Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Tell me how many Rabbis didn't send the letter.They became Post WWII FDR Americans and left their religion behind."screeching for Whitey's demise"I didn't say that I'm neutral towards Jews, nor did I say I hate Jews.
I just don't like Jews as a collective, something about screeching for Whitey's demise, and shrieking about Poland doing the Holocaust.
Once again...Don't drink and post.
So, why do many Jews support Liberal multiculturalism?
I have often pointed out to my (thankfully very few) Observant Liberal Jews that they cannot defend their positions based on Judaism.
They can't answer because I'm right.
What about the 1,500 Jewish Rabbis who sent a letter to Trump demanding he accept Islamic refugees?
Are those Jews who left behind their religion?
Unlike Catholicism, a Rabbi is someone who studied for his Title; he is not suddenly an emissary of God.
There are plenty of Rabbis who suffer from Liberalism and say really stupid things that they can't defend.
I can't stand it when emotionally disturbed people use religion to rationalize their nonsense.
There's way more Rabbis than that in the US.Tell me how many Rabbis didn't send the letter.They became Post WWII FDR Americans and left their religion behind."screeching for Whitey's demise"
Once again...Don't drink and post.
So, why do many Jews support Liberal multiculturalism?
I have often pointed out to my (thankfully very few) Observant Liberal Jews that they cannot defend their positions based on Judaism.
They can't answer because I'm right.
What about the 1,500 Jewish Rabbis who sent a letter to Trump demanding he accept Islamic refugees?
Are those Jews who left behind their religion?
Unlike Catholicism, a Rabbi is someone who studied for his Title; he is not suddenly an emissary of God.
There are plenty of Rabbis who suffer from Liberalism and say really stupid things that they can't defend.
I can't stand it when emotionally disturbed people use religion to rationalize their nonsense.
From my understanding there's about 4,000 - 5,000 Jewish Rabbis in the U.S.A, so still there's a good deal of them urging Trump to accept Islamic Refugees.
The big question is how many of them would write a letter congratulating Trump?
There's way more Rabbis than that in the US.Tell me how many Rabbis didn't send the letter.They became Post WWII FDR Americans and left their religion behind.So, why do many Jews support Liberal multiculturalism?
I have often pointed out to my (thankfully very few) Observant Liberal Jews that they cannot defend their positions based on Judaism.
They can't answer because I'm right.
What about the 1,500 Jewish Rabbis who sent a letter to Trump demanding he accept Islamic refugees?
Are those Jews who left behind their religion?
Unlike Catholicism, a Rabbi is someone who studied for his Title; he is not suddenly an emissary of God.
There are plenty of Rabbis who suffer from Liberalism and say really stupid things that they can't defend.
I can't stand it when emotionally disturbed people use religion to rationalize their nonsense.
From my understanding there's about 4,000 - 5,000 Jewish Rabbis in the U.S.A, so still there's a good deal of them urging Trump to accept Islamic Refugees.
The big question is how many of them would write a letter congratulating Trump?
My Town alone has a few hundred.
Not every Rabbi has a Congregation.
You must love the Pope.
Saul of Tarsus was not educated and never claimed to be so; he claimed to be a zealot.
Presuming you believe in The New Testament.
"St. Paul"'s Epistles are childish at best....please be specific about his "brilliant" verses.
There's way more Rabbis than that in the US.Tell me how many Rabbis didn't send the letter.They became Post WWII FDR Americans and left their religion behind.
I have often pointed out to my (thankfully very few) Observant Liberal Jews that they cannot defend their positions based on Judaism.
They can't answer because I'm right.
What about the 1,500 Jewish Rabbis who sent a letter to Trump demanding he accept Islamic refugees?
Are those Jews who left behind their religion?
Unlike Catholicism, a Rabbi is someone who studied for his Title; he is not suddenly an emissary of God.
There are plenty of Rabbis who suffer from Liberalism and say really stupid things that they can't defend.
I can't stand it when emotionally disturbed people use religion to rationalize their nonsense.
From my understanding there's about 4,000 - 5,000 Jewish Rabbis in the U.S.A, so still there's a good deal of them urging Trump to accept Islamic Refugees.
The big question is how many of them would write a letter congratulating Trump?
My Town alone has a few hundred.
Not every Rabbi has a Congregation.
You must love the Pope.
Between these 2 sources, it seems like there's just 4,000 - 6,000 Jewish Rabbis.
