Why does the left continue to HUMILIATE themselves on the WMD issue?

[P@triot]

It is a FACT that large caches of WMD's were in fact located in Iraq.

An indisputable fact. That fact has been confirmed by none other than the radical left-wing propaganda machine of the dumbocrat party - MSNBC (see link below which was initially on MSNBC's website and has since been migrated to the NBC website since the split). It has also been confirmed by WikiLeak cables! It has been confirmed by former special forces operators, authors, reporters, and more. How the left can continue to deny the world is round, the sky is blue, and the sun is hot is simply absurd. They have ZERO credibility left when they try to deny fact.

From Chuck Pfarerr's book, Seal Target: Geronimo

It is a chilling fact that thousands of chemical weapons have been uncovered in Iraq. These weapons have been used by Al Qaeda against coalition and NATO forces on dozens of occasions. This has been confirmed by countless sources, most recently in the released WikiLeaks cables.

So why haven't the American people been told of the stock-piled caches of chemical WMD's uncovered in Iraq or of the chemical weapon attacks by Al Qaeda?

The Republicans won’t touch this because it would reveal the incompetence of the Bush administration in failing to neutralize the danger of Iraqi WMD (instead of preventing Weapons of Mass Destruction from falling into the hands of terrorists, the 2003 invasion of Iraq has accelerated the acquisition, manufacture, and use of chemical weapons by Al Qaeda).

The Democrats won’t touch it because it would show President Bush was right to invade Iraq in the first place. It is an axis of embarrassment. And the press won't touch it because they had already convinced themselves, and most of the American public, that Saddam Hussein didn’t have any WMD's. The media turned a blind eye to continued reports of chemical weapon attacks because its own credibility was threatened. Several major outlets were deeply invested with the story line of an “unjustifiable war". Not many people can bear to admit they were wrong, especially in print, and especially if they have been very wrong for a very long time.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4997808...ddeadly-sarin-gas-explodes-iraq/#.T9_OGBB5mK0

http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2005/1/13/70852.shtml

 

[g5000]

It is a FACT that large caches of WMD's were in fact located in Iraq.

An indisputable fact. That fact has been confirmed by none other than the radical left-wing propaganda machine of the dumbocrat party - MSNBC (see link below which was initially on MSNBC's website and has since been migrated to the NBC website since the split). It has also been confirmed by WikiLeak cables! It has been confirmed by former special forces operators, authors, reporters, and more. How the left can continue to deny the world is round, the sky is blue, and the sun is hot is simply absurd. They have ZERO credibility left when they try to deny fact.

From Chuck Pfarerr's book, Seal Target: Geronimo

It is a chilling fact that thousands of chemical weapons have been uncovered in Iraq. These weapons have been used by Al Qaeda against coalition and NATO forces on dozens of occasions. This has been confirmed by countless sources, most recently in the released WikiLeaks cables.

So why haven't the American people been told of the stock-piled caches of chemical WMD's uncovered in Iraq or of the chemical weapon attacks by Al Qaeda?

The Republicans won’t touch this because it would reveal the incompetence of the Bush administration in failing to neutralize the danger of Iraqi WMD (instead of preventing Weapons of Mass Destruction from falling into the hands of terrorists, the 2003 invasion of Iraq has accelerated the acquisition, manufacture, and use of chemical weapons by Al Qaeda).

The Democrats won’t touch it because it would show President Bush was right to invade Iraq in the first place. It is an axis of embarrassment. And the press won't touch it because they had already convinced themselves, and most of the American public, that Saddam Hussein didn’t have any WMD's. The media turned a blind eye to continued reports of chemical weapon attacks because its own credibility was threatened. Several major outlets were deeply invested with the story line of an “unjustifiable war". Not many people can bear to admit they were wrong, especially in print, and especially if they have been very wrong for a very long time.

Sarin-loaded bomb explodes in Iraq - World news - Mideast/N. Africa - Conflict in Iraq | NBC News

NewsMax.com: Inside Cover Story

You need to read your own links, dude.

From the first one:

Two former weapons inspectors — Hans Blix and David Kay — said the shell was likely a stray weapon that had been scavenged by militants and did not signify that Iraq had large stockpiles of such weapons.

