Who thinks 9/11 was an inside Job?

[Godboy]

Downing Street memo's were true, bitch.

Show me otherwise. You can't.

The Downing Street memos were NOT true.

Show me otherwise. You cant.

I always provide proof when you idiots ask. You guys NEVER back up what you are saying.

So you can't find one article that says Downing Street Memo's were bogus?

Then why did your little buddy make the claim?

I win.

You cant find one article which proves the memo was real.

You lose.

 

[manu1959]

Downing Street memo's were true, bitch.

Show me otherwise. You can't.

The Downing Street memos were NOT true.

Show me otherwise. You cant.

I always provide proof when you idiots ask. You guys NEVER back up what you are saying.

So you can't find one article that says Downing Street Memo's were bogus?

Then why did your little buddy make the claim?

I win.

i like this opinion....

Captain's Quarters

The timing of the memo also reveals its irrelevancy. Supposedly the memo claimed that war was imminent. However, it took almost eight months after that, and two attempts at the UN to issue an ultimatum to Saddam, before we actually initiated military action. It had been Bush's position that military action was justified just by Saddam's firing on jets in the no-fly zone, an obvious and clear violation of the cease-fire that stopped the Coalition from marching on Baghdad in 1991. It was the British who wanted new legal justification for military action, not the US, and against the advice of both America and France, it was the British who wanted to go back for a second resolution in 2003 rather than just rely on 1441. In short, Washington didn't have much need to "fix" intelligence at all.

Beyond that, the memo itself says nothing at all. It mentions no names and provides no quotes. The supposed "smoking gun" of the memo, the "fixing" statement, isn't even attributed to another person. It actually reads like the opinion of the memo's author -- and as Kinsley points out, that opinion could hardly be considered unique, even at the time the memo was written. The analysis matches the Labour position at the time, which wanted to stick with sanctions on Iraq that supposedly kept Saddam in his box, a contention that we know now (through Oil-For-Food evidence seized after the invasion) had not been true for years.

Simply put, the DSM provides nothing new -- no evidence, no perspective, not even decent hearsay. It's the opinion of an anonymous analyst who traveled to Washington and spoke with unknown sources, and then came back and wrote a memo supporting what the analyst thought was the party line. It provides no support for what its fans claim to be its central assertion. The DSM is a development only Air America could love.

 

[eots]

The Downing Street memos were NOT true.

Show me otherwise. You cant.

I always provide proof when you idiots ask. You guys NEVER back up what you are saying.

So you can't find one article that says Downing Street Memo's were bogus?

Then why did your little buddy make the claim?

I win.

You cant find one article which proves the memo was real.

You lose.

prove your not a butterfly dreaming your a goatboy....

 

[eots]

Friday, December 30th, 2005
Downing Street Documents’ - Confirmed and Corroborated!
Leaked Top-Secret British Documents Revealing Bush Intended to Launch a War on Iraq — No Matter What — Have Been Proven Legitimate and Correct John Conyers’ Latest Report Provides a Point-by-Point Verification.


Complete Set of Downing Street Documents | AfterDowningStreet.org

 

[Godboy]

I always provide proof when you idiots ask. You guys NEVER back up what you are saying.

So you can't find one article that says Downing Street Memo's were bogus?

Then why did your little buddy make the claim?

I win.

You cant find one article which proves the memo was real.

You lose.

prove your not a butterfly dreaming your a goatboy....

Well, first off, butterflies cant type, nor do they have the capacity for language, let alone the english language. Furthermore, i dont see how a butterfly would even know what a goatboy is in order to begin dreaming about being one in the first place.

 

[sealybobo]

YES, bobo the moron, the downing street memo was an admitted fake by the guy that produced it
he CLAIMS he reproduced the original and then destroyed it


uh huh

The Downing Street "Memo" is actually the minutes of a meeting, transcribed during a gathering of many of the British Prime Minister's senior ministers on July 23, 2002. Published by The Sunday Times on May 1, 2005 this document was the first hard evidence from within the UK or US governments that exposed the truth about how the Iraq war began.

Since that time, much more information has come to light through leaks of secret government documents and the accounts of an increasing number of people who have witnessed the administration’s wrongdoing firsthand.

