Wales has banned parents from stopping their children learning about sex, religion and LGBT people

[PoliticalChic]

"Bigoted" means having a different opinion than you have?

Is that the Liberal-to-English definition?

Your post appears to have become a boomerang, huh?

Bigotry is an "opinion." Having a negative opinion about someone, or mistreating them, based solely on who they are is bigotry. graham is a bigoted dickhead. Maybe he can find some other venue to spew his filth.

Silencing those with whom you disagree goes beyond having an opinion.
And Liberals are infamous for doing just that.

Hatred is not just an "opinion." It is an attempt to hurt others.

These venues have no obligation to give this fraud a forum. Judging from the posted link, the city councils concluded that his speech would offend their community values. He can go elsewhere to spew his hatred. Perhaps a local auditorium would rent to him.

His continued attempts to frame his views as representing the entire Christian faith is absolutely sickening. No matter what the headline screams (Christianity BANNED in the UK), there have been no reports that St. Paul's, Westminster Abbey, and Canterbury have been shut down.

I'm made this point in a number of posts: Liberals like you believe in 'thought crimes'....any views contrary to theirs, the orthodoxy.


Conservatives don't demand uniform views.



Know who does?

Nazis.

Communists.

Fascists.

You.

People who refer to themselves as "conservatives" demand lock-step conformity on every subject. One cannot speak of being pro-choice or on behalf of equality of the races, sexes, religions, or sexual orientations without being subjected to a barrage of name-calling and obscenity.

Anyway, this discussion does not involve crime of any sort. This guy can speak as long as he can find a venue. Piccadilly Circus maybe?

So what if my views are moderate-to-liberal? It depends on the issue. Am I committing a "thought crime"?

"So what if my views are moderate-to-liberal? It depends on the issue. Am I committing a "thought crime"?"

Let's summarize: we have found, and agree, that you feel comfortable using the very same modus operandi as other Fascists, Communists, and Nazis.

Certainly no coincidence that the party you support is the only one in American history that put American citizens in concentration camps.


Now.....do you prefer 'Good day!' or Sieg Heil?

 

[mudwhistle]

Wales has banned parents from stopping their children learning about sex, religion and LGBT people

Wales has removed the rights of parents to prevent their children from learning about different types of relationships.

Parents have long had the right to withdraw children from relationship and sexuality education (RSE) and religious education (RE), but Welsh education minister Kirsty Williams announced on Tuesday that parents will no longer be permitted to deny their kids access to teaching about relationships and different religions.

Very proud Welshman here. We will have a more tolerant and civil society.

There's a difference between teaching tolerance and indoctrination, mate.

If you want to learn how to bugger Nigel move to France. Leave the kids out of it.

 

[Polishprince]

Wales has banned parents from stopping their children learning about sex, religion and LGBT people

Wales has removed the rights of parents to prevent their children from learning about different types of relationships.

Parents have long had the right to withdraw children from relationship and sexuality education (RSE) and religious education (RE), but Welsh education minister Kirsty Williams announced on Tuesday that parents will no longer be permitted to deny their kids access to teaching about relationships and different religions.

Very proud Welshman here. We will have a more tolerant and civil society.

There's a difference between teaching tolerance and indoctrination, mate.

If you want to learn how to bugger Nigel move to France. Leave the kids out of it.

Exactly.

If someone wants to "Walk on the Wild Side" and engage in buggery or pimpery or voyeurism, they used to just do it in traditional red light districts where children did not go.

The idea of exposing children to the world of she-males and homos, johns, pimps and hoes, is a novel 21st century one.

 

[Crixus]

Wales has banned parents from stopping their children learning about sex, religion and LGBT people

Wales has removed the rights of parents to prevent their children from learning about different types of relationships.

Parents have long had the right to withdraw children from relationship and sexuality education (RSE) and religious education (RE), but Welsh education minister Kirsty Williams announced on Tuesday that parents will no longer be permitted to deny their kids access to teaching about relationships and different religions.

Very proud Welshman here. We will have a more tolerant and civil society.

Never thought of the Welsh that way. To me they were more like sister humping inbreads.

I was reading an interview given by a musician from the London area, and asked about another British player, he trashed them totally as some kind of doofus from the Midlands area. I can't imagine that sophisticated Brits think anything better of Welshmen.

