Weissman Fake Dossier Knowledge Should Shut Mueller Down

[Billy_Bob]

You have proof that any of it has been verified? By whom and when.. Cough it up moron...

Has any of it been debunked?

Nope

How about you pony up with your proof.... You first...

Sorry dude.

If you're going to claim it is fake then it's on YOU to prove THAT.

And so far...nada

Wrong, dipstick. Those making extraordinary claims are required by logic to provide the supporting evidence. No one is required to disprove any idiotic claim.

The extraordinary claim is that the Dossier is fake.

Great. Prove it

The Dossier is fake and that comes from the man who wrote it, Christopher Steel, under oath, in a British court, in a case for slander.

But hey, YOU said it was fact and true now pony up bitchboy..

 

[bripat9643]

You have proof that any of it has been verified? By whom and when.. Cough it up moron...

Has any of it been debunked?

Nope

How about you pony up with your proof.... You first...

Sorry dude.

If you're going to claim it is fake then it's on YOU to prove THAT.

And so far...nada

Wrong, dipstick. Those making extraordinary claims are required by logic to provide the supporting evidence. No one is required to disprove any idiotic claim.

The extraordinary claim is that the Dossier is fake.

Great. Prove it

Wrong. There's nothing extraordinary about being skeptical.

 

[Lesh]

Has any of it been debunked?

Nope

How about you pony up with your proof.... You first...

Sorry dude.

If you're going to claim it is fake then it's on YOU to prove THAT.

And so far...nada

Wrong, dipstick. Those making extraordinary claims are required by logic to provide the supporting evidence. No one is required to disprove any idiotic claim.

The extraordinary claim is that the Dossier is fake.

Great. Prove it

Wrong. There's nothing extraordinary about being skeptical.

You can be as skeptical as you want...but if you're going to make claims...it's on you to provide proof

 

[Lesh]

Has any of it been debunked?

Nope

How about you pony up with your proof.... You first...

Sorry dude.

If you're going to claim it is fake then it's on YOU to prove THAT.

And so far...nada

Wrong, dipstick. Those making extraordinary claims are required by logic to provide the supporting evidence. No one is required to disprove any idiotic claim.

The extraordinary claim is that the Dossier is fake.

Great. Prove it

The Dossier is fake and that comes from the man who wrote it, Christopher Steel, under oath, in a British court, in a case for slander.

But hey, YOU said it was fact and true now pony up bitchboy..

That would be....what's the word for it?

Oh yea...a LIE

Imagine that. An Ocifer of the Law lying.

Does that ever happen?

 

[Vel]

BWHAHAHAHAHAHHHhahahahhahah

What a load of horse shit... No matter how many times you tell this lie it wont make it true.. Keep eating out of the toilet called CNN... Or MSNBC.. FAKE NEWS sources that lie every day and you left tards eat it up...

Provide RELIABLE sources for your evidence.. You cant because there are none.. Even Comey, Brennan, and the current FBI head Reay said that the document was unverified and unreliable. Nothing has changed!

Nope. They said it was unverified.

Big difference

You have proof that any of it has been verified? By whom and when.. Cough it up moron...

Has any of it been debunked?

Nope

Cohen was never in Prague. There's one to start.

But he WAS in Italy. And no travel records or passports are required to cross that border. oops.


Next...

Passport stamps show him in Italy in July. The dossier claims that he was in Prague in late August or early September. And seriously, if you bring a charge, i.e. the dossier is true, it's up to the person bringing the charge to prove it. Innocence is assumed until guilt is proven beyond a reasonable doubt.​

 

[Billy_Bob]

How about you pony up with your proof.... You first...

Sorry dude.

If you're going to claim it is fake then it's on YOU to prove THAT.

And so far...nada

Wrong, dipstick. Those making extraordinary claims are required by logic to provide the supporting evidence. No one is required to disprove any idiotic claim.

The extraordinary claim is that the Dossier is fake.

Great. Prove it

The Dossier is fake and that comes from the man who wrote it, Christopher Steel, under oath, in a British court, in a case for slander.

But hey, YOU said it was fact and true now pony up bitchboy..

That would be....what's the word for it?

Oh yea...a LIE

Imagine that. An Ocifer of the Law lying.

Does that ever happen?

LOL...

In other words, you think the British court asking a man if the dossier is true and the man saying no, is all a lie?

Pull your head from your ass.. Now supply the facts you say which make the dossier verified and true.... Come on... Post them up...

Your a lying punk and nothing more!

 

[Lesh]

Sorry dude.

If you're going to claim it is fake then it's on YOU to prove THAT.

