Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You are a Nazi, Bush family lover, and an admirer or employee of the CIA.wrongThe evidence is overwhelming, but only fools and statists (you are both) don't know it.No it does not or you could cite some of the evidence which you never can.The evidence clearly points to conspiracy and your best buds the CIA and the Bush family, are at the center of it.
Stop spewing your CIA trained lies...no one is buying them.
Go back to Langley and STFU!
You have repeatedly said the" cia did it the cia did it the cia did it " but you never demonstrate a speck of evidence that your claim is true.
You Said so means nothing.
Present some evidence.
Wrong.'
There is no evidence at all to support your claims.
The evidence overwhelmingly proves you wrong which is why I have repeatedly cited such evidence.'
You can cite none whatsoever and never have. You have even admitted as much.
Now cite some evidence or it merely proves you are lying like a fool
I am quite correct and you are lying.
You have been proven wrong by the evidence and have never tried to demonstrate or cite any evidence to support your claims.
I have asked many times for evidence and you can never produce any.
That is fact
You are a Nazi, Bush family lover, and an admirer or employee of the CIA.wrongThe evidence is overwhelming, but only fools and statists (you are both) don't know it.No it does not or you could cite some of the evidence which you never can.
You have repeatedly said the" cia did it the cia did it the cia did it " but you never demonstrate a speck of evidence that your claim is true.
You Said so means nothing.
Present some evidence.
Wrong.'
There is no evidence at all to support your claims.
The evidence overwhelmingly proves you wrong which is why I have repeatedly cited such evidence.'
You can cite none whatsoever and never have. You have even admitted as much.
Now cite some evidence or it merely proves you are lying like a fool
I am quite correct and you are lying.
You have been proven wrong by the evidence and have never tried to demonstrate or cite any evidence to support your claims.
I have asked many times for evidence and you can never produce any.
That is fact
Now...all those things clearly indicate you are a serial liar and you prove it in every thread on JFK...funny you never post in any other threads. Apparently, your training at Langley must have failed.
Why? You just lie and spout the Government line. Statists..,ugh!You are a Nazi, Bush family lover, and an admirer or employee of the CIA.wrongThe evidence is overwhelming, but only fools and statists (you are both) don't know it.
Wrong.'
There is no evidence at all to support your claims.
The evidence overwhelmingly proves you wrong which is why I have repeatedly cited such evidence.'
You can cite none whatsoever and never have. You have even admitted as much.
Now cite some evidence or it merely proves you are lying like a fool
I am quite correct and you are lying.
You have been proven wrong by the evidence and have never tried to demonstrate or cite any evidence to support your claims.
I have asked many times for evidence and you can never produce any.
That is fact
Now...all those things clearly indicate you are a serial liar and you prove it in every thread on JFK...funny you never post in any other threads. Apparently, your training at Langley must have failed.
I am none of those things you are however a liar and fool. Those various accusations are merely evasive labels you toss out whenever someone better than you proves you wrong.
I have in fact defeated you and shown evidence and facts to prove you wrong on every JFK thread.
Now demonstrate some evidence for any of your ludicrous claims which you have never done.
Why? You just lie and spout the Government line. Statists..,ugh!You are a Nazi, Bush family lover, and an admirer or employee of the CIA.wrongWrong.'
There is no evidence at all to support your claims.
The evidence overwhelmingly proves you wrong which is why I have repeatedly cited such evidence.'
You can cite none whatsoever and never have. You have even admitted as much.
Now cite some evidence or it merely proves you are lying like a fool
I am quite correct and you are lying.
You have been proven wrong by the evidence and have never tried to demonstrate or cite any evidence to support your claims.
I have asked many times for evidence and you can never produce any.
That is fact
Now...all those things clearly indicate you are a serial liar and you prove it in every thread on JFK...funny you never post in any other threads. Apparently, your training at Langley must have failed.
I am none of those things you are however a liar and fool. Those various accusations are merely evasive labels you toss out whenever someone better than you proves you wrong.
I have in fact defeated you and shown evidence and facts to prove you wrong on every JFK thread.