Shortage of rabbis strikes all movements
We have an opportunity to tell every rabbi in America the truth about Jesus | The Prophecy Society
Saul of Tarsus is a virtual unknown until Constantine made him a star overnight.Saul of Tarsus was not educated and never claimed to be so; he claimed to be a zealot.
Presuming you believe in The New Testament.
"St. Paul"'s Epistles are childish at best....please be specific about his "brilliant" verses.
Not only could Paul write, he wrote in Greek. He was, therefore, educated. You are wrong once again. And while I never claimed his writing was brilliant (your use of the word "brilliant" indicates how dishonest you are and your use of quotes around it demonstrates how dishonest your method of argument is...lack of confidence in your position, undoubtedly), it certainly isn't "childish", your sneer notwithstanding:
When I was a child, I spake as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child: but when I became a man, I put away childish things.Since you insinuated I am ignorant of Greek philosophy (and I wouldn't normally be so rude), let me see if you can identify the very famous bit of Platonism in St Paul's writing here. Can you name the Dialogue?
For now we see through a glass, darkly; but then face to face: now I know in part; but then shall I know even as also I am known.
And now abideth faith, hope, charity, these three; but the greatest of these is charity.
I Corinthians 13:11-13
LOL, I have my real face as my avatar, you use someone else's, and you the one trying to save face...Saul of Tarsus is a virtual unknown until Constantine made him a star overnight.Saul of Tarsus was not educated and never claimed to be so; he claimed to be a zealot.
Presuming you believe in The New Testament.
"St. Paul"'s Epistles are childish at best....please be specific about his "brilliant" verses.
Not only could Paul write, he wrote in Greek. He was, therefore, educated. You are wrong once again. And while I never claimed his writing was brilliant (your use of the word "brilliant" indicates how dishonest you are and your use of quotes around it demonstrates how dishonest your method of argument is...lack of confidence in your position, undoubtedly), it certainly isn't "childish", your sneer notwithstanding:
When I was a child, I spake as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child: but when I became a man, I put away childish things.Since you insinuated I am ignorant of Greek philosophy (and I wouldn't normally be so rude), let me see if you can identify the very famous bit of Platonism in St Paul's writing here. Can you name the Dialogue?
For now we see through a glass, darkly; but then face to face: now I know in part; but then shall I know even as also I am known.
And now abideth faith, hope, charity, these three; but the greatest of these is charity.
I Corinthians 13:11-13
There are well over 250,000 variations of the Epistles and Gospels floating around the world and we have no idea who really wrote what.
Aristotelian would not allow for Case Law...Case Closed.
There's way more Rabbis than that in the US.Tell me how many Rabbis didn't send the letter.What about the 1,500 Jewish Rabbis who sent a letter to Trump demanding he accept Islamic refugees?
Are those Jews who left behind their religion?
Unlike Catholicism, a Rabbi is someone who studied for his Title; he is not suddenly an emissary of God.
There are plenty of Rabbis who suffer from Liberalism and say really stupid things that they can't defend.
I can't stand it when emotionally disturbed people use religion to rationalize their nonsense.
From my understanding there's about 4,000 - 5,000 Jewish Rabbis in the U.S.A, so still there's a good deal of them urging Trump to accept Islamic Refugees.
The big question is how many of them would write a letter congratulating Trump?
My Town alone has a few hundred.
Not every Rabbi has a Congregation.
You must love the Pope.
Between these 2 sources, it seems like there's just 4,000 - 6,000 Jewish Rabbis.
Shortage of rabbis strikes all movements
We have an opportunity to tell every rabbi in America the truth about Jesus | The Prophecy Society
Speaking of Sanctuary Cities and bleeding hearts...
How many Pastors, Ministers, Priests, Bishops and Cardinals in the US fit this description?
Probably in the 10s of 1,000s.
But nary a peep from you about those wonderful Christians bleeding your Whiteness into oblivion.
They became Post WWII FDR Americans and left their religion behind."screeching for Whitey's demise"Either you have a poor memory or there's more than one person using your account.When did I say I was neutral towards Jews?
Check your own postings.
I get the feeling you're a very angry person and don't put too much thought into your postings.
First you sneak up like you don't care.
Then your neutral.
Then you hate Jews.
That's cool.
I'm having fun making you make yourself look stupid.
I didn't say that I'm neutral towards Jews, nor did I say I hate Jews.
