Wall Street Speculators Raising Your Grocery Bill

Star

Gold Member
Apr 5, 2009
2,532
614
190
Wall Street Speculators Raising Your Grocery Bill



By M. Joy Hayes, Ph.D., The Motley Fool

04/19/12


Over the past 10 years, prices for basic food commodities like meat, dairy products, grains, oils and fats, and sugar, have increased by an average of more than 125%.

Part of the increase is due to rising production costs and changes in supply and demand. But you also have Wall Street traders to thank for the higher price tags.

With no intention of buying the underlying food commodities, Wall Street dumps massive amounts of money into commodities futures in hopes of profiting from fluctuations in food prices. In the process, it's moving the market in its favor -- and emptying the pockets of consumers.

So what the heck is a future, and how does it affect your grocery bill?

The Fable of the Farmer and the Speculator

Suppose Speculator Smith thinks the price of wheat will go up in the future, and wants to make money off the price change. Smith can do this by purchasing a future in wheat. This future buys a specific amount of wheat at a pre-determined price to be delivered at a set date in the future, when the wheat future matures. If the price of wheat goes up, Smith's investment in his wheat future is worth more, and he can sell it at a higher price without taking delivery of the wheat.

So far, so good. The farmers benefited from the security of knowing they would be able to sell some portion of their crop at a set price at the end of the season. Smith's gamble paid off once the wheat price increased, but he also took on the risk of losing money if the price of wheat went down in the interim.

Here's where it gets hairy. Frequently, instead of a farmer being on the other end of the speculator's contract, there is another speculator.


In such a case, neither side owns the commodity and neither wants to own it. They are just on opposite sides of a bet on whether the price will go up or down. Before the contract expires, the loser simply pays the winner, and no commodities change hands.


But this speculation actually causes the prices of the underlying commodities to move. As the demand for futures rises, the price for those futures rises, causing the prices of the underlying commodities (including food commodities) to increase.

The problem has only grown in recent years, as financial companies have nearly doubled their investments in food commodities over the past five years, which has helped push food prices to 30-year highs.

And these price increases are passed on to consumers like you. Commodity speculation also pushes up prices on energy, among many other products we rely on.

Fuller Pockets for Wall Street, Emptier Fridges for the Rest of Us

The importance of this issue is magnified by the fact that about 46 million Americans -- about one in seven -- turn to food stamps to help them pay for food.

The effects of rising food costs are even more alarming in Third World and developing countries, where there are many poor people who already spend more than 60% of their income on food. According to the UN World Food Program, 115 million people have fallen into hunger as a result of sharp increases in food prices since 2008 and the global economic recession, which has caused food riots to erupt in countries like Mexico and Bangladesh.

While the recently passed Dodd-Frank Act calls for stronger regulation of commodity trading, Wall Street has been fighting tooth and nail to defang the regulations, and has undertaken legal challenges that have prevented the regulations from coming into force yet.

Until they do, don't expect your grocery bill to get any leaner.
 
Scapegoat the speculators!

Hail Obama!
You'd think that speculators are a brand new development since Obama has been in office.

I guess it's cause and effect though; if there isn't much volatility in the markets, there's no reason to bring them up. But all of a sudden, whooops, there goes a 777 point loss in one day and all of a sudden they go from the peripheral to the spotlight.

And once they were in the spotlight, I think a lot of everyday people not as crazy about politics as most of us are here started learning how they were able to operate under conditions that had permitted them to do those things legally, and it got people upset. As it should, I spose, it's like Glass-Steagall wasn't even really talked about outside of the bubble until the market was in turmoil.
 
Scapegoat the speculators!

Hail Obama!
You'd think that speculators are a brand new development since Obama has been in office.

Obviously not. But I find it refreshing that agricultural products are being spotlighted for a change- not just crude oil and gasoline.

As I've stated in other threads, there are more farm votes than hydrocarbon votes.

Maybe that's why we hear so much about crude oil "subsidies" and nothing of farm subsidies.

The federal government provides a "safety net" to agricultural producers to help them through the variations in agricultural production and profitability from year to year - due to variations in weather, market prices, and other factors - while ensuring a stable food supply.

What are Farm Subsidy Payments? || EWG Farm Subsidy Database
 
Tax pure speculators (that is to say people buying or selling futures contracts who are not actually involved in that commodity business as their primary business) at a stupendously higher rate than those who ARE.

The farmers selling futures contracts and the end users of their products (millers, for example) would therefore be taxed on any profits at a much lower rate than pure speculators.

This would get most the pure gambling out of the commodities business.

The only people who would typically therefore be buying or selling futures contracts on commodities would be those who are truly in that commodities business.

We'd have a lot less BUBBLES in the commodities business if we did that rather simple thing.
 
Tax pure speculators (that is to say people buying or selling futures contracts who are not actually involved in that commodity business as their primary business) at a stupendously higher rate than those who ARE.

The farmers selling futures contracts and the end users of their products (millers, for example) would therefore be taxed on any profits at a much lower rate than pure speculators.

This would get most the pure gambling out of the commodities business.

The only people who would typically therefore be buying or selling futures contracts on commodities would be those who are truly in that commodities business.

We'd have a lot less BUBBLES in the commodities business if we did that rather simple thing.

Make that guy buying corn futures actually take delivery of 1,000,000 bu of corn :)
His apt would be a bit crowded.
 
Scapegoat the speculators!

Hail Obama!
You'd think that speculators are a brand new development since Obama has been in office.

Obviously not. But I find it refreshing that agricultural products are being spotlighted for a change- not just crude oil and gasoline.

As I've stated in other threads, there are more farm votes than hydrocarbon votes.

Maybe that's why we hear so much about crude oil "subsidies" and nothing of farm subsidies.

The federal government provides a "safety net" to agricultural producers to help them through the variations in agricultural production and profitability from year to year - due to variations in weather, market prices, and other factors - while ensuring a stable food supply.

What are Farm Subsidy Payments? || EWG Farm Subsidy Database

And rural areas do tend to be more republican...
 

Forum List

Back
Top