Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
47% of the unemployed have stop looking for workWho Will Lose Their Job to the Machines
William Lee invented a stocking frame knitting machine in 1589. After traveling to London to present his invention to Queen Elizabeth I, she responded, “Thou aimest high, Master Lee. Consider thou what the invention could do to my poor subjects. It would assuredly bring to them ruin by depriving them of employment, thus making them beggars.” The Queen denied him the patent. Why? Because job security is not a new concern.
The researchers estimated that about 47% of the U.S. workforce was at risk.
http://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/downloads/academic/The_Future_of_Employment.pdf
Over 700 jobs and their risks.
See? It's not immigrants who Red States should be concerned about.
dear the wheel plow hammer screw PC car and electric motor have displaced billions of workers and still we have only 5% unemployment.
Do you now see how stupid the liberal is?? What other conclusion is possible??
That's impossible.Actually 47% of the adult population in this country is without employment. 95% of those by choice...Welfare leeches.Who Will Lose Their Job to the Machines
William Lee invented a stocking frame knitting machine in 1589. After traveling to London to present his invention to Queen Elizabeth I, she responded, “Thou aimest high, Master Lee. Consider thou what the invention could do to my poor subjects. It would assuredly bring to them ruin by depriving them of employment, thus making them beggars.” The Queen denied him the patent. Why? Because job security is not a new concern.
The researchers estimated that about 47% of the U.S. workforce was at risk.
http://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/downloads/academic/The_Future_of_Employment.pdf
Over 700 jobs and their risks.
See? It's not immigrants who Red States should be concerned about.
dear the wheel plow hammer screw PC car and electric motor have displaced billions of workers and still we have only 5% unemployment.
Do you now see how stupid the liberal is?? What other conclusion is possible??
47% of the unemployed have stop looking for workWho Will Lose Their Job to the Machines
William Lee invented a stocking frame knitting machine in 1589. After traveling to London to present his invention to Queen Elizabeth I, she responded, “Thou aimest high, Master Lee. Consider thou what the invention could do to my poor subjects. It would assuredly bring to them ruin by depriving them of employment, thus making them beggars.” The Queen denied him the patent. Why? Because job security is not a new concern.
The researchers estimated that about 47% of the U.S. workforce was at risk.
http://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/downloads/academic/The_Future_of_Employment.pdf
Over 700 jobs and their risks.
See? It's not immigrants who Red States should be concerned about.
dear the wheel plow hammer screw PC car and electric motor have displaced billions of workers and still we have only 5% unemployment.
Do you now see how stupid the liberal is?? What other conclusion is possible??That's impossible.Actually 47% of the adult population in this country is without employment. 95% of those by choice...Welfare leeches.Who Will Lose Their Job to the Machines
William Lee invented a stocking frame knitting machine in 1589. After traveling to London to present his invention to Queen Elizabeth I, she responded, “Thou aimest high, Master Lee. Consider thou what the invention could do to my poor subjects. It would assuredly bring to them ruin by depriving them of employment, thus making them beggars.” The Queen denied him the patent. Why? Because job security is not a new concern.
The researchers estimated that about 47% of the U.S. workforce was at risk.
http://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/downloads/academic/The_Future_of_Employment.pdf
Over 700 jobs and their risks.
See? It's not immigrants who Red States should be concerned about.
dear the wheel plow hammer screw PC car and electric motor have displaced billions of workers and still we have only 5% unemployment.
Do you now see how stupid the liberal is?? What other conclusion is possible??
In the month of April 2015, there were 148,523,000 people employed. The total adult population is 242,542,000. Therefore 61% of adult thepopulation is working and 39% are not working, simple math.
US Employment and Jobs Department of Numbers
Total population by child and adult populations KIDS COUNT Data Center
Some years ago I happened to pick up an interesting book entitledWho Will Lose Their Job to the Machines
William Lee invented a stocking frame knitting machine in 1589. After traveling to London to present his invention to Queen Elizabeth I, she responded, “Thou aimest high, Master Lee. Consider thou what the invention could do to my poor subjects. It would assuredly bring to them ruin by depriving them of employment, thus making them beggars.” The Queen denied him the patent. Why? Because job security is not a new concern.