There is now in the public record a large body of evidence that vividly illustrates:

Bush’s long-standing intent to invade Iraq
Bush’s willingness to provoke Saddam (in a variety of ways) into providing a pretext for war
The fact that the war effectively began with an air campaign nearly a year before the March 2003 invasion and months before Congressional approval for the use of force
The administration’s widespread effort to crush dissent and manipulate information that would counter its justification for war
The lack of planning for the war’s aftermath and a fundamental lack of understanding of the Iraqi society

The Downing Street Memo :: What is it?

I don't know all the details, but I do know bush lied about yellow cake from africa and saddam's involvment.

That's ok Dive. I like it that you believe treasonist liars. It makes me think better of you than I already do.

Now I see how the Civil war happened.

no, bush didnt lie
Wilson was the one that lied about yellowcake

Hey Dive, someone just corroborated that you are wrong about the Downing Street Memo's.

Imagine what else you are wrong about.

Everything? I'll go along with that.

 

[Godboy]

The Downing Street "Memo" is actually the minutes of a meeting, transcribed during a gathering of many of the British Prime Minister's senior ministers on July 23, 2002. Published by The Sunday Times on May 1, 2005 this document was the first hard evidence from within the UK or US governments that exposed the truth about how the Iraq war began.

Since that time, much more information has come to light through leaks of secret government documents and the accounts of an increasing number of people who have witnessed the administration’s wrongdoing firsthand.

There is now in the public record a large body of evidence that vividly illustrates:

Bush’s long-standing intent to invade Iraq
Bush’s willingness to provoke Saddam (in a variety of ways) into providing a pretext for war
The fact that the war effectively began with an air campaign nearly a year before the March 2003 invasion and months before Congressional approval for the use of force
The administration’s widespread effort to crush dissent and manipulate information that would counter its justification for war
The lack of planning for the war’s aftermath and a fundamental lack of understanding of the Iraqi society

The Downing Street Memo :: What is it?

I don't know all the details, but I do know bush lied about yellow cake from africa and saddam's involvment.

That's ok Dive. I like it that you believe treasonist liars. It makes me think better of you than I already do.

Now I see how the Civil war happened.

no, bush didnt lie
Wilson was the one that lied about yellowcake

Hey Dive, someone just corroborated that you are wrong about the Downing Street Memo's.

Imagine what else you are wrong about.

Everything? I'll go along with that.

You seem to go along with alot of stupid things. Why stop now?

 

[sealybobo]

no, bush didnt lie
Wilson was the one that lied about yellowcake

Hey Dive, someone just corroborated that you are wrong about the Downing Street Memo's.

Imagine what else you are wrong about.

Everything? I'll go along with that.

You seem to go along with alot of stupid things. Why stop now?

Stop sucking Dive's balls. If you two were in prison, you'd be holding his inside out pocket like a leash you little bitch.

 

[DiveCon]

Friday, December 30th, 2005
Downing Street Documents’ - Confirmed and Corroborated!
Leaked Top-Secret British Documents Revealing Bush Intended to Launch a War on Iraq — No Matter What — Have Been Proven Legitimate and Correct John Conyers’ Latest Report Provides a Point-by-Point Verification.


Complete Set of Downing Street Documents | AfterDowningStreet.org

yeah, like going to one of your troofer sites
LOL
of course afterdowningstreet will claim they are real
they LIE

 

[DiveCon]

The Downing Street "Memo" is actually the minutes of a meeting, transcribed during a gathering of many of the British Prime Minister's senior ministers on July 23, 2002. Published by The Sunday Times on May 1, 2005 this document was the first hard evidence from within the UK or US governments that exposed the truth about how the Iraq war began.

Since that time, much more information has come to light through leaks of secret government documents and the accounts of an increasing number of people who have witnessed the administration’s wrongdoing firsthand.

There is now in the public record a large body of evidence that vividly illustrates:

Bush’s long-standing intent to invade Iraq
Bush’s willingness to provoke Saddam (in a variety of ways) into providing a pretext for war
The fact that the war effectively began with an air campaign nearly a year before the March 2003 invasion and months before Congressional approval for the use of force
The administration’s widespread effort to crush dissent and manipulate information that would counter its justification for war
The lack of planning for the war’s aftermath and a fundamental lack of understanding of the Iraqi society

The Downing Street Memo :: What is it?