I just don't like Jews as a collective, something about screeching for Whitey's demise, and shrieking about Poland doing the Holocaust.
Once again...Don't drink and post.
So, why do many Jews support Liberal multiculturalism?
I have often pointed out to my (thankfully very few) Observant Liberal Jews that they cannot defend their positions based on Judaism.
They can't answer because I'm right.
They became Post WWII FDR Americans and left their religion behind."screeching for Whitey's demise"Either you have a poor memory or there's more than one person using your account.When did I say I was neutral towards Jews?
Check your own postings.
I get the feeling you're a very angry person and don't put too much thought into your postings.
First you sneak up like you don't care.
Then your neutral.
Then you hate Jews.
That's cool.
I'm having fun making you make yourself look stupid.
I didn't say that I'm neutral towards Jews, nor did I say I hate Jews.
I just don't like Jews as a collective, something about screeching for Whitey's demise, and shrieking about Poland doing the Holocaust.
Once again...Don't drink and post.
So, why do many Jews support Liberal multiculturalism?
I have often pointed out to my (thankfully very few) Observant Liberal Jews that they cannot defend their positions based on Judaism.
They can't answer because I'm right.
Your postings come down to...They became Post WWII FDR Americans and left their religion behind."screeching for Whitey's demise"Either you have a poor memory or there's more than one person using your account.
Check your own postings.
I get the feeling you're a very angry person and don't put too much thought into your postings.
First you sneak up like you don't care.
Then your neutral.
Then you hate Jews.
That's cool.
I'm having fun making you make yourself look stupid.
I didn't say that I'm neutral towards Jews, nor did I say I hate Jews.
I just don't like Jews as a collective, something about screeching for Whitey's demise, and shrieking about Poland doing the Holocaust.
Once again...Don't drink and post.
So, why do many Jews support Liberal multiculturalism?
I have often pointed out to my (thankfully very few) Observant Liberal Jews that they cannot defend their positions based on Judaism.
They can't answer because I'm right.
You make it out like the White Goys made the Jews Liberal.
But, what about the Jews who changed White Goyim views in the Liberal direction?
Such as Jewish TV-networks NBC, and CBS, or Jewish dominated Hollywood, or Jews even in Anthropology like Franz Boas.
Ever consider people thinking you're somewhat psychotic.LOL, I have my real face as my avatar, you use someone else's, and you the one trying to save face...Saul of Tarsus is a virtual unknown until Constantine made him a star overnight.Saul of Tarsus was not educated and never claimed to be so; he claimed to be a zealot.
Presuming you believe in The New Testament.
"St. Paul"'s Epistles are childish at best....please be specific about his "brilliant" verses.
Not only could Paul write, he wrote in Greek. He was, therefore, educated. You are wrong once again. And while I never claimed his writing was brilliant (your use of the word "brilliant" indicates how dishonest you are and your use of quotes around it demonstrates how dishonest your method of argument is...lack of confidence in your position, undoubtedly), it certainly isn't "childish", your sneer notwithstanding:
When I was a child, I spake as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child: but when I became a man, I put away childish things.Since you insinuated I am ignorant of Greek philosophy (and I wouldn't normally be so rude), let me see if you can identify the very famous bit of Platonism in St Paul's writing here. Can you name the Dialogue?
For now we see through a glass, darkly; but then face to face: now I know in part; but then shall I know even as also I am known.
And now abideth faith, hope, charity, these three; but the greatest of these is charity.
I Corinthians 13:11-13
There are well over 250,000 variations of the Epistles and Gospels floating around the world and we have no idea who really wrote what.
Aristotelian would not allow for Case Law...Case Closed.
Your postings come down to...They became Post WWII FDR Americans and left their religion behind."screeching for Whitey's demise"I didn't say that I'm neutral towards Jews, nor did I say I hate Jews.
I just don't like Jews as a collective, something about screeching for Whitey's demise, and shrieking about Poland doing the Holocaust.
Once again...Don't drink and post.
So, why do many Jews support Liberal multiculturalism?
I have often pointed out to my (thankfully very few) Observant Liberal Jews that they cannot defend their positions based on Judaism.
They can't answer because I'm right.
You make it out like the White Goys made the Jews Liberal.
But, what about the Jews who changed White Goyim views in the Liberal direction?
Such as Jewish TV-networks NBC, and CBS, or Jewish dominated Hollywood, or Jews even in Anthropology like Franz Boas.
