CDZ What did you all think of the 60 minutes Stormy interview?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I hope Trump had fun motorboating that set of boobs. I know I would.

It is hypocritical for Liberals to say anything about Trump's sex life after giving Bill Clinton a pass on being a sexual predator and having sex with a young intern in the White House and then lying about it. Then the Liberals voted for his wife who attacked the women that exposed Bill Clinton being a sexual predator.

Yeah, like I said, voting for Trump just proved there was no "moral" in the "minority".

Not that I care if Trump dies next to his mistress as long as he leads the country well. Just loving that pretenders can't make fun of B. Clinton anymore w/o making fun of Trump unless they are a hypocrite or cheerleader.


Newsflash - Billionaire gets some hot nookie!

There was no rape like with Bill Clinton.

There was getting blowjobs in the White House like with Bill Clinton.

There was no lying to a judge about it like there was with Bill Clinton.

There was no looking the American people in the eye and lying to them like it was with Bill Clinton.

There was no Hillary Clinton demeaning and attacking the women that exposed the sexual attacks.

I dunno man.

While it did not happen in the oval office it did happen and right about the time Melania gave birth right?

Really the lying to a judge remark, the looking Americans in the eye and the demeaning part all make it seem like you are making excuses for your team.

It is OK to say "Trump is a dirty fellow. Bill Clinton is a dirty fellow. All I care about is how their politics agree with mine".

Really it is ok. You don't need to ride the moral majority line and hold Trump up to standards he can't meet.

It is ok to admit that Christian values stuff does not really matter to you more than voting pragmatically.

I'm a cold hard fellow that way. You can be to!


All I am doing is pointing out the hypocrisy of the Moon Bats that are trying to make a big deal about a man getting a little fine nookie on the side.

It is not about morality. It is about mindless Trump hate. If it was about morality then the Moon Bats would have condemned Slick Willy and Crooked Hillary.
 
I hope Trump had fun motorboating that set of boobs. I know I would.

It is hypocritical for Liberals to say anything about Trump's sex life after giving Bill Clinton a pass on being a sexual predator and having sex with a young intern in the White House and then lying about it. Then the Liberals voted for his wife who attacked the women that exposed Bill Clinton being a sexual predator.

Yeah, like I said, voting for Trump just proved there was no "moral" in the "minority".

Not that I care if Trump dies next to his mistress as long as he leads the country well. Just loving that pretenders can't make fun of B. Clinton anymore w/o making fun of Trump unless they are a hypocrite or cheerleader.


Newsflash - Billionaire gets some hot nookie!

There was no rape like with Bill Clinton.

There was getting blowjobs in the White House like with Bill Clinton.

There was no lying to a judge about it like there was with Bill Clinton.

There was no looking the American people in the eye and lying to them like it was with Bill Clinton.

There was no Hillary Clinton demeaning and attacking the women that exposed the sexual attacks.

I dunno man.

While it did not happen in the oval office it did happen and right about the time Melania gave birth right?

Really the lying to a judge remark, the looking Americans in the eye and the demeaning part all make it seem like you are making excuses for your team.

It is OK to say "Trump is a dirty fellow. Bill Clinton is a dirty fellow. All I care about is how their politics agree with mine".

Really it is ok. You don't need to ride the moral majority line and hold Trump up to standards he can't meet.

It is ok to admit that Christian values stuff does not really matter to you more than voting pragmatically.

I'm a cold hard fellow that way. You can be to!


All I am doing is pointing out the hypocrisy of the Moon Bats that are trying to make a big deal about a man getting a little fine nookie on the side.

It is not about morality. It is about mindless Trump hate. If it was about morality then the Moon Bats would have condemned Slick Willy and Crooked Hillary.

That's fair. Note I have been making references to FDR, JFK, B. Clinton and George H all along. I am not trying to portray any level of moral superiority on the sexual front here. At best I'm looking at people saying "where is your outrage now? I've been hearing about Bill's sex life for 20 years!"
 
No matter what, after all the shit the libturds have been forced to admit to, never mind the mountains of sinister shit they deny doing, Trump looks like a celibate monk.

