XponentialChaos
Diamond Member
- Jul 25, 2018
- 34,449
- 12,675
- 1,435
Don't trust China. Mistake by Trump.
100,000 dead ain't Sheyat compared to 40 million out of work....
- Thread starter justoffal
- Start date
Don't trust China. Mistake by Trump.
- Moderator
- #202
And "we" have dozens of quotes with Democrats screaming that President Trump was overreacting.
"
Feb 24 — Pelosi was pushing tourism to Chinatown.
March 13 — NY Mayor DeBlasio encourages New Yorkers to go about their daily lives as usual.
Your childish effort if both childish and counter-productive. Trying to blame President Trump for something that is clearly not, will serve only to show that Democrats are far more interested in bringing down a president than solving problems.
Specifically what were the Democrats doing, spending all their time on between January 2017 and February 5th 2020?
I'll help, here is what Democrats were concentrating all their time and energy upon.
MTP DAILY
House impeachment managers walk articles to Senate
Jan. 15, 2020
- "The seven impeachment managers chosen by Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), who will guide the trial, deliver the articles to the Senate in a historic moment."
House impeachment managers walk articles to Senate
The seven impeachment managers chosen by Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), who will guide the trial, deliver the articles to the Senate in a historic moment.www.msnbc.com
Your "But Pelosi" is noted.
Doesn't change a thing about Trump's inability to get us prepared for this disaster.
The study is from 2019. You realize this, right? One might want to look at how we have done in the last few months and compare it to this study.
They're using something called the Global Health Security Index. The study ranks systems in place to combat an infection. They use six different categories:
Based on those categories, we were in good shape to handle this thing. Several months later, we're now leading the world in cases and deaths. By a mile.
- Prevention: Prevention of the emergence or release of pathogens
- Detection and Reporting: Early detection and reporting for epidemics of potential international concern
- Rapid Response: Rapid response to and mitigation of the spread of an epidemic
- Health System: Sufficient and robust health system to treat the sick and protect health workers
- Compliance with International Norms: Commitments to improving national capacity, financing plans to address gaps, and adhering to global norms
- Risk Environment: Overall risk environment and country vulnerability to biological threats
Even though we were one of the countries best prepared to handle this thing several months ago, we STILL fucked it up about as bad as humanly possible.
Trump was given an all-star lineup and still somehow managed to lose by 100 points.
Oh, now I understand even more, it wasn't China we trusted. It was the World Health Organization.
How did you expect the President and his task force to act efficiently when they were being lied to by the CCP? Look at the comment chain with the study again. We relied on WHO, who relied on China's word that there was no evidence of human to human transmission related to this virus. The WHO is supposed to be the premier global health watchdog; trusted to relay accurate health information and statistics to the world, which they ultimately didn't.
The evidence is damning, and it makes you look all the more foolish by placing every expectation on the President when he was doing the reasonable thing and relying on information being put out by the WHO, who, it was discovered, was put on a leash by the Chinese Communist Party. They were made to delay the pandemic announcement so China could save face. China, and by proxy, WHO, betrayed us all.
Now look at us.
Like I said. You presume too much.
(I can't help but notice in that comment chain you said the president (and by default, America) was not prepared for this pandemic, but then make the assertion to me in our discussion that we were. How does that work again?)
Last edited:
healthmyths
Diamond Member
- Sep 19, 2011
- 30,375
- 11,942
- 1,400
And of course you believe everything that China reports, i.e.
- ONLY 82,985 cases out of 1.4 billion people?
- ONLY 4,634 deaths? out of 1.4 billion
- ONLY ZERO tests?
Really you believe that?
-
XponentialChaos
Diamond Member
- Jul 25, 2018
- 34,449
- 12,675
- 1,435
And "we" have dozens of quotes with Democrats screaming that President Trump was overreacting.
"
Feb 24 — Pelosi was pushing tourism to Chinatown.
March 13 — NY Mayor DeBlasio encourages New Yorkers to go about their daily lives as usual.
