Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Do you have any articles that tell of Clinton saying BACK OFF of Bin Ladin?
I saved a bunch of Time Mags from the 90's. You find all kinds of shit in there that back then didn't mean anything but today makes you wonder.
I don't doubt it when it comes to the Clinton's.
He was a good centrist president, but for sure he sold out to the rich.
But they didn't fuck the middle class over on Clinton's watch, so he goes down as a good president, just like Ronald Reagan. But today we see that Bill went a long with a lot of things that led us to the mess we are in. No doubt about that. Not saying they weren't dirty.
Which is why I voted for Obama over Hillary. Was Hillary losing on purpose or by design? No. Its the things Bill did that made me not vote for Hillary. I knew she didn't represent change.
Now I hope/think Obama is that change. But he isn't going to change things as much as I want, and certainly not as much as you want.
Do you know why? Because the American voters are really dumb and easily manipulated by the corporate media.
So don't expect too much change when the average American is as dumb as they are now.
Just look at how they react to the idea that bush knew 9-11 was coming. Why would they doubt the possibility? Especially right wingers who insist the government is the enemy!
So I'm still a HUGE Obama supporter.
Its up to him to prove you wrong.
The same corporate media that was in bed with Obama from Day 1?
You only think they were in bed with him from day one.
When you are money like he is, it is hard to be against him.
It would have been obvious if they tried any harder to knock him down. That's one of the reasons race helped him. Can't pick on the black guy. Same reason being a woman helped Hillary.
Trust me, they tried their hardest to help Hillary get the lead back, but it was too late. Remember, the press was helping Hillary eek back into a tie and she couldn't possibly win, so she/the Dem elders cut Obama a deal. Sell out and we'll let you be the nominee.
So he hired Hillary and god knows what else. Oh yea, passed that FISA bill holding his nose.
It took the Super Delegates to break away from Hillary before the media gave up on her.
And you guys want to call it a liberal media for this? That's your proof? Or you don't even really offer any proof. You just call it liberal media? Even though we know neo cons bought up all the media since 96 and now 5 rich families own it all?
Should we give eots more respect than Bobo? After all, eots seems to be non-partisan.
Should we give eots more respect than Bobo? After all, eots seems to be non-partisan.
So the only people that get any respect here are non partisans and right wingers?
Almost all of the people I argue with are republicans or republicans in denial. You may refer to them as Libertarians.
So you right and far right cock suckers want to kick out the guy who belongs to the party that runs your fucking country?
I see, a closed door meeting of neo nuts. I'm out!!!
And I won't tell anyone I was here.
The same corporate media that was in bed with Obama from Day 1?
You only think they were in bed with him from day one.
When you are money like he is, it is hard to be against him.
It would have been obvious if they tried any harder to knock him down. That's one of the reasons race helped him. Can't pick on the black guy. Same reason being a woman helped Hillary.
Trust me, they tried their hardest to help Hillary get the lead back, but it was too late. Remember, the press was helping Hillary eek back into a tie and she couldn't possibly win, so she/the Dem elders cut Obama a deal. Sell out and we'll let you be the nominee.
So he hired Hillary and god knows what else. Oh yea, passed that FISA bill holding his nose.
It took the Super Delegates to break away from Hillary before the media gave up on her.
And you guys want to call it a liberal media for this? That's your proof? Or you don't even really offer any proof. You just call it liberal media? Even though we know neo cons bought up all the media since 96 and now 5 rich families own it all?
and you give all the proof on earth that Bush was responsible for 9/11.
You only think they were in bed with him from day one.
When you are money like he is, it is hard to be against him.
It would have been obvious if they tried any harder to knock him down. That's one of the reasons race helped him. Can't pick on the black guy. Same reason being a woman helped Hillary.
Trust me, they tried their hardest to help Hillary get the lead back, but it was too late. Remember, the press was helping Hillary eek back into a tie and she couldn't possibly win, so she/the Dem elders cut Obama a deal. Sell out and we'll let you be the nominee.
So he hired Hillary and god knows what else. Oh yea, passed that FISA bill holding his nose.
It took the Super Delegates to break away from Hillary before the media gave up on her.