He kinda looks like an old playboy who had to pay off some porn star he slept with.

Again, FDR died with his mistress. I have no qualms and am rooted in reality here.

Just making notes to see who the party cheerleaders / hero worshipers are here so I can judge everything they say / type in the future.

I might point out that these things are often, and easily reversed engineered.
 
I hope Trump had fun motorboating that set of boobs. I know I would.

It is hypocritical for Liberals to say anything about Trump's sex life after giving Bill Clinton a pass on being a sexual predator and having sex with a young intern in the White House and then lying about it. Then the Liberals voted for his wife who attacked the women that exposed Bill Clinton being a sexual predator.

Yeah, like I said, voting for Trump just proved there was no "moral" in the "minority".

Not that I care if Trump dies next to his mistress as long as he leads the country well. Just loving that pretenders can't make fun of B. Clinton anymore w/o making fun of Trump unless they are a hypocrite or cheerleader.


Newsflash - Billionaire gets some hot nookie!

There was no rape like with Bill Clinton.

There was getting blowjobs in the White House like with Bill Clinton.

There was no lying to a judge about it like there was with Bill Clinton.

There was no looking the American people in the eye and lying to them like it was with Bill Clinton.

There was no Hillary Clinton demeaning and attacking the women that exposed the sexual attacks.

I dunno man.

While it did not happen in the oval office it did happen and right about the time Melania gave birth right?

Really the lying to a judge remark, the looking Americans in the eye and the demeaning part all make it seem like you are making excuses for your team.

It is OK to say "Trump is a dirty fellow. Bill Clinton is a dirty fellow. All I care about is how their politics agree with mine".

Really it is ok. You don't need to ride the moral majority line and hold Trump up to standards he can't meet.

It is ok to admit that Christian values stuff does not really matter to you more than voting pragmatically.

I'm a cold hard fellow that way. You can be to!


All I am doing is pointing out the hypocrisy of the Moon Bats that are trying to make a big deal about a man getting a little fine nookie on the side.

It is not about morality. It is about mindless Trump hate. If it was about morality then the Moon Bats would have condemned Slick Willy and Crooked Hillary.

And I would also point out, not use a Porn Actress who stated that, when her child was threatened, did nothing, as their Hero.
 
I hope Trump had fun motorboating that set of boobs. I know I would.

It is hypocritical for Liberals to say anything about Trump's sex life after giving Bill Clinton a pass on being a sexual predator and having sex with a young intern in the White House and then lying about it. Then the Liberals voted for his wife who attacked the women that exposed Bill Clinton being a sexual predator.

Yeah, like I said, voting for Trump just proved there was no "moral" in the "minority".

Not that I care if Trump dies next to his mistress as long as he leads the country well. Just loving that pretenders can't make fun of B. Clinton anymore w/o making fun of Trump unless they are a hypocrite or cheerleader.


Newsflash - Billionaire gets some hot nookie!

There was no rape like with Bill Clinton.

There was getting blowjobs in the White House like with Bill Clinton.

There was no lying to a judge about it like there was with Bill Clinton.

There was no looking the American people in the eye and lying to them like it was with Bill Clinton.

There was no Hillary Clinton demeaning and attacking the women that exposed the sexual attacks.

I dunno man.

While it did not happen in the oval office it did happen and right about the time Melania gave birth right?

Really the lying to a judge remark, the looking Americans in the eye and the demeaning part all make it seem like you are making excuses for your team.

It is OK to say "Trump is a dirty fellow. Bill Clinton is a dirty fellow. All I care about is how their politics agree with mine".

Really it is ok. You don't need to ride the moral majority line and hold Trump up to standards he can't meet.

It is ok to admit that Christian values stuff does not really matter to you more than voting pragmatically.

I'm a cold hard fellow that way. You can be to!


All I am doing is pointing out the hypocrisy of the Moon Bats that are trying to make a big deal about a man getting a little fine nookie on the side.

It is not about morality. It is about mindless Trump hate. If it was about morality then the Moon Bats would have condemned Slick Willy and Crooked Hillary.

