WATCH: Trump Warns Obama Can be Charged For Drone Strikes if Court Rules Against Immunity Claims

[MAGA Macho Man]

Ha! Jack Smith wasn't expecting this. Remember when Obama had an American citizen assassinated by a drone in 2011? Yea, that's what I thought. Nevertheless Trump and his lawyers did though.

WATCH: Trump Warns Obama Can be Charged For Drone Strikes if Court Rules Against Immunity Claims | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila

President Trump’s attorney John Sauer appeared before a three-judge panel for the DC Circuit Court of Appeals on Tuesday morning to argue Trump’s immunity claims in Jack Smith’s DC case.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Biden can also be prosecuted for his botched Afghanistan withdrawal that resulted in the death of 13 US service members.

“The lowest moment, I think, in the history of our country was Afghanistan – the way we withdrew. With shame. We surrendered. People were killed, 13 great soldiers killed…[Biden] could be prosecuted for that. So you can’t have a president without immunity,” Trump said.

One of Trump’s lawyers said as soon as they argued that Obama could be prosecuted for drone strikes, all of a sudden Jack Smith pivoted and said that Obama should be protected from criminal prosecution because of presidential immunity.

WATCH in link.

 

[two_iron]

I like where this is going. The party that likes to fuck kids understands one thing - retaliation in kind.

Like a dog that keeps shitting on the carpet needs to be swatted on the nose with a rolled up newspaper.... same with shitlibs.

They send one of ours to prison for 5 years we send 50 of theirs to prison for 600 years. Tit for tat with an appropriate multiplier.

I'm here to provide solutions.

 

[pknopp]

I believe Obama should have been charged for his drone strikes.

 

[g5000]

Ha! Jack Smith wasn't expecting this. Remember when Obama had an American citizen assassinated by a drone in 2011? Yea, that's what I thought. Nevertheless Trump and his lawyers did though.

WATCH: Trump Warns Obama Can be Charged For Drone Strikes if Court Rules Against Immunity Claims | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila

President Trump’s attorney John Sauer appeared before a three-judge panel for the DC Circuit Court of Appeals on Tuesday morning to argue Trump’s immunity claims in Jack Smith’s DC case.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Biden can also be prosecuted for his botched Afghanistan withdrawal that resulted in the death of 13 US service members.

“The lowest moment, I think, in the history of our country was Afghanistan – the way we withdrew. With shame. We surrendered. People were killed, 13 great soldiers killed…[Biden] could be prosecuted for that. So you can’t have a president without immunity,” Trump said.

One of Trump’s lawyers said as soon as they argued that Obama could be prosecuted for drone strikes, all of a sudden Jack Smith pivoted and said that Obama should be protected from criminal prosecution because of presidential immunity.

WATCH in link.

This just might be the dumbest topic started in 2024 so far.

 

[g5000]

I believe Obama should have been charged for his drone strikes.

What law did he break?

And don't forget, Trump killed more civilians with his drone strikes than Obama. He killed so many, he ordered all reports of civilian deaths be ended.

 

[g5000]

“The lowest moment, I think, in the history of our country was Afghanistan – the way we withdrew. With shame. We surrendered. People were killed, 13 great soldiers killed…[Biden] could be prosecuted for that. So you can’t have a president without immunity."

What an incredible idiot.

You can smell the flop sweat dripping from him.

 

[pknopp]

What law did he break?

Constitutional Due Process.

And don't forget, Trump killed more civilians with his drone strikes than Obama. He killed so many, he ordered all reports of civilian deaths be ended.

I don't agree with any of it BUT Obama bombed American citizens targeting them specifically. American citizens do not get a death sentence without due process.

It was murder.

 

[progressive hunter]

Ha! Jack Smith wasn't expecting this. Remember when Obama had an American citizen assassinated by a drone in 2011? Yea, that's what I thought. Nevertheless Trump and his lawyers did though.

WATCH: Trump Warns Obama Can be Charged For Drone Strikes if Court Rules Against Immunity Claims | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila

President Trump’s attorney John Sauer appeared before a three-judge panel for the DC Circuit Court of Appeals on Tuesday morning to argue Trump’s immunity claims in Jack Smith’s DC case.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Biden can also be prosecuted for his botched Afghanistan withdrawal that resulted in the death of 13 US service members.

“The lowest moment, I think, in the history of our country was Afghanistan – the way we withdrew. With shame. We surrendered. People were killed, 13 great soldiers killed…[Biden] could be prosecuted for that. So you can’t have a president without immunity,” Trump said.

One of Trump’s lawyers said as soon as they argued that Obama could be prosecuted for drone strikes, all of a sudden Jack Smith pivoted and said that Obama should be protected from criminal prosecution because of presidential immunity.

WATCH in link.

