WWIII . . . Let's Game Some Scenarios

Really? Not when you have to send two or more after every major target.

You can't forget that these people tend to believe information that is literally decades out of date. And seem to think that a single "nuclear weapon" will destroy half a continent.

If they were to somehow decide to drop one on each of the most heavily populated cities in the country, it would not be as bad as people seem to think. Of course, they can't do that, it is impossible. But don't forget that a lot of people simply do not live in reality.
 
The application of two, very small, nuclear weapons turned a fanatical military state into Capitalist pacifists practically over night.
If NATO and the U.S. keep pushing Putin and it begins to look as though Russian forces will be pushed out of Ukraine, Putin could use a couple of his low-yield tactical devices to take out an airport logistics base in Poland (for example) and then the west has to decide whether or not to answer him. I have no confidence that the current administration WOULD do so.
 
Or .. it will play itself out like thousands of other European conflicts that have been going on practically non-stop since Roman Times.

It's a normal state of affairs for Europeans to be at war with each other. They haven't had more than 30 consecutive years of peace in the last 2,000.

There is no reason for Americans to become embroiled, once again, in European greed, barbarism, ignorance, and hate.
Except that BIDEN works for the CHINESE and they have already been practicing their war exercises with the focus on having the US and Russia duke it out---weakening both allowing the Chinese to take over.
 
If NATO and the U.S. keep pushing Putin and it begins to look as though Russian forces will be pushed out of Ukraine, Putin could use a couple of his low-yield tactical devices to take out an airport logistics base in Poland (for example) and then the west has to decide whether or not to answer him. I have no confidence that the current administration WOULD do so.
I'm confident even Biden would have no choice but to respond to a nuclear attack of any kind. If he didn't he would be risking getting impeached with a mountain of Democratic support or 25th Amendmented.
 
Germany and France kept Ukraine out of NATO in 2008, for those who haven't looked up the record. Putin's worry if he goes nuclear will not be the U.S., it will be France and Britain's responses, same as it was for the Soviets during the Cold War. They're much more sensitive to regimes letting nukes fly in Europe and its borders.
 
Last edited:
Soros is also playing

George Soros Issues Blueprint of Globalist WW3 Propaganda

by László

George Soros posted an editorial on his blog, Project Syndicate, with the title “Vladimir Putin and the Risk of World War III” that is worth analyzing.

Far from denying their ties to Soros any more, the leftist Hungarian media outlet, Index published an article that loyally summarizes Soros’ agit-prop piece he posted in Project Syndicate, without any commentaries on the part of Index, as if it were the most natural thing in the world that we must take his words at face value. Even worse, Index zealously stretched the WW3 propaganda even further than Soros himself. While Soros talks only about the “risk” of WW3, Index gives this title to their article:


Index must have thought that the word “risk” in itself is not scary enough.


Normies
Like we told yas

Globo homo inc always let's ya in on what they plan on doing or want to do ...how it all plays out ........to be determined

View attachment 617065
Odd that Soros wrote that on March 11, and on March 27 Biden was also calling for Putin's removal
 
Russia lacks the men, material or resolve to start WWIII.

Unfortunately, the puppet masters controlling Zelensky and Biden have both nearly unlimited financial resources and an unrivaled propaganda outlet.

They've already set about starving a fair portion of the human race and it looks like it gets worse for the foreseeable future.

My concern isn't Putin or Xi or Biden, it's that most of humanity is reactive and sleepwalking. The last thing many will see is their personal Roy Batty, " Wake up. Time to die"
 
Germany and France kept Ukraine out of NATO in 2008, for those who haven't looked up the record.

Oh? I was not aware of any kind of vote in 2008 to give them entry or not. Care to tell us about it?

I know the body had reservations about Ukraine and Georgia because of political instability in both nations at the time.