That's fair. Note I have been making references to FDR, JFK, B. Clinton and George H all along. I am not trying to portray any level of moral superiority on the sexual front here. At best I'm looking at people saying "where is your outrage now? I've been hearing about Bill's sex life for 20 years!"


I understand.

The moral outrage is not based upon any sense of morality but mostly a political agenda.

If there is a difference it is the fact that Clinton was a sexual predator. That is a whole different ball game that should have produced outrage by all Americans.

JFK (like Trump) liked his nookie but it was all consensual as far as we know. You can over look that. After all guys like to screw pretty girls. You can't over look the fact that Bill Clinton was accused by many women of unwanted sexual advances and that his wife, who many Liberals voted for for President, attacked the women that exposed Bill being a scumbag.
 
Some background. Personally I think it would be more surprising for a fella like Trump to have NOT played around than to have. FDR died with his mistress alongside if I recall and Bill Clinton, well, he would have been fun to party with I suppose. So the only real point of this for me is to use it as a yardstick/check for hypocrisy in folks who ridicule B. Clinton, JFK or whoever for their promiscuity.

That said, did you all find "Stormy" to appear credible in the interview? It is the least goofy she has ever seemed to me. Maybe the background skepticism I brought in from the Kimmel interview where I found her to be goofy bled over?

I was waiting for her to say, "I can describe his genitals to you and an independent investigator can verify".

Threatening her is the only thing which would bother me. That relies totally on how much I believe Stormy. Remembering the gals in my life she reminds me of, I'm not ready to hang someone on her word.

The facts of the payoff lend more credence to her claim than she does. Not that it is high treason but the details given of the $130,000 payoff seem to warrant the slap on the wrist rich people get in these cases.

Just wondering what the scuttlebut is on this one.
I am thinking a parody/spoof, with alternate foreign policy scenarios.
 
Who would watch that garbage?

-Geaux

I watched it. I think it was funny watching it actually. Stormy has brought much laughter to my life:

Here is what the left believes is a credible witness:

An actress who has performed sex acts for money hundreds, if not thousands of times for money.
A Stripper
A Porn Film Producer
A Porn Film Director
A woman who has slept with more Men (and likely women, and who knows how many combinations of both) then most people have shaken hands with in a life time.
A women who publicly declared it didn't happen, then back that up a second time, now says it did.

And then theres her attorney who doesn't care if the evidence will stand up in court (what attorney says that!), its what the public thinks that matters.

If this thing is anything, it's a poorly written comedy.
Those are the very women Trump has chosen to hang out with throughout his life

He likes arm candy and thinks others are impressed with the women he pays for

Of course you would believe a women that, you yourself has characterized has having low moral standards. Then she actually backs up your assertion by. 1.) going back on her written statement saying that she never had sex with Donald Trump, and 2.) Claiming she felt obligated to have sex with a man she did not want to have sex with because he bought her dinner and used his bathroom.

Just too funny and says more about you then you might think.
Creepy Donnie was trying to bribe her with an offer to appear on Celebrity Apprentice

So you would sleep with someone you don't find attractive for a short term gig?

As I said earlier, this is not someone you want on the stand and says sooooooo much more about you then you might think.

Also, she not only claim she did what you said, when her child was threatened, she did NOTHING, not even tell the cops. Not only a leader in the Porn Industry, but a really bad Mother as well!

You can't make this stuff up!
I think Stormy Daniels would do better on the stand than Creepy Donnie

Not going to the police means the threat was effective
 
Some background. Personally I think it would be more surprising for a fella like Trump to have NOT played around than to have. FDR died with his mistress alongside if I recall and Bill Clinton, well, he would have been fun to party with I suppose. So the only real point of this for me is to use it as a yardstick/check for hypocrisy in folks who ridicule B. Clinton, JFK or whoever for their promiscuity.

That said, did you all find "Stormy" to appear credible in the interview? It is the least goofy she has ever seemed to me. Maybe the background skepticism I brought in from the Kimmel interview where I found her to be goofy bled over?

I was waiting for her to say, "I can describe his genitals to you and an independent investigator can verify".