The researchers estimated that about 47% of the U.S. workforce was at risk.
http://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/downloads/academic/The_Future_of_Employment.pdf
Over 700 jobs and their risks.
See? It's not immigrants who Red States should be concerned about.
Can they spell "math"?47% of the unemployed have stop looking for workWho Will Lose Their Job to the Machines
William Lee invented a stocking frame knitting machine in 1589. After traveling to London to present his invention to Queen Elizabeth I, she responded, “Thou aimest high, Master Lee. Consider thou what the invention could do to my poor subjects. It would assuredly bring to them ruin by depriving them of employment, thus making them beggars.” The Queen denied him the patent. Why? Because job security is not a new concern.
The researchers estimated that about 47% of the U.S. workforce was at risk.
http://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/downloads/academic/The_Future_of_Employment.pdf
Over 700 jobs and their risks.
See? It's not immigrants who Red States should be concerned about.
dear the wheel plow hammer screw PC car and electric motor have displaced billions of workers and still we have only 5% unemployment.
Do you now see how stupid the liberal is?? What other conclusion is possible??That's impossible.Actually 47% of the adult population in this country is without employment. 95% of those by choice...Welfare leeches.Who Will Lose Their Job to the Machines
William Lee invented a stocking frame knitting machine in 1589. After traveling to London to present his invention to Queen Elizabeth I, she responded, “Thou aimest high, Master Lee. Consider thou what the invention could do to my poor subjects. It would assuredly bring to them ruin by depriving them of employment, thus making them beggars.” The Queen denied him the patent. Why? Because job security is not a new concern.
The researchers estimated that about 47% of the U.S. workforce was at risk.
http://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/downloads/academic/The_Future_of_Employment.pdf
Over 700 jobs and their risks.
See? It's not immigrants who Red States should be concerned about.
dear the wheel plow hammer screw PC car and electric motor have displaced billions of workers and still we have only 5% unemployment.
Do you now see how stupid the liberal is?? What other conclusion is possible??
In the month of April 2015, there were 148,523,000 people employed. The total adult population is 242,542,000. Therefore 61% of adult thepopulation is working and 39% are not working, simple math.
US Employment and Jobs Department of Numbers
Total population by child and adult populations KIDS COUNT Data Center
- They don't require a math test to join the Tea Party.
I read a couple reviews and hope to read the book. The end of work has been the goal of humans for centuries but now it appears it maybe within our grasp, the Utopian world of leisure doesn't look so good.Some years ago I happened to pick up an interesting book entitledWho Will Lose Their Job to the Machines
William Lee invented a stocking frame knitting machine in 1589. After traveling to London to present his invention to Queen Elizabeth I, she responded, “Thou aimest high, Master Lee. Consider thou what the invention could do to my poor subjects. It would assuredly bring to them ruin by depriving them of employment, thus making them beggars.” The Queen denied him the patent. Why? Because job security is not a new concern.
The researchers estimated that about 47% of the U.S. workforce was at risk.
http://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/downloads/academic/The_Future_of_Employment.pdf
Over 700 jobs and their risks.
See? It's not immigrants who Red States should be concerned about.
"The End Of Work," by Jeremy Rifkin. It's an interesting read and some would say: prophetic.
Jeremy Rifkin The Foundation on Economic Trends Books
I read a couple reviews and hope to read the book. The end of work has been the goal of humans for centuries but now it appears it maybe within our grasp, the Utopian world of leisure doesn't look so good.Some years ago I happened to pick up an interesting book entitledWho Will Lose Their Job to the Machines
William Lee invented a stocking frame knitting machine in 1589. After traveling to London to present his invention to Queen Elizabeth I, she responded, “Thou aimest high, Master Lee. Consider thou what the invention could do to my poor subjects. It would assuredly bring to them ruin by depriving them of employment, thus making them beggars.” The Queen denied him the patent. Why? Because job security is not a new concern.
The researchers estimated that about 47% of the U.S. workforce was at risk.
http://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/downloads/academic/The_Future_of_Employment.pdf
Over 700 jobs and their risks.