And 2 years later when Viktor Yanukovych became President, he made it clear they were no longer interested in joining NATO, and wanted to remain an unaligned and independent nation. And that is pretty much where it has remained ever since. Ukraine has still not made any real attempt to join NATO, and for the last decade as repeatedly said it has no interest in joining.
 
Oh? I was not aware of any kind of vote in 2008 to give them entry or not. Care to tell us about it?

I know the body had reservations about Ukraine and Georgia because of political instability in both nations at the time.

And 2 years later when Viktor Yanukovych became President, he made it clear they were no longer interested in joining NATO, and wanted to remain an unaligned and independent nation. And that is pretty much where it has remained ever since. Ukraine has still not made any real attempt to join NATO, and for the last decade as repeatedly said it has no interest in joining.

Let me know what day you're sober and I might school you on it.

Anybody who isn't a silly troll can ask or look it up on Goggle. The UK's objection, along with France's, carried more weight with Bush than Germany's, due to Merkel's perfidy, but most sources list Germany anyway, even though it was an 'also ran' at the Bucharest Summit.
 
Last edited:
Anybody who isn't a silly troll can ask or look it up on Goggle. The UK's objection, along with France's, carried more weight with Bush than Germany's, due to Merkel's perfidy, but most sources list Germany anyway, even though it was an 'also ran' at the Bucharest Summit.

That was not to actually JOIN NATO, it was only the first of many steps. And it had less to do with the objections, than they at that time were not very stable.
 
I'll go first.

Under unrelenting pressure from Western media and with non-stop pictures of murdered Ukrainian children spammed all over the net, and on the back of skyrocketing inflation at home, Biden cajoles the Congress to declare war on Russia. Both sides informally agree to keep the conflict conventional. World War three has begun. To be fair, Biden and NATO could alternatively decide to go for the no-fly zone over the Ukraine, forcing Putin to declare war on the US.

The Allies: the US, NATO, India, Australia, Japan, South Korea, the EU, various South American and African nations

The New Axis: Russia, China, Iran, North Korea, Mexico, Venezuela, various African and Middle Eastern nations

Front One: Europe

A given. Russia launches a mass invasion of Eastern Europe while simultaneously bombing major European capital cities. Meanwhile, in Eastern Europe NATO forward positions are overrun and driven back. The US mobilizes its major army divisions (which will take two months minimum to reach Europe) and rapid deploys the three Atlantic based Marine Expeditionary Units via the Mediterranean. Russian subs sink two of them. Several EU nations, such as Germany, France, Italy and Spain—with their capital cities in ruin—threaten to drop out of NATO if US main forces fail to reach Europe in a given period of time. Putin launches a second thrust across the Bering Sea to slow American main battle forces reaching Europe.

Front Two: The Pacific

China declares war on the US and NATO and immediately launches a two-pronged assault. Prong one: an invasion of Taiwan. Prong two: an invasion of Australia. While US forces are still in the deployment to Europe stage, China launches a third campaign moving full steam east across the Pacific capturing the Philippines, threatening Japan, and moving rapidly toward Hawaii, causing the US to split its forces between Europe and the newly opened and rapidly widening Pacific theatre.

Front Three: South Korea

North Korea declares war on both the United States and South Korea and invades the south, further slowing America's response to Europe and buying Putin even more time to gain footholds in Eastern Europe and beyond. The US must now attempt a rescue/reinforcement of its military forces stationed in South Korea, as Japan is busy dealing with Chinese forces threatening its homeland.

Front Four: Alaska/Canada

Russian forces drive deep into Alaska and split, with half driving southeast into Canada, and the other half pushing down through British Columbia, threatening the lower 48 United States. Putin knows this is a suicide mission, but he's counting on the operation further slowing America's main military forces from reaching Europe. Perhaps some Russian missile batteries make it far enough south to launch on US Western seaboard cities. Panic sweeps up and down the coast, from Washington State to California.