Threatening her is the only thing which would bother me. That relies totally on how much I believe Stormy. Remembering the gals in my life she reminds me of, I'm not ready to hang someone on her word.

The facts of the payoff lend more credence to her claim than she does. Not that it is high treason but the details given of the $130,000 payoff seem to warrant the slap on the wrist rich people get in these cases.

Just wondering what the scuttlebut is on this one.
The problem with this version of the story is she claims on Facebook that she never slept with Trump. She was pretty clear about it.
 
Some background. Personally I think it would be more surprising for a fella like Trump to have NOT played around than to have. FDR died with his mistress alongside if I recall and Bill Clinton, well, he would have been fun to party with I suppose. So the only real point of this for me is to use it as a yardstick/check for hypocrisy in folks who ridicule B. Clinton, JFK or whoever for their promiscuity.

That said, did you all find "Stormy" to appear credible in the interview? It is the least goofy she has ever seemed to me. Maybe the background skepticism I brought in from the Kimmel interview where I found her to be goofy bled over?

I was waiting for her to say, "I can describe his genitals to you and an independent investigator can verify".

Threatening her is the only thing which would bother me. That relies totally on how much I believe Stormy. Remembering the gals in my life she reminds me of, I'm not ready to hang someone on her word.

The facts of the payoff lend more credence to her claim than she does. Not that it is high treason but the details given of the $130,000 payoff seem to warrant the slap on the wrist rich people get in these cases.

Just wondering what the scuttlebut is on this one.
The problem with this version of the story is she claims on Facebook that she never slept with Trump. She was pretty clear about it.
As Trump paid her to do

And threatened her life
 
Some background. Personally I think it would be more surprising for a fella like Trump to have NOT played around than to have. FDR died with his mistress alongside if I recall and Bill Clinton, well, he would have been fun to party with I suppose. So the only real point of this for me is to use it as a yardstick/check for hypocrisy in folks who ridicule B. Clinton, JFK or whoever for their promiscuity.

That said, did you all find "Stormy" to appear credible in the interview? It is the least goofy she has ever seemed to me. Maybe the background skepticism I brought in from the Kimmel interview where I found her to be goofy bled over?

I was waiting for her to say, "I can describe his genitals to you and an independent investigator can verify".

Threatening her is the only thing which would bother me. That relies totally on how much I believe Stormy. Remembering the gals in my life she reminds me of, I'm not ready to hang someone on her word.

The facts of the payoff lend more credence to her claim than she does. Not that it is high treason but the details given of the $130,000 payoff seem to warrant the slap on the wrist rich people get in these cases.

Just wondering what the scuttlebut is on this one.

Who would watch that garbage?

-Geaux
That question, in a general sense, is easily answered:
Using the data above, one sees that the quantity of people who watched the interview corresponds to:
  • ~33.6% of the quantity of people who voted for Donald Trump
  • ~16.2% of the quantity of people who in the 2016 election voted for a POTUS candidate.
 
I watched it. I think it was funny watching it actually. Stormy has brought much laughter to my life:

Here is what the left believes is a credible witness:

An actress who has performed sex acts for money hundreds, if not thousands of times for money.
A Stripper
A Porn Film Producer
A Porn Film Director
A woman who has slept with more Men (and likely women, and who knows how many combinations of both) then most people have shaken hands with in a life time.
A women who publicly declared it didn't happen, then back that up a second time, now says it did.

And then theres her attorney who doesn't care if the evidence will stand up in court (what attorney says that!), its what the public thinks that matters.

If this thing is anything, it's a poorly written comedy.
Those are the very women Trump has chosen to hang out with throughout his life

He likes arm candy and thinks others are impressed with the women he pays for

Of course you would believe a women that, you yourself has characterized has having low moral standards. Then she actually backs up your assertion by. 1.) going back on her written statement saying that she never had sex with Donald Trump, and 2.) Claiming she felt obligated to have sex with a man she did not want to have sex with because he bought her dinner and used his bathroom.

Just too funny and says more about you then you might think.
Creepy Donnie was trying to bribe her with an offer to appear on Celebrity Apprentice

So you would sleep with someone you don't find attractive for a short term gig?

