Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Oswald never fired a gun that fateful day.There was only one missed shot not several.Yes in fact there was a missed shot which was Oswald's first.I got to less than half and quit watching. There was no missed shot. SS Agent Sam Kinney heard all three reports and saw all three strike their target. It was a professional hit
The other two hit.
It was no professional murder unless you consider Oswald a professional murderer which he was not.
One witness means nothing and witnesses are the weakest form of evidence in addition you are not providing a source for the agent's testimony and it is doubtful you quoted him accurately.
There were several missed shots. Agreed that Oswald was not a professional hit man. That's why his role was to take the fall for those who were. Including the missed shots that skipped along the street and scratched James Tague, the missed shot that embedded in the grass across from the knoll and was picked up and pocketed by a DPD officer, the missed shot that dinged some window trim on the car, and the three missed shots that hit Connally.
The event was far better at organizing itself than at carrying itself out. That's why it had to send Ruby in to eliminate the guy who could do the most damage exposing them, in a hit that everybody in the world could see immediately was set up. Messy operation all around, including the coverup by the Whitewash Commission.
That's why we're still at it today.
Oswald was a murderer an that was his only role.
The shot which hit Tague was the only missed shot and oswald fired it along with two others which hit Kennedy and Connally.
there was no other shooter and no other bullets.
No bullet was picked up and pocketed by any officer.
It was no set up and no one can see it because no one can produce evidence to support such a stupid claim.
Massive evidence proves Oswald did it and no evidence shows an accomplice.
I wish you would ask your buddy Poppy Bush about the murder. Maybe you could catch him off guard and maybe...just maybe, he would tell you the truth...it was your pals at the CIA who did the dirty deed.
Okay come on. You must be a Bush or friend of the Bush’s No one can be this dumb but one purposely trying to protect the Bush legacy...a legacy of deception and murder.Oswald never fired a gun that fateful day.There was only one missed shot not several.Yes in fact there was a missed shot which was Oswald's first.I got to less than half and quit watching. There was no missed shot. SS Agent Sam Kinney heard all three reports and saw all three strike their target. It was a professional hit
The other two hit.
It was no professional murder unless you consider Oswald a professional murderer which he was not.
One witness means nothing and witnesses are the weakest form of evidence in addition you are not providing a source for the agent's testimony and it is doubtful you quoted him accurately.
There were several missed shots. Agreed that Oswald was not a professional hit man. That's why his role was to take the fall for those who were. Including the missed shots that skipped along the street and scratched James Tague, the missed shot that embedded in the grass across from the knoll and was picked up and pocketed by a DPD officer, the missed shot that dinged some window trim on the car, and the three missed shots that hit Connally.
The event was far better at organizing itself than at carrying itself out. That's why it had to send Ruby in to eliminate the guy who could do the most damage exposing them, in a hit that everybody in the world could see immediately was set up. Messy operation all around, including the coverup by the Whitewash Commission.
That's why we're still at it today.
Oswald was a murderer an that was his only role.
The shot which hit Tague was the only missed shot and oswald fired it along with two others which hit Kennedy and Connally.
there was no other shooter and no other bullets.
No bullet was picked up and pocketed by any officer.
It was no set up and no one can see it because no one can produce evidence to support such a stupid claim.
Massive evidence proves Oswald did it and no evidence shows an accomplice.
I wish you would ask your buddy Poppy Bush about the murder. Maybe you could catch him off guard and maybe...just maybe, he would tell you the truth...it was your pals at the CIA who did the dirty deed.
Oswald was the only one who fired a gun that day as the evidence proves.
Nothing proves any of your claims.
Your dad bush was not involved and neither was your mom Hillary.
You have no evidence it was the CIA and you are a wanna be CIA agent paid to post information as we have proven
The dumb one is one who makes idiotic accusations without evidence.Okay come on. You must be a Bush or friend of the Bush’s No one can be this dumb but one purposely trying to protect the Bush legacy...a legacy of deception and murder.Oswald never fired a gun that fateful day.There was only one missed shot not several.Yes in fact there was a missed shot which was Oswald's first.
The other two hit.
It was no professional murder unless you consider Oswald a professional murderer which he was not.
One witness means nothing and witnesses are the weakest form of evidence in addition you are not providing a source for the agent's testimony and it is doubtful you quoted him accurately.
There were several missed shots. Agreed that Oswald was not a professional hit man. That's why his role was to take the fall for those who were. Including the missed shots that skipped along the street and scratched James Tague, the missed shot that embedded in the grass across from the knoll and was picked up and pocketed by a DPD officer, the missed shot that dinged some window trim on the car, and the three missed shots that hit Connally.
The event was far better at organizing itself than at carrying itself out. That's why it had to send Ruby in to eliminate the guy who could do the most damage exposing them, in a hit that everybody in the world could see immediately was set up. Messy operation all around, including the coverup by the Whitewash Commission.