And you guys want to call it a liberal media for this? That's your proof? Or you don't even really offer any proof. You just call it liberal media? Even though we know neo cons bought up all the media since 96 and now 5 rich families own it all?
and you give all the proof on earth that Bush was responsible for 9/11.
Confronted with logic and details, pussies like you usually change the subject.
PS. I lay out a lot of facts that don't add up and suggest Bush might have known 9-11 was coming and didn't do anything about it because he was going to use it to sell us on his radical agenda.
I didn't say I proved Bush did anything. I know there is proof Bush did other things, like lie, but he didn't get impeached for it, so idiots like you keep running your mouth, as if you don't understand why he wasn't impeached. Don't ask, it's over your tiny head.
Anyways, run along now.
Confronted with logic and details, pussies like you usually change the subject.
PS. I lay out a lot of facts that don't add up and suggest Bush might have known 9-11 was coming and didn't do anything about it because he was going to use it to sell us on his radical agenda.
I didn't say I proved Bush did anything. I know there is proof Bush did other things, like lie, but he didn't get impeached for it, so idiots like you keep running your mouth, as if you don't understand why he wasn't impeached. Don't ask, it's over your tiny head.
Anyways, run along now.
Should we give eots more respect than Bobo? After all, eots seems to be non-partisan.
yes, you doConfronted with logic and details, pussies like you usually change the subject.
PS. I lay out a lot of facts that don't add up and suggest Bush might have known 9-11 was coming and didn't do anything about it because he was going to use it to sell us on his radical agenda.
I didn't say I proved Bush did anything. I know there is proof Bush did other things, like lie, but he didn't get impeached for it, so idiots like you keep running your mouth, as if you don't understand why he wasn't impeached. Don't ask, it's over your tiny head.
Anyways, run along now.
You can say that again.anytime their confronted with logic and you lay out the facts for them that dont add up,they change the subject and run off their mouth about something thats totally irrelevant to the subject.
yes, you doConfronted with logic and details, pussies like you usually change the subject.
PS. I lay out a lot of facts that don't add up and suggest Bush might have known 9-11 was coming and didn't do anything about it because he was going to use it to sell us on his radical agenda.
I didn't say I proved Bush did anything. I know there is proof Bush did other things, like lie, but he didn't get impeached for it, so idiots like you keep running your mouth, as if you don't understand why he wasn't impeached. Don't ask, it's over your tiny head.
Anyways, run along now.
You can say that again.anytime their confronted with logic and you lay out the facts for them that dont add up,they change the subject and run off their mouth about something thats totally irrelevant to the subject.
Bush wasnt impeached because he didnt commit an impeachable offenseYou only think they were in bed with him from day one.
When you are money like he is, it is hard to be against him.
It would have been obvious if they tried any harder to knock him down. That's one of the reasons race helped him. Can't pick on the black guy. Same reason being a woman helped Hillary.
Trust me, they tried their hardest to help Hillary get the lead back, but it was too late. Remember, the press was helping Hillary eek back into a tie and she couldn't possibly win, so she/the Dem elders cut Obama a deal. Sell out and we'll let you be the nominee.
So he hired Hillary and god knows what else. Oh yea, passed that FISA bill holding his nose.
It took the Super Delegates to break away from Hillary before the media gave up on her.
And you guys want to call it a liberal media for this? That's your proof? Or you don't even really offer any proof. You just call it liberal media? Even though we know neo cons bought up all the media since 96 and now 5 rich families own it all?
and you give all the proof on earth that Bush was responsible for 9/11.
Confronted with logic and details, pussies like you usually change the subject.
PS. I lay out a lot of facts that don't add up and suggest Bush might have known 9-11 was coming and didn't do anything about it because he was going to use it to sell us on his radical agenda.
I didn't say I proved Bush did anything. I know there is proof Bush did other things, like lie, but he didn't get impeached for it, so idiots like you keep running your mouth, as if you don't understand why he wasn't impeached. Don't ask, it's over your tiny head.
Anyways, run along now.
Plus, who else here has a whole topic named after him in the byline?
Do you have any articles that tell of Clinton saying BACK OFF of Bin Ladin?
I saved a bunch of Time Mags from the 90's. You find all kinds of shit in there that back then didn't mean anything but today makes you wonder.
I don't doubt it when it comes to the Clinton's.
He was a good centrist president, but for sure he sold out to the rich.