How come Gentiles don't like Jews when Jews behave like Gentiles?
Oy! They're destroying us and themselves with excessive kindness.Your postings come down to...They became Post WWII FDR Americans and left their religion behind."screeching for Whitey's demise"
Once again...Don't drink and post.
So, why do many Jews support Liberal multiculturalism?
I have often pointed out to my (thankfully very few) Observant Liberal Jews that they cannot defend their positions based on Judaism.
They can't answer because I'm right.
You make it out like the White Goys made the Jews Liberal.
But, what about the Jews who changed White Goyim views in the Liberal direction?
Such as Jewish TV-networks NBC, and CBS, or Jewish dominated Hollywood, or Jews even in Anthropology like Franz Boas.
How come Gentiles don't like Jews when Jews behave like Gentiles?
Many Liberal anti-racist Jews might be reform Jews, and Atheist Jews, but the same holds true for many Liberal anti-racist Goys are also reform Christians, and Goy Atheists.
LOL, simply cannot admit you were wrong, can you? One of your least attractive characteristics.Ever consider people thinking you're somewhat psychotic.LOL, I have my real face as my avatar, you use someone else's, and you the one trying to save face...Saul of Tarsus is a virtual unknown until Constantine made him a star overnight.Saul of Tarsus was not educated and never claimed to be so; he claimed to be a zealot.
Presuming you believe in The New Testament.
"St. Paul"'s Epistles are childish at best....please be specific about his "brilliant" verses.
Not only could Paul write, he wrote in Greek. He was, therefore, educated. You are wrong once again. And while I never claimed his writing was brilliant (your use of the word "brilliant" indicates how dishonest you are and your use of quotes around it demonstrates how dishonest your method of argument is...lack of confidence in your position, undoubtedly), it certainly isn't "childish", your sneer notwithstanding:
When I was a child, I spake as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child: but when I became a man, I put away childish things.Since you insinuated I am ignorant of Greek philosophy (and I wouldn't normally be so rude), let me see if you can identify the very famous bit of Platonism in St Paul's writing here. Can you name the Dialogue?
For now we see through a glass, darkly; but then face to face: now I know in part; but then shall I know even as also I am known.
And now abideth faith, hope, charity, these three; but the greatest of these is charity.
I Corinthians 13:11-13
There are well over 250,000 variations of the Epistles and Gospels floating around the world and we have no idea who really wrote what.
Aristotelian would not allow for Case Law...Case Closed.
Your last post was an ad hominem.LOL, simply cannot admit you were wrong, can you? One of your least attractive characteristics.Ever consider people thinking you're somewhat psychotic.LOL, I have my real face as my avatar, you use someone else's, and you the one trying to save face...Saul of Tarsus is a virtual unknown until Constantine made him a star overnight.Saul of Tarsus was not educated and never claimed to be so; he claimed to be a zealot.
Presuming you believe in The New Testament.
"St. Paul"'s Epistles are childish at best....please be specific about his "brilliant" verses.
Not only could Paul write, he wrote in Greek. He was, therefore, educated. You are wrong once again. And while I never claimed his writing was brilliant (your use of the word "brilliant" indicates how dishonest you are and your use of quotes around it demonstrates how dishonest your method of argument is...lack of confidence in your position, undoubtedly), it certainly isn't "childish", your sneer notwithstanding:
When I was a child, I spake as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child: but when I became a man, I put away childish things.Since you insinuated I am ignorant of Greek philosophy (and I wouldn't normally be so rude), let me see if you can identify the very famous bit of Platonism in St Paul's writing here. Can you name the Dialogue?
For now we see through a glass, darkly; but then face to face: now I know in part; but then shall I know even as also I am known.
And now abideth faith, hope, charity, these three; but the greatest of these is charity.
I Corinthians 13:11-13
There are well over 250,000 variations of the Epistles and Gospels floating around the world and we have no idea who really wrote what.
Aristotelian would not allow for Case Law...Case Closed.