Front Five: Iran/Israel/Saudi Arabia

Iran declares war on Israel, Saudi Arabia and the United States and pushes north through Armenia and Georgia in an attempt to link up with Russian forces in the Ukraine. Iranian forces also drive southwest across the Persian Gulf, setting up a blockade of that vital waterway, sabotaging oil tankers as it goes, invades the UAE and then Saudi Arabia in an attempt to secure Saudi oil fields for the New Axis Powers. Simultaneously, Iran also fires missiles at Israel, who threatens to go nuclear.

Front Six: India/China

China opens up yet another front by invading India, who immediately threatens nuclear retaliation.

Front Seven: Australia/China

China takes Australia in a matter of days, all the while the Australians beg for US forces to come to their rescue.

Front Eight: The Atlantic

Hundreds of US ships begin to cross the Atlantic carrying the bulk of America's main battle tanks, IFVs, artillery pieces, ammo and other war materials all bound for Europe and the fight against Russia. Russian subs sink scores of them, forcing vital US Naval assets to escort these ship convoys and to also suffer losses to Russian subs.

WWIII: the halfway point:

Russia has driven deep into central Europe and has devastated several major European cities. If American main battle forces take much longer to reach the European theater, they won't have much of a foothold or safe port to land. Meanwhile, the Middle East is ablaze with Iran's war on Saudi Arabia and Israel, and the world economy is crashing with Iran's blockade of the Persian Gulf. South Korea has nearly fallen to the North, and tens of thousands of US soldiers are trapped in southern South Korea, their backs to the sea. Taiwan and Australia have fallen. Japan is on the brink of being overrun by Chinese landing forces. Alaska has fallen, Canada is on the brink and Russian forces are striking US West Coast cities with mobile missile batteries from British Columbia. The only question? Which side will be the first to resort to tactical nuclear missiles, the gateway to a full ICBM exchange?
One year later....nope~
 
I'll go first.

Under unrelenting pressure from Western media and with non-stop pictures of murdered Ukrainian children spammed all over the net, and on the back of skyrocketing inflation at home, Biden cajoles the Congress to declare war on Russia. Both sides informally agree to keep the conflict conventional. World War three has begun. To be fair, Biden and NATO could alternatively decide to go for the no-fly zone over the Ukraine, forcing Putin to declare war on the US.

The Allies: the US, NATO, India, Australia, Japan, South Korea, the EU, various South American and African nations

The New Axis: Russia, China, Iran, North Korea, Mexico, Venezuela, various African and Middle Eastern nations

Front One: Europe

A given. Russia launches a mass invasion of Eastern Europe while simultaneously bombing major European capital cities. Meanwhile, in Eastern Europe NATO forward positions are overrun and driven back. The US mobilizes its major army divisions (which will take two months minimum to reach Europe) and rapid deploys the three Atlantic based Marine Expeditionary Units via the Mediterranean. Russian subs sink two of them. Several EU nations, such as Germany, France, Italy and Spain—with their capital cities in ruin—threaten to drop out of NATO if US main forces fail to reach Europe in a given period of time. Putin launches a second thrust across the Bering Sea to slow American main battle forces reaching Europe.

Front Two: The Pacific

China declares war on the US and NATO and immediately launches a two-pronged assault. Prong one: an invasion of Taiwan. Prong two: an invasion of Australia. While US forces are still in the deployment to Europe stage, China launches a third campaign moving full steam east across the Pacific capturing the Philippines, threatening Japan, and moving rapidly toward Hawaii, causing the US to split its forces between Europe and the newly opened and rapidly widening Pacific theatre.

Front Three: South Korea

North Korea declares war on both the United States and South Korea and invades the south, further slowing America's response to Europe and buying Putin even more time to gain footholds in Eastern Europe and beyond. The US must now attempt a rescue/reinforcement of its military forces stationed in South Korea, as Japan is busy dealing with Chinese forces threatening its homeland.