But they didn't fuck the middle class over on Clinton's watch, so he goes down as a good president, just like Ronald Reagan. But today we see that Bill went a long with a lot of things that led us to the mess we are in. No doubt about that. Not saying they weren't dirty.
Which is why I voted for Obama over Hillary. Was Hillary losing on purpose or by design? No. Its the things Bill did that made me not vote for Hillary. I knew she didn't represent change.
Now I hope/think Obama is that change. But he isn't going to change things as much as I want, and certainly not as much as you want.
Do you know why? Because the American voters are really dumb and easily manipulated by the corporate media.
So don't expect too much change when the average American is as dumb as they are now.
Just look at how they react to the idea that bush knew 9-11 was coming. Why would they doubt the possibility? Especially right wingers who insist the government is the enemy!
So I'm still a HUGE Obama supporter.
Its up to him to prove you wrong.
no question about it...the only thing in question is the details
I am so sick of the people who without question or thought dismiss the idea that Bush/Chaney might actually be this evil.
They are this evil!!! Hello everyone!!! Anyone listening?
As bad as Saddam is, so is Dick Cheney and GW Bush.
I think even HW Bush believes his son is an asshole.
Lets look back at the Iran Contra Affair and the October Surprise where the Republicans made a deal with the terrorists to hold the hostages until after the election so Carter would lose.
Then a year or so later Ollie North and Reagan are selling arms to Iran?
Why? We never found out why they were giving guns to Iran.
If it wasn't payment for the October Surprise, please someone tell me why we sold Iran guns.
I also think Cheney sent out the anthrax. When I lay out all the facts, what we know, etc, it only makes sense. Cheney tried to blame Saddam for the antrax. What proof did he have? So he wasn't even worried about where the anthrax was coming from. Why not? Because it was coming from him. And who got antrax mailed to them? Two powerful democrats who were blocking the Patriot Act.
Bush and Cheney considered the people in the World Trade Center as collateral damage. Necessary evil type shit. They might even believe that this is a case of, "the good of the many outweigh the few".
I truly believe the GOP think they did the right thing in the middle east. It may look like they did it for $ only, but it may have more to do with having a foot hold in the middle east. It may help with gas prices. It may help with fighting terrorists. And lets face it, Saddam was a bad guy.
So, I think the Republicans view themselves as patriots, not traitors.
What do I think? I think they should all be hung. And any Democrat who knew about torture and knew about the tele coms spying on Americans, should be put in jail.
And I don't approve of the neo con's PNAC right wing agenda. I think if most Americans were told all the details, neither would they. That's why they lied us into Iraq rather than tell us the truth.
Republicans think the key to our countries success is to allow our Robber Baron's to buy up as much of the world as possible, (new world order) and at the same time, they are having a fire sale here in the US and they are selling all our companies to foreigners REALLY CHEAP!
And allow illegals in because Americans need cheap labor.
God, the more I try to get into the mind of Republicans, the more I realize just how fucked up wrong/stupid their ideas are.
Do they ever think them all the way thru?
I tried, and in the end I always realized their ideas are fatally flawed.
PS. I just had a flashback. Last year I remember a story about a foreign company that either bought a company or invested in a company, and that foreign company was guaranteed a return of 10%.
STOP SPAMING
Capt. Eric H. May, U.S. Army (ret) Former U.S. Army Intelligence Officer. Former inspector and interpreter for the Intermediate Nuclear Forces Treaty team.
Essay 9/11 and Non-investigation: "As a former Army officer, my tendency immediately after 911 was to rally 'round the colors and defend the country against what I then thought was an insidious, malicious all-Arab entity called Al-Qaida. In fact, in April of 2002, I attempted to reactivate my then-retired commission to return to serve my country in its time of peril. ...
Now I view the 911 event as Professor David Griffin, author of The New Pearl Harbor, views it: as a matter that implies either
A) passive participation by the Bush White House through a deliberate stand-down of proper defense procedures that (if followed) would have led US air assets to a quick identification and confrontation of the passenger aircraft that impacted WTC 1 and WTC 2, or worse ...