I don't know all the details, but I do know bush lied about yellow cake from africa and saddam's involvment.

That's ok Dive. I like it that you believe treasonist liars. It makes me think better of you than I already do.

Now I see how the Civil war happened.

no, bush didnt lie
Wilson was the one that lied about yellowcake

Hey Dive, someone just corroborated that you are wrong about the Downing Street Memo's.

Imagine what else you are wrong about.

Everything? I'll go along with that.

yes, because we klnow sealybobisntanidiot.com will back you up 110%

 

[DiveCon]

Hey Dive, someone just corroborated that you are wrong about the Downing Street Memo's.

Imagine what else you are wrong about.

Everything? I'll go along with that.

You seem to go along with alot of stupid things. Why stop now?

Stop sucking Dive's balls. If you two were in prison, you'd be holding his inside out pocket like a leash you little bitch.

dude, just what is your facination with homosexual sex acts?

 

[GHook93]

Why does it seem like 9/11 Truther or as I call them "useless, self-hating douche-bags" always come from the far left! I have to say nothing pisses me off more than an American 9/11 truther, not even a Holocaust Denier!

 

[DiveCon]

Why does it seem like 9/11 Truther or as I call them "useless, self-hating douche-bags" always come from the far left! I have to say nothing pisses me off more than an American 9/11 truther, not even a Holocaust Denier!

hell, a bunch of the troofers ARE holocaust deniers

a lot of them even believe that Israel did 9/11

 

[xotoxi]

Why does it seem like 9/11 Truther or as I call them "useless, self-hating douche-bags" always come from the far left! I have to say nothing pisses me off more than an American 9/11 truther, not even a Holocaust Denier!

I don't think that 9/11 Truthers come from the far left...or the far right.

That is, unless the entrance to the city sewer is located to the far left or the far right...

 

[eots]

Why does it seem like 9/11 Truther or as I call them "useless, self-hating douche-bags" always come from the far left! I have to say nothing pisses me off more than an American 9/11 truther, not even a Holocaust Denier!

hell, a bunch of the troofers ARE holocaust deniers

a lot of them even believe that Israel did 9/11

a lot of people that don't believe 911 was an inside job have molested children and committed crimes

........and Israel did appear to have prior knowledge

 

[eots]

Why does it seem like 9/11 Truther or as I call them "useless, self-hating douche-bags" always come from the far left! I have to say nothing pisses me off more than an American 9/11 truther, not even a Holocaust Denier!

I don't think that 9/11 Truthers come from the far left...or the far right.

That is, unless the entrance to the city sewer is located to the far left or the far right...

so your saying these decorated American heroes come from ..a sewer ???

Question 9/11 - Responsible Criticism of the 9/11 ...This website provides responsible criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report by senior military, intelligence and government officials.
Patriots Question 9/11 - Responsible Criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report

 

[DiveCon]

Why does it seem like 9/11 Truther or as I call them "useless, self-hating douche-bags" always come from the far left! I have to say nothing pisses me off more than an American 9/11 truther, not even a Holocaust Denier!

hell, a bunch of the troofers ARE holocaust deniers

a lot of them even believe that Israel did 9/11

a lot of people that don't believe 911 was an inside job have molested children and committed crimes

........and Israel did appear to have prior knowledge

See!!!!

 

[DiveCon]

Why does it seem like 9/11 Truther or as I call them "useless, self-hating douche-bags" always come from the far left! I have to say nothing pisses me off more than an American 9/11 truther, not even a Holocaust Denier!

I don't think that 9/11 Truthers come from the far left...or the far right.

That is, unless the entrance to the city sewer is located to the far left or the far right...

so your saying these decorated American heroes come from ..a sewer ???

Question 9/11 - Responsible Criticism of the 9/11 ...This website provides responsible criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report by senior military, intelligence and government officials.
Patriots Question 9/11 - Responsible Criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report

no, because you cant prove they agree with you on anything, except they want another investigation, that you would not accept the results of because they would find the same thing WE already know is the truth

 

[eots]

I don't think that 9/11 Truthers come from the far left...or the far right.

That is, unless the entrance to the city sewer is located to the far left or the far right...

so your saying these decorated American heroes come from ..a sewer ???