Now demonstrate some evidence for any of your ludicrous claims which you have never done.
facts to prove you wrong on every JFK thread.
facts to prove you wrong on every JFK thread.
This is LBJ's reaction when the CIA told him that Israel had started the 67 war with the weapons, meant for our troops in 'nam, given to Israel by LBJ for free on the US taxpayer expense...
CIA Analysis of the 1967 Arab-Israeli War — Central Intelligence Agency
"Helms was awakened at 3:00 in the morning on 5 June by a call from the CIA Operations Center. The Foreign Broadcast Information Service had picked up reports that Israel had launched its attack. (OCI soon concluded that the Israelis— contrary to their claims—had fired first.) President Johnson was gratified that because of CIA analyses and Helms's tip, he could inform congressional leaders later in the day that he had been expecting Israel's move"
and then LBJ got on TV and lied his ass off, claiming Israel was attacked and was just defending itself...
WHY did LBJ lie about the 67 war?
How is this remotely relevant?
How is this remotely relevant?
The MOTIVE for JFK's assassination was is not "relevant?"
Get real.
Israel is behind JFK, the USS Liberty, the Marines in Lebanon 1983, Pan Am 103 (type Gaddafi Jewish into any search engine), 911, and ISIS.
We'd better get a clue fast if we are to survive as a nation intact.
You provided no motive at all which is why the question still stands.
There is no evidence that anyone except Oswald shot Kennedy.
Funny how every time Zionism whacks the US, a Jew is right there with a camera, as "Naudet" was for the "first" plane on 911...
Both were just dumb luck that's all.
I cant believe all these years later people actually think a loser like Oswald could whack the President. No wonder they threw him under the bus as the patsy.
""""Zapruder's movie camera was an 8 mm Bell & Howell Zoomatic Director Series Model 414 PD—top of the line when it was purchased in 1962.""""
Abraham Zapruder - Wikipedia
examining the JFK assassination using logic
How's This Logic?
The one thing the CIA and KGB had in common was to prevent World War III. In order to solve the Cuban Missile crisis, there was an agreement between the two to eliminate both Kennedys and depose Khrushchev, who had underestimated JFK's fraternity-bully trigger-happiness. We had missiles in Turkey as dangerous as the Russian missiles in Cuba, so the whole thing could have been solved before the crisis without Russia losing
face with its allies by backing down.
You provided no motive at all which is why the question still stands.
There is no evidence that anyone except Oswald shot Kennedy.
there is evidence, that's the whole point of this thread
No.Funny how every time Zionism whacks the US, a Jew is right there with a camera, as "Naudet" was for the "first" plane on 911...
Both were just dumb luck that's all.
I cant believe all these years later people actually think a loser like Oswald could whack the President. No wonder they threw him under the bus as the patsy.
Loser?
He was trained Marine sniper, was he not?
Minor coincidences happen to everyone all the time.ok, so you're a big believer in coincidences.
we get it
No.Funny how every time Zionism whacks the US, a Jew is right there with a camera, as "Naudet" was for the "first" plane on 911...
Both were just dumb luck that's all.
I cant believe all these years later people actually think a loser like Oswald could whack the President. No wonder they threw him under the bus as the patsy.
Loser?
He was trained Marine sniper, was he not?
He was a trained Marine but never a sniper.
The Marine corps has the finest basic rifle marksmanship program in the military and the average Marine is a better shot than most people but Snipers are in a whole different category.
The fact is he did not need to be a sniper. The basic rifle training he got in the Marines was more than enough to give him the skills to hit Kennedy.No.Funny how every time Zionism whacks the US, a Jew is right there with a camera, as "Naudet" was for the "first" plane on 911...
Both were just dumb luck that's all.
I cant believe all these years later people actually think a loser like Oswald could whack the President. No wonder they threw him under the bus as the patsy.
Loser?
He was trained Marine sniper, was he not?
He was a trained Marine but never a sniper.
The Marine corps has the finest basic rifle marksmanship program in the military and the average Marine is a better shot than most people but Snipers are in a whole different category.
I stand corrected. You are quite right! My apologies!
See libs! That;s how it is done when you find out you were wrong!