Your childish effort if both childish and counter-productive. Trying to blame President Trump for something that is clearly not, will serve only to show that Democrats are far more interested in bringing down a president than solving problems.
Specifically what were the Democrats doing, spending all their time on between January 2017 and February 5th 2020?
I'll help, here is what Democrats were concentrating all their time and energy upon.
MTP DAILY
House impeachment managers walk articles to Senate
Jan. 15, 2020
- "The seven impeachment managers chosen by Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), who will guide the trial, deliver the articles to the Senate in a historic moment."
House impeachment managers walk articles to Senate
The seven impeachment managers chosen by Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), who will guide the trial, deliver the articles to the Senate in a historic moment.
Your "But Pelosi" is noted.
Doesn't change a thing about Trump's inability to get us prepared for this disaster.
The study is from 2019. You realize this, right? One might want to look at how we have done in the last few months and compare it to this study.
They're using something called the Global Health Security Index. The study ranks systems in place to combat an infection. They use six different categories:
Based on those categories, we were in good shape to handle this thing. Several months later, we're now leading the world in cases and deaths. By a mile.
- Prevention: Prevention of the emergence or release of pathogens
- Detection and Reporting: Early detection and reporting for epidemics of potential international concern
- Rapid Response: Rapid response to and mitigation of the spread of an epidemic
- Health System: Sufficient and robust health system to treat the sick and protect health workers
- Compliance with International Norms: Commitments to improving national capacity, financing plans to address gaps, and adhering to global norms
- Risk Environment: Overall risk environment and country vulnerability to biological threats
Even though we were one of the countries best prepared to handle this thing several months ago, we STILL fucked it up about as bad as humanly possible.
Trump was given an all-star lineup and still somehow managed to lose by 100 points.
Oh, now I understand even more, it wasn't China we trusted. It was the WHO.
How do you expect the President and his task force to act efficiently when they were being lied to by the CCP? Look at the comment chain with the study again. We relied on WHO, who relied on China's word that there was no evidence of human to human transmission related to this virus. The WHO is supposed to be the premier global health watchdog, trusted to relay accurate health information and statistics to the world, which they didn't.
The evidence is damning, and it makes you look all the more foolish, placing every expectation on the President when he was doing the reasonable thing and relying on information being put out by the WHO, who, it was discovered, was put on a leash by the Chinese Communist Party. They were made to delay the pandemic announcement so China could save face.
Now look at us.
Like I said. You presume too much.
You took a study by Johns Hopkins saying we're well-prepared and somehow turned it into a criticism of the WHO.
Wow. Just wow.
- Moderator
- #205
Sorry, I wasn't finished with my Frosted Mini-Wheats.
- Moderator
- #206
And "we" have dozens of quotes with Democrats screaming that President Trump was overreacting.
"
Feb 24 — Pelosi was pushing tourism to Chinatown.
March 13 — NY Mayor DeBlasio encourages New Yorkers to go about their daily lives as usual.
Your childish effort if both childish and counter-productive. Trying to blame President Trump for something that is clearly not, will serve only to show that Democrats are far more interested in bringing down a president than solving problems.
Specifically what were the Democrats doing, spending all their time on between January 2017 and February 5th 2020?
I'll help, here is what Democrats were concentrating all their time and energy upon.
MTP DAILY
House impeachment managers walk articles to Senate
Jan. 15, 2020
- "The seven impeachment managers chosen by Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), who will guide the trial, deliver the articles to the Senate in a historic moment."
House impeachment managers walk articles to Senate
The seven impeachment managers chosen by Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), who will guide the trial, deliver the articles to the Senate in a historic moment.
Your "But Pelosi" is noted.
Doesn't change a thing about Trump's inability to get us prepared for this disaster.
The study is from 2019. You realize this, right? One might want to look at how we have done in the last few months and compare it to this study.
They're using something called the Global Health Security Index. The study ranks systems in place to combat an infection. They use six different categories:
Based on those categories, we were in good shape to handle this thing. Several months later, we're now leading the world in cases and deaths. By a mile.