See? It's not immigrants who Red States should be concerned about.
"The End Of Work," by Jeremy Rifkin. It's an interesting read and some would say: prophetic.
Jeremy Rifkin The Foundation on Economic Trends Books
The work ethic is strongly rooted in all societies. The more people in the workforce that become redundant the more social problems were're going to have. I think we're going to have some major changes.
Just because you may not have to shuck peas doesn't mean you won't stop working. I suspect some will, but most won't.I read a couple reviews and hope to read the book. The end of work has been the goal of humans for centuries but now it appears it maybe within our grasp, the Utopian world of leisure doesn't look so good.Some years ago I happened to pick up an interesting book entitledWho Will Lose Their Job to the Machines
William Lee invented a stocking frame knitting machine in 1589. After traveling to London to present his invention to Queen Elizabeth I, she responded, “Thou aimest high, Master Lee. Consider thou what the invention could do to my poor subjects. It would assuredly bring to them ruin by depriving them of employment, thus making them beggars.” The Queen denied him the patent. Why? Because job security is not a new concern.
The researchers estimated that about 47% of the U.S. workforce was at risk.
http://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/downloads/academic/The_Future_of_Employment.pdf
Over 700 jobs and their risks.
See? It's not immigrants who Red States should be concerned about.
"The End Of Work," by Jeremy Rifkin. It's an interesting read and some would say: prophetic.
Jeremy Rifkin The Foundation on Economic Trends Books
The work ethic is strongly rooted in all societies. The more people in the workforce that become redundant the more social problems were're going to have. I think we're going to have some major changes.
Who Will Lose Their Job to the Machines
William Lee invented a stocking frame knitting machine in 1589. After traveling to London to present his invention to Queen Elizabeth I, she responded, “Thou aimest high, Master Lee. Consider thou what the invention could do to my poor subjects. It would assuredly bring to them ruin by depriving them of employment, thus making them beggars.” The Queen denied him the patent. Why? Because job security is not a new concern.
The researchers estimated that about 47% of the U.S. workforce was at risk.
http://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/downloads/academic/The_Future_of_Employment.pdf
Over 700 jobs and their risks.
See? It's not immigrants who Red States should be concerned about.
Anti education Republicans will be completely left out.Who Will Lose Their Job to the Machines
William Lee invented a stocking frame knitting machine in 1589. After traveling to London to present his invention to Queen Elizabeth I, she responded, “Thou aimest high, Master Lee. Consider thou what the invention could do to my poor subjects. It would assuredly bring to them ruin by depriving them of employment, thus making them beggars.” The Queen denied him the patent. Why? Because job security is not a new concern.
The researchers estimated that about 47% of the U.S. workforce was at risk.
http://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/downloads/academic/The_Future_of_Employment.pdf
Over 700 jobs and their risks.
See? It's not immigrants who Red States should be concerned about.
Well , eventually everyone will loose their jobs to robots and computers, but that's still a bit far away in the future fifty to seventy years in the future.
Society will have to reacomodate for this new situation.
Yes, I suppose you could pay people based on their performance on Sims or Pokemon, but I don't see that is any better than sending them a check every month. People will always find some leisure activity to occupy their time but I really don't think Pokemon or any other computer game is going to give people a sense worth that a job provides.I read a couple reviews and hope to read the book. The end of work has been the goal of humans for centuries but now it appears it maybe within our grasp, the Utopian world of leisure doesn't look so good.Some years ago I happened to pick up an interesting book entitledWho Will Lose Their Job to the Machines
William Lee invented a stocking frame knitting machine in 1589. After traveling to London to present his invention to Queen Elizabeth I, she responded, “Thou aimest high, Master Lee. Consider thou what the invention could do to my poor subjects. It would assuredly bring to them ruin by depriving them of employment, thus making them beggars.” The Queen denied him the patent. Why? Because job security is not a new concern.
The researchers estimated that about 47% of the U.S. workforce was at risk.
http://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/downloads/academic/The_Future_of_Employment.pdf
Over 700 jobs and their risks.
