CDZ What did you all think of the 60 minutes Stormy interview?

[pismoe]

course i don't know if he did , if he did he can afford the best Doctors if the wife gets sick RWinger !!

 

[Pop23]

From what little I heard about it on the radio this morning I'm glad I ignored it.

I thought of watching it, but figured I'd wait an hour, and read the highlights in the news. Let me give you the gist of it. Trump cheated on his wife. I know. It's shocking, right?

Nobody gives a shit about that. It's what went down in October of 2016 that's relevant.

Did she go into any detail about that?

I can't remember what she said about the hush money, but nothing is going to become of that either way. Trump isn't a dummy. His name isn't on the NDA, and Cohen claims he made the payment out of his own pocket. Trump is completely insulated from the situation.

Actually he's completely painted into a corner. Into two corners you might say.

In this corner we have Rump suing or threatening to sue over an NDA that, as you just noted, doesn't even have his name on it. That means he has no standing to sue.

And in that corner you have him claiming that the fling never happened, which if that were true, would completely remove any reason for a payoff to keep quiet about some event that never happened. And if it did happen, triggering the payoff, then he admits he's a liar. Which he also does by suing under the NDA.

It's a veritable pretzel factory.

And in that corner you have him claiming that the fling never happened, which if that were true, would completely remove any reason for a payoff to keep quiet about some event that never happened.

Not always true. Many times these are done to simply stop an annoying false claim. And the question remains. If she signed it, plus several other documents saying it never happened, then what is her credibility now?

I think her attorney showed his hand when he stated publicly that (and I am paraphrasing) he did not care if the evidence would stand up in court, what matters is what the public thinks. Appears he may have been bluffing that any real evidence actually does exist.

 

[Pop23]

i didn't see it , i wouldn't waste my time . But as regards SHE the slut . A person can't avoid seeing on the tv what she looks like and she ain't any big deal as far as looks go , imo .

Can you believe Fat Donnie had sex with that slut without wearing a condom and then went home to his wife?

You realize which zone you posted in, right?

 

[Pete7469]

No matter what, after all the shit the libturds have been forced to admit to, never mind the mountains of sinister shit they deny doing, Trump looks like a celibate monk.

 

[Geaux4it]

Some background. Personally I think it would be more surprising for a fella like Trump to have NOT played around than to have. FDR died with his mistress alongside if I recall and Bill Clinton, well, he would have been fun to party with I suppose. So the only real point of this for me is to use it as a yardstick/check for hypocrisy in folks who ridicule B. Clinton, JFK or whoever for their promiscuity.

That said, did you all find "Stormy" to appear credible in the interview? It is the least goofy she has ever seemed to me. Maybe the background skepticism I brought in from the Kimmel interview where I found her to be goofy bled over?

I was waiting for her to say, "I can describe his genitals to you and an independent investigator can verify".

Threatening her is the only thing which would bother me. That relies totally on how much I believe Stormy. Remembering the gals in my life she reminds me of, I'm not ready to hang someone on her word.

The facts of the payoff lend more credence to her claim than she does. Not that it is high treason but the details given of the $130,000 payoff seem to warrant the slap on the wrist rich people get in these cases.

Just wondering what the scuttlebut is on this one.

Who would watch that garbage?

-Geaux

 

[rightwinger]

course i don't know if he did , if he did he can afford the best Doctors if the wife gets sick RWinger !!

I’m sure that is consoling to Melania

 

[rightwinger]

i didn't see it , i wouldn't waste my time . But as regards SHE the slut . A person can't avoid seeing on the tv what she looks like and she ain't any big deal as far as looks go , imo .

Can you believe Fat Donnie had sex with that slut without wearing a condom and then went home to his wife?

You realize which zone you posted in, right?

Replying to what was posted to me

 

[pismoe]

course i don't know if he did , if he did he can afford the best Doctors if the wife gets sick RWinger !!

I’m sure that is consoling to Melania

---------------------------------- good Doctor is nothing to sneer at , ask 'juan mcstain' RWinger !!

 

[Pop23]

Some background. Personally I think it would be more surprising for a fella like Trump to have NOT played around than to have. FDR died with his mistress alongside if I recall and Bill Clinton, well, he would have been fun to party with I suppose. So the only real point of this for me is to use it as a yardstick/check for hypocrisy in folks who ridicule B. Clinton, JFK or whoever for their promiscuity.

That said, did you all find "Stormy" to appear credible in the interview? It is the least goofy she has ever seemed to me. Maybe the background skepticism I brought in from the Kimmel interview where I found her to be goofy bled over?

I was waiting for her to say, "I can describe his genitals to you and an independent investigator can verify".