- Prevention: Prevention of the emergence or release of pathogens
- Detection and Reporting: Early detection and reporting for epidemics of potential international concern
- Rapid Response: Rapid response to and mitigation of the spread of an epidemic
- Health System: Sufficient and robust health system to treat the sick and protect health workers
- Compliance with International Norms: Commitments to improving national capacity, financing plans to address gaps, and adhering to global norms
- Risk Environment: Overall risk environment and country vulnerability to biological threats
Even though we were one of the countries best prepared to handle this thing several months ago, we STILL fucked it up about as bad as humanly possible.
Trump was given an all-star lineup and still somehow managed to lose by 100 points.
Oh, now I understand even more, it wasn't China we trusted. It was the WHO.
How do you expect the President and his task force to act efficiently when they were being lied to by the CCP? Look at the comment chain with the study again. We relied on WHO, who relied on China's word that there was no evidence of human to human transmission related to this virus. The WHO is supposed to be the premier global health watchdog, trusted to relay accurate health information and statistics to the world, which they didn't.
The evidence is damning, and it makes you look all the more foolish, placing every expectation on the President when he was doing the reasonable thing and relying on information being put out by the WHO, who, it was discovered, was put on a leash by the Chinese Communist Party. They were made to delay the pandemic announcement so China could save face.
Now look at us.
Like I said. You presume too much.
You took a study by Johns Hopkins saying we're well-prepared and somehow turned it into a criticism of the WHO.
Wow. Just wow.
My turn. What the hell are you talking about?
I am addressing the content of the discussion between you and Markle.
XponentialChaos
Diamond Member
- Jul 25, 2018
- 34,449
- 12,675
- 1,435
Now I'm just repeating myself.
Read post #179 and #201.
I've probably said it another half dozen times here alone.
XponentialChaos
Diamond Member
- Jul 25, 2018
- 34,449
- 12,675
- 1,435
And "we" have dozens of quotes with Democrats screaming that President Trump was overreacting.
"
Feb 24 — Pelosi was pushing tourism to Chinatown.
March 13 — NY Mayor DeBlasio encourages New Yorkers to go about their daily lives as usual.
Your childish effort if both childish and counter-productive. Trying to blame President Trump for something that is clearly not, will serve only to show that Democrats are far more interested in bringing down a president than solving problems.
Specifically what were the Democrats doing, spending all their time on between January 2017 and February 5th 2020?
I'll help, here is what Democrats were concentrating all their time and energy upon.
MTP DAILY
House impeachment managers walk articles to Senate
Jan. 15, 2020
- "The seven impeachment managers chosen by Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), who will guide the trial, deliver the articles to the Senate in a historic moment."
House impeachment managers walk articles to Senate
The seven impeachment managers chosen by Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), who will guide the trial, deliver the articles to the Senate in a historic moment.
Your "But Pelosi" is noted.
Doesn't change a thing about Trump's inability to get us prepared for this disaster.
The study is from 2019. You realize this, right? One might want to look at how we have done in the last few months and compare it to this study.
They're using something called the Global Health Security Index. The study ranks systems in place to combat an infection. They use six different categories:
Based on those categories, we were in good shape to handle this thing. Several months later, we're now leading the world in cases and deaths. By a mile.
- Prevention: Prevention of the emergence or release of pathogens
- Detection and Reporting: Early detection and reporting for epidemics of potential international concern
- Rapid Response: Rapid response to and mitigation of the spread of an epidemic
- Health System: Sufficient and robust health system to treat the sick and protect health workers
- Compliance with International Norms: Commitments to improving national capacity, financing plans to address gaps, and adhering to global norms
- Risk Environment: Overall risk environment and country vulnerability to biological threats
Even though we were one of the countries best prepared to handle this thing several months ago, we STILL fucked it up about as bad as humanly possible.
Trump was given an all-star lineup and still somehow managed to lose by 100 points.
Oh, now I understand even more, it wasn't China we trusted. It was the WHO.