And so far...nada

Wrong, dipstick. Those making extraordinary claims are required by logic to provide the supporting evidence. No one is required to disprove any idiotic claim.

The extraordinary claim is that the Dossier is fake.

Great. Prove it

The Dossier is fake and that comes from the man who wrote it, Christopher Steel, under oath, in a British court, in a case for slander.

But hey, YOU said it was fact and true now pony up bitchboy..

That would be....what's the word for it?

Oh yea...a LIE

Imagine that. An Ocifer of the Law lying.

Does that ever happen?

LOL...

In other words You think the British court asking a man if the dossier is true and the mans saying no, is all a lie?

Pull your head from your ass..

Your a lying punk and nothing more!

You claim that occurred?

Prove it or admit you lied

 

[bripat9643]

How about you pony up with your proof.... You first...

Sorry dude.

If you're going to claim it is fake then it's on YOU to prove THAT.

And so far...nada

Wrong, dipstick. Those making extraordinary claims are required by logic to provide the supporting evidence. No one is required to disprove any idiotic claim.

The extraordinary claim is that the Dossier is fake.

Great. Prove it

Wrong. There's nothing extraordinary about being skeptical.

You can be as skeptical as you want...but if you're going to make claims...it's on you to provide proof

I'm not making any claims. You are.

 

[bripat9643]

How about you pony up with your proof.... You first...

Sorry dude.

If you're going to claim it is fake then it's on YOU to prove THAT.

And so far...nada

Wrong, dipstick. Those making extraordinary claims are required by logic to provide the supporting evidence. No one is required to disprove any idiotic claim.

The extraordinary claim is that the Dossier is fake.

Great. Prove it

The Dossier is fake and that comes from the man who wrote it, Christopher Steel, under oath, in a British court, in a case for slander.

But hey, YOU said it was fact and true now pony up bitchboy..

That would be....what's the word for it?

Oh yea...a LIE

Imagine that. An Ocifer of the Law lying.

Does that ever happen?

Which "ocifer of the law" is that?

 

[Dragonlady]

Weissman Fake Dossier Knowledge Should Shut Mueller Down
https://www.americanthinker.com/arti...#ixzz5PuMSwp00

While all legacy media and liberal eyes have been focused on Trump "fixer" Michael Cohen and Clintonista lawyer Lanny Davis's lies about Trump payoffs to old girlfriends, few have focused on the activities of Andrew Weissmann, special counsel Robert Mueller's chief deputy and investigator, who has a well deserved reputation as Mueller's "pit bull." Weissmann, among his other jobs, was lead prosecutor in the trial of former Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort. Weissmann was also Mueller's attorney on the ground, who oversaw the pre-dawn raid on Manafort's home. He was a key player in Mueller's team of angry Democrat lawyers...
Weissmann had full knowledge of the fake nature of the Steele dossier, which was a major predicate of the Russian witch-hunt that became the Mueller probe. Weissman knew there was collusion with the Russians and that it was among the DNC; the Clinton campaign; British agent Christopher Steele; Fusion GPS; the DOJ; the FBI; and, yes, Russian sources interested in upending the Trump presidency.


~~~~~~
The bottom line is, Mueller has not conducted an investigation. He's been orchestrating and implementing a cover up and a witch hunt to frame Trump. This is the "Insurance Policy" on display for all the world to see. The same one Peter Strzok and Lisa Page wrote about in their memos.
For the last two years, I've heard empty headed libs screaming about Trump colluding with the Russians. They are so clueless they don’t realize it was Hillary, DNC, 0bama, DOJ, FBI and many of the heads of other three-letter agencies appointed by Obama.
Weissman is yet just another co-conspirator in this attempted coup d'état. So far I haven't seen any indicted conspirator or co-conspirator in the Deep State plot to bring Trump down. Those would be Comey, McCabe, McCain, Obama, Clinton, Clapper, Brennan, Strzok, Page, Baker, Ohr and wife. I'm quite sure there are other's who I am forgetting right off the top of my head.

The American Stinker??? Why don’t you quote InfoWars and Breitbart while you’re at it?

All of the information in the Dossier is confirmed except the Pee Tape. After Dumb Donald’s adventures with porn stars, do you really think there’s any chance it doesn’t exist?

That’s why Trump is lashing out at everyone. Firing your lawyer at this point is an admission you’re fucked.

 

[bripat9643]

Weissman Fake Dossier Knowledge Should Shut Mueller Down
https://www.americanthinker.com/arti...#ixzz5PuMSwp00

While all legacy media and liberal eyes have been focused on Trump "fixer" Michael Cohen and Clintonista lawyer Lanny Davis's lies about Trump payoffs to old girlfriends, few have focused on the activities of Andrew Weissmann, special counsel Robert Mueller's chief deputy and investigator, who has a well deserved reputation as Mueller's "pit bull." Weissmann, among his other jobs, was lead prosecutor in the trial of former Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort. Weissmann was also Mueller's attorney on the ground, who oversaw the pre-dawn raid on Manafort's home. He was a key player in Mueller's team of angry Democrat lawyers...
Weissmann had full knowledge of the fake nature of the Steele dossier, which was a major predicate of the Russian witch-hunt that became the Mueller probe. Weissman knew there was collusion with the Russians and that it was among the DNC; the Clinton campaign; British agent Christopher Steele; Fusion GPS; the DOJ; the FBI; and, yes, Russian sources interested in upending the Trump presidency.