See? It's not immigrants who Red States should be concerned about.
"The End Of Work," by Jeremy Rifkin. It's an interesting read and some would say: prophetic.
Jeremy Rifkin The Foundation on Economic Trends Books
The work ethic is strongly rooted in all societies. The more people in the workforce that become redundant the more social problems were're going to have. I think we're going to have some major changes.
Perhaps the work ethic is something that can be transfered into a computer program and accessed by humans as needed. Work in a virtual reality environment my be just as fulfilling as that in the material world! SOme video game simulations are already approaching that possibility!
I think we would probably end up with some sort of job sharing where most people worked only a few days a week. In Mexico a few years ago, there was some sort of incentive for employers to hire more people with less hours of work in order to increase employment.Just because you may not have to shuck peas doesn't mean you won't stop working. I suspect some will, but most won't.I read a couple reviews and hope to read the book. The end of work has been the goal of humans for centuries but now it appears it maybe within our grasp, the Utopian world of leisure doesn't look so good.Some years ago I happened to pick up an interesting book entitledWho Will Lose Their Job to the Machines
William Lee invented a stocking frame knitting machine in 1589. After traveling to London to present his invention to Queen Elizabeth I, she responded, “Thou aimest high, Master Lee. Consider thou what the invention could do to my poor subjects. It would assuredly bring to them ruin by depriving them of employment, thus making them beggars.” The Queen denied him the patent. Why? Because job security is not a new concern.
The researchers estimated that about 47% of the U.S. workforce was at risk.
http://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/downloads/academic/The_Future_of_Employment.pdf
Over 700 jobs and their risks.
See? It's not immigrants who Red States should be concerned about.
"The End Of Work," by Jeremy Rifkin. It's an interesting read and some would say: prophetic.
Jeremy Rifkin The Foundation on Economic Trends Books
The work ethic is strongly rooted in all societies. The more people in the workforce that become redundant the more social problems were're going to have. I think we're going to have some major changes.
Still, technology costs money. If someone wants something they will get creative and find a way to earn it.I think we would probably end up with some sort of job sharing where most people worked only a few days a week. In Mexico a few years ago, there was some sort of incentive for employers to hire more people with less hours of work in order to increase employment.Just because you may not have to shuck peas doesn't mean you won't stop working. I suspect some will, but most won't.I read a couple reviews and hope to read the book. The end of work has been the goal of humans for centuries but now it appears it maybe within our grasp, the Utopian world of leisure doesn't look so good.Some years ago I happened to pick up an interesting book entitledWho Will Lose Their Job to the Machines
William Lee invented a stocking frame knitting machine in 1589. After traveling to London to present his invention to Queen Elizabeth I, she responded, “Thou aimest high, Master Lee. Consider thou what the invention could do to my poor subjects. It would assuredly bring to them ruin by depriving them of employment, thus making them beggars.” The Queen denied him the patent. Why? Because job security is not a new concern.
The researchers estimated that about 47% of the U.S. workforce was at risk.
http://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/downloads/academic/The_Future_of_Employment.pdf
Over 700 jobs and their risks.
See? It's not immigrants who Red States should be concerned about.
"The End Of Work," by Jeremy Rifkin. It's an interesting read and some would say: prophetic.
Jeremy Rifkin The Foundation on Economic Trends Books
The work ethic is strongly rooted in all societies. The more people in the workforce that become redundant the more social problems were're going to have. I think we're going to have some major changes.
Yes, I suppose you could pay people based on their performance on Sims or Pokemon, but I don't see that is any better than sending them a check every month. People will always find some leisure activity to occupy their time but I really don't think Pokemon or any other computer game is going to give people a sense worth that a job provides.I read a couple reviews and hope to read the book. The end of work has been the goal of humans for centuries but now it appears it maybe within our grasp, the Utopian world of leisure doesn't look so good.Some years ago I happened to pick up an interesting book entitledWho Will Lose Their Job to the Machines
William Lee invented a stocking frame knitting machine in 1589. After traveling to London to present his invention to Queen Elizabeth I, she responded, “Thou aimest high, Master Lee. Consider thou what the invention could do to my poor subjects. It would assuredly bring to them ruin by depriving them of employment, thus making them beggars.” The Queen denied him the patent. Why? Because job security is not a new concern.