Nope. That crap is kind of why my folks left and came here.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Christianity wasn't "banned" in the UK. All that happened was that some venues banned a bigoted dickhead, who cannot be held to represent the Christian religion on any count. He's just an imposter who claims to be a Christian, but who is not. These venues may do what they wish, and they chose to not give a platform to such trash.

"Bigoted" means having a different opinion than you have?

Is that the Liberal-to-English definition?

Your post appears to have become a boomerang, huh?

Bigotry is an "opinion." Having a negative opinion about someone, or mistreating them, based solely on who they are is bigotry. graham is a bigoted dickhead. Maybe he can find some other venue to spew his filth.

Silencing those with whom you disagree goes beyond having an opinion.
And Liberals are infamous for doing just that.

Hatred is not just an "opinion." It is an attempt to hurt others.

These venues have no obligation to give this fraud a forum. Judging from the posted link, the city councils concluded that his speech would offend their community values. He can go elsewhere to spew his hatred. Perhaps a local auditorium would rent to him.

His continued attempts to frame his views as representing the entire Christian faith is absolutely sickening. No matter what the headline screams (Christianity BANNED in the UK), there have been no reports that St. Paul's, Westminster Abbey, and Canterbury have been shut down.

I'm made this point in a number of posts: Liberals like you believe in 'thought crimes'....any views contrary to theirs, the orthodoxy.


Conservatives don't demand uniform views.



Know who does?

Nazis.

Communists.

Fascists.

You.

Lysistrata is a leftist, not a liberal. Actual liberals believe in free speech. These extreme authoritarian leftists like her do not.

 

[PoliticalChic]

"Bigoted" means having a different opinion than you have?

Is that the Liberal-to-English definition?

Your post appears to have become a boomerang, huh?

Bigotry is an "opinion." Having a negative opinion about someone, or mistreating them, based solely on who they are is bigotry. graham is a bigoted dickhead. Maybe he can find some other venue to spew his filth.

Silencing those with whom you disagree goes beyond having an opinion.
And Liberals are infamous for doing just that.

Hatred is not just an "opinion." It is an attempt to hurt others.

These venues have no obligation to give this fraud a forum. Judging from the posted link, the city councils concluded that his speech would offend their community values. He can go elsewhere to spew his hatred. Perhaps a local auditorium would rent to him.

His continued attempts to frame his views as representing the entire Christian faith is absolutely sickening. No matter what the headline screams (Christianity BANNED in the UK), there have been no reports that St. Paul's, Westminster Abbey, and Canterbury have been shut down.

I'm made this point in a number of posts: Liberals like you believe in 'thought crimes'....any views contrary to theirs, the orthodoxy.


Conservatives don't demand uniform views.



Know who does?

Nazis.

Communists.

Fascists.

You.

Lysistrata is a leftist, not a liberal. Actual liberals believe in free speech. These extreme authoritarian leftists like her do not.

Well, in that case, there are no 'actual Liberals' left.

Any who vote Democrat support what that one posts.....they believe in thought crimes and ending free speech.

Hussein put an anti-free speech Liberal on the Supreme Court.


"In her 1993 article "Regulation of Hate Speech and Pornography After R.A.V," for the University of Chicago Law Review, Kagan writes:

"I take it as a given that we live in a society marred by racial and gender inequality, that certain forms of speech perpetuate and promote this inequality, and that the uncoerced disappearance of such speech would be cause for great elation."

In a 1996 paper, "Private Speech, Public Purpose: The Role of Governmental Motive in First Amendment Doctrine," Kagan argued it may be proper to suppress speech because it is offensive to society or to the government.
That paper asserted First Amendment doctrine is comprised of "motives and ... actions infested with them" and she goes so far as to claim that "First Amendment law is best understood and most readily explained as a kind of motive-hunting."

Kagan's name was also on a brief, United States V. Stevens, dug up by the Washington Examiner, stating: "Whether a given category of speech enjoys First Amendment protection depends upon a categorical balancing of the value of the speech against its societal costs."
If the government doesn't like what you say, Elena Kagan believes it is the duty of courts to tell you to shut up. If some pantywaist is offended by what you say, Elena Kagan believes your words can be "disappeared".
WyBlog -- Elena Kagan's America: some speech can be "disappeared"

Elena Kagan Radical anti-gun nut?

Brandenburg v. Ohio - Wikipedia





5. “Earlier this week, Obama-appointed Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan wrote in her minority dissent to the Janus ruling that the Court had “weaponized the First Amendment.”