Threatening her is the only thing which would bother me. That relies totally on how much I believe Stormy. Remembering the gals in my life she reminds me of, I'm not ready to hang someone on her word.

The facts of the payoff lend more credence to her claim than she does. Not that it is high treason but the details given of the $130,000 payoff seem to warrant the slap on the wrist rich people get in these cases.

Just wondering what the scuttlebut is on this one.

Who would watch that garbage?

-Geaux

I watched it. I think it was funny watching it actually. Stormy has brought much laughter to my life:

Here is what the left believes is a credible witness:

An actress who has performed sex acts for money hundreds, if not thousands of times.
A Stripper
A Porn Film Producer
A Porn Film Director
A woman who has slept with more Men (and likely women, and who knows how many combinations of both) then most people have shaken hands with in a life time.
A women who publicly declared it didn't happen, then back that up a second time, now says it did.

And then theres her attorney who doesn't care if the evidence will stand up in court (what attorney says that!), its what the public thinks that matters.

If this thing is anything, it's a poorly written comedy.

 

[rightwinger]

Some background. Personally I think it would be more surprising for a fella like Trump to have NOT played around than to have. FDR died with his mistress alongside if I recall and Bill Clinton, well, he would have been fun to party with I suppose. So the only real point of this for me is to use it as a yardstick/check for hypocrisy in folks who ridicule B. Clinton, JFK or whoever for their promiscuity.

That said, did you all find "Stormy" to appear credible in the interview? It is the least goofy she has ever seemed to me. Maybe the background skepticism I brought in from the Kimmel interview where I found her to be goofy bled over?

I was waiting for her to say, "I can describe his genitals to you and an independent investigator can verify".

Threatening her is the only thing which would bother me. That relies totally on how much I believe Stormy. Remembering the gals in my life she reminds me of, I'm not ready to hang someone on her word.

The facts of the payoff lend more credence to her claim than she does. Not that it is high treason but the details given of the $130,000 payoff seem to warrant the slap on the wrist rich people get in these cases.

Just wondering what the scuttlebut is on this one.

Who would watch that garbage?

-Geaux

I watched it. I think it was funny watching it actually. Stormy has brought much laughter to my life:

Here is what the left believes is a credible witness:

An actress who has performed sex acts for money hundreds, if not thousands of times for money.
A Stripper
A Porn Film Producer
A Porn Film Director
A woman who has slept with more Men (and likely women, and who knows how many combinations of both) then most people have shaken hands with in a life time.
A women who publicly declared it didn't happen, then back that up a second time, now says it did.

And then theres her attorney who doesn't care if the evidence will stand up in court (what attorney says that!), its what the public thinks that matters.

If this thing is anything, it's a poorly written comedy.

Those are the very women Trump has chosen to hang out with throughout his life

He likes arm candy and thinks others are impressed with the women he pays for

 

[Pop23]

Some background. Personally I think it would be more surprising for a fella like Trump to have NOT played around than to have. FDR died with his mistress alongside if I recall and Bill Clinton, well, he would have been fun to party with I suppose. So the only real point of this for me is to use it as a yardstick/check for hypocrisy in folks who ridicule B. Clinton, JFK or whoever for their promiscuity.

That said, did you all find "Stormy" to appear credible in the interview? It is the least goofy she has ever seemed to me. Maybe the background skepticism I brought in from the Kimmel interview where I found her to be goofy bled over?

I was waiting for her to say, "I can describe his genitals to you and an independent investigator can verify".

Threatening her is the only thing which would bother me. That relies totally on how much I believe Stormy. Remembering the gals in my life she reminds me of, I'm not ready to hang someone on her word.

The facts of the payoff lend more credence to her claim than she does. Not that it is high treason but the details given of the $130,000 payoff seem to warrant the slap on the wrist rich people get in these cases.

Just wondering what the scuttlebut is on this one.

Who would watch that garbage?

-Geaux

I watched it. I think it was funny watching it actually. Stormy has brought much laughter to my life:

Here is what the left believes is a credible witness:

An actress who has performed sex acts for money hundreds, if not thousands of times for money.
A Stripper
A Porn Film Producer
A Porn Film Director
A woman who has slept with more Men (and likely women, and who knows how many combinations of both) then most people have shaken hands with in a life time.
A women who publicly declared it didn't happen, then back that up a second time, now says it did.

And then theres her attorney who doesn't care if the evidence will stand up in court (what attorney says that!), its what the public thinks that matters.

If this thing is anything, it's a poorly written comedy.

Those are the very women Trump has chosen to hang out with throughout his life

He likes arm candy and thinks others are impressed with the women he pays for

Of course you would believe a women that, you yourself has characterized has having low moral standards. Then she actually backs up your assertion by. 1.) going back on her written statement saying that she never had sex with Donald Trump, and 2.) Claiming she felt obligated to have sex with a man she did not want to have sex with because he bought her dinner and used his bathroom.