As I said earlier, this is not someone you want on the stand and says sooooooo much more about you then you might think.

Also, she not only claim she did what you said, when her child was threatened, she did NOTHING, not even tell the cops. Not only a leader in the Porn Industry, but a really bad Mother as well!

You can't make this stuff up!
I think Stormy Daniels would do better on the stand than Creepy Donnie

Not going to the police means the threat was effective

Happy you think so, but then a Porn Star, who's slept with more men then there were lice in a WWI battle trench and neglected to tell law enforcement of a threat against her child, is YOUR IDEA OF A CREDIBLE WITNESS. To normal people.............


Not so much.
 
Those are the very women Trump has chosen to hang out with throughout his life

He likes arm candy and thinks others are impressed with the women he pays for

Of course you would believe a women that, you yourself has characterized has having low moral standards. Then she actually backs up your assertion by. 1.) going back on her written statement saying that she never had sex with Donald Trump, and 2.) Claiming she felt obligated to have sex with a man she did not want to have sex with because he bought her dinner and used his bathroom.

Just too funny and says more about you then you might think.
Creepy Donnie was trying to bribe her with an offer to appear on Celebrity Apprentice

So you would sleep with someone you don't find attractive for a short term gig?

As I said earlier, this is not someone you want on the stand and says sooooooo much more about you then you might think.

Also, she not only claim she did what you said, when her child was threatened, she did NOTHING, not even tell the cops. Not only a leader in the Porn Industry, but a really bad Mother as well!

You can't make this stuff up!
I think Stormy Daniels would do better on the stand than Creepy Donnie

Not going to the police means the threat was effective

Happy you think so, but then a Porn Star, who's slept with more men then there were lice in a WWI battle trench and neglected to tell law enforcement of a threat against her child, is YOUR IDEA OF A CREDIBLE WITNESS. To normal people.............


Not so much.
Compared to Lying Donnie, she is the pope when it comes to credibility
 
Of course you would believe a women that, you yourself has characterized has having low moral standards. Then she actually backs up your assertion by. 1.) going back on her written statement saying that she never had sex with Donald Trump, and 2.) Claiming she felt obligated to have sex with a man she did not want to have sex with because he bought her dinner and used his bathroom.

Just too funny and says more about you then you might think.
Creepy Donnie was trying to bribe her with an offer to appear on Celebrity Apprentice

So you would sleep with someone you don't find attractive for a short term gig?

As I said earlier, this is not someone you want on the stand and says sooooooo much more about you then you might think.

Also, she not only claim she did what you said, when her child was threatened, she did NOTHING, not even tell the cops. Not only a leader in the Porn Industry, but a really bad Mother as well!

You can't make this stuff up!
I think Stormy Daniels would do better on the stand than Creepy Donnie

Not going to the police means the threat was effective

Happy you think so, but then a Porn Star, who's slept with more men then there were lice in a WWI battle trench and neglected to tell law enforcement of a threat against her child, is YOUR IDEA OF A CREDIBLE WITNESS. To normal people.............


Not so much.
Compared to Lying Donnie, she is the pope when it comes to credibility

And away goes your credibility! I think “Donnie” would have acted if his child was threatened.
 
Creepy Donnie was trying to bribe her with an offer to appear on Celebrity Apprentice

So you would sleep with someone you don't find attractive for a short term gig?

As I said earlier, this is not someone you want on the stand and says sooooooo much more about you then you might think.

Also, she not only claim she did what you said, when her child was threatened, she did NOTHING, not even tell the cops. Not only a leader in the Porn Industry, but a really bad Mother as well!

You can't make this stuff up!
I think Stormy Daniels would do better on the stand than Creepy Donnie

Not going to the police means the threat was effective

Happy you think so, but then a Porn Star, who's slept with more men then there were lice in a WWI battle trench and neglected to tell law enforcement of a threat against her child, is YOUR IDEA OF A CREDIBLE WITNESS. To normal people.............