How do you expect the President and his task force to act efficiently when they were being lied to by the CCP? Look at the comment chain with the study again. We relied on WHO, who relied on China's word that there was no evidence of human to human transmission related to this virus. The WHO is supposed to be the premier global health watchdog, trusted to relay accurate health information and statistics to the world, which they didn't.
The evidence is damning, and it makes you look all the more foolish, placing every expectation on the President when he was doing the reasonable thing and relying on information being put out by the WHO, who, it was discovered, was put on a leash by the Chinese Communist Party. They were made to delay the pandemic announcement so China could save face.
Now look at us.
Like I said. You presume too much.
You took a study by Johns Hopkins saying we're well-prepared and somehow turned it into a criticism of the WHO.
Wow. Just wow.
My turn. What the hell are you talking about?
I am addressing the content of the discussion between you and Markle.
The Johns Hopkins study that he brought up.
Are you going senile?
- Moderator
- #209
I did "read the damn study". Something you are working hard to discredit. Were we prepared or not? You tell Markle we weren't, and then tell me we were.
Which is it, my schizophrenic friend?
- Moderator
- #210
And "we" have dozens of quotes with Democrats screaming that President Trump was overreacting.
"
Feb 24 — Pelosi was pushing tourism to Chinatown.
March 13 — NY Mayor DeBlasio encourages New Yorkers to go about their daily lives as usual.
Your childish effort if both childish and counter-productive. Trying to blame President Trump for something that is clearly not, will serve only to show that Democrats are far more interested in bringing down a president than solving problems.
Specifically what were the Democrats doing, spending all their time on between January 2017 and February 5th 2020?
I'll help, here is what Democrats were concentrating all their time and energy upon.
MTP DAILY
House impeachment managers walk articles to Senate
Jan. 15, 2020
- "The seven impeachment managers chosen by Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), who will guide the trial, deliver the articles to the Senate in a historic moment."
House impeachment managers walk articles to Senate
The seven impeachment managers chosen by Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), who will guide the trial, deliver the articles to the Senate in a historic moment.
Your "But Pelosi" is noted.
Doesn't change a thing about Trump's inability to get us prepared for this disaster.
The study is from 2019. You realize this, right? One might want to look at how we have done in the last few months and compare it to this study.
They're using something called the Global Health Security Index. The study ranks systems in place to combat an infection. They use six different categories:
Based on those categories, we were in good shape to handle this thing. Several months later, we're now leading the world in cases and deaths. By a mile.
- Prevention: Prevention of the emergence or release of pathogens
- Detection and Reporting: Early detection and reporting for epidemics of potential international concern
- Rapid Response: Rapid response to and mitigation of the spread of an epidemic
- Health System: Sufficient and robust health system to treat the sick and protect health workers
- Compliance with International Norms: Commitments to improving national capacity, financing plans to address gaps, and adhering to global norms
- Risk Environment: Overall risk environment and country vulnerability to biological threats
Even though we were one of the countries best prepared to handle this thing several months ago, we STILL fucked it up about as bad as humanly possible.
Trump was given an all-star lineup and still somehow managed to lose by 100 points.
Oh, now I understand even more, it wasn't China we trusted. It was the WHO.
How do you expect the President and his task force to act efficiently when they were being lied to by the CCP? Look at the comment chain with the study again. We relied on WHO, who relied on China's word that there was no evidence of human to human transmission related to this virus. The WHO is supposed to be the premier global health watchdog, trusted to relay accurate health information and statistics to the world, which they didn't.
The evidence is damning, and it makes you look all the more foolish, placing every expectation on the President when he was doing the reasonable thing and relying on information being put out by the WHO, who, it was discovered, was put on a leash by the Chinese Communist Party. They were made to delay the pandemic announcement so China could save face.
Now look at us.
Like I said. You presume too much.
You took a study by Johns Hopkins saying we're well-prepared and somehow turned it into a criticism of the WHO.
Wow. Just wow.
My turn. What the hell are you talking about?
I am addressing the content of the discussion between you and Markle.
The Johns Hopkins study that he brought up.
Are you going senile?