The second one is Newsmax, which cannot be mistaken as a "radical left-wing propaganda machine" by even the craziest person. Newsmax is a right wing hack site.

From that link:

The U.S. has ended the hunt for weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, with the press here and abroad describing the effort as an abject failure that turned up no evidence whatsoever that Saddam Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Next we'll be hearing that when Bush and others sold the war on threats of a 'mushroom cloud',

he was really talking about real mushrooms that grow out of the ground.

 

[Mac1958]

.

Why in the world would someone want to bring the subject of this horrific disaster back up?

.

 

[g5000]

The Newsmax article believes that some jets buried in the sand is evidence of WMDs!

 

[BreezeWood]

The Republicans made up an unprovoked war to win elections and left others to pay for it while reducing their own taxes ...

 

[BlindBoo]

The weapons the Bush administration claimed Saddam was actively producing were never found. Nor was any evidence found that the regime had pursued manufacturing of WMD of any kind since the end of the first gulf war.

You're an embarrassment to yourself and Rottweilers everywhere.

 

[BreezeWood]

The weapons the Bush administration claimed Saddam was actively producing were never found. Nor was any evidence found that the regime had pursued manufacturing of WMD of any kind since the end of the first gulf war.

You're an embarrassment to yourself and Rottweilers everywhere.

an embarrassment to Terriers as well.

 

[bucs90]

Great.

So when are we gonna invade North Korea, Iran, Syria, China, Russia, Pakistan and all the other nations that have WMD's?

Im sick of being World Police. Bring our boys home. Protect our land and sea borders.

 

[Mac1958]

Great.

So when are we gonna invade North Korea, Iran, Syria, China, Russia, Pakistan and all the other nations that have WMD's?

Im sick of being World Police. Bring our boys home. Protect our land and sea borders.

Bravo.

.

 

[editec]

Why does the left continue to HUMILIATE themselves on the WMD issue?

Truth needs no defenders. But ignorance must be challenged.

There were no nuclear weapons, not biological weapons and nothing but some standard non-lethal chemical antipersonnel wepons to be found.

Nothing they found was of the WMD class, lad.

 

[P@triot]

Next we'll be hearing that when Bush and others sold the war on threats of a 'mushroom cloud',

he was really talking about real mushrooms that grow out of the ground.

That's the last desperate effort of idiot liberals (you guys are so predictable - it's hilarious).

There was NEVER a claim that it was NUKES. They said OVER, and OVER, and OVER - WMD's. In fact, the famous picture of Collin Powell before the UN was of him holding a vile of a biological weapon - NOT of him hold a nuke.

I love when you guys lose an argument - you can't admit you're wrong, so you just make wild and false claims to move the goalposts.

 

[P@triot]

Great.

So when are we gonna invade North Korea, Iran, Syria, China, Russia, Pakistan and all the other nations that have WMD's?

Im sick of being World Police. Bring our boys home. Protect our land and sea borders.

Fine - at least an HONEST comment from a leftie. Nothing wrong with what you just said (I disagree, but at least it's HONEST).

But claiming there "were NO WMD's in Iraq" when in fact there THOUSANDS it's just plain asinine.

 

[P@triot]

Why does the left continue to HUMILIATE themselves on the WMD issue?

Truth needs no defenders. But ignorance must be challenged.

There were no nuclear weapons, not biological weapons and nothing but some standard non-lethal chemical antipersonnel wepons to be found.

Nothing they found was of the WMD class, lad.

You radicals just can't admit when you were wrong (and especially when it means Bush was right)

Sorry, it's illegal to move the goalposts. Chemical weapons are WMD's and thousands of chemical weapons were not only found, but they were actually also used.

You lose, stupid...

 

[P@triot]

The weapons the Bush administration claimed Saddam was actively producing were never found. Nor was any evidence found that the regime had pursued manufacturing of WMD of any kind since the end of the first gulf war.

You're an embarrassment to yourself and Rottweilers everywhere.

The Bush Administration claimed WMD's - nothing more, nothing less. And WMD's were found (you inability to accept reality because said reality is in direct conflict with your ideology and the false reality you created yourself, does not make that reality any less real)...

 

[Nika2013]

Responding to Rottweiler:

You are citing a tainted source...Although Pfarerr's book was an interesting read, it was discredited by the Seals and most other people...A few weapons in a cache are not Weapons of Mass Destruction. I am not a Democrat, but I am a liberal....