The researchers estimated that about 47% of the U.S. workforce was at risk.
http://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/downloads/academic/The_Future_of_Employment.pdf
Over 700 jobs and their risks.
See? It's not immigrants who Red States should be concerned about.
"The End Of Work," by Jeremy Rifkin. It's an interesting read and some would say: prophetic.
Jeremy Rifkin The Foundation on Economic Trends Books
The work ethic is strongly rooted in all societies. The more people in the workforce that become redundant the more social problems were're going to have. I think we're going to have some major changes.
Perhaps the work ethic is something that can be transfered into a computer program and accessed by humans as needed. Work in a virtual reality environment my be just as fulfilling as that in the material world! SOme video game simulations are already approaching that possibility!
But wouldn't it be just be pastime?Yes, I suppose you could pay people based on their performance on Sims or Pokemon, but I don't see that is any better than sending them a check every month. People will always find some leisure activity to occupy their time but I really don't think Pokemon or any other computer game is going to give people a sense worth that a job provides.I read a couple reviews and hope to read the book. The end of work has been the goal of humans for centuries but now it appears it maybe within our grasp, the Utopian world of leisure doesn't look so good.Some years ago I happened to pick up an interesting book entitledWho Will Lose Their Job to the Machines
William Lee invented a stocking frame knitting machine in 1589. After traveling to London to present his invention to Queen Elizabeth I, she responded, “Thou aimest high, Master Lee. Consider thou what the invention could do to my poor subjects. It would assuredly bring to them ruin by depriving them of employment, thus making them beggars.” The Queen denied him the patent. Why? Because job security is not a new concern.
The researchers estimated that about 47% of the U.S. workforce was at risk.
http://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/downloads/academic/The_Future_of_Employment.pdf
Over 700 jobs and their risks.
See? It's not immigrants who Red States should be concerned about.
"The End Of Work," by Jeremy Rifkin. It's an interesting read and some would say: prophetic.
Jeremy Rifkin The Foundation on Economic Trends Books
The work ethic is strongly rooted in all societies. The more people in the workforce that become redundant the more social problems were're going to have. I think we're going to have some major changes.
Perhaps the work ethic is something that can be transfered into a computer program and accessed by humans as needed. Work in a virtual reality environment my be just as fulfilling as that in the material world! SOme video game simulations are already approaching that possibility!
The kind of virtual reality I had in mind is far more complex than Pokeman or any other mere video game. I envision a virtual world similar to that depicted in a movie called "The Matrix" or the training simulator aboard the Captain Kirk's Enterprise.. Sure, right now we can shrug it off as science fiction and likely improbable for the near future but I can see it coming. By the time machines are doing everything for us, the effects of Moore's Law will have unleashed technological wonders we can now only dream of!
But wouldn't it be just be pastime?Yes, I suppose you could pay people based on their performance on Sims or Pokemon, but I don't see that is any better than sending them a check every month. People will always find some leisure activity to occupy their time but I really don't think Pokemon or any other computer game is going to give people a sense worth that a job provides.I read a couple reviews and hope to read the book. The end of work has been the goal of humans for centuries but now it appears it maybe within our grasp, the Utopian world of leisure doesn't look so good.Some years ago I happened to pick up an interesting book entitled
"The End Of Work," by Jeremy Rifkin. It's an interesting read and some would say: prophetic.
Jeremy Rifkin The Foundation on Economic Trends Books
The work ethic is strongly rooted in all societies. The more people in the workforce that become redundant the more social problems were're going to have. I think we're going to have some major changes.
Perhaps the work ethic is something that can be transfered into a computer program and accessed by humans as needed. Work in a virtual reality environment my be just as fulfilling as that in the material world! SOme video game simulations are already approaching that possibility!