I never thought of that,,

great catch,,

the dems better beware how far they go with this,, it could come back and bite them in the ass,,

 

[g5000]

Constitutional Due Process.




I don't agree with any of it BUT Obama bombed American citizens targeting them specifically. American citizens do not get a death sentence without due process.

It was murder.

Americans who were plotting terrorist attacks who law enforcement could not get to.

Moron.

 

[progressive hunter]

Americans who were plotting terrorist attacks who law enforcement could not get to.

Moron.

changes nothing,,
they were sitting in a cafe not on a battle field,,

 

[g5000]

changes nothing,,
they were sitting in a cafe not on a battle field,,

You get them when and where you can.

Moron.

 

[progressive hunter]

You get them when and where you can.

Moron.

you follow the law and respect human rights,,

moron,,

 

[pknopp]

Americans who were plotting terrorist attacks who law enforcement could not get to.

Moron.

We have a process for that. It's called In-Absentia. It's how we tried Ira Einhorn. People were begging to put Anwar Al-awlaki on trial in-absentia. If need be it could have been a military trial. At least then there would have been a record of any proof. Otherwise you can not kill American citizens just because someone says so.

Even then he went and killed his son who was 16. It's highly unlikely he was some terrorist mastermind.

It was murder.

 

[konradv]

Ha! Jack Smith wasn't expecting this. Remember when Obama had an American citizen assassinated by a drone in 2011? Yea, that's what I thought. Nevertheless Trump and his lawyers did though.

WATCH: Trump Warns Obama Can be Charged For Drone Strikes if Court Rules Against Immunity Claims | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila

President Trump’s attorney John Sauer appeared before a three-judge panel for the DC Circuit Court of Appeals on Tuesday morning to argue Trump’s immunity claims in Jack Smith’s DC case.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Biden can also be prosecuted for his botched Afghanistan withdrawal that resulted in the death of 13 US service members.

“The lowest moment, I think, in the history of our country was Afghanistan – the way we withdrew. With shame. We surrendered. People were killed, 13 great soldiers killed…[Biden] could be prosecuted for that. So you can’t have a president without immunity,” Trump said.

One of Trump’s lawyers said as soon as they argued that Obama could be prosecuted for drone strikes, all of a sudden Jack Smith pivoted and said that Obama should be protected from criminal prosecution because of presidential immunity.

WATCH in link.

Trump doesn’t know the law. Whatever he says is eorthless.

 

[MagicMike]

Ha! Jack Smith wasn't expecting this. Remember when Obama had an American citizen assassinated by a drone in 2011? Yea, that's what I thought. Nevertheless Trump and his lawyers did though.

WATCH: Trump Warns Obama Can be Charged For Drone Strikes if Court Rules Against Immunity Claims | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila

President Trump’s attorney John Sauer appeared before a three-judge panel for the DC Circuit Court of Appeals on Tuesday morning to argue Trump’s immunity claims in Jack Smith’s DC case.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Biden can also be prosecuted for his botched Afghanistan withdrawal that resulted in the death of 13 US service members.

“The lowest moment, I think, in the history of our country was Afghanistan – the way we withdrew. With shame. We surrendered. People were killed, 13 great soldiers killed…[Biden] could be prosecuted for that. So you can’t have a president without immunity,” Trump said.

One of Trump’s lawyers said as soon as they argued that Obama could be prosecuted for drone strikes, all of a sudden Jack Smith pivoted and said that Obama should be protected from criminal prosecution because of presidential immunity.

WATCH in link.

Obama's drone strikes are not the same thing as Trump trying to steal an election and the two things should not and will not ever be treated as equal.

 

[progressive hunter]

Obama's drone strikes are not the same thing as Trump trying to steal an election and the two things should not and will not ever be treated as equal.

thats not whats in question,,

both are acts of POTUS but the question is how to determine when can a POTUS be held accountable for something they did in office,,
what they did isnt the issue,

 

[Lord-Humungus]

You get them when and where you can.

Moron.

That’s the same logic one would use to justify putting a knee on criminals neck killing them rather than arrest them and let the justice system do its job. Fuck the rule of law you gotta do what you gotta do right?

 

[pknopp]

thats not whats in question,,

both are acts of POTUS but the question is how to determine when can a POTUS be held accountable for something they did in office,,
what they did isnt the issue,

Nobody should ever argue a president, any president should have immunity from our laws.

 

[progressive hunter]

Nobody should ever argue a president, any president should have immunity from our laws.

thats not the issue,, sure all should be held accountable,,
but like police with qualified immunity theres a process to remove that immunity,,
same for any other official of the government that applies enforcement of laws,,

 

[pknopp]

thats not the issue,, sure all should be held accountable,,
but like police with qualified immunity theres a process to remove that immunity,,
same for any other official of the government that applies enforcement of laws,,

Qualified immunity is against everything this country should stand for.