Nope. Just noting how you are trying to make two competing arguments at the same time. Akin to flipping a coin and wanting it to be both heads and tails.
candycorn
Diamond Member
Correct
XponentialChaos
Diamond Member
- Jul 25, 2018
- 34,449
- 12,675
- 1,435
Ok, one more time. I'm going to make this as simple as I possibly can for you. If you don't get it after this, I'm sorry.
"I did "read the damn study". Something you are working hard to discredit."
I have stated the exact opposite: "I'm not disregarding it because it's old. I think it's accurate if you look at how it was done and what it's actually measuring." Post #180
Can you show me where I'm trying to discredit it? You won't find a post of mine saying that. You're just lost.
"Were we prepared or not? You tell Markle we weren't, and then tell me we were."
We were well-prepared by the metrics outlined in the study. That is, we had systems in place that we're top-notch compared to the rest of the world.
"They're using something called the Global Health Security Index. The study ranks systems in place to combat an infection. They use six different categories:
- Prevention: Prevention of the emergence or release of pathogens
- Detection and Reporting: Early detection and reporting for epidemics of potential international concern
- Rapid Response: Rapid response to and mitigation of the spread of an epidemic
- Health System: Sufficient and robust health system to treat the sick and protect health workers
- Compliance with International Norms: Commitments to improving national capacity, financing plans to address gaps, and adhering to global norms
- Risk Environment: Overall risk environment and country vulnerability to biological threats
By THOSE metrics outlined in the Johns Hopkins study, yes, we we were prepared. In fact we were the most prepared country in the world.
However, Trump was clearly in way over his head and he didn't think to check the stockpile or come up with a cohesive plan. He disregarded Obama's plan and didn't replace it with anything adequate. In THAT sense, no, we were not prepared.
There you go, bud. Hope that helps.
XponentialChaos
Diamond Member
- Jul 25, 2018
- 34,449
- 12,675
- 1,435
And "we" have dozens of quotes with Democrats screaming that President Trump was overreacting.
"
Feb 24 — Pelosi was pushing tourism to Chinatown.
March 13 — NY Mayor DeBlasio encourages New Yorkers to go about their daily lives as usual.
Your childish effort if both childish and counter-productive. Trying to blame President Trump for something that is clearly not, will serve only to show that Democrats are far more interested in bringing down a president than solving problems.
Specifically what were the Democrats doing, spending all their time on between January 2017 and February 5th 2020?
I'll help, here is what Democrats were concentrating all their time and energy upon.
MTP DAILY
House impeachment managers walk articles to Senate
Jan. 15, 2020
- "The seven impeachment managers chosen by Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), who will guide the trial, deliver the articles to the Senate in a historic moment."
House impeachment managers walk articles to Senate
The seven impeachment managers chosen by Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), who will guide the trial, deliver the articles to the Senate in a historic moment.
Your "But Pelosi" is noted.
Doesn't change a thing about Trump's inability to get us prepared for this disaster.
The study is from 2019. You realize this, right? One might want to look at how we have done in the last few months and compare it to this study.
They're using something called the Global Health Security Index. The study ranks systems in place to combat an infection. They use six different categories:
Based on those categories, we were in good shape to handle this thing. Several months later, we're now leading the world in cases and deaths. By a mile.
- Prevention: Prevention of the emergence or release of pathogens
- Detection and Reporting: Early detection and reporting for epidemics of potential international concern
- Rapid Response: Rapid response to and mitigation of the spread of an epidemic
- Health System: Sufficient and robust health system to treat the sick and protect health workers
- Compliance with International Norms: Commitments to improving national capacity, financing plans to address gaps, and adhering to global norms
- Risk Environment: Overall risk environment and country vulnerability to biological threats
Even though we were one of the countries best prepared to handle this thing several months ago, we STILL fucked it up about as bad as humanly possible.
Trump was given an all-star lineup and still somehow managed to lose by 100 points.
Oh, now I understand even more, it wasn't China we trusted. It was the WHO.
