With Trump and Sanders Win, Are We Seeing a Full Scale Revolt in America?

trump is perfectly happy to have cronies that benefit him. Bernie, is well... Bernie. he's probably the purest of any politician. I wonder if that will change now that he wants something so big. me? I don't see the country voting for a socialist jew with a Brooklyn accent.


Trump played the political crony game and played it well and now wants to dismantle it. and he profits handsomely in brand name value if he pulls it off.

Sanders is who is his and I dont think voters will hold that against him if he can put the Wall Street genie back in the bottle. I know I dont.
You don't see how utterly naive you sound do you?

Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk
 
trump is perfectly happy to have cronies that benefit him. Bernie, is well... Bernie. he's probably the purest of any politician. I wonder if that will change now that he wants something so big. me? I don't see the country voting for a socialist jew with a Brooklyn accent.


Trump played the political crony game and played it well and now wants to dismantle it. and he profits handsomely in brand name value if he pulls it off.

Sanders is who is his and I dont think voters will hold that against him if he can put the Wall Street genie back in the bottle. I know I dont.
You don't see how utterly naive you sound do you?
Maybe you need a new sound system, bro.
 
Let's look at the primaries through and including Super Tuesday, March 1st:

Nevada
South Carolina
Alabama
Alaska
Arkansas
Colorado
Georgia
Massachusetts
Minnesota
North Dakota
Oklahoma
Tennessee
Texas
Vermont
Virginia
Wyoming

Does anyone seriously believe Sanders is going to win in states such as Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, or Texas – as for Trump, he may win a few more states, but he'll have the same trouble with Christian fundamentalists and the social right as he did in Iowa, in addition to larger, more diverse blue states turned off by his arrogance and bigotry.

And again, this is just through March 1st, on March 15th the following primaries take place:

Florida
Illinois
Missouri
North Carolina
Ohio

These are large, diverse states, which is why by the end of March we'll see a completely different primary landscape, and understand why Iowa and NH are completely irrelevant.

Yes C_Coward, let's do look.

Nevada - Sanders
South Carolina - Toss up
Alabama - Clinton
Alaska - Sanders
Arkansas - Clinton
Colorado- Sanders
Georgia - Clinton
Massachusetts - Sanders
Minnesota - Sanders
North Dakota - Sanders
Oklahoma - Sanders
Tennessee - Sanders
Texas - Sanders
Vermont - Sanders
Virginia - Sanders
Wyoming - Sanders
 
Let's look at the primaries through and including Super Tuesday, March 1st:

Nevada
South Carolina
Alabama
Alaska
Arkansas
Colorado
Georgia
Massachusetts
Minnesota
North Dakota
Oklahoma
Tennessee
Texas
Vermont
Virginia
Wyoming

Does anyone seriously believe Sanders is going to win in states such as Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, or Texas – as for Trump, he may win a few more states, but he'll have the same trouble with Christian fundamentalists and the social right as he did in Iowa, in addition to larger, more diverse blue states turned off by his arrogance and bigotry.

And again, this is just through March 1st, on March 15th the following primaries take place:

Florida
Illinois
Missouri
North Carolina
Ohio

These are large, diverse states, which is why by the end of March we'll see a completely different primary landscape, and understand why Iowa and NH are completely irrelevant.

Yes C_Coward, let's do look.

Nevada - Sanders
South Carolina - Toss up
Alabama - Clinton
Alaska - Sanders
Arkansas - Clinton
Colorado- Sanders
Georgia - Clinton
Massachusetts - Sanders
Minnesota - Sanders
North Dakota - Sanders
Oklahoma - Sanders
Tennessee - Sanders
Texas - Sanders
Vermont - Sanders
Virginia - Sanders
Wyoming - Sanders
And the NH disaster makes her lose ground even more so.
 
Btw, i said Banks.....not businesses. That comes later. Attack the economy first by tearing down financial institutions. Classic Marxism, essentially the exploitation of the working class.

1. Sanders is not a communist. He is a democratic socialist.

2. He wants to dismantle the 'too big to fail' Wall Street banks that got the $4 Trillion in Quantitative EAsing hand outs, so I guess we, the People, kind of own those damned banks and rip them up to shreds if we want to; we paid for them.