Just too funny and says more about you then you might think.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

From what little I heard about it on the radio this morning I'm glad I ignored it.

I thought of watching it, but figured I'd wait an hour, and read the highlights in the news. Let me give you the gist of it. Trump cheated on his wife. I know. It's shocking, right?

Nobody gives a shit about that. It's what went down in October of 2016 that's relevant.

Did she go into any detail about that?

I can't remember what she said about the hush money, but nothing is going to become of that either way. Trump isn't a dummy. His name isn't on the NDA, and Cohen claims he made the payment out of his own pocket. Trump is completely insulated from the situation.

Actually he's completely painted into a corner. Into two corners you might say.

In this corner we have Rump suing or threatening to sue over an NDA that, as you just noted, doesn't even have his name on it. That means he has no standing to sue.

And in that corner you have him claiming that the fling never happened, which if that were true, would completely remove any reason for a payoff to keep quiet about some event that never happened. And if it did happen, triggering the payoff, then he admits he's a liar. Which he also does by suing under the NDA.

It's a veritable pretzel factory.

And in that corner you have him claiming that the fling never happened, which if that were true, would completely remove any reason for a payoff to keep quiet about some event that never happened.

Not always true. Many times these are done to simply stop an annoying false claim. And the question remains. If she signed it, plus several other documents saying it never happened, then what is her credibility now?

I think her attorney showed his hand when he stated publicly that (and I am paraphrasing) he did not care if the evidence would stand up in court, what matters is what the public thinks. Appears he may have been bluffing that any real evidence actually does exist.

It's an obvious smear job by the Democrats/Press

 

[Pop23]

Maybe the biggest hit on her credibility was when she stated that a stranger threatened her child AND SHE DIDN'T REPORT IT TO THE POLICE!

Yep, this is someone you REALLY WANT ON THE STAND!

again, you can't make this stuff up folks!

 

[rightwinger]

Some background. Personally I think it would be more surprising for a fella like Trump to have NOT played around than to have. FDR died with his mistress alongside if I recall and Bill Clinton, well, he would have been fun to party with I suppose. So the only real point of this for me is to use it as a yardstick/check for hypocrisy in folks who ridicule B. Clinton, JFK or whoever for their promiscuity.

That said, did you all find "Stormy" to appear credible in the interview? It is the least goofy she has ever seemed to me. Maybe the background skepticism I brought in from the Kimmel interview where I found her to be goofy bled over?

I was waiting for her to say, "I can describe his genitals to you and an independent investigator can verify".

Threatening her is the only thing which would bother me. That relies totally on how much I believe Stormy. Remembering the gals in my life she reminds me of, I'm not ready to hang someone on her word.

The facts of the payoff lend more credence to her claim than she does. Not that it is high treason but the details given of the $130,000 payoff seem to warrant the slap on the wrist rich people get in these cases.

Just wondering what the scuttlebut is on this one.

Who would watch that garbage?

-Geaux

I watched it. I think it was funny watching it actually. Stormy has brought much laughter to my life:

Here is what the left believes is a credible witness:

An actress who has performed sex acts for money hundreds, if not thousands of times for money.
A Stripper
A Porn Film Producer
A Porn Film Director
A woman who has slept with more Men (and likely women, and who knows how many combinations of both) then most people have shaken hands with in a life time.
A women who publicly declared it didn't happen, then back that up a second time, now says it did.

And then theres her attorney who doesn't care if the evidence will stand up in court (what attorney says that!), its what the public thinks that matters.

If this thing is anything, it's a poorly written comedy.

Those are the very women Trump has chosen to hang out with throughout his life

He likes arm candy and thinks others are impressed with the women he pays for

Of course you would believe a women that, you yourself has characterized has having low moral standards. Then she actually backs up your assertion by. 1.) going back on her written statement saying that she never had sex with Donald Trump, and 2.) Claiming she felt obligated to have sex with a man she did not want to have sex with because he bought her dinner and used his bathroom.

Just too funny and says more about you then you might think.

Creepy Donnie was trying to bribe her with an offer to appear on Celebrity Apprentice

 

[Pop23]

Some background. Personally I think it would be more surprising for a fella like Trump to have NOT played around than to have. FDR died with his mistress alongside if I recall and Bill Clinton, well, he would have been fun to party with I suppose. So the only real point of this for me is to use it as a yardstick/check for hypocrisy in folks who ridicule B. Clinton, JFK or whoever for their promiscuity.

That said, did you all find "Stormy" to appear credible in the interview? It is the least goofy she has ever seemed to me. Maybe the background skepticism I brought in from the Kimmel interview where I found her to be goofy bled over?