How do you expect the President and his task force to act efficiently when they were being lied to by the CCP? Look at the comment chain with the study again. We relied on WHO, who relied on China's word that there was no evidence of human to human transmission related to this virus. The WHO is supposed to be the premier global health watchdog, trusted to relay accurate health information and statistics to the world, which they didn't.
The evidence is damning, and it makes you look all the more foolish, placing every expectation on the President when he was doing the reasonable thing and relying on information being put out by the WHO, who, it was discovered, was put on a leash by the Chinese Communist Party. They were made to delay the pandemic announcement so China could save face.
Now look at us.
Like I said. You presume too much.
You took a study by Johns Hopkins saying we're well-prepared and somehow turned it into a criticism of the WHO.
Wow. Just wow.
My turn. What the hell are you talking about?
I am addressing the content of the discussion between you and Markle.
The Johns Hopkins study that he brought up.
Are you going senile?
Nope. Just noting how you are trying to make two competing arguments at the same time. Akin to flipping a coin and wanting it to be both heads and tails.
I can understand how it might seem that way to you since you have no idea what you're even talking about. Must be hard.
- Moderator
- #214
I have reread that discussion multiple times... and I have discovered the flaw in Xponent's argument.
He would have said "he fucked up" even if only 100 people died from this virus instead of 100,000. His concern for the well-being of his fellow-men isn't.
Without being specific, Xponent contends "the president fucked up."
How? And in what way? What specific action by the president led to 100,000 Americans dying from this virus?
He would have said "he fucked up" even if only 100 people died from this virus instead of 100,000. His concern for the well-being of his fellow-men isn't.
Without being specific, Xponent contends "the president fucked up."
How? And in what way? What specific action by the president led to 100,000 Americans dying from this virus?
Last edited:
- Moderator
- #215
"The study is from 2019" you said. Obviously you trying to discredit it.
Post #164.
- Moderator
- #216
And "we" have dozens of quotes with Democrats screaming that President Trump was overreacting.
"
Feb 24 — Pelosi was pushing tourism to Chinatown.
March 13 — NY Mayor DeBlasio encourages New Yorkers to go about their daily lives as usual.
Your childish effort if both childish and counter-productive. Trying to blame President Trump for something that is clearly not, will serve only to show that Democrats are far more interested in bringing down a president than solving problems.
Specifically what were the Democrats doing, spending all their time on between January 2017 and February 5th 2020?
I'll help, here is what Democrats were concentrating all their time and energy upon.
MTP DAILY
House impeachment managers walk articles to Senate
Jan. 15, 2020
- "The seven impeachment managers chosen by Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), who will guide the trial, deliver the articles to the Senate in a historic moment."
House impeachment managers walk articles to Senate
The seven impeachment managers chosen by Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), who will guide the trial, deliver the articles to the Senate in a historic moment.
Your "But Pelosi" is noted.
Doesn't change a thing about Trump's inability to get us prepared for this disaster.
The study is from 2019. You realize this, right? One might want to look at how we have done in the last few months and compare it to this study.
They're using something called the Global Health Security Index. The study ranks systems in place to combat an infection. They use six different categories:
Based on those categories, we were in good shape to handle this thing. Several months later, we're now leading the world in cases and deaths. By a mile.
- Prevention: Prevention of the emergence or release of pathogens
- Detection and Reporting: Early detection and reporting for epidemics of potential international concern
- Rapid Response: Rapid response to and mitigation of the spread of an epidemic
- Health System: Sufficient and robust health system to treat the sick and protect health workers
- Compliance with International Norms: Commitments to improving national capacity, financing plans to address gaps, and adhering to global norms
- Risk Environment: Overall risk environment and country vulnerability to biological threats
Even though we were one of the countries best prepared to handle this thing several months ago, we STILL fucked it up about as bad as humanly possible.
Trump was given an all-star lineup and still somehow managed to lose by 100 points.
Oh, now I understand even more, it wasn't China we trusted. It was the WHO.
How do you expect the President and his task force to act efficiently when they were being lied to by the CCP? Look at the comment chain with the study again. We relied on WHO, who relied on China's word that there was no evidence of human to human transmission related to this virus. The WHO is supposed to be the premier global health watchdog, trusted to relay accurate health information and statistics to the world, which they didn't.