~~~~~~
The bottom line is, Mueller has not conducted an investigation. He's been orchestrating and implementing a cover up and a witch hunt to frame Trump. This is the "Insurance Policy" on display for all the world to see. The same one Peter Strzok and Lisa Page wrote about in their memos.
For the last two years, I've heard empty headed libs screaming about Trump colluding with the Russians. They are so clueless they don’t realize it was Hillary, DNC, 0bama, DOJ, FBI and many of the heads of other three-letter agencies appointed by Obama.
Weissman is yet just another co-conspirator in this attempted coup d'état. So far I haven't seen any indicted conspirator or co-conspirator in the Deep State plot to bring Trump down. Those would be Comey, McCabe, McCain, Obama, Clinton, Clapper, Brennan, Strzok, Page, Baker, Ohr and wife. I'm quite sure there are other's who I am forgetting right off the top of my head.

The American Stinker??? Why don’t you quote InfoWars and Breitbart while you’re at it?

All of the information in the Dossier is confirmed except the Pee Tape. After Dumb Donald’s adventures with porn stars, do you really think there’s any chance it doesn’t exist?

That’s why Trump is lashing out at everyone. Firing your lawyer at this point is an admission you’re fucked.

When are you douche nozzle snowflakes going to quit lying about the dossier?

 

[Billy_Bob]

Wrong, dipstick. Those making extraordinary claims are required by logic to provide the supporting evidence. No one is required to disprove any idiotic claim.

The extraordinary claim is that the Dossier is fake.

Great. Prove it

The Dossier is fake and that comes from the man who wrote it, Christopher Steel, under oath, in a British court, in a case for slander.

But hey, YOU said it was fact and true now pony up bitchboy..

That would be....what's the word for it?

Oh yea...a LIE

Imagine that. An Ocifer of the Law lying.

Does that ever happen?

LOL...

In other words You think the British court asking a man if the dossier is true and the mans saying no, is all a lie?

Pull your head from your ass..

Your a lying punk and nothing more!

You claim that occurred?

Prove it or admit you lied

Fuck you, you little commie bitch... Prove your accusations.. You made them now back them up. The British Court is a matter of public record that you need to go find as it has been well published. Here is just one of many for your lazy ass. source: Fusion GPS’s Steele Dossier: Collusion Narrative Falls Apart | National Review

 

[airplanemechanic]

You have proof that any of it has been verified? By whom and when.. Cough it up moron...

Has any of it been debunked?

Nope

How about you pony up with your proof.... You first...

Sorry dude.

If you're going to claim it is fake then it's on YOU to prove THAT.

And so far...nada

Wrong, dipstick. Those making extraordinary claims are required by logic to provide the supporting evidence. No one is required to disprove any idiotic claim.

The extraordinary claim is that the Dossier is fake.

Great. Prove it

Not how the world works. Nobody has to prove a negative. You said it's true, YOU PROVE IT.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

BWHAHAHAHAHAHHHhahahahhahah

What a load of horse shit... No matter how many times you tell this lie it wont make it true.. Keep eating out of the toilet called CNN... Or MSNBC.. FAKE NEWS sources that lie every day and you left tards eat it up...

Provide RELIABLE sources for your evidence.. You cant because there are none.. Even Comey, Brennan, and the current FBI head Reay said that the document was unverified and unreliable. Nothing has changed!

Nope. They said it was unverified.

Big difference

You have proof that any of it has been verified? By whom and when.. Cough it up moron...

Has any of it been debunked?

Nope

How about you pony up with your proof.... You first...

Sorry dude.

If you're going to claim it is fake then it's on YOU to prove THAT.