The kind of virtual reality I had in mind is far more complex than Pokeman or any other mere video game. I envision a virtual world similar to that depicted in a movie called "The Matrix" or the training simulator aboard the Captain Kirk's Enterprise.. Sure, right now we can shrug it off as science fiction and likely improbable for the near future but I can see it coming. By the time machines are doing everything for us, the effects of Moore's Law will have unleashed technological wonders we can now only dream of!
Physics was a past time to Einstein and Galileo.But wouldn't it be just be pastime?Yes, I suppose you could pay people based on their performance on Sims or Pokemon, but I don't see that is any better than sending them a check every month. People will always find some leisure activity to occupy their time but I really don't think Pokemon or any other computer game is going to give people a sense worth that a job provides.I read a couple reviews and hope to read the book. The end of work has been the goal of humans for centuries but now it appears it maybe within our grasp, the Utopian world of leisure doesn't look so good.Some years ago I happened to pick up an interesting book entitled
"The End Of Work," by Jeremy Rifkin. It's an interesting read and some would say: prophetic.
Jeremy Rifkin The Foundation on Economic Trends Books
The work ethic is strongly rooted in all societies. The more people in the workforce that become redundant the more social problems were're going to have. I think we're going to have some major changes.
Perhaps the work ethic is something that can be transfered into a computer program and accessed by humans as needed. Work in a virtual reality environment my be just as fulfilling as that in the material world! SOme video game simulations are already approaching that possibility!
The kind of virtual reality I had in mind is far more complex than Pokeman or any other mere video game. I envision a virtual world similar to that depicted in a movie called "The Matrix" or the training simulator aboard the Captain Kirk's Enterprise.. Sure, right now we can shrug it off as science fiction and likely improbable for the near future but I can see it coming. By the time machines are doing everything for us, the effects of Moore's Law will have unleashed technological wonders we can now only dream of!
If robots are going to replace 47% of the jobs, than we don't need these high levels of immigration to begin with.Who Will Lose Their Job to the Machines
William Lee invented a stocking frame knitting machine in 1589. After traveling to London to present his invention to Queen Elizabeth I, she responded, “Thou aimest high, Master Lee. Consider thou what the invention could do to my poor subjects. It would assuredly bring to them ruin by depriving them of employment, thus making them beggars.” The Queen denied him the patent. Why? Because job security is not a new concern.
The researchers estimated that about 47% of the U.S. workforce was at risk.
http://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/downloads/academic/The_Future_of_Employment.pdf
Over 700 jobs and their risks.
See? It's not immigrants who Red States should be concerned about.
Republicans are too old, too fat and not educated. We need immigrants in Red States.If robots are going to replace 47% of the jobs, than we don't need these high levels of immigration to begin with.Who Will Lose Their Job to the Machines
William Lee invented a stocking frame knitting machine in 1589. After traveling to London to present his invention to Queen Elizabeth I, she responded, “Thou aimest high, Master Lee. Consider thou what the invention could do to my poor subjects. It would assuredly bring to them ruin by depriving them of employment, thus making them beggars.” The Queen denied him the patent. Why? Because job security is not a new concern.
The researchers estimated that about 47% of the U.S. workforce was at risk.
http://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/downloads/academic/The_Future_of_Employment.pdf
Over 700 jobs and their risks.
See? It's not immigrants who Red States should be concerned about.
I agree, we need more illiterate mexican indians, I won't rest until we replicate mexico city's slums here.Republicans are too old, too fat and not educated. We need immigrants in Red States.If robots are going to replace 47% of the jobs, than we don't need these high levels of immigration to begin with.Who Will Lose Their Job to the Machines
William Lee invented a stocking frame knitting machine in 1589. After traveling to London to present his invention to Queen Elizabeth I, she responded, “Thou aimest high, Master Lee. Consider thou what the invention could do to my poor subjects. It would assuredly bring to them ruin by depriving them of employment, thus making them beggars.” The Queen denied him the patent. Why? Because job security is not a new concern.
The researchers estimated that about 47% of the U.S. workforce was at risk.
http://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/downloads/academic/The_Future_of_Employment.pdf
Over 700 jobs and their risks.
See? It's not immigrants who Red States should be concerned about.