Front Four: Alaska/Canada

Russian forces drive deep into Alaska and split, with half driving southeast into Canada, and the other half pushing down through British Columbia, threatening the lower 48 United States. Putin knows this is a suicide mission, but he's counting on the operation further slowing America's main military forces from reaching Europe. Perhaps some Russian missile batteries make it far enough south to launch on US Western seaboard cities. Panic sweeps up and down the coast, from Washington State to California.

Front Five: Iran/Israel/Saudi Arabia

Iran declares war on Israel, Saudi Arabia and the United States and pushes north through Armenia and Georgia in an attempt to link up with Russian forces in the Ukraine. Iranian forces also drive southwest across the Persian Gulf, setting up a blockade of that vital waterway, sabotaging oil tankers as it goes, invades the UAE and then Saudi Arabia in an attempt to secure Saudi oil fields for the New Axis Powers. Simultaneously, Iran also fires missiles at Israel, who threatens to go nuclear.

Front Six: India/China

China opens up yet another front by invading India, who immediately threatens nuclear retaliation.

Front Seven: Australia/China

China takes Australia in a matter of days, all the while the Australians beg for US forces to come to their rescue.

Front Eight: The Atlantic

Hundreds of US ships begin to cross the Atlantic carrying the bulk of America's main battle tanks, IFVs, artillery pieces, ammo and other war materials all bound for Europe and the fight against Russia. Russian subs sink scores of them, forcing vital US Naval assets to escort these ship convoys and to also suffer losses to Russian subs.

WWIII: the halfway point:

Russia has driven deep into central Europe and has devastated several major European cities. If American main battle forces take much longer to reach the European theater, they won't have much of a foothold or safe port to land. Meanwhile, the Middle East is ablaze with Iran's war on Saudi Arabia and Israel, and the world economy is crashing with Iran's blockade of the Persian Gulf. South Korea has nearly fallen to the North, and tens of thousands of US soldiers are trapped in southern South Korea, their backs to the sea. Taiwan and Australia have fallen. Japan is on the brink of being overrun by Chinese landing forces. Alaska has fallen, Canada is on the brink and Russian forces are striking US West Coast cities with mobile missile batteries from British Columbia. The only question? Which side will be the first to resort to tactical nuclear missiles, the gateway to a full ICBM exchange?
I can't even begin to list the thousands of things wrong with your scenario. I will list the simpleist in Europe. Russia doesn't have the logictical resources to support the war with Ukraine which is right on it's border and served by railroad tracks leading rightinto Russia. There is no way Russia could support an invasion force more than a hundred miles from its border. In the Cold War, Russia depended on Eastern Europe for logistics support, ammo, frontline and support troops. In your scenario almost all the ex-Warsaw Pact countries are either part of NATO, or are independently fighting Russia, so Russia would be on its own with a handful of "allies" less effective than Italy and Romania were for Germany in WWII.
 
So. . . if the Mexicans are part of this, "new axis. . . "

.. . . does that mean the cartels are on our side?

:dunno:
The Arizona, New Mexico and Texas National Guards could overrun Mexico in weeks. The only thing slowing them down would be lack of supplies.

The Mexican military has less than 200,000 members and its equipment is third rate at best. Mexico finally retired its WWII era M-3 Stuarts a decade or so ago. Mexico now doesn't have a single vehicle armed with anything more powerful than a low-velocity 90mm mounted in a Panhard armored car. Most of its "armor" are WWII or Vietnam vintage armored cars with a variety of light and obsolete weapons mounted on them. The Cartels are better armed and trained than the Mexican army.
 
Last edited:
With their entire 2 Regiments combined? Their roughly 25,000 combined are going to take on 200,000?

Not hardly.
I was being a little hyperbolic, but the Mexican troops are poorly trained, equipped and badly led. The NG troops would have armor, modern artillery, both fixed and rotary wing fire support and the majority of the troops would be combat vets.
 

Forum List

Back
Top