B) active execution of a plot by rogue elements of government, starting with the White House itself, in creating a spectacle of destruction that would lead the United States into an invasion of the Middle East ..." Captain Eric May
Signatory: Petition requesting a reinvestigation of 9/11:
"We want truthful answers to question. As Americans of conscience, we ask for four things:
An immediate investigation by New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer
Immediate investigation in Congressional Hearings.
Media attention to scrutinize and investigate the evidence.
The formation of a truly independent citizens-based inquiry." http://www.911truth.org/article
Bush never did anything wrong because he is above the law.
Bush believes he is above the law | AfterDowningStreet.org
let me guess, you believe that silly "Clinton Death list" nonsense, right?STOP SPAMING
Capt. Eric H. May, U.S. Army (ret) Former U.S. Army Intelligence Officer. Former inspector and interpreter for the Intermediate Nuclear Forces Treaty team.
Essay 9/11 and Non-investigation: "As a former Army officer, my tendency immediately after 911 was to rally 'round the colors and defend the country against what I then thought was an insidious, malicious all-Arab entity called Al-Qaida. In fact, in April of 2002, I attempted to reactivate my then-retired commission to return to serve my country in its time of peril. ...
Now I view the 911 event as Professor David Griffin, author of The New Pearl Harbor, views it: as a matter that implies either
A) passive participation by the Bush White House through a deliberate stand-down of proper defense procedures that (if followed) would have led US air assets to a quick identification and confrontation of the passenger aircraft that impacted WTC 1 and WTC 2, or worse ...
B) active execution of a plot by rogue elements of government, starting with the White House itself, in creating a spectacle of destruction that would lead the United States into an invasion of the Middle East ..." Captain Eric May
Signatory: Petition requesting a reinvestigation of 9/11:
"We want truthful answers to question. As Americans of conscience, we ask for four things:
An immediate investigation by New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer
Immediate investigation in Congressional Hearings.
Media attention to scrutinize and investigate the evidence.
The formation of a truly independent citizens-based inquiry." http://www.911truth.org/article
Bush never did anything wrong because he is above the law.
Bush believes he is above the law | AfterDowningStreet.org
same with Clinton.thats the problem with our country is that politicians and ESPECIALY presidents commit crimes all the time including murder and get off scott free constantly.Theres one different law for politicians and one different one for citizens.everybody in the world knows that.Just look at Nixon and Clinton,if WE lied under oath in front of a federal grand jury like they did,we go to jail.THEY got off scott free.
YES, bobo the moron, the downing street memo was an admitted fake by the guy that produced it
he CLAIMS he reproduced the original and then destroyed it
uh huh
You usually demand proof. Where is your proof?
I think you are a conspiracy theorist.
YES, bobo the moron, the downing street memo was an admitted fake by the guy that produced it
he CLAIMS he reproduced the original and then destroyed it
uh huh
You usually demand proof. Where is your proof?
I think you are a conspiracy theorist.
No he is a conspiracy denial.the thing I think is s hysterical about the 9/11 apologists here such as retired and divecon is they have let the government brainwash them into believeing were conspiracy theorists for not falling for their lies and propaganda.the government coined that term calling people since the 60's who dont accept that other fairy tale commission -the warren commission that oswald killed kennedy a conspiracy theorist.They cant call us conspiracy theorists in 9/11 because THIS time they had to acknowledge that 9/11 WAS a conspiracy since it involved more than one person.the people like Retired who defend the official version ARE conspiracy theorists because they defend the official government conspiracy THEORY that muslims were behind it all.
[youtube]BzGd0t8v-d4[/youtube]You usually demand proof. Where is your proof?
I think you are a conspiracy theorist.
No he is a conspiracy denial.the thing I think is s hysterical about the 9/11 apologists here such as retired and divecon is they have let the government brainwash them into believeing were conspiracy theorists for not falling for their lies and propaganda.the government coined that term calling people since the 60's who dont accept that other fairy tale commission -the warren commission that oswald killed kennedy a conspiracy theorist.They cant call us conspiracy theorists in 9/11 because THIS time they had to acknowledge that 9/11 WAS a conspiracy since it involved more than one person.the people like Retired who defend the official version ARE conspiracy theorists because they defend the official government conspiracy THEORY that muslims were behind it all.
so Noam chomsky is brainwashed by the government? go to youtube and watch his talk on 9/11 conspiracy. I'd post it but it wont work on here.