Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Our resident lunatic left seem a tad obsessed. I notice very few threads discussing actual issues, and vast amounts of threads regurgitating unproven allegations and gossip. Funny that. Sadly, it's also very boring.
Our resident lunatic left seem a tad obsessed. I notice very few threads discussing actual issues, and vast amounts of threads regurgitating unproven allegations and gossip. Funny that. Sadly, it's also very boring.
Our resident lunatic left seem a tad obsessed. I notice very few threads discussing actual issues, and vast amounts of threads regurgitating unproven allegations and gossip. Funny that. Sadly, it's also very boring.
ahahahahah...find more.
Woorier 102 is a birther too along with Gasbag and Stephanie.
Anyways these people will avoid this thread like stepthanie avoids facts.
was he the best choice, no, do the R's need to stand behind him, yes. Simple as that, i am sure there are ton of dems who dont agree with Obama, but they are out in full force shoving his agendas down peoples throats. Its their right.
Was Obama really the best candidate at the time? No, even the polls showed that, but he got lucky, hit a surge and rode a wave. We all know which wave.
Yes; but the thread, I hoped, would be about how you call the man a "coward", "damaged goods", and "statist" and then vote for him. I supported Hillary; gave her money. And I was saddened that she was such a bad campaigner. In contrast, I am quite pleased with her custodianship of the State Department; pure class.
Additionally and I'm sure you'll agree, that the difference between Barack Obama and Hillary was largely the vote to use force in the Gulf. Had Hillary not cast that vote in favor, it is very likely she'd be in the White House right now. Maybe not. But the difference between the two candidates was marginal at best. I'm sure you'll also agree that there is a case to be made that Newt Gingrich and Mitt Romney <sarcasm> are arguably of different species. Most of the field was on one side of the see saw and Governor Romney and Jon Huntsman were on the other side. How you walk back from supporting one them on one side to now offering a full throated support of the other is not conducive to the "principles" you claim you have and your political opponents do not.
ahahahahah...find more.
Woorier 102 is a birther too along with Gasbag and Stephanie.
the circle jerky is fun
Anyways these people will avoid this thread like stepthanie avoids facts.
you mean like all of yours?
anyways, circle jerks can be fun to watch
carry on
was he the best choice, no, do the R's need to stand behind him, yes. Simple as that, i am sure there are ton of dems who dont agree with Obama, but they are out in full force shoving his agendas down peoples throats. Its their right.
Was Obama really the best candidate at the time? No, even the polls showed that, but he got lucky, hit a surge and rode a wave. We all know which wave.
Yes; but the thread, I hoped, would be about how you call the man a "coward", "damaged goods", and "statist" and then vote for him. I supported Hillary; gave her money. And I was saddened that she was such a bad campaigner. In contrast, I am quite pleased with her custodianship of the State Department; pure class.
Additionally and I'm sure you'll agree, that the difference between Barack Obama and Hillary was largely the vote to use force in the Gulf. Had Hillary not cast that vote in favor, it is very likely she'd be in the White House right now. Maybe not. But the difference between the two candidates was marginal at best. I'm sure you'll also agree that there is a case to be made that Newt Gingrich and Mitt Romney <sarcasm> are arguably of different species. Most of the field was on one side of the see saw and Governor Romney and Jon Huntsman were on the other side. How you walk back from supporting one them on one side to now offering a full throated support of the other is not conducive to the "principles" you claim you have and your political opponents do not.
What's your point?
That we shouldn't vote in the election? Nice try.
Canned corn; Romney and Ryan together want to fix what Obama fucked up, this country. He may not have been a lot of people's first choice but he is waaaaaay better than Obama. And that's how it is.
But it is obvious by his Ryan pick that he wants to improve the economy of this great country.
Canned corn; Romney and Ryan together want to fix what Obama fucked up, this country. He may not have been a lot of people's first choice but he is waaaaaay better than Obama. And that's how it is.
But it is obvious by his Ryan pick that he wants to improve the economy of this great country.
It's just going to ring really hollow when the "principle" card gets played in the future.
Ryan? What does he really ad since both men have chunked his budget overboard. I'd like to know.
Yes; but the thread, I hoped, would be about how you call the man a "coward", "damaged goods", and "statist" and then vote for him. I supported Hillary; gave her money. And I was saddened that she was such a bad campaigner. In contrast, I am quite pleased with her custodianship of the State Department; pure class.
Additionally and I'm sure you'll agree, that the difference between Barack Obama and Hillary was largely the vote to use force in the Gulf. Had Hillary not cast that vote in favor, it is very likely she'd be in the White House right now. Maybe not. But the difference between the two candidates was marginal at best. I'm sure you'll also agree that there is a case to be made that Newt Gingrich and Mitt Romney <sarcasm> are arguably of different species. Most of the field was on one side of the see saw and Governor Romney and Jon Huntsman were on the other side. How you walk back from supporting one them on one side to now offering a full throated support of the other is not conducive to the "principles" you claim you have and your political opponents do not.
What's your point?
That we shouldn't vote in the election? Nice try.
That it reinforces the quality of the Republican nominee. Vote for whomever you like. You guys could have done a lot worse than Romney. I backed Huntsmann myself.
I think Romney was superior to several of the other candidates; apparently the bar was very low in the minds of the rabid GOP members here.
..... NOT!!! 
was he the best choice, no, do the R's need to stand behind him, yes. Simple as that, i am sure there are ton of dems who dont agree with Obama, but they are out in full force shoving his agendas down peoples throats. Its their right.
The people quoted above aren't just settling for what they perceive as the the lesser of two evils. They've stuck their tongues so far up Romney's ass, they can tell what he had for dinner last week.
Was Obama really the best candidate at the time? No, even the polls showed that, but he got lucky, hit a surge and rode a wave. We all know which wave.
Au contraire. The establishment candidate was Secretary Clinton. It was the rank and file who bucked them, and nominated Obama. Don't you remember all those pink sneakers worn by the Hillary supporters? You even had some high level Democrats claim they were going to vote for McCain. Perhaps they did.
