Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Define 'they' in the context you're using
-Geaux
The people who run the BLM movement. The ones who actually speak for the original movement.
Who Really Runs #BlackLivesMatter?
The call has come for us in the NRA to police our own. Can we assume BLM and Muslims will do the same?
A real team effort?
-Geaux
You have now deflected.
If you support BLM, what is the closure criteria for the movement? Are they waiting for winter? Some other event? What tangible outcome from the protest is acceptable?
-Geaux
Am I to believe that you would really like an answer to that question?
Let's give you the benefit of the doubt.
I support the movement in as much as it has helped to shine a light on the previously hidden social ill that has been perpetrated on American citizens. The organizers have gained enough notariety to secure air time on national news programs and to have an audience with important decision makers in this nation. Their purpose is to expose injustice and to work toward ending it.
The tangible criteria? When we no longer have this injustice. It's very simple.
The US remained the largest donor by volume with net ODA flows of USD 31.5 billion, an increase of 1.3% in real terms from 2012. US ODA as a share of GNI was 0.19%. Most of the increase was due to humanitarian aid and support for fighting HIV/AIDS. By contrast US net bilateral aid to LDCs fell by 11.7% in real terms to USD 8.4 billion due in particular to reduced disbursements to Afghanistan. Net ODA disbursements to sub-Saharan Africa fell by 2.9% to USD 8.7 billion.
OK: a link.
The US remained the largest donor by volume with net ODA flows of USD 31.5 billion, an increase of 1.3% in real terms from 2012. US ODA as a share of GNI was 0.19%. Most of the increase was due to humanitarian aid and support for fighting HIV/AIDS. By contrast US net bilateral aid to LDCs fell by 11.7% in real terms to USD 8.4 billion due in particular to reduced disbursements to Afghanistan. Net ODA disbursements to sub-Saharan Africa fell by 2.9% to USD 8.7 billion.
Aid to developing countries rebounds in 2013 to reach an all-time high - OECD
You do trust the OECD, no?? lmao
Greg
Simple? And just how do envision this happening? Sounds like BLM needs to dig in for the long haul and not going away anytime soon. As what they seek is not a sprint, but a marathon.
Edit- Their cause could garner respect if they can reel in the misfits calling for police brutality and murder
Simple? And just how do envision this happening? Sounds like BLM needs to dig in for the long haul and not going away anytime soon. As what they seek is not a sprint, but a marathon.
Edit- Their cause could garner respect if they can reel in the misfits calling for police brutality and murder
The same could be said of the NRA calling for people to shoot ATF agents, but I don't think that's going to happen any time soon.
so how about instead of trying to tar a movement with the words of their most radical members (unlike the NRA, where the "Jack-booted thugs" comments are made by the leadership), how about addressing their concerns.
Simple? And just how do envision this happening? Sounds like BLM needs to dig in for the long haul and not going away anytime soon. As what they seek is not a sprint, but a marathon.
Edit- Their cause could garner respect if they can reel in the misfits calling for police brutality and murder
The same could be said of the NRA calling for people to shoot ATF agents, but I don't think that's going to happen any time soon.
so how about instead of trying to tar a movement with the words of their most radical members (unlike the NRA, where the "Jack-booted thugs" comments are made by the leadership), how about addressing their concerns.
Simple? And just how do envision this happening? Sounds like BLM needs to dig in for the long haul and not going away anytime soon. As what they seek is not a sprint, but a marathon.
Edit- Their cause could garner respect if they can reel in the misfits calling for police brutality and murder
The same could be said of the NRA calling for people to shoot ATF agents, but I don't think that's going to happen any time soon.
so how about instead of trying to tar a movement with the words of their most radical members (unlike the NRA, where the "Jack-booted thugs" comments are made by the leadership), how about addressing their concerns.
The concerns (calling for LEO death) from those who don't represent the movement? Or the concerns from the (3) girls who started the movement?
That's stupid!! Police are dead because of BLM inspired violence. THAT is NOT acceptable!!!
The people who run the BLM movement. The ones who actually speak for the original movement.