The goal of any communist is to destroy capitalism. If you want power, you have to convince the youth of any nation that capitalism is evil. Capitalism isn't evil. Lawyers are evil. They're paid to find ways around laws.

Nuff said.

Not sure why you are going on about communism. Not much of any one outside of academia wants communism that I have ever seen.
its always his response when he's ;using any debate ... then when you point it out he goes off on another tangent
It's called being a realist.
 
With Trump and Sanders Win, Are We Seeing a Full Scale Revolt in America?

Full scale? No.

But a revolt against the present authority?

Yes.

People are tired of being lied to about what govt is doing, tired of the govt controlling the economy more and more and making it worse, tired of govt taking over health care and making it worse, tired of the govt changing foreign relations and making them worse, tired of govt degrading our own armed forces, changing their missions and making them worse.

Trump, Sanders (and Cruz) are very believable when they'll say they will change all that. Whether they actually can change them for the better, remains to be seen.

But yes, we're seeing the beginnings of a revolt. Nothing like the one they had in 1776, but we're moving steadily closer.
 
Bold you are to say SC is a toss up.
Clinton is in a route and trying to imitate/steal Sanders message now.

The real question is, Why would anyone vote for this crook?

HillaryScandals_zpsbkbcamd4.jpg
 
The Clintonistas claim it in the bag, but they said the same of NH.

But even if she takes it, she gets creamed on Super Tuesday. ONLY the deep south supports her. Texas sure won't, those Austin lefties think Mao Tse Sanders is too conservative.

There is one reason why the Clintons are once strong in the South; the mimicked proud Southerners.

ClintonGoreRebelFlagPin_zpsa8zybhpv.jpg


I dont think that is going to fly any more.
 
Bold you are to say SC is a toss up.

Why?

The Clintonistas claim it in the bag, but they said the same of NH.

But even if she takes it, she gets creamed on Super Tuesday. ONLY the deep south supports her. Texas sure won't, those Austin lefties think Mao Tse Sanders is too conservative.
Well, it's something like 17 days away, so anything is possible, but SC's dem party is about 50% black or MORE, and the polls do show Hillary with a lead. So, assuming the Clinton's have at least 10% solid support amongst whites, do you think it very likely that more than one in five blacks will flip to a Jew from Brooklyn who's not really been down there, and guess who is running a tv ad there today?
 
Well, it's something like 17 days away, so anything is possible, but SC's dem party is about 50% black or MORE, and the polls do show Hillary with a lead. So, assuming the Clinton's have at least 10% solid support amongst whites, do you think it very likely that more than one in five blacks will flip to a Jew from Brooklyn who's not really been down there, and guess who is running a tv ad there today?
So you are implying that blacks are anti-semitic?

Not nice.

Hillary has a double digit lead around 20% like Sanders had in NH, but her lead is evaporating while Sanders is GROWING.

With NH at his back, methinks Sanders will sail to within a statistical tie.
 
Well, it's something like 17 days away, so anything is possible, but SC's dem party is about 50% black or MORE, and the polls do show Hillary with a lead. So, assuming the Clinton's have at least 10% solid support amongst whites, do you think it very likely that more than one in five blacks will flip to a Jew from Brooklyn who's not really been down there, and guess who is running a tv ad there today?
So you are implying that blacks are anti-semitic?

Not nice.

Hillary has a double digit lead around 20% like Sanders had in NH, but her lead is evaporating while Sanders is GROWING.

With NH at his back, methinks Sanders will sail to within a statistical tie.
No, I'm commenting upon the fact that Slick has courted black support for decades, and Benie hasn't noticed them.

And worse, he left Brooklyn to move to "the land" in NH back in the 70s. He's not on his home turf with states with large black pops.

I don't know what will happen, but saying SC is a "toss up" is bold talk.
 
Well, it's something like 17 days away, so anything is possible, but SC's dem party is about 50% black or MORE, and the polls do show Hillary with a lead. So, assuming the Clinton's have at least 10% solid support amongst whites, do you think it very likely that more than one in five blacks will flip to a Jew from Brooklyn who's not really been down there, and guess who is running a tv ad there today?
So you are implying that blacks are anti-semitic?

Not nice.