The evidence is damning, and it makes you look all the more foolish, placing every expectation on the President when he was doing the reasonable thing and relying on information being put out by the WHO, who, it was discovered, was put on a leash by the Chinese Communist Party. They were made to delay the pandemic announcement so China could save face.
Now look at us.
Like I said. You presume too much.
You took a study by Johns Hopkins saying we're well-prepared and somehow turned it into a criticism of the WHO.
Wow. Just wow.
My turn. What the hell are you talking about?
I am addressing the content of the discussion between you and Markle.
The Johns Hopkins study that he brought up.
Are you going senile?
Nope. Just noting how you are trying to make two competing arguments at the same time. Akin to flipping a coin and wanting it to be both heads and tails.
I can understand how it might seem that way to you since you have no idea what you're even talking about. Must be hard.
You can stop making excuses now.
healthmyths
Diamond Member
- Sep 19, 2011
- 30,375
- 11,942
- 1,400
But YOU are the one critical of USA handling of the pandemic!
I don't see any country including China and India with over 30% of the World population has done better? Being critical of the USA that has tested 4.5% of the population which is nearly twice as many as the next largest,Russia is strictly because of your dislike of Trump.
XponentialChaos
Diamond Member
- Jul 25, 2018
- 34,449
- 12,675
- 1,435
"He would have said "he fucked up" even if only 100 people died from this virus instead of 100,000. His concern for the well-being of his fellow-men isn't."
Complete bullshit.
"How? And in what way? What specific action by the president led to 100,000 Americans dying from this virus?"
Minimized the seriousness of this virus. Sat on his ass for 3.5 years instead of checking on the stockpile of supplies. Disregarded Obama's plan because Obama made it. Didn't replace it with an adequate plan.
XponentialChaos
Diamond Member
- Jul 25, 2018
- 34,449
- 12,675
- 1,435
Your reading comprehension is lacking then. I made it as clear as I possibly could have.
Good luck out there, bud.
healthmyths
Diamond Member
- Sep 19, 2011
- 30,375
- 11,942
- 1,400
Prove to me where Obama had a plan?
Federal officials repeatedly warned that US hospitals lacked enough ventilators
In at least 10 government reports from 2003 to 2015, federal officials predicted the United States would experience a critical lack of ventilators and other lifesaving medical supplies if it faced a viral outbreak like the one currently sweeping the country.
Federal officials repeatedly warned that US hospitals lacked enough ventilators
Since 2003, federal officials have repeatedly warned that US hospitals lacked enough ventilators to handle a pandemic like coronavirus.
www.cnn.com
Both the Obama and Trump administrations had adequate time to respond to the task force recommendation before the coronavirus outbreak, said Dr. Lee Gross, who practices family medicine in North Port, Florida, and is president of Docs 4 Patient Care, a national health care advocacy group.
The Obama administration had at least seven years to replenish the stockpile of masks, while the Trump administration had about three.
“Certainly the number of depleted masks were not replaced, and we should know why. It’s been a problem across multiple administrations,” Gross told The Daily Signal in a phone interview.
After Last Pandemic, Task Force Advised Obama to Avert Shortage of Masks
A federal stockpile was short 100 million protective masks after the Obama administration addressed swine flu a decade ago.
www.dailysignal.com
Similar threads
New Topics
-
Soros DA on 4-Year Witch Hunt Against Cop Who Used Beanbag Round on BLMers Gets Taste of His Own Bitter Medicine
- Started by Hollie
- Replies: 2
-
Goodness, is it just me or are the dems here extra incensed today?- Started by 1srelluc
- Replies: 3
-
Genius Move: Did ICE Just Use the DMV as Bait to Lure Illegal Alien Truck Drivers?
- Started by Hollie
- Replies: 0
-
-
Democrats' Open Borders Policies Caused a Massive Spike in Chicago's HIV Cases
- Started by Hollie
- Replies: 4
