was given an all-star lineup and still somehow managed to lose by 100 points.

Yes indeed, the study is from WAY BACK IN 2019!

When did the virus get released in CHINA?

It's 2020 now. Look at the numbers. We're now leading the world in cases and deaths.

Do you think we've done a good job of handling this?

HMMM... so the USA with 330 million people is the 3rd largest behind India 1,362,670,735 and China at 1,402,799,720...
leads the world in cases right? The USA leads the other two largest countries in testing with 14,767,002 or 4.47% of the USA population.
So explain why China which is 24% larger than the USA have NOT tested anyone!
So explain how China has ONLY 82,985 out of 1.4 billion or 0.0059% cases? And NOT one test reported to WHO!

 

[TemplarKormac]

You're just embarrassing yourself now. He brought up an old study. We can look back on that study to see how it turned out. Pretty simple stuff.

"old study"

Is that you speak for "I don't have a cogent counterpoint?"

 

[TemplarKormac]

We were well-prepared to handle the pandemic. Then we fucked it up.

Wait what?

 

[TemplarKormac]

We have about 30% of the cases and deaths in the world despite being only 5% of the world population. Our economy is a complete disaster. Do you think we handled this virus well?

Don't Buy the Misleading Figures. Here's the Real Story About How the U.S. Matches Up on Coronavirus Deaths

pjmedia.com

 

[XponentialChaos]

The study is from 2019. You realize this, right? One might want to look at how we have done in the last few months and compare it to this study.

They're using something called the Global Health Security Index. The study ranks systems in place to combat an infection. They use six different categories:

• Prevention: Prevention of the emergence or release of pathogens
• Detection and Reporting: Early detection and reporting for epidemics of potential international concern
• Rapid Response: Rapid response to and mitigation of the spread of an epidemic
• Health System: Sufficient and robust health system to treat the sick and protect health workers
• Compliance with International Norms: Commitments to improving national capacity, financing plans to address gaps, and adhering to global norms
• Risk Environment: Overall risk environment and country vulnerability to biological threats

Based on those categories, we were in good shape to handle this thing. Several months later, we're now leading the world in cases and deaths. By a mile.

Even though we were one of the countries best prepared to handle this thing several months ago, we STILL fucked it up about as bad as humanly possible.

Trump was given an all-star lineup and still somehow managed to lose by 100 points.

Yes indeed, the study is from WAY BACK IN 2019!

When did the virus get released in CHINA?

It's 2020 now. Look at the numbers. We're now leading the world in cases and deaths.

Do you think we've done a good job of handling this?

HMMM... so the USA with 330 million people is the 3rd largest behind India 1,362,670,735 and China at 1,402,799,720...
leads the world in cases right? The USA leads the other two largest countries in testing with 14,767,002 or 4.47% of the USA population.
So explain why China which is 24% larger than the USA have NOT tested anyone!
So explain how China has ONLY 82,985 out of 1.4 billion or 0.0059% cases? And NOT one test reported to WHO!

I don't trust what China says.

 

[XponentialChaos]

You're just embarrassing yourself now. He brought up an old study. We can look back on that study to see how it turned out. Pretty simple stuff.

"old study"

Is that you speak for "I don't have a cogent counterpoint?"

I'm not disregarding it because it's old. I think it's accurate if you look at how it was done and what it's actually measuring.

The study outlines how well-prepared we were prior to the outbreak. Then we take the new information during the outbreak. Then we can compare the two. That's all I'm doing.