That's why we're still at it today.
Oswald was a murderer an that was his only role.
The shot which hit Tague was the only missed shot and oswald fired it along with two others which hit Kennedy and Connally.
there was no other shooter and no other bullets.
No bullet was picked up and pocketed by any officer.
It was no set up and no one can see it because no one can produce evidence to support such a stupid claim.
Massive evidence proves Oswald did it and no evidence shows an accomplice.
I wish you would ask your buddy Poppy Bush about the murder. Maybe you could catch him off guard and maybe...just maybe, he would tell you the truth...it was your pals at the CIA who did the dirty deed.
Oswald was the only one who fired a gun that day as the evidence proves.
Nothing proves any of your claims.
Your dad bush was not involved and neither was your mom Hillary.
You have no evidence it was the CIA and you are a wanna be CIA agent paid to post information as we have proven
Can you please admit it?
Are you Jeb or Neil?The dumb one is one who makes idiotic accusations without evidence.Okay come on. You must be a Bush or friend of the Bush’s No one can be this dumb but one purposely trying to protect the Bush legacy...a legacy of deception and murder.Oswald never fired a gun that fateful day.There was only one missed shot not several.There were several missed shots. Agreed that Oswald was not a professional hit man. That's why his role was to take the fall for those who were. Including the missed shots that skipped along the street and scratched James Tague, the missed shot that embedded in the grass across from the knoll and was picked up and pocketed by a DPD officer, the missed shot that dinged some window trim on the car, and the three missed shots that hit Connally.
The event was far better at organizing itself than at carrying itself out. That's why it had to send Ruby in to eliminate the guy who could do the most damage exposing them, in a hit that everybody in the world could see immediately was set up. Messy operation all around, including the coverup by the Whitewash Commission.
That's why we're still at it today.
Oswald was a murderer an that was his only role.
The shot which hit Tague was the only missed shot and oswald fired it along with two others which hit Kennedy and Connally.
there was no other shooter and no other bullets.
No bullet was picked up and pocketed by any officer.
It was no set up and no one can see it because no one can produce evidence to support such a stupid claim.
Massive evidence proves Oswald did it and no evidence shows an accomplice.
I wish you would ask your buddy Poppy Bush about the murder. Maybe you could catch him off guard and maybe...just maybe, he would tell you the truth...it was your pals at the CIA who did the dirty deed.
Oswald was the only one who fired a gun that day as the evidence proves.
Nothing proves any of your claims.
Your dad bush was not involved and neither was your mom Hillary.
You have no evidence it was the CIA and you are a wanna be CIA agent paid to post information as we have proven
Can you please admit it?
Present some evidence for your lame arguments
Who's your daddy???The dumb one is one who makes idiotic accusations without evidence.Okay come on. You must be a Bush or friend of the Bush’s No one can be this dumb but one purposely trying to protect the Bush legacy...a legacy of deception and murder.Oswald never fired a gun that fateful day.There was only one missed shot not several.There were several missed shots. Agreed that Oswald was not a professional hit man. That's why his role was to take the fall for those who were. Including the missed shots that skipped along the street and scratched James Tague, the missed shot that embedded in the grass across from the knoll and was picked up and pocketed by a DPD officer, the missed shot that dinged some window trim on the car, and the three missed shots that hit Connally.
The event was far better at organizing itself than at carrying itself out. That's why it had to send Ruby in to eliminate the guy who could do the most damage exposing them, in a hit that everybody in the world could see immediately was set up. Messy operation all around, including the coverup by the Whitewash Commission.
That's why we're still at it today.
Oswald was a murderer an that was his only role.
The shot which hit Tague was the only missed shot and oswald fired it along with two others which hit Kennedy and Connally.
there was no other shooter and no other bullets.
No bullet was picked up and pocketed by any officer.
It was no set up and no one can see it because no one can produce evidence to support such a stupid claim.
Massive evidence proves Oswald did it and no evidence shows an accomplice.
I wish you would ask your buddy Poppy Bush about the murder. Maybe you could catch him off guard and maybe...just maybe, he would tell you the truth...it was your pals at the CIA who did the dirty deed.
Oswald was the only one who fired a gun that day as the evidence proves.
Nothing proves any of your claims.
Your dad bush was not involved and neither was your mom Hillary.
You have no evidence it was the CIA and you are a wanna be CIA agent paid to post information as we have proven
Can you please admit it?
Present some evidence for your lame arguments
Are you Jeb or Neil?The dumb one is one who makes idiotic accusations without evidence.Okay come on. You must be a Bush or friend of the Bush’s No one can be this dumb but one purposely trying to protect the Bush legacy...a legacy of deception and murder.Oswald never fired a gun that fateful day.There was only one missed shot not several.