And so far...nada

You're an axe murderer.....prove otherwise.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

You have proof that any of it has been verified? By whom and when.. Cough it up moron...

Has any of it been debunked?

Nope

How about you pony up with your proof.... You first...

Sorry dude.

If you're going to claim it is fake then it's on YOU to prove THAT.

And so far...nada

Wrong, dipstick. Those making extraordinary claims are required by logic to provide the supporting evidence. No one is required to disprove any idiotic claim.

The extraordinary claim is that the Dossier is fake.

Great. Prove it

 

[Lesh]

Nope. They said it was unverified.

Big difference

You have proof that any of it has been verified? By whom and when.. Cough it up moron...

Has any of it been debunked?

Nope

How about you pony up with your proof.... You first...

Sorry dude.

If you're going to claim it is fake then it's on YOU to prove THAT.

And so far...nada

You're an axe murderer.....prove otherwise.

If you choose not to believe the Steele Dossier...that's on you and that's fine.

Claim that it's fake and you have to prove your claim.

You can't

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Weissman Fake Dossier Knowledge Should Shut Mueller Down
https://www.americanthinker.com/arti...#ixzz5PuMSwp00

While all legacy media and liberal eyes have been focused on Trump "fixer" Michael Cohen and Clintonista lawyer Lanny Davis's lies about Trump payoffs to old girlfriends, few have focused on the activities of Andrew Weissmann, special counsel Robert Mueller's chief deputy and investigator, who has a well deserved reputation as Mueller's "pit bull." Weissmann, among his other jobs, was lead prosecutor in the trial of former Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort. Weissmann was also Mueller's attorney on the ground, who oversaw the pre-dawn raid on Manafort's home. He was a key player in Mueller's team of angry Democrat lawyers...
Weissmann had full knowledge of the fake nature of the Steele dossier, which was a major predicate of the Russian witch-hunt that became the Mueller probe. Weissman knew there was collusion with the Russians and that it was among the DNC; the Clinton campaign; British agent Christopher Steele; Fusion GPS; the DOJ; the FBI; and, yes, Russian sources interested in upending the Trump presidency.


~~~~~~
The bottom line is, Mueller has not conducted an investigation. He's been orchestrating and implementing a cover up and a witch hunt to frame Trump. This is the "Insurance Policy" on display for all the world to see. The same one Peter Strzok and Lisa Page wrote about in their memos.
For the last two years, I've heard empty headed libs screaming about Trump colluding with the Russians. They are so clueless they don’t realize it was Hillary, DNC, 0bama, DOJ, FBI and many of the heads of other three-letter agencies appointed by Obama.
Weissman is yet just another co-conspirator in this attempted coup d'état. So far I haven't seen any indicted conspirator or co-conspirator in the Deep State plot to bring Trump down. Those would be Comey, McCabe, McCain, Obama, Clinton, Clapper, Brennan, Strzok, Page, Baker, Ohr and wife. I'm quite sure there are other's who I am forgetting right off the top of my head.

“Weissman Fake Dossier Knowledge Should Shut Mueller Down”

No, it shouldn’t – and it won’t.

The blind partisan, subjective, wrongheaded opinions propagated by rightwing sites such as American Thinker are devoid of fact, worth, and merit, this being one of many examples.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

You have proof that any of it has been verified? By whom and when.. Cough it up moron...

Has any of it been debunked?

Nope

How about you pony up with your proof.... You first...

Sorry dude.

If you're going to claim it is fake then it's on YOU to prove THAT.

And so far...nada

You're an axe murderer.....prove otherwise.

If you choose not to believe the Steele Dossier...that's on you and that's fine.

Claim that it's fake and you have to prove your claim.

You can't

Prove you're not an axe murderer and a child molester.

 

[Lesh]

You have proof that any of it has been verified? By whom and when.. Cough it up moron...

Has any of it been debunked?

Nope

How about you pony up with your proof.... You first...

Sorry dude.

If you're going to claim it is fake then it's on YOU to prove THAT.

And so far...nada

You're an axe murderer.....prove otherwise.

If you choose not to believe the Steele Dossier...that's on you and that's fine.

Claim that it's fake and you have to prove your claim.

You can't

I repeat

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Has any of it been debunked?

Nope

How about you pony up with your proof.... You first...

Sorry dude.

If you're going to claim it is fake then it's on YOU to prove THAT.

And so far...nada

You're an axe murderer.....prove otherwise.

If you choose not to believe the Steele Dossier...that's on you and that's fine.

Claim that it's fake and you have to prove your claim.

You can't

I repeat

...like a broken record.
Prove you aren't a child molester.