What's more important with your political party?

Well I get the point but they are not mutually exclusive. One can be responsible and work to lessen pollution and CO2 being released by man. The problem is when the far left starts running the show, they are some really idiotic people. They have not met a lie they could not use and a Human they could not lose.
 
You must be talking about the dems in the 80's. you need to let that go. and until you admit your party has the bigger and better liars, nothings ever going to change. Pelosi, Reed and Obama give you no reason to doubt they won't work on behalf of america. Mccain and the gop raped america.

vote for mccain if you like the economy the way it is right now. add 4 more yrs of iraq spending and free reign for the oil companies and war with iran.
 
You must be talking about the dems in the 80's. you need to let that go. and until you admit your party has the bigger and better liars, nothings ever going to change. Pelosi, Reed and Obama give you no reason to doubt they won't work on behalf of america. Mccain and the gop raped america.

vote for mccain if you like the economy the way it is right now. add 4 more yrs of iraq spending and free reign for the oil companies and war with iran.

Retard alert, Retard alert.
 
Retard alert, Retard alert.

Are you saying that Mccain is more honest than pelosi?

Oh, if its one polar bear for one child, the child is saved. But one child for the entire bear population? Sacrafice the child. Greater good.

Just because stevens and delay were corrupt, doesn't mean reed and pelosi are. are mccain and boehner corrupt too?
 
Are you saying that Mccain is more honest than pelosi?

Oh, if its one polar bear for one child, the child is saved. But one child for the entire bear population? Sacrafice the child. Greater good.

Just because stevens and delay were corrupt, doesn't mean reed and pelosi are. are mccain and boehner corrupt too?
Group decries 'egregious earmarks' in Democrats' Iraq funding bill - On Deadline - USATODAY.com
"Despite their campaign talk about earmark reform last fall, the new Democratic leadership shamelessly used pork to buy votes — before the vote, Representatives Collin Peterson of Minnesota and Peter DeFazio of Oregon acknowledged that add-ons for their districts would influence their decisions," Thomas Schatz of Citizens Against Government Waste writes in an essay on the op-ed page of The New York Times. "The heavyweights also led by example: the Senate majority leader, Harry Reid of Nevada, added $20 million to eradicate Mormon crickets, and David Obey of Wisconsin, the House Appropriations Committee chairman, came away with $283 million for the Milk Income Loss Contract Program."

Reid isn't corrupt at all, adding the eradication of mormon crickets to an Iraq spending bill....:eusa_whistle: (20 million dollars!!
 
Group decries 'egregious earmarks' in Democrats' Iraq funding bill - On Deadline - USATODAY.com
"Despite their campaign talk about earmark reform last fall, the new Democratic leadership shamelessly used pork to buy votes — before the vote, Representatives Collin Peterson of Minnesota and Peter DeFazio of Oregon acknowledged that add-ons for their districts would influence their decisions," Thomas Schatz of Citizens Against Government Waste writes in an essay on the op-ed page of The New York Times. "The heavyweights also led by example: the Senate majority leader, Harry Reid of Nevada, added $20 million to eradicate Mormon crickets, and David Obey of Wisconsin, the House Appropriations Committee chairman, came away with $283 million for the Milk Income Loss Contract Program."

Reid isn't corrupt at all, adding the eradication of mormon crickets to an Iraq spending bill....:eusa_whistle: (20 million dollars!!

What programs do reed's pork projects fund? or are you suggesting getting rid of pork altogether? or would you vote for democrats if they never used earmarks? Or should the gop be the only ones that get pork? because then everyone would only vote gop. That's why Ted Stevens always won. He brings home the bacon. I think you want it both ways.
 
Wow, this is a tough question. Republicans don't care about human children or polar bears so I guess they are eliminated from the first round. Democrats care about the health of polar bears because it reflects the health of the environment...and a screwed up environment means trouble for human children in the long run.

All right! Dems win and Republicans suck!

:badgrin:
 
Hopefully, it is Sealybob's. If we are talking about my kids, there are gonna be an awful lot of dead polar bears.


You think society cares that much about your kid? We would out vote you. Only a small percentage of bible thumpers would agree your kids worth more than an entire species. You call us tree huggers yet you think the life of one brat is worth the entire polar bear species? :cuckoo: You care so much about the seed in a girls womb but you don't care about Polar bears? What's wrong with you? A lot of you don't even care about Iraqi lives.
 
You are a complete idiot:woohoo::ahole-1:

You think one child is worth the entire bear population? Who's the asshole? Of course in your mind the child is white anglo, correct? Because I'm sure you would sacrafice an Iraqi child.

Maybe you wouldn't hate bears so much if they weren't black and brown bears? Oh wait, you hate Polar bears too. Probably panda's as well.
 
Are you saying that Mccain is more honest than pelosi?

Oh, if its one polar bear for one child, the child is saved. But one child for the entire bear population? Sacrafice the child. Greater good.

Just because stevens and delay were corrupt, doesn't mean reed and pelosi are. are mccain and boehner corrupt too?

What is inherently good about polar bears? Animals go extinct, it's the cycle of life. Maybe you guys should get a little dose of perspective and stop trying to save things that weren't intended to be saved.
 
What is inherently good about polar bears? Animals go extinct, it's the cycle of life. Maybe you guys should get a little dose of perspective and stop trying to save things that weren't intended to be saved.
How do you know what has and hasn't been intended to save? By whom?
 
You think one child is worth the entire bear population? Who's the asshole? Of course in your mind the child is white anglo, correct? Because I'm sure you would sacrafice an Iraqi child.

Maybe you wouldn't hate bears so much if they weren't black and brown bears? Oh wait, you hate Polar bears too. Probably panda's as well.

Leave it to the extreme liberal whack-job to then try and call someone racist

You are also indeed an asshole
 
What is inherently good about polar bears? Animals go extinct, it's the cycle of life. Maybe you guys should get a little dose of perspective and stop trying to save things that weren't intended to be saved.

You mean like unwanted fetus'?

What is inherently good about people?
 
You mean like unwanted fetus'?

What is inherently good about people?

Well...if you happen to be a polar bear they taste okay.. if you can't get a seal, that is.

The young fats ones taste the best, I'd imagine.
 
The GOP is good for neither. The democratic party's good for half, and the polar bears are going to be learning to swim either way.
 

Forum List

Back
Top