Oswald was a murderer an that was his only role.
The shot which hit Tague was the only missed shot and oswald fired it along with two others which hit Kennedy and Connally.
there was no other shooter and no other bullets.
No bullet was picked up and pocketed by any officer.
It was no set up and no one can see it because no one can produce evidence to support such a stupid claim.
Massive evidence proves Oswald did it and no evidence shows an accomplice.
I wish you would ask your buddy Poppy Bush about the murder. Maybe you could catch him off guard and maybe...just maybe, he would tell you the truth...it was your pals at the CIA who did the dirty deed.
Oswald was the only one who fired a gun that day as the evidence proves.
Nothing proves any of your claims.
Your dad bush was not involved and neither was your mom Hillary.
You have no evidence it was the CIA and you are a wanna be CIA agent paid to post information as we have proven
Can you please admit it?
Present some evidence for your lame arguments
Who's your daddy???The dumb one is one who makes idiotic accusations without evidence.Okay come on. You must be a Bush or friend of the Bush’s No one can be this dumb but one purposely trying to protect the Bush legacy...a legacy of deception and murder.Oswald never fired a gun that fateful day.There was only one missed shot not several.
Oswald was a murderer an that was his only role.
The shot which hit Tague was the only missed shot and oswald fired it along with two others which hit Kennedy and Connally.
there was no other shooter and no other bullets.
No bullet was picked up and pocketed by any officer.
It was no set up and no one can see it because no one can produce evidence to support such a stupid claim.
Massive evidence proves Oswald did it and no evidence shows an accomplice.
I wish you would ask your buddy Poppy Bush about the murder. Maybe you could catch him off guard and maybe...just maybe, he would tell you the truth...it was your pals at the CIA who did the dirty deed.
Oswald was the only one who fired a gun that day as the evidence proves.
Nothing proves any of your claims.
Your dad bush was not involved and neither was your mom Hillary.
You have no evidence it was the CIA and you are a wanna be CIA agent paid to post information as we have proven
Can you please admit it?
Present some evidence for your lame arguments
Silly...HW is YOUR daddy.Who's your daddy???The dumb one is one who makes idiotic accusations without evidence.Okay come on. You must be a Bush or friend of the Bush’s No one can be this dumb but one purposely trying to protect the Bush legacy...a legacy of deception and murder.Oswald never fired a gun that fateful day.
I wish you would ask your buddy Poppy Bush about the murder. Maybe you could catch him off guard and maybe...just maybe, he would tell you the truth...it was your pals at the CIA who did the dirty deed.
Oswald was the only one who fired a gun that day as the evidence proves.
Nothing proves any of your claims.
Your dad bush was not involved and neither was your mom Hillary.
You have no evidence it was the CIA and you are a wanna be CIA agent paid to post information as we have proven
Can you please admit it?
Present some evidence for your lame arguments
A picture of your dad is not evidence of anything so present some evidence.
No he is not and neither is the man in the picture.Silly...HW is YOUR daddy.Who's your daddy???The dumb one is one who makes idiotic accusations without evidence.Okay come on. You must be a Bush or friend of the Bush’s No one can be this dumb but one purposely trying to protect the Bush legacy...a legacy of deception and murder.Oswald was the only one who fired a gun that day as the evidence proves.
Nothing proves any of your claims.
Your dad bush was not involved and neither was your mom Hillary.
You have no evidence it was the CIA and you are a wanna be CIA agent paid to post information as we have proven
Can you please admit it?
Present some evidence for your lame arguments
A picture of your dad is not evidence of anything so present some evidence.
Okay maybe you are W. Because you clearly aren't very smart.No he is not and neither is the man in the picture.Silly...HW is YOUR daddy.Who's your daddy???The dumb one is one who makes idiotic accusations without evidence.Okay come on. You must be a Bush or friend of the Bush’s No one can be this dumb but one purposely trying to protect the Bush legacy...a legacy of deception and murder.
Can you please admit it?
Present some evidence for your lame arguments
A picture of your dad is not evidence of anything so present some evidence.
He is your dad
Now answer the question and provide some evidence for your stupid claims. Or will you run away like a bitch as you always do when asked for evidence?
Okay maybe you are W. Because you clearly aren't very smart.No he is not and neither is the man in the picture.Silly...HW is YOUR daddy.Who's your daddy???The dumb one is one who makes idiotic accusations without evidence.
Present some evidence for your lame arguments
A picture of your dad is not evidence of anything so present some evidence.
He is your dad
Now answer the question and provide some evidence for your stupid claims. Or will you run away like a bitch as you always do when asked for evidence?
