Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Well you might support it, but you are not facing it..The Majority of the people DISAPPROVE of Obama...that my friend is REALITY.
Actually his approval rating just hit 53%.
In any case..if the majority "dissapprove"..he will lose the election come 2012. So you have no worries.
Right?
lol, 53%
Just like Unemployment is only 8.5%
speaking of belonging to a bubble club...you are part of a Minority of Obama supporters.
tsk tsk
I support reality, not Obama, and when you guys attack him from a position of non-reality, I type my widdle fingers.
Well you might support it, but you are not facing it..The Majority of the people DISAPPROVE of Obama...that my friend is REALITY.
Actually his approval rating just hit 53%.
In any case..if the majority "dissapprove"..he will lose the election come 2012. So you have no worries.
Right?
lol, 53%
Just like Unemployment is only 8.5%
You're giggling and ignoring reality. Like I said, the bubble.
This, from RASMUSSEN on January 30th.
In potential Election 2012 matchups, its President Obama 47% and Romney 41%. However, if Gingrich is his Republican opponent, the president holds a double-digit lead, 52% to 35%.
Overall, 51% of voters say they at least somewhat approve of the president's job performance.
^That's Rasmussen Steph.
lol, 53%
Just like Unemployment is only 8.5%
You're giggling and ignoring reality. Like I said, the bubble.
This, from RASMUSSEN on January 30th.
In potential Election 2012 matchups, its President Obama 47% and Romney 41%. However, if Gingrich is his Republican opponent, the president holds a double-digit lead, 52% to 35%.
Overall, 51% of voters say they at least somewhat approve of the president's job performance.
^That's Rasmussen Steph.
they AT LEAST somewhat approve..what a great indicator for reelection..
No doubt Obama is the most polarizing president
Once he was elected, Republicans decided they would not lift a finger to help him succeed at anything. They have dug in and opposed every single Obama policy. Even the ones they once proposed. The stonewalling of Obama has resulted in a stagnant government that cannot accomplish the most simple task
No question that Obama is divisive
I seem to remember a few years of your BOOOOOSH Derangement Syndrome from years gone by, sparky.The OP wrongly assumes that the president, or any president, causes the polarization.
I seem to remember a few years of your BOOOOOSH Derangement Syndrome from years gone by, sparky.The OP wrongly assumes that the president, or any president, causes the polarization.
How quickly they forget.
Right down the ole memory-hole. I love these Wingnuts.
Carbie often forgets his past. It's a survival mechanism.I seem to remember a few years of your BOOOOOSH Derangement Syndrome from years gone by, sparky.The OP wrongly assumes that the president, or any president, causes the polarization.
How quickly they forget.
The difference between Clinton and Obama is that when Clinton's party took a beating in the mid-terms, Slick Willie was an astute enough politician to move to the center. Do you remember him making the statement that the day of big goverment was over? Where did Obama ever move to the center? Clinton was able to work with Gingrich because "HE" moderated his agenda in keeping with what the electorate wanted. Obama hasn't changed his agenda at all...he's just changed his methods for trying to achieve it.
Our Congress never used to be like this
Back when Ron Reagan was fighting Tip O'Neil, they used to be able to find a middle ground. Publicly, they fought like cats and dogs....privately, they compromised
It was the emergence of Newt Gingrich in the 90s that changed politics forever. Newt prought with him a new breed of politician, one who thought ideology was everything and compromise was for pussies.
With Clinton, they just kept him tied up with one investigation after another. When all else failed, they impeached him. With Obama, they realized they paid too big a price with impeachment. Their tactics changed to obstruction and noncooperation. Compromise was now an admission of failure. It was better to do nothing than to do something that someone else might get credit for.
Our Congress never used to be like this
Back when Ron Reagan was fighting Tip O'Neil, they used to be able to find a middle ground. Publicly, they fought like cats and dogs....privately, they compromised
It was the emergence of Newt Gingrich in the 90s that changed politics forever. Newt prought with him a new breed of politician, one who thought ideology was everything and compromise was for pussies.
With Clinton, they just kept him tied up with one investigation after another. When all else failed, they impeached him. With Obama, they realized they paid too big a price with impeachment. Their tactics changed to obstruction and noncooperation. Compromise was now an admission of failure. It was better to do nothing than to do something that someone else might get credit for.
Obama and John Kerry saying Bush was "Terrorising Iraqi woman and children in the middle of the night"
"Bush Lied...People Died!"
Every week was a new accusation. They won the 06' and 08' elections on critcizing Bush, and Obama hasn't stopped doing it yet.