The majority opinion dwelt on issues of compelled speech, noting that “because such compulsion so plainly violates the Constitution, most of our free speech cases have involved restrictions on what can be said, rather than laws compelling speech. But measures compelling speech are at least as threatening.”

Kagan, however, has other ideas and claimed in her dissent that

“The First Amendment was meant for better things,” she concluded.

Kagan’s fantastical notion of “black-robed rulers overriding citizens’ choices” by “weaponizing the First Amendment” is puzzling. Citizens in non-right-to-work states are completely free to join a union if they so wish, and in doing so, commit to paying union dues. The only change here is that unions can no longer extort dues from non-members in any state.

Citizens’ choices have not been overridden; indeed, citizen choice is expanded under this ruling. They can join a union or not join a union, those who do not join cannot be compelled to pay union dues, but they are also not barred from doing so if they wish.

Her point about “weaponizing the First Amendment” is equally confounding. The Founders intendedthe First Amendment to be a weapon . . . against government tyranny and oppression. They were insistent that freedom of speech was required to check government and to maintain a free and independent citizenry.” Who's afraid of the 1st Amendment?




Sooo.....who put Obama in office....Liberals or Leftists?

 

[Lysistrata]

Bigotry is an "opinion." Having a negative opinion about someone, or mistreating them, based solely on who they are is bigotry. graham is a bigoted dickhead. Maybe he can find some other venue to spew his filth.

Silencing those with whom you disagree goes beyond having an opinion.
And Liberals are infamous for doing just that.

Hatred is not just an "opinion." It is an attempt to hurt others.

These venues have no obligation to give this fraud a forum. Judging from the posted link, the city councils concluded that his speech would offend their community values. He can go elsewhere to spew his hatred. Perhaps a local auditorium would rent to him.

His continued attempts to frame his views as representing the entire Christian faith is absolutely sickening. No matter what the headline screams (Christianity BANNED in the UK), there have been no reports that St. Paul's, Westminster Abbey, and Canterbury have been shut down.

I'm made this point in a number of posts: Liberals like you believe in 'thought crimes'....any views contrary to theirs, the orthodoxy.


Conservatives don't demand uniform views.



Know who does?

Nazis.

Communists.

Fascists.

You.

People who refer to themselves as "conservatives" demand lock-step conformity on every subject. One cannot speak of being pro-choice or on behalf of equality of the races, sexes, religions, or sexual orientations without being subjected to a barrage of name-calling and obscenity.

Anyway, this discussion does not involve crime of any sort. This guy can speak as long as he can find a venue. Piccadilly Circus maybe?

So what if my views are moderate-to-liberal? It depends on the issue. Am I committing a "thought crime"?

"People who refer to themselves as "conservatives" demand lock-step conformity on every subject."

Watch how simple it is to prove you a liar: as per the silencing of of the subject of the article I posted.....can you name a Liberal, Progressive, Democrat who has been treated in that way by conservatives?

No?

None?

Not a single one?????


Next time, take your shoe off before you put your foot in your mouth.

Treated what way? You posted it in post No. 75 without being prevented from doing so, false headline and all, didn't you? Who "silenced" what? I've read through all of the comments. They didn't involve silencing you. You got to speak your piece. You even got to liken me to a fascist, a communist, and a nazi, even though I never attempted to silence you.

 

[Lysistrata]

"Bigoted" means having a different opinion than you have?

Is that the Liberal-to-English definition?

Your post appears to have become a boomerang, huh?

Bigotry is an "opinion." Having a negative opinion about someone, or mistreating them, based solely on who they are is bigotry. graham is a bigoted dickhead. Maybe he can find some other venue to spew his filth.

Silencing those with whom you disagree goes beyond having an opinion.
And Liberals are infamous for doing just that.

Hatred is not just an "opinion." It is an attempt to hurt others.

These venues have no obligation to give this fraud a forum. Judging from the posted link, the city councils concluded that his speech would offend their community values. He can go elsewhere to spew his hatred. Perhaps a local auditorium would rent to him.

His continued attempts to frame his views as representing the entire Christian faith is absolutely sickening. No matter what the headline screams (Christianity BANNED in the UK), there have been no reports that St. Paul's, Westminster Abbey, and Canterbury have been shut down.

I'm made this point in a number of posts: Liberals like you believe in 'thought crimes'....any views contrary to theirs, the orthodoxy.


Conservatives don't demand uniform views.



Know who does?

Nazis.

Communists.

Fascists.

You.