The evidence clearly points to conspiracy and your best buds the CIA and the Bush family, are at the center of it.Okay maybe you are W. Because you clearly aren't very smart.No he is not and neither is the man in the picture.Silly...HW is YOUR daddy.Who's your daddy???
A picture of your dad is not evidence of anything so present some evidence.
He is your dad
Now answer the question and provide some evidence for your stupid claims. Or will you run away like a bitch as you always do when asked for evidence?
Yet the evidence proves what I have said and proves you wrong.
I never claimed to be particularly smart just smarter than you which is clearly true.
Support your claims with some evidence
No it does not or you could cite some of the evidence which you never can.The evidence clearly points to conspiracy and your best buds the CIA and the Bush family, are at the center of it.Okay maybe you are W. Because you clearly aren't very smart.No he is not and neither is the man in the picture.Silly...HW is YOUR daddy.A picture of your dad is not evidence of anything so present some evidence.
He is your dad
Now answer the question and provide some evidence for your stupid claims. Or will you run away like a bitch as you always do when asked for evidence?
Yet the evidence proves what I have said and proves you wrong.
I never claimed to be particularly smart just smarter than you which is clearly true.
Support your claims with some evidence
Stop spewing your CIA trained lies...no one is buying them.
Go back to Langley and STFU!
examining the JFK assassination using logic
The evidence is overwhelming, but only fools and statists (you are both) don't know it.No it does not or you could cite some of the evidence which you never can.The evidence clearly points to conspiracy and your best buds the CIA and the Bush family, are at the center of it.Okay maybe you are W. Because you clearly aren't very smart.No he is not and neither is the man in the picture.Silly...HW is YOUR daddy.
He is your dad
Now answer the question and provide some evidence for your stupid claims. Or will you run away like a bitch as you always do when asked for evidence?
Yet the evidence proves what I have said and proves you wrong.
I never claimed to be particularly smart just smarter than you which is clearly true.
Support your claims with some evidence
Stop spewing your CIA trained lies...no one is buying them.
Go back to Langley and STFU!
You have repeatedly said the" cia did it the cia did it the cia did it " but you never demonstrate a speck of evidence that your claim is true.
You Said so means nothing.
Present some evidence.
The evidence is overwhelming, but only fools and statists (you are both) don't know it.No it does not or you could cite some of the evidence which you never can.The evidence clearly points to conspiracy and your best buds the CIA and the Bush family, are at the center of it.Okay maybe you are W. Because you clearly aren't very smart.No he is not and neither is the man in the picture.
He is your dad
Now answer the question and provide some evidence for your stupid claims. Or will you run away like a bitch as you always do when asked for evidence?
Yet the evidence proves what I have said and proves you wrong.
I never claimed to be particularly smart just smarter than you which is clearly true.
Support your claims with some evidence
Stop spewing your CIA trained lies...no one is buying them.
Go back to Langley and STFU!
You have repeatedly said the" cia did it the cia did it the cia did it " but you never demonstrate a speck of evidence that your claim is true.
You Said so means nothing.
Present some evidence.
wrongThe evidence is overwhelming, but only fools and statists (you are both) don't know it.No it does not or you could cite some of the evidence which you never can.The evidence clearly points to conspiracy and your best buds the CIA and the Bush family, are at the center of it.Okay maybe you are W. Because you clearly aren't very smart.
Yet the evidence proves what I have said and proves you wrong.
I never claimed to be particularly smart just smarter than you which is clearly true.
Support your claims with some evidence
Stop spewing your CIA trained lies...no one is buying them.
Go back to Langley and STFU!
You have repeatedly said the" cia did it the cia did it the cia did it " but you never demonstrate a speck of evidence that your claim is true.
You Said so means nothing.
Present some evidence.
Wrong.'
There is no evidence at all to support your claims.
The evidence overwhelmingly proves you wrong which is why I have repeatedly cited such evidence.'
You can cite none whatsoever and never have. You have even admitted as much.
Now cite some evidence or it merely proves you are lying like a fool
wrongThe evidence is overwhelming, but only fools and statists (you are both) don't know it.No it does not or you could cite some of the evidence which you never can.The evidence clearly points to conspiracy and your best buds the CIA and the Bush family, are at the center of it.Yet the evidence proves what I have said and proves you wrong.
I never claimed to be particularly smart just smarter than you which is clearly true.
Support your claims with some evidence
Stop spewing your CIA trained lies...no one is buying them.
Go back to Langley and STFU!
You have repeatedly said the" cia did it the cia did it the cia did it " but you never demonstrate a speck of evidence that your claim is true.
You Said so means nothing.
Present some evidence.
Wrong.'
There is no evidence at all to support your claims.
The evidence overwhelmingly proves you wrong which is why I have repeatedly cited such evidence.'
You can cite none whatsoever and never have. You have even admitted as much.
Now cite some evidence or it merely proves you are lying like a fool
