- Aug 4, 2009
- 281,396
- 142,631
- 2,615
Moore has blundered since this thing first came upYou lie like you breathe.dude we have Wolf Blitzer interviewing her she said no. so we have the her actual words."A lawyer representing a woman who accused Alabama's GOP Senate candidate of sexual assault on Wednesday offered to hand over evidence to a Congressional committee if the committee agrees to hold hearings on the accusations.
Gloria Allred offered to hand over to "an independent expert" a yearbook that reportedly confirms Moore knew her client, Beverly Young Nelson, in 1977 when she was 16 years old.
Moore has denied that he knew Nelson. His attorney, Phillip L. Jauregui, on Wednesday called on Nelson to turn over the yearbook to a neutral party for handwriting analysis.
"We also urge the committees to subpoena Roy Moore to testify under oath about his denials of the accusations made against him," Allred said in a statement.
Allred said she sent letters to the Senate Judiciary Committee and the Senate Select Committee on Ethics requesting that they hold hearings on recent accusations against Moore "within the next two weeks."
"I formally requested that those committees conduct a hearing within the next two weeks regarding the accusations made by the five women who alleged that they were victims of Roy Moore when they were teenagers," Allred said in a statement.
"In the event that either or both Committees agree to conduct our requested hearing, then we would agree to have the original yearbook examined by an independent expert or experts who would obtain exemplars of Mr. Moore’s handwriting during the period in question and compare that handwriting to that contained in the yearbook."
Lawyer: Congress can examine yearbook if hearings are held on Moore accusations
In addition, the woman has agreed to testify under oath. Hell of a lot Moore....than Moore.
Why is Moore afraid to go under oath?
It's not being afraid to, it's just that you don't give fodder to things like this.
His denials and victim hood ring shallow
He should have said that was a character flaw from 40 years ago and there is no recent evidence
If there is no evidence, why admit guilt?
How's it working out for him as he lies about knowing these women?
He is digging a deeper hole