Lysistrata is a leftist, not a liberal. Actual liberals believe in free speech. These extreme authoritarian leftists like her do not.

When have I interfered with anyone's free speech? Free speech involves the freedom to criticize the content of someone else's speech. Or does free speech require everyone else to applaud every comment made?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Silencing those with whom you disagree goes beyond having an opinion.
And Liberals are infamous for doing just that.

Hatred is not just an "opinion." It is an attempt to hurt others.

These venues have no obligation to give this fraud a forum. Judging from the posted link, the city councils concluded that his speech would offend their community values. He can go elsewhere to spew his hatred. Perhaps a local auditorium would rent to him.

His continued attempts to frame his views as representing the entire Christian faith is absolutely sickening. No matter what the headline screams (Christianity BANNED in the UK), there have been no reports that St. Paul's, Westminster Abbey, and Canterbury have been shut down.

I'm made this point in a number of posts: Liberals like you believe in 'thought crimes'....any views contrary to theirs, the orthodoxy.


Conservatives don't demand uniform views.



Know who does?

Nazis.

Communists.

Fascists.

You.

People who refer to themselves as "conservatives" demand lock-step conformity on every subject. One cannot speak of being pro-choice or on behalf of equality of the races, sexes, religions, or sexual orientations without being subjected to a barrage of name-calling and obscenity.

Anyway, this discussion does not involve crime of any sort. This guy can speak as long as he can find a venue. Piccadilly Circus maybe?

So what if my views are moderate-to-liberal? It depends on the issue. Am I committing a "thought crime"?

"People who refer to themselves as "conservatives" demand lock-step conformity on every subject."

Watch how simple it is to prove you a liar: as per the silencing of of the subject of the article I posted.....can you name a Liberal, Progressive, Democrat who has been treated in that way by conservatives?

No?

None?

Not a single one?????


Next time, take your shoe off before you put your foot in your mouth.

Treated what way? You posted it in post No. 75 without being prevented from doing so, false headline and all, didn't you? Who "silenced" what? I've read through all of the comments. They didn't involve silencing you. You got to speak your piece. You even got to liken me to a fascist, a communist, and a nazi, even though I never attempted to silence you.

"Treated what way? "


Let's check:

"At least five venues in the United Kingdom have cancelled events featuring Rev Franklin Graham after his Christian beliefs were deemed “discriminatory,” “repulsive” and “hateful”.

Life Site News reported that Graham’s plans to appear at ACC Liverpool stadium were overset after a group called the Liverpool Labour [Party] LGBT Network circulated a petition against his “platforming” and sent it to the Liverpool City Council.

The group objected to Graham’s Christian view of sexuality and claimed his “appearance may incite hateful mobilisation and risk the security of our LGBTQ+ community.” The petition gathered only 500 signatures."
Christianity BANNED in the United Kingdom · Caldron Pool



"....Graham’s Christian view of sexuality..."


His view....his opinion....his thoughts.....you Fascists can't allow that, huh?

 

[dblack]

Bigotry is an "opinion." Having a negative opinion about someone, or mistreating them, based solely on who they are is bigotry. graham is a bigoted dickhead. Maybe he can find some other venue to spew his filth.

Silencing those with whom you disagree goes beyond having an opinion.
And Liberals are infamous for doing just that.

Hatred is not just an "opinion." It is an attempt to hurt others.

These venues have no obligation to give this fraud a forum. Judging from the posted link, the city councils concluded that his speech would offend their community values. He can go elsewhere to spew his hatred. Perhaps a local auditorium would rent to him.

His continued attempts to frame his views as representing the entire Christian faith is absolutely sickening. No matter what the headline screams (Christianity BANNED in the UK), there have been no reports that St. Paul's, Westminster Abbey, and Canterbury have been shut down.

I'm made this point in a number of posts: Liberals like you believe in 'thought crimes'....any views contrary to theirs, the orthodoxy.


Conservatives don't demand uniform views.



Know who does?

Nazis.

Communists.

Fascists.

You.

Lysistrata is a leftist, not a liberal. Actual liberals believe in free speech. These extreme authoritarian leftists like her do not.

When have I interfered with anyone's free speech? Free speech involves the freedom to criticize the content of someone else's speech. Or does free speech require everyone else to applaud every comment made?

Free speech merely means there will be no laws limiting speech. It doesn't mean others must listen to you, or publish your views.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Silencing those with whom you disagree goes beyond having an opinion.
And Liberals are infamous for doing just that.