Who Really Runs #BlackLivesMatter?
The call has come for us in the NRA to police our own. Can we assume BLM and Muslims will do the same?
A real team effort?
-Geaux
You have now deflected.
If you support BLM, what is the closure criteria for the movement? Are they waiting for winter? Some other event? What tangible outcome from the protest is acceptable?
-Geaux
Am I to believe that you would really like an answer to that question?
Let's give you the benefit of the doubt.
I support the movement in as much as it has helped to shine a light on the previously hidden social ill that has been perpetrated on American citizens. The organizers have gained enough notariety to secure air time on national news programs and to have an audience with important decision makers in this nation. Their purpose is to expose injustice and to work toward ending it.
The tangible criteria? When we no longer have this injustice. It's very simple.
Simple? And just how do envision this happening? Sounds like BLM needs to dig in for the long haul and not going away anytime soon. As what they seek is not a sprint, but a marathon.
Edit- Their cause could garner respect if they can reel in the misfits calling for police brutality and murder
-Geaux
The concerns (calling for LEO death) from those who don't represent the movement? Or the concerns from the (3) girls who started the movement?
You are evading the point again. No point talking to you if you evade the point.
You do get that MILLIONS of African Americans don't like the fact that the police gun down their children in the street with no consequences. You get this, don't you?
Or do you think the darkies would just be happy eating Watermelon if it weren't for these "outside agitators"
The call has come for us in the NRA to police our own. Can we assume BLM and Muslims will do the same?
A real team effort?
-Geaux
You have now deflected.
If you support BLM, what is the closure criteria for the movement? Are they waiting for winter? Some other event? What tangible outcome from the protest is acceptable?
-Geaux
Am I to believe that you would really like an answer to that question?
Let's give you the benefit of the doubt.
I support the movement in as much as it has helped to shine a light on the previously hidden social ill that has been perpetrated on American citizens. The organizers have gained enough notariety to secure air time on national news programs and to have an audience with important decision makers in this nation. Their purpose is to expose injustice and to work toward ending it.
The tangible criteria? When we no longer have this injustice. It's very simple.
Simple? And just how do envision this happening? Sounds like BLM needs to dig in for the long haul and not going away anytime soon. As what they seek is not a sprint, but a marathon.
Edit- Their cause could garner respect if they can reel in the misfits calling for police brutality and murder
-Geaux
We don't disagree. Having freaks glom onto your name is never a positive thing.....but.....when the freaks are given immediate attention and validation from your opposition...in a blatant attempt to confuse the issue and blemish your message..what can you do?
Now....will you state that.....as far as you know....the BLM organizers are NOT calling for the murder of police officers.
To my knowledge, never.....not one time....have any of the actual BLM organizers called for any violence of any kind.
You have now deflected.
If you support BLM, what is the closure criteria for the movement? Are they waiting for winter? Some other event? What tangible outcome from the protest is acceptable?
-Geaux
Am I to believe that you would really like an answer to that question?
Let's give you the benefit of the doubt.
I support the movement in as much as it has helped to shine a light on the previously hidden social ill that has been perpetrated on American citizens. The organizers have gained enough notariety to secure air time on national news programs and to have an audience with important decision makers in this nation. Their purpose is to expose injustice and to work toward ending it.
The tangible criteria? When we no longer have this injustice. It's very simple.
Simple? And just how do envision this happening? Sounds like BLM needs to dig in for the long haul and not going away anytime soon. As what they seek is not a sprint, but a marathon.
Edit- Their cause could garner respect if they can reel in the misfits calling for police brutality and murder
-Geaux
We don't disagree. Having freaks glom onto your name is never a positive thing.....but.....when the freaks are given immediate attention and validation from your opposition...in a blatant attempt to confuse the issue and blemish your message..what can you do?
Now....will you state that.....as far as you know....the BLM organizers are NOT calling for the murder of police officers.
To my knowledge, never.....not one time....have any of the actual BLM organizers called for any violence of any kind.