I was waiting for her to say, "I can describe his genitals to you and an independent investigator can verify".

Threatening her is the only thing which would bother me. That relies totally on how much I believe Stormy. Remembering the gals in my life she reminds me of, I'm not ready to hang someone on her word.

The facts of the payoff lend more credence to her claim than she does. Not that it is high treason but the details given of the $130,000 payoff seem to warrant the slap on the wrist rich people get in these cases.

Just wondering what the scuttlebut is on this one.

Who would watch that garbage?

-Geaux

I watched it. I think it was funny watching it actually. Stormy has brought much laughter to my life:

Here is what the left believes is a credible witness:

An actress who has performed sex acts for money hundreds, if not thousands of times for money.
A Stripper
A Porn Film Producer
A Porn Film Director
A woman who has slept with more Men (and likely women, and who knows how many combinations of both) then most people have shaken hands with in a life time.
A women who publicly declared it didn't happen, then back that up a second time, now says it did.

And then theres her attorney who doesn't care if the evidence will stand up in court (what attorney says that!), its what the public thinks that matters.

If this thing is anything, it's a poorly written comedy.

Those are the very women Trump has chosen to hang out with throughout his life

He likes arm candy and thinks others are impressed with the women he pays for

Of course you would believe a women that, you yourself has characterized has having low moral standards. Then she actually backs up your assertion by. 1.) going back on her written statement saying that she never had sex with Donald Trump, and 2.) Claiming she felt obligated to have sex with a man she did not want to have sex with because he bought her dinner and used his bathroom.

Just too funny and says more about you then you might think.

Creepy Donnie was trying to bribe her with an offer to appear on Celebrity Apprentice

So you would sleep with someone you don't find attractive for a short term gig?

As I said earlier, this is not someone you want on the stand and says sooooooo much more about you then you might think.

Also, she not only claim she did what you said, when her child was threatened, she did NOTHING, not even tell the cops. Not only a leader in the Porn Industry, but a really bad Mother as well!

You can't make this stuff up!

 

[Toronado3800]

I hope Trump had fun motorboating that set of boobs. I know I would.

It is hypocritical for Liberals to say anything about Trump's sex life after giving Bill Clinton a pass on being a sexual predator and having sex with a young intern in the White House and then lying about it. Then the Liberals voted for his wife who attacked the women that exposed Bill Clinton being a sexual predator.

Yeah, like I said, voting for Trump just proved there was no "moral" in the "minority".

Not that I care if Trump dies next to his mistress as long as he leads the country well. Just loving that pretenders can't make fun of B. Clinton anymore w/o making fun of Trump unless they are a hypocrite or cheerleader.

Newsflash - Billionaire gets some hot nookie!

There was no rape like with Bill Clinton.

There was getting blowjobs in the White House like with Bill Clinton.

There was no lying to a judge about it like there was with Bill Clinton.

There was no looking the American people in the eye and lying to them like it was with Bill Clinton.

There was no Hillary Clinton demeaning and attacking the women that exposed the sexual attacks.

I dunno man.

While it did not happen in the oval office it did happen and right about the time Melania gave birth right?

Really the lying to a judge remark, the looking Americans in the eye and the demeaning part all make it seem like you are making excuses for your team.

It is OK to say "Trump is a dirty fellow. Bill Clinton is a dirty fellow. All I care about is how their politics agree with mine".

Really it is ok. You don't need to ride the moral majority line and hold Trump up to standards he can't meet.

It is ok to admit that Christian values stuff does not really matter to you more than voting pragmatically.

I'm a cold hard fellow that way. You can be to!

 

[Toronado3800]

i didn't see it , i wouldn't waste my time . But as regards SHE the slut . A person can't avoid seeing on the tv what she looks like and she ain't any big deal as far as looks go , imo .

Are you conducting the personal assaults on a woman's character Flash was demeaning Hillary for?

Better watch out, he is gonna call you out (or look like a cheerleader / hypocrite).

 

[Toronado3800]

No matter what, after all the shit the libturds have been forced to admit to, never mind the mountains of sinister shit they deny doing, Trump looks like a celibate monk.

He kinda looks like an old playboy who had to pay off some porn star he slept with.

Again, FDR died with his mistress. I have no qualms and am rooted in reality here.

Just making notes to see who the party cheerleaders / hero worshipers are here so I can judge everything they say / type in the future.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

The Press is trying to make it a big issue to hurt Trump

 

[Toronado3800]

The Press is trying to make it a big issue to hurt Trump

That might be. It is the same impression I got in the 90's. Is it the same impression you got in the 90's about the fixation on the President's sex life?