Hatred is not just an "opinion." It is an attempt to hurt others.

These venues have no obligation to give this fraud a forum. Judging from the posted link, the city councils concluded that his speech would offend their community values. He can go elsewhere to spew his hatred. Perhaps a local auditorium would rent to him.

His continued attempts to frame his views as representing the entire Christian faith is absolutely sickening. No matter what the headline screams (Christianity BANNED in the UK), there have been no reports that St. Paul's, Westminster Abbey, and Canterbury have been shut down.

I'm made this point in a number of posts: Liberals like you believe in 'thought crimes'....any views contrary to theirs, the orthodoxy.


Conservatives don't demand uniform views.



Know who does?

Nazis.

Communists.

Fascists.

You.

People who refer to themselves as "conservatives" demand lock-step conformity on every subject. One cannot speak of being pro-choice or on behalf of equality of the races, sexes, religions, or sexual orientations without being subjected to a barrage of name-calling and obscenity.

Anyway, this discussion does not involve crime of any sort. This guy can speak as long as he can find a venue. Piccadilly Circus maybe?

So what if my views are moderate-to-liberal? It depends on the issue. Am I committing a "thought crime"?

"People who refer to themselves as "conservatives" demand lock-step conformity on every subject."

Watch how simple it is to prove you a liar: as per the silencing of of the subject of the article I posted.....can you name a Liberal, Progressive, Democrat who has been treated in that way by conservatives?

No?

None?

Not a single one?????


Next time, take your shoe off before you put your foot in your mouth.

Treated what way? You posted it in post No. 75 without being prevented from doing so, false headline and all, didn't you? Who "silenced" what? I've read through all of the comments. They didn't involve silencing you. You got to speak your piece. You even got to liken me to a fascist, a communist, and a nazi, even though I never attempted to silence you.

"You even got to liken me to a fascist, a communist, and a nazi, even though I never attempted to silence you."

You may try to change the subject to silencing me, but that, clearly isn't what the issue is...

....and you wouldn't be back, squealing like the stuck pig that you are, if I hadn't hit the nail on your head.

You are a Fascist, Communist, Nazi...and would support the murder of those who disagree, if you could.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Bigotry is an "opinion." Having a negative opinion about someone, or mistreating them, based solely on who they are is bigotry. graham is a bigoted dickhead. Maybe he can find some other venue to spew his filth.

Silencing those with whom you disagree goes beyond having an opinion.
And Liberals are infamous for doing just that.

Hatred is not just an "opinion." It is an attempt to hurt others.

These venues have no obligation to give this fraud a forum. Judging from the posted link, the city councils concluded that his speech would offend their community values. He can go elsewhere to spew his hatred. Perhaps a local auditorium would rent to him.

His continued attempts to frame his views as representing the entire Christian faith is absolutely sickening. No matter what the headline screams (Christianity BANNED in the UK), there have been no reports that St. Paul's, Westminster Abbey, and Canterbury have been shut down.

I'm made this point in a number of posts: Liberals like you believe in 'thought crimes'....any views contrary to theirs, the orthodoxy.


Conservatives don't demand uniform views.



Know who does?

Nazis.

Communists.

Fascists.

You.

Lysistrata is a leftist, not a liberal. Actual liberals believe in free speech. These extreme authoritarian leftists like her do not.

When have I interfered with anyone's free speech? Free speech involves the freedom to criticize the content of someone else's speech. Or does free speech require everyone else to applaud every comment made?

Do you support the silencing of Rev Franklin Graham and his Christian beliefs ?


You certainly did in an earlier post.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Bigotry is an "opinion." Having a negative opinion about someone, or mistreating them, based solely on who they are is bigotry. graham is a bigoted dickhead. Maybe he can find some other venue to spew his filth.

Silencing those with whom you disagree goes beyond having an opinion.
And Liberals are infamous for doing just that.

Hatred is not just an "opinion." It is an attempt to hurt others.

These venues have no obligation to give this fraud a forum. Judging from the posted link, the city councils concluded that his speech would offend their community values. He can go elsewhere to spew his hatred. Perhaps a local auditorium would rent to him.

His continued attempts to frame his views as representing the entire Christian faith is absolutely sickening. No matter what the headline screams (Christianity BANNED in the UK), there have been no reports that St. Paul's, Westminster Abbey, and Canterbury have been shut down.