 

[g5000]

Why does the left continue to HUMILIATE themselves on the WMD issue?

Truth needs no defenders. But ignorance must be challenged.

There were no nuclear weapons, not biological weapons and nothing but some standard non-lethal chemical antipersonnel wepons to be found.

Nothing they found was of the WMD class, lad.

You radicals just can't admit when you were wrong (and especially when it means Bush was right)

Sorry, it's illegal to move the goalposts. Chemical weapons are WMD's and thousands of chemical weapons were not only found, but they were actually also used.

You lose, stupid...

Thousands of chemical weapons were used?

Then you must have a shit ton of evidence! I mean, the sheer numbers of our soldiers incapacitated by them would tell the whole story all by itself!

Post the evidence, and embarrass the shit out of everyone. Please. Show us the heartbreaking stories of the thousands of soldiers who died from this shit.

 

[P@triot]

You need to read your own links, dude.

You need to learn to read period, "dude". The opening sentence of the MSNBC post:

"BAGHDAD, Iraq — A roadside bomb thought to contain deadly sarin nerve agent exploded near a U.S. military convoy, the U.S. military said Monday. It was believed to be the first confirmed discovery of any of the banned weapons that the United States cited in making its case for the Iraq war."

Two former weapons inspectors — Hans Blix and David Kay — said the shell was likely a stray weapon that had been scavenged by militants and did not signify that Iraq had large stockpiles of such weapons.

Oh... oh, I'm sorry. I didn't realize that Iraq needed "large" stockpiles of the WMD's to justify our actions. First it was, "well they need to have WMD's to justify what we did". When I prove their were in fact WMD's, now suddenly you move the goalposts and the new narrative becomes "well they didn't have LARGE stockpiles".

By the way, "dude", you may not want to point to a man who FAILED at his job and who is desperate to cover up his own failed bumbling, to support your view. When a "weapons inspector" fails to locate weapons that were in fact there, he's proven to be both inept and his job and incompetent. The world couldn't really give a shit what Hans Blix thinks now and you shouldn't either.

Finally, as I stated before, you really need to learn how to read "dude" because author Chuck Pfarrer stated THOUSANDS of WMD's. Let me guess - time to move the goalposts once again and claim that "thousands" does not qualify as "a large stockpile"?

* Warning to USMB readers - G5000 is an unhinged Sovereign Citizen with a deep hatred for conservatives who are not anarchists. On the occasional post when he is right, I will give thanks and/or rep. However, when I point out with fact that he is wrong, he flies off the handle. So please expect follow up posts full of phrases that include d*cks in various orifices, various bodily fluids, and nonsensical statements. It's a maturity issue with him (hoping someday he will grow up - both on his posts and on his "fuck the police" love of anarchy views).

 

[P@triot]

Truth needs no defenders. But ignorance must be challenged.

There were no nuclear weapons, not biological weapons and nothing but some standard non-lethal chemical antipersonnel wepons to be found.

Nothing they found was of the WMD class, lad.

You radicals just can't admit when you were wrong (and especially when it means Bush was right)

Sorry, it's illegal to move the goalposts. Chemical weapons are WMD's and thousands of chemical weapons were not only found, but they were actually also used.

You lose, stupid...

Thousands of chemical weapons were used?

Then you must have a shit ton of evidence! I mean, the sheer numbers of our soldiers incapacitated by them would tell the whole story all by itself!

Post the evidence, and embarrass the shit out of everyone. Please. Show us the heartbreaking stories of the thousands of soldiers who died from this shit.

Nice try sweetie - but the facts are posted for everyone to see. You can't twist my words, no matter how hard you try (unless you can get someone from USMB to delete my original post)

 

[P@triot]

Responding to Rottweiler:

You are citing a tainted source...Although Pfarerr's book was an interesting read, it was discredited by the Seals and most other people...A few weapons in a cache are not Weapons of Mass Destruction. I am not a Democrat, but I am a liberal....

Really? Please do all of USMB a favor and cite links to back up your claim here.

(For the record - you might want to do your homework a little better next time. Chuck Pfarrer is a former Navy Seal himself..... ooops!)