Lord, you a-duckin' and a-weavin', ain't ya, Shlomo. Let's try again:Your last post was an ad hominem.LOL, simply cannot admit you were wrong, can you? One of your least attractive characteristics.Ever consider people thinking you're somewhat psychotic.LOL, I have my real face as my avatar, you use someone else's, and you the one trying to save face...Saul of Tarsus is a virtual unknown until Constantine made him a star overnight.Not only could Paul write, he wrote in Greek. He was, therefore, educated. You are wrong once again. And while I never claimed his writing was brilliant (your use of the word "brilliant" indicates how dishonest you are and your use of quotes around it demonstrates how dishonest your method of argument is...lack of confidence in your position, undoubtedly), it certainly isn't "childish", your sneer notwithstanding:
When I was a child, I spake as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child: but when I became a man, I put away childish things.Since you insinuated I am ignorant of Greek philosophy (and I wouldn't normally be so rude), let me see if you can identify the very famous bit of Platonism in St Paul's writing here. Can you name the Dialogue?
For now we see through a glass, darkly; but then face to face: now I know in part; but then shall I know even as also I am known.
And now abideth faith, hope, charity, these three; but the greatest of these is charity.
I Corinthians 13:11-13
There are well over 250,000 variations of the Epistles and Gospels floating around the world and we have no idea who really wrote what.
Aristotelian would not allow for Case Law...Case Closed.
You simply cannot ascribe greatness to your "hero" and you did your usual...went off on a tangent.
My picture has zero impact on the discussion.
If it does, stop linking to anything where the Link's author does not have his/her picture.
There is no proven historical link to any known author.Lord, you a-duckin' and a-weavin', ain't ya, Shlomo. Let's try again:Your last post was an ad hominem.LOL, simply cannot admit you were wrong, can you? One of your least attractive characteristics.Ever consider people thinking you're somewhat psychotic.LOL, I have my real face as my avatar, you use someone else's, and you the one trying to save face...Saul of Tarsus is a virtual unknown until Constantine made him a star overnight.
There are well over 250,000 variations of the Epistles and Gospels floating around the world and we have no idea who really wrote what.
Aristotelian would not allow for Case Law...Case Closed.
You simply cannot ascribe greatness to your "hero" and you did your usual...went off on a tangent.
My picture has zero impact on the discussion.
If it does, stop linking to anything where the Link's author does not have his/her picture.
Identify the very famous bit of Platonism in St Paul's writing here. Can you name the Dialogue?
When I was a child, I spake as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child: but when I became a man, I put away childish things.
For now we see through a glass, darkly; but then face to face: now I know in part; but then shall I know even as also I am known.
And now abideth faith, hope, charity, these three; but the greatest of these is charity.
I Corinthians 13:11-13
There is no proven historical link to any known author.Lord, you a-duckin' and a-weavin', ain't ya, Shlomo. Let's try again:Your last post was an ad hominem.LOL, simply cannot admit you were wrong, can you? One of your least attractive characteristics.Ever consider people thinking you're somewhat psychotic.LOL, I have my real face as my avatar, you use someone else's, and you the one trying to save face...
You simply cannot ascribe greatness to your "hero" and you did your usual...went off on a tangent.
My picture has zero impact on the discussion.
If it does, stop linking to anything where the Link's author does not have his/her picture.
Identify the very famous bit of Platonism in St Paul's writing here. Can you name the Dialogue?
When I was a child, I spake as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child: but when I became a man, I put away childish things.
For now we see through a glass, darkly; but then face to face: now I know in part; but then shall I know even as also I am known.
And now abideth faith, hope, charity, these three; but the greatest of these is charity.
I Corinthians 13:11-13
Stop embarrassing yourself.
And Saul wasn't St. Paul until centuries later when Sainthood was fabricated into existence.
Maybe in your neck of the woods. Mosaic law is the foundation for the Western Justice system, the ethics, moral laws, and social justice that has been part of modern civilization, and also part of the New Testament, but you're too fucking ignorant to know it.
Oy! They're destroying us and themselves with excessive kindness.Your postings come down to...They became Post WWII FDR Americans and left their religion behind.So, why do many Jews support Liberal multiculturalism?
I have often pointed out to my (thankfully very few) Observant Liberal Jews that they cannot defend their positions based on Judaism.
They can't answer because I'm right.
You make it out like the White Goys made the Jews Liberal.
But, what about the Jews who changed White Goyim views in the Liberal direction?
Such as Jewish TV-networks NBC, and CBS, or Jewish dominated Hollywood, or Jews even in Anthropology like Franz Boas.
How come Gentiles don't like Jews when Jews behave like Gentiles?
Many Liberal anti-racist Jews might be reform Jews, and Atheist Jews, but the same holds true for many Liberal anti-racist Goys are also reform Christians, and Goy Atheists.
I call it masochistic altruism.