I'm made this point in a number of posts: Liberals like you believe in 'thought crimes'....any views contrary to theirs, the orthodoxy.


Conservatives don't demand uniform views.



Know who does?

Nazis.

Communists.

Fascists.

You.

Lysistrata is a leftist, not a liberal. Actual liberals believe in free speech. These extreme authoritarian leftists like her do not.

When have I interfered with anyone's free speech? Free speech involves the freedom to criticize the content of someone else's speech. Or does free speech require everyone else to applaud every comment made?

Bigotry is an "opinion." Having a negative opinion about someone, or mistreating them, based solely on who they are is bigotry. graham is a bigoted dickhead. Maybe he can find some other venue to spew his filth.

Silencing those with whom you disagree goes beyond having an opinion.
And Liberals are infamous for doing just that.

Hatred is not just an "opinion." It is an attempt to hurt others.

These venues have no obligation to give this fraud a forum. Judging from the posted link, the city councils concluded that his speech would offend their community values. He can go elsewhere to spew his hatred. Perhaps a local auditorium would rent to him.

His continued attempts to frame his views as representing the entire Christian faith is absolutely sickening. No matter what the headline screams (Christianity BANNED in the UK), there have been no reports that St. Paul's, Westminster Abbey, and Canterbury have been shut down.

I'm made this point in a number of posts: Liberals like you believe in 'thought crimes'....any views contrary to theirs, the orthodoxy.


Conservatives don't demand uniform views.



Know who does?

Nazis.

Communists.

Fascists.

You.

Lysistrata is a leftist, not a liberal. Actual liberals believe in free speech. These extreme authoritarian leftists like her do not.

When have I interfered with anyone's free speech? Free speech involves the freedom to criticize the content of someone else's speech. Or does free speech require everyone else to applaud every comment made?

Free speech seems to imply, in this instance, that US extremists can travel to foreign countries and expect those countries to provide them with a platform . Its nuts. The majority of Americans dont even share his views. Why should we allow him to come here and abuse our citizens ?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Silencing those with whom you disagree goes beyond having an opinion.
And Liberals are infamous for doing just that.

Hatred is not just an "opinion." It is an attempt to hurt others.

These venues have no obligation to give this fraud a forum. Judging from the posted link, the city councils concluded that his speech would offend their community values. He can go elsewhere to spew his hatred. Perhaps a local auditorium would rent to him.

His continued attempts to frame his views as representing the entire Christian faith is absolutely sickening. No matter what the headline screams (Christianity BANNED in the UK), there have been no reports that St. Paul's, Westminster Abbey, and Canterbury have been shut down.

I'm made this point in a number of posts: Liberals like you believe in 'thought crimes'....any views contrary to theirs, the orthodoxy.


Conservatives don't demand uniform views.



Know who does?

Nazis.

Communists.

Fascists.

You.

Lysistrata is a leftist, not a liberal. Actual liberals believe in free speech. These extreme authoritarian leftists like her do not.

When have I interfered with anyone's free speech? Free speech involves the freedom to criticize the content of someone else's speech. Or does free speech require everyone else to applaud every comment made?

Free speech merely means there will be no laws limiting speech. It doesn't mean others must listen to you, or publish your views.

No one made such a claim.

It appears I've netted yet another Fascist who would rather alter the discussion rather than admitting is true nature.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Silencing those with whom you disagree goes beyond having an opinion.
And Liberals are infamous for doing just that.

Hatred is not just an "opinion." It is an attempt to hurt others.

These venues have no obligation to give this fraud a forum. Judging from the posted link, the city councils concluded that his speech would offend their community values. He can go elsewhere to spew his hatred. Perhaps a local auditorium would rent to him.

His continued attempts to frame his views as representing the entire Christian faith is absolutely sickening. No matter what the headline screams (Christianity BANNED in the UK), there have been no reports that St. Paul's, Westminster Abbey, and Canterbury have been shut down.

I'm made this point in a number of posts: Liberals like you believe in 'thought crimes'....any views contrary to theirs, the orthodoxy.


Conservatives don't demand uniform views.



Know who does?

Nazis.

Communists.

Fascists.

You.

Lysistrata is a leftist, not a liberal. Actual liberals believe in free speech. These extreme authoritarian leftists like her do not.

When have I interfered with anyone's free speech? Free speech involves the freedom to criticize the content of someone else's speech. Or does free speech require everyone else to applaud every comment made?

