Yeah, this about sums Trump up

[PredFan]

Hope he does fire the special prosecutor. Then definitely bye-bye Mr Pres.

Trump's deeply worrisome New York Times interview reveals a lawless president

Fake news. It's not against the law for Trump to fire him. It's not a crime, it's not a High Crime, it's not a misdemeanor.

Wrong.

A misdemeanor is any bad act – whether that act is illegal or not is irrelevant.

In Trump’s case his incessant lying, his false accusations, his unwarranted attacks on the judiciary, and his providing intelligence to the Russians all constitute misdemeanors and violations of his oath of office – justifying impeachment and conviction in the Senate.

Impeachment is a political – not legal – process; a president needn’t have violated the law or committed a crime to be removed from office.

And Trump is an excellent example of a president who needs to be removed from office, someone clearly unfit to be president, the consequence of his misdemeanors.

You lose be in a fantasy work completely out of touch with reality.

 

[Dr Grump]

you mean like the Starr investigation? That kind of partisanship?

Who appointed Mueller again? The Justice Dept. Who runs the Justice Dept? Sessions. Who appointed Sessions?

Stop your fucking whining. Mueller is YOUR guy...

Put your helmet on and hush. The topic is clearly beyond you.[/QUOTE]

Which part of what I said is wrong. Take your time....

 

[Dr Grump]

Shouldn't she be able to cut me to ribbons without any of your assistance?

She does on a daily basis. You're just too dumb to see it.

 

[bripat9643]

Shouldn't she be able to cut me to ribbons without any of your assistance?

She does on a daily basis. You're just too dumb to see it.

ROFL! You have a vivid imagination. All she does is make herself look like a petulant child having a hissy fit.

 

[postman]

ROFL! You have a vivid imagination. All she does is make herself look like a petulant child having a hissy fit.

Speaking of children and hissy fits. This seems to fit the bill.

Should Muller's investigation include Trump's financial history?
He has no Russian ties, let alone illegal ones. Podesta, Hillary and Slick, on the other hand, have plenty of shady Russian ties.
Post by: bripat9643, Yesterday at 2:44 PM in forum: Politics

What do you mean Trump has no Russian ties? We aren't talking haberdashery, we're talking Trump and his business deals in Moscow.

No ties indeed. Heed your own words

It looks like Trump fired Preet Barrarah because Veselnitskaya asked him to
In other words, you don't have a clue.
Post by: bripat9643, Yesterday at 7:50 AM in forum: Politics