Hillary has a double digit lead around 20% like Sanders had in NH, but her lead is evaporating while Sanders is GROWING.

With NH at his back, methinks Sanders will sail to within a statistical tie.
No, I'm commenting upon the fact that Slick has courted black support for decades, and Benie hasn't noticed them.
And this has helped improve black lives how?

Oh, thats right, you think they are too stupid to look elsewhere, got it.

If I can vote for a Yankee like Trump, blacks can vote for a Yankee like Sanders,trust me on that. roflmao
 
Last edited:
I thnk both parties in new Hampshire were misguided.

however, trump feeds on the base's hate. Bernie feeds on it's hope. that isn't divisive, it's just naïve.

I agree
Then kindly point out where Trump said anything that was hate speech. You libtards keep going on and on about Trump tapping into the hate vote, but it is all nothing more than a bullshit smear job without specific quotes.
your kidding right ???
No, I am not kidding. I do know that Trump opening campaign speech has been labeled as hate speech toward Hispanics when he never said any thing pf the kind. But I dont want to set up a Straw Man here; either put up some links to Trumps supposedly racist speech or shut the hell up about it.

You libtards repeat bullshit lies among each other so much you simply assume the lies are true because everyone you know regards it as true based on ZERO evidence, so, come on; put up or shut up.
that is your opinion that I don't agree with ... it was his implications that are racist ... he said mexican, drug dealers, murders, and rapist are coming across our boarders ... that statement alone is saying to mexican who came across the boarder are murders rapist and drug dealers ... he didn't say some of the part of them his implication was all of them... he said that to arouse the bigoted republican base ... which it did .. I not saying all republicans are bigoted i saying he woke up a lot of them ... whats bull shit here is you not seeing that which tells me you too might be a bigot


Boarders? You have those people renting rooms in your house?
 
trump is perfectly happy to have cronies that benefit him. Bernie, is well... Bernie. he's probably the purest of any politician. I wonder if that will change now that he wants something so big. me? I don't see the country voting for a socialist jew with a Brooklyn accent.


Trump played the political crony game and played it well and now wants to dismantle it. and he profits handsomely in brand name value if he pulls it off.

Sanders is who is his and I dont think voters will hold that against him if he can put the Wall Street genie back in the bottle. I know I dont.

Agreed, The one sure thing is Sanders will face immediate and on going opposition from those who are doing very well, They will protect the Golden Goose to which they feel entitled and fill the internet, radio and TV with hundreds of million of dollars to protect what they believe is theirs to take, with lies, half-truths, innuendos, rumors and hate and fear.

For years (literally) I have made the argument that the economic policy's for over a generation have created the foundation for a swing of the pendulum and that pendulum has swung away from the power elite and toward Bernie Sanders and his followers.
 
Well, it's something like 17 days away, so anything is possible, but SC's dem party is about 50% black or MORE, and the polls do show Hillary with a lead. So, assuming the Clinton's have at least 10% solid support amongst whites, do you think it very likely that more than one in five blacks will flip to a Jew from Brooklyn who's not really been down there, and guess who is running a tv ad there today?
So you are implying that blacks are anti-semitic?

Not nice.

Hillary has a double digit lead around 20% like Sanders had in NH, but her lead is evaporating while Sanders is GROWING.

With NH at his back, methinks Sanders will sail to within a statistical tie.
No, I'm commenting upon the fact that Slick has courted black support for decades, and Benie hasn't noticed them.
And this has helped improve black lives how?

Oh, thats right, you think they are too stupid to look elsewhere, got it.

If I can vote for a Yankee like Trump, blacks can vote for a Yankee like Sanders,trust me on that. roflmao
I don't presume to suggest how blacks should vote. But I suspect Bernie will have trouble connecting.
 
"With Trump and Sanders Win, Are We Seeing a Full Scale Revolt in America?"

No.

NH is not 'representative' of all of America.

We're seeing an irrelevant primary in an irrelevant state, whose election results will be forgotten by the end of March – the democratic primary in particular, given Sanders is from Vermont.

Neither Trump nor Sanders will be their respective party's nominee.
Other than being a commie, do you like the current political system or are you just a Hillary lover?
 

Forum List

Back
Top