Question 9/11 - Responsible Criticism of the 9/11 ...This website provides responsible criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report by senior military, intelligence and government officials.
Patriots Question 9/11 - Responsible Criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report

no, because you cant prove they agree with you on anything, except they want another investigation, that you would not accept the results of because they would find the same thing WE already know is the truth

really ???

Capt. Daniel Davis, U.S. Army – Former U.S. Army Air Defense Officer and NORAD Tac Director. Decorated with the Bronze Star and the Soldiers Medal for bravery under fire and the Purple Heart for injuries sustained in Viet Nam.

Statement to this website 3/23/07: "As a former General Electric Turbine engineering specialist and manager and then CEO of a turbine engineering company, I can guarantee that none of the high tech, high temperature alloy engines on any of the four planes that crashed on 9/11 would be completely destroyed, burned, shattered or melted in any crash or fire. Wrecked, yes, but not destroyed. Where are all of those engines, particularly at the Pentagon? If jet powered aircraft crashed on 9/11, those engines, plus wings and tail assembly, would be there.

Additionally, in my experience as an officer in NORAD as a Tactical Director for the Chicago-Milwaukee Air Defense and as a current private pilot, there is no way that an aircraft on instrument flight plans (all commercial flights are IFR) would not be intercepted when they deviate from their flight plan, turn off their transponders, or stop communication with Air Traffic Control. No way! With very bad luck, perhaps one could slip by, but no there's no way all four of them could!

Finally, going over the hill and highway and crashing into the Pentagon right at the wall/ground interface is nearly impossible for even a small slow single engine airplane and no way for a 757. Maybe the best pilot in the world could accomplish that but not these unskilled "terrorists".

Attempts to obscure facts by calling them a "Conspiracy Theory" does not change the truth. It seems, "Something is rotten in the State."




Capt. Eric H. May, U.S. Army (ret) – Former U.S. Army Intelligence Officer. Former inspector and interpreter for the Intermediate Nuclear Forces Treaty team.

Essay 9/11 and Non-investigation: "As a former Army officer, my tendency immediately after 911 was to rally 'round the colors and defend the country against what I then thought was an insidious, malicious all-Arab entity called Al-Qaida. In fact, in April of 2002, I attempted to reactivate my then-retired commission to return to serve my country in its time of peril. ...

Now I view the 911 event as Professor David Griffin, author of The New Pearl Harbor, views it: as a matter that implies either

A) passive participation by the Bush White House through a deliberate stand-down of proper defense procedures that (if followed) would have led US air assets to a quick identification and confrontation of the passenger aircraft that impacted WTC 1 and WTC 2, or worse ...

B) active execution of a plot by rogue elements of government, starting with the White House itself, in creating a spectacle of destruction that would lead the United States into an invasion of the Middle East ..." Captain Eric May


Signatory: Petition requesting a reinvestigation of 9/11:
"We want truthful answers to question. … As Americans of conscience, we ask for four things:
An immediate investigation by New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer
Immediate investigation in Congressional Hearings.
Media attention to scrutinize and investigate the evidence.
The formation of a truly independent citizens-based inquiry." http://www.911truth.org/article


Major General Albert Stubblebine, U.S. Army (ret) – Former Commanding General of U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command, 1981 - 1984. Also commanded the U.S. Army’s Electronic Research and Development Command and the U.S. Army’s Intelligence School and Center. Former head of Imagery Interpretation for Scientific and Technical Intelligence. 32-year Army career.

Member, Military Intelligence Hall of Fame.
Video 7/11/06: "One of my experiences in the Army was being in charge of the Army’s Imagery Interpretation for Scientific and Technical Intelligence during the Cold War. I measured pieces of Soviet equipment from photographs. It was my job. I look at the hole in the Pentagon and I look at the size of an airplane that was supposed to have hit the Pentagon. And I said, ‘The plane does not fit in that hole’. So what did hit the Pentagon? What hit it? Where is it? What's going on?" http://www.und

Patriots Question 9/11 - Responsible Criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report

 

[eots]

Why does it seem like 9/11 Truther or as I call them "useless, self-hating douche-bags" always come from the far left! I have to say nothing pisses me off more than an American 9/11 truther, not even a Holocaust Denier!

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pYIZW959vJc]YouTube - Fox News expose: Israelis had foreknowledge of 9-11.[/ame]