Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You can't accuse someone of the crime unless they actually committed it. If they are found "not guilty", it's much easier to win a civil suit. However, OJ was aquitted, but still had to pay everything in the civil suit. Innocent in one doesn't mean automaticly innocent in the other.
How would anyone be able to accuse anyone of a crime then? People are accused of crimes all the time, then in the court of law are found guilty or innocent, but it was never a crime to accuse someone. Meanwhile, outside of the court of law, private citizens are free to express their own opinion about people's guilt or innocence.
Rush was just giving his opinion that Sharpton helped incite the riot.
Liberals for 8 years have been accusing Bush of commiting crimes he never commited, I don't see you saying all those libs should be held accountable.
This is nothing more than another liberal attempt to squash free speech of conservatives.
Conservatives went after Clinton for 8 years spending more than 40 million in taxpayer money and only came up with Monica.
Democrats did NOT go after Bush the same way because the US is/was fighting wars on two fronts. Democrats rallied around the President making him the most popular president in US history. That is an undeniable FACT!
But if they had gone after Bush, you have to admit, there is an awful lot of material to work with.
.
More fantasy arguements from rdean.I get the impression that most Republicans are not completely against assassination as an option
that the bush administration blamed Iraq for 9/11it disproved your premise in the second paragraphyes that is why i posted it.
and what was my premise?
and don't forget the shady land deals, and various other investigations the culminated with blue dress gateHow would anyone be able to accuse anyone of a crime then? People are accused of crimes all the time, then in the court of law are found guilty or innocent, but it was never a crime to accuse someone. Meanwhile, outside of the court of law, private citizens are free to express their own opinion about people's guilt or innocence.
Rush was just giving his opinion that Sharpton helped incite the riot.
Liberals for 8 years have been accusing Bush of commiting crimes he never commited, I don't see you saying all those libs should be held accountable.
This is nothing more than another liberal attempt to squash free speech of conservatives.
Conservatives went after Clinton for 8 years spending more than 40 million in taxpayer money and only came up with Monica.
Democrats did NOT go after Bush the same way because the US is/was fighting wars on two fronts. Democrats rallied around the President making him the most popular president in US history. That is an undeniable FACT!
But if they had gone after Bush, you have to admit, there is an awful lot of material to work with.
.
They went after Clinton because he LIED under OATH. That is a FACT.
He also compromised the Presidency by putting himself in a position to be blackmailed.
Democrats did not go after Bush because there was never any evidence of a law being broken. Every accusation thrown at Bush was debunked, much to their disappointment.
More fantasy arguements from rdean.I get the impression that most Republicans are not completely against assassination as an option
I get the impression you suffer from some type of mental disorder, if not several.
He also compromised the Presidency by putting himself in a position to be blackmailed.
what the fuck you yelling about?....are you from one of those white racist chat rooms?..........hey liability , lush should have been in jail years ago for trafficking, 10,000 pills with no percription is a little more than an addiction, had he been black his white ass would have never seen the light of day again, just like he said on his show in 94, send them down the river , what do ya think a$$wipe