Not so much.
Compared to Lying Donnie, she is the pope when it comes to credibility

And away goes your credibility! I think “Donnie” would have acted if his child was threatened.
Stormy does not have the resources that Lying Donnie does

She realizes what a thug like Trump can do...both illegally and legally
 
Maybe the biggest hit on her credibility was when she stated that a stranger threatened her child AND SHE DIDN'T REPORT IT TO THE POLICE!

Yep, this is someone you REALLY WANT ON THE STAND!

again, you can't make this stuff up folks!

DIDN'T REPORT IT TO THE POLICE???!!??? OH MY GOD.
hair-fire.gif

.
You think "reporting to the police" legitimizes something? :lmao:

I got a note on my car warning that "people around here have guns" from some oaf who thought I had honked at them. Didn't report to police.

Another time I got assaulted and spent the night getting stitched back together in hospital, getting my arm put in a sling for months. I didn't report that to the police either.

I thought y'all gun nuts were all about self-protection because the police take too long.
Doesn't take long to pull a 180 I see.
 
Those are the very women Trump has chosen to hang out with throughout his life

He likes arm candy and thinks others are impressed with the women he pays for

Of course you would believe a women that, you yourself has characterized has having low moral standards. Then she actually backs up your assertion by. 1.) going back on her written statement saying that she never had sex with Donald Trump, and 2.) Claiming she felt obligated to have sex with a man she did not want to have sex with because he bought her dinner and used his bathroom.

Just too funny and says more about you then you might think.
Creepy Donnie was trying to bribe her with an offer to appear on Celebrity Apprentice

So you would sleep with someone you don't find attractive for a short term gig?

As I said earlier, this is not someone you want on the stand and says sooooooo much more about you then you might think.

Also, she not only claim she did what you said, when her child was threatened, she did NOTHING, not even tell the cops. Not only a leader in the Porn Industry, but a really bad Mother as well!

You can't make this stuff up!
I think Stormy Daniels would do better on the stand than Creepy Donnie

Not going to the police means the threat was effective

Happy you think so, but then a Porn Star, who's slept with more men then there were lice in a WWI battle trench and neglected to tell law enforcement of a threat against her child, is YOUR IDEA OF A CREDIBLE WITNESS. To normal people.............


Not so much.

Number one, check me on this but I'm pretty sure that nobody featured in a porn flick is "sleeping".

Number two, your source for the number of males the subject has, as you say, "slept" with is where?

And number three, whatever that number is ---- exactly how does it affect her, or anyone's credibility?


Bonus question three (a) --- on the same basis, how shall we rank Orange Rumpy's "credibility"? Hm?
 
Of course you would believe a women that, you yourself has characterized has having low moral standards. Then she actually backs up your assertion by. 1.) going back on her written statement saying that she never had sex with Donald Trump, and 2.) Claiming she felt obligated to have sex with a man she did not want to have sex with because he bought her dinner and used his bathroom.

Just too funny and says more about you then you might think.
Creepy Donnie was trying to bribe her with an offer to appear on Celebrity Apprentice

So you would sleep with someone you don't find attractive for a short term gig?

As I said earlier, this is not someone you want on the stand and says sooooooo much more about you then you might think.

Also, she not only claim she did what you said, when her child was threatened, she did NOTHING, not even tell the cops. Not only a leader in the Porn Industry, but a really bad Mother as well!

You can't make this stuff up!
I think Stormy Daniels would do better on the stand than Creepy Donnie

Not going to the police means the threat was effective

Happy you think so, but then a Porn Star, who's slept with more men then there were lice in a WWI battle trench and neglected to tell law enforcement of a threat against her child, is YOUR IDEA OF A CREDIBLE WITNESS. To normal people.............


Not so much.

Number one, check me on this but I'm pretty sure that nobody featured in a porn flick is "sleeping".

Number two, your source for the number of males the subject has, as you say, "slept" with is where?

And number three, whatever that number is ---- exactly how does it affect her, or anyone's credibility?


Bonus question three (a) --- on the same basis, how shall we rank Orange Rumpy's "credibility"? Hm?

LOL, you have lost your mind. Reread my post and then check your little mind. Credible people with good moral compasses do not have sex with others FOR MONEY (God knows I've turned down bucket loads).

You lefty loons crack me up!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top