Contumacious
Radical Freedom
well,, if one is convicted of having sex with a minor then one has in fact committed the criminal act of statutory rape!
Sure, he committed rape. But that's not what he was convicted of.
think,,, convicted of sex with a minor equal conviction of statutory rape. Because sex with any minor is defined as statutory rape. how can you not be convicted of rape if you have had sex with an underage person who cannot legally give consent? doesn't make sense. just semantics
That's bullshit.
If she had had sex with a 14 y/o the State would have not prosecuted anyone. What is the difference between screwing a 14 y/o and a 50 y/o?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?
.