What's more important with your political party?

Discussion in 'Politics' started by KMAN, Aug 10, 2008.

  1. KMAN
    Offline

    KMAN Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2008
    Messages:
    2,683
    Thanks Received:
    268
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +269
    A polar bear

    or

    A human child
     
  2. RetiredGySgt
    Offline

    RetiredGySgt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    39,576
    Thanks Received:
    5,902
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +8,993
    Well I get the point but they are not mutually exclusive. One can be responsible and work to lessen pollution and CO2 being released by man. The problem is when the far left starts running the show, they are some really idiotic people. They have not met a lie they could not use and a Human they could not lose.
     
  3. sealybobo
    Offline

    sealybobo Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    50,740
    Thanks Received:
    3,200
    Trophy Points:
    1,845
    Location:
    Michigan
    Ratings:
    +10,215
    You must be talking about the dems in the 80's. you need to let that go. and until you admit your party has the bigger and better liars, nothings ever going to change. Pelosi, Reed and Obama give you no reason to doubt they won't work on behalf of america. Mccain and the gop raped america.

    vote for mccain if you like the economy the way it is right now. add 4 more yrs of iraq spending and free reign for the oil companies and war with iran.
     
  4. RetiredGySgt
    Offline

    RetiredGySgt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    39,576
    Thanks Received:
    5,902
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +8,993
    Retard alert, Retard alert.
     
  5. sealybobo
    Offline

    sealybobo Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    50,740
    Thanks Received:
    3,200
    Trophy Points:
    1,845
    Location:
    Michigan
    Ratings:
    +10,215
    Are you saying that Mccain is more honest than pelosi?

    Oh, if its one polar bear for one child, the child is saved. But one child for the entire bear population? Sacrafice the child. Greater good.

    Just because stevens and delay were corrupt, doesn't mean reed and pelosi are. are mccain and boehner corrupt too?
     
  6. jreeves
    Offline

    jreeves Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2008
    Messages:
    6,588
    Thanks Received:
    315
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +315
    Group decries 'egregious earmarks' in Democrats' Iraq funding bill - On Deadline - USATODAY.com
    "Despite their campaign talk about earmark reform last fall, the new Democratic leadership shamelessly used pork to buy votes — before the vote, Representatives Collin Peterson of Minnesota and Peter DeFazio of Oregon acknowledged that add-ons for their districts would influence their decisions," Thomas Schatz of Citizens Against Government Waste writes in an essay on the op-ed page of The New York Times. "The heavyweights also led by example: the Senate majority leader, Harry Reid of Nevada, added $20 million to eradicate Mormon crickets, and David Obey of Wisconsin, the House Appropriations Committee chairman, came away with $283 million for the Milk Income Loss Contract Program."

    Reid isn't corrupt at all, adding the eradication of mormon crickets to an Iraq spending bill....:eusa_whistle: (20 million dollars!!
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  7. sealybobo
    Offline

    sealybobo Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    50,740
    Thanks Received:
    3,200
    Trophy Points:
    1,845
    Location:
    Michigan
    Ratings:
    +10,215
    What programs do reed's pork projects fund? or are you suggesting getting rid of pork altogether? or would you vote for democrats if they never used earmarks? Or should the gop be the only ones that get pork? because then everyone would only vote gop. That's why Ted Stevens always won. He brings home the bacon. I think you want it both ways.
     
  8. editec
    Offline

    editec Mr. Forgot-it-All

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    41,427
    Thanks Received:
    5,598
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Maine
    Ratings:
    +5,618
    Depends..whose child are we talking about, here?
     
  9. CSM
    Offline

    CSM Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2004
    Messages:
    6,907
    Thanks Received:
    708
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Northeast US
    Ratings:
    +708
    Hopefully, it is Sealybob's. If we are talking about my kids, there are gonna be an awful lot of dead polar bears.
     
  10. Ravi
    Offline

    Ravi Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2008
    Messages:
    81,417
    Thanks Received:
    12,697
    Trophy Points:
    2,205
    Location:
    Hating Hatters
    Ratings:
    +29,846
    Wow, this is a tough question. Republicans don't care about human children or polar bears so I guess they are eliminated from the first round. Democrats care about the health of polar bears because it reflects the health of the environment...and a screwed up environment means trouble for human children in the long run.

    All right! Dems win and Republicans suck!

    :badgrin:
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1

Share This Page