I have yet to find any radical comments coming from the (3) BLM founders. But you start to go off the reservation so to speak when saying the media is promoting the negative side of BLM. That's all we know is the bad
-Geaux
If you support BLM, what is the closure criteria for the movement? Are they waiting for winter? Some other event? What tangible outcome from the protest is acceptable?
-Geaux
Am I to believe that you would really like an answer to that question?
Let's give you the benefit of the doubt.
I support the movement in as much as it has helped to shine a light on the previously hidden social ill that has been perpetrated on American citizens. The organizers have gained enough notariety to secure air time on national news programs and to have an audience with important decision makers in this nation. Their purpose is to expose injustice and to work toward ending it.
The tangible criteria? When we no longer have this injustice. It's very simple.
Simple? And just how do envision this happening? Sounds like BLM needs to dig in for the long haul and not going away anytime soon. As what they seek is not a sprint, but a marathon.
Edit- Their cause could garner respect if they can reel in the misfits calling for police brutality and murder
-Geaux
We don't disagree. Having freaks glom onto your name is never a positive thing.....but.....when the freaks are given immediate attention and validation from your opposition...in a blatant attempt to confuse the issue and blemish your message..what can you do?
Now....will you state that.....as far as you know....the BLM organizers are NOT calling for the murder of police officers.
To my knowledge, never.....not one time....have any of the actual BLM organizers called for any violence of any kind.
I have yet to find any radical comments coming from the (3) BLM founders. But you start to go off the reservation so to speak when saying the media is promoting the negative side of BLM. That's all we know is the bad
-Geaux
I didn't say that the media is promoting the negative side of BLM. I said that Internet based nutjobs have taken every provocative or violent comment made by any black assholes online and attributed them to the BLM movement. As evidenced by this forum.......many people buy it wholesale and repeat it daily.
When I......the father of a police officer....am accused of supporting a group that calls for murder of police officers.....I think I have a legitimate cause to push back. It's bullshit.
Of course they will, just like the Unions supported Clinton when he screwed them with his Free trade agreements. Unions have become long on words but short on action.
Unions were needed in the 40-50-60's, not anymore. Unions are a cancer to capitalism
-Geaux
That's stupid!! Police are dead because of BLM inspired violence. THAT is NOT acceptable!!!
No, police are dead because we let crazy people buy guns in this country. If BLM didn't set them off, something else would.
If you support BLM, what is the closure criteria for the movement? Are they waiting for winter? Some other event? What tangible outcome from the protest is acceptable?
-Geaux
Am I to believe that you would really like an answer to that question?
Let's give you the benefit of the doubt.
I support the movement in as much as it has helped to shine a light on the previously hidden social ill that has been perpetrated on American citizens. The organizers have gained enough notariety to secure air time on national news programs and to have an audience with important decision makers in this nation. Their purpose is to expose injustice and to work toward ending it.
The tangible criteria? When we no longer have this injustice. It's very simple.
Simple? And just how do envision this happening? Sounds like BLM needs to dig in for the long haul and not going away anytime soon. As what they seek is not a sprint, but a marathon.
Edit- Their cause could garner respect if they can reel in the misfits calling for police brutality and murder
-Geaux
We don't disagree. Having freaks glom onto your name is never a positive thing.....but.....when the freaks are given immediate attention and validation from your opposition...in a blatant attempt to confuse the issue and blemish your message..what can you do?
Now....will you state that.....as far as you know....the BLM organizers are NOT calling for the murder of police officers.
To my knowledge, never.....not one time....have any of the actual BLM organizers called for any violence of any kind.
I have yet to find any radical comments coming from the (3) BLM founders. But you start to go off the reservation so to speak when saying the media is promoting the negative side of BLM. That's all we know is the bad
-Geaux
I didn't say that the media is promoting the negative side of BLM. I said that Internet based nutjobs have taken every provocative or violent comment made by any black assholes online and attributed them to the BLM movement. As evidenced by this forum.......many people buy it wholesale and repeat it daily.
When I......the father of a police officer....am accused of supporting a group that calls for murder of police officers.....I think I have a legitimate cause to push back. It's bullshit.