Silencing those with whom you disagree goes beyond having an opinion.
And Liberals are infamous for doing just that.

Hatred is not just an "opinion." It is an attempt to hurt others.

These venues have no obligation to give this fraud a forum. Judging from the posted link, the city councils concluded that his speech would offend their community values. He can go elsewhere to spew his hatred. Perhaps a local auditorium would rent to him.

His continued attempts to frame his views as representing the entire Christian faith is absolutely sickening. No matter what the headline screams (Christianity BANNED in the UK), there have been no reports that St. Paul's, Westminster Abbey, and Canterbury have been shut down.

I'm made this point in a number of posts: Liberals like you believe in 'thought crimes'....any views contrary to theirs, the orthodoxy.


Conservatives don't demand uniform views.



Know who does?

Nazis.

Communists.

Fascists.

You.

Lysistrata is a leftist, not a liberal. Actual liberals believe in free speech. These extreme authoritarian leftists like her do not.

When have I interfered with anyone's free speech? Free speech involves the freedom to criticize the content of someone else's speech. Or does free speech require everyone else to applaud every comment made?

Free speech seems to imply, in this instance, that US extremists can travel to foreign countries and expect those countries to provide them with a platform . Its nuts. The majority of Americans dont even share his views. Why should we allow him to come here and abuse our citizens ?

"Why should we allow him to come here and abuse our citizens ?"

Don't forget to press your brown shirt before the next Bund meeting.

 

[Gracie]

Fuck Wales. Parents are the ONLY ones that should inform children of the birds and bees. Not some schmuck teacher. And if I were living there, I would continue to fight this stupid law and NOT let my kids be "taught" what is MY job to do.

 

[dblack]

Hatred is not just an "opinion." It is an attempt to hurt others.

These venues have no obligation to give this fraud a forum. Judging from the posted link, the city councils concluded that his speech would offend their community values. He can go elsewhere to spew his hatred. Perhaps a local auditorium would rent to him.

His continued attempts to frame his views as representing the entire Christian faith is absolutely sickening. No matter what the headline screams (Christianity BANNED in the UK), there have been no reports that St. Paul's, Westminster Abbey, and Canterbury have been shut down.

I'm made this point in a number of posts: Liberals like you believe in 'thought crimes'....any views contrary to theirs, the orthodoxy.


Conservatives don't demand uniform views.



Know who does?

Nazis.

Communists.

Fascists.

You.

Lysistrata is a leftist, not a liberal. Actual liberals believe in free speech. These extreme authoritarian leftists like her do not.

When have I interfered with anyone's free speech? Free speech involves the freedom to criticize the content of someone else's speech. Or does free speech require everyone else to applaud every comment made?

Free speech merely means there will be no laws limiting speech. It doesn't mean others must listen to you, or publish your views.

No one made such a claim.

It appears I've netted yet another Fascist who would rather alter the discussion rather than admitting is true nature.

Troll off.

 

[Lysistrata]

Hatred is not just an "opinion." It is an attempt to hurt others.

These venues have no obligation to give this fraud a forum. Judging from the posted link, the city councils concluded that his speech would offend their community values. He can go elsewhere to spew his hatred. Perhaps a local auditorium would rent to him.

His continued attempts to frame his views as representing the entire Christian faith is absolutely sickening. No matter what the headline screams (Christianity BANNED in the UK), there have been no reports that St. Paul's, Westminster Abbey, and Canterbury have been shut down.

I'm made this point in a number of posts: Liberals like you believe in 'thought crimes'....any views contrary to theirs, the orthodoxy.


Conservatives don't demand uniform views.



Know who does?

Nazis.

Communists.

Fascists.

You.

People who refer to themselves as "conservatives" demand lock-step conformity on every subject. One cannot speak of being pro-choice or on behalf of equality of the races, sexes, religions, or sexual orientations without being subjected to a barrage of name-calling and obscenity.

Anyway, this discussion does not involve crime of any sort. This guy can speak as long as he can find a venue. Piccadilly Circus maybe?

So what if my views are moderate-to-liberal? It depends on the issue. Am I committing a "thought crime"?

"People who refer to themselves as "conservatives" demand lock-step conformity on every subject."

Watch how simple it is to prove you a liar: as per the silencing of of the subject of the article I posted.....can you name a Liberal, Progressive, Democrat who has been treated in that way by conservatives?

No?

None?

Not a single one?????


Next time, take your shoe off before you put your foot in your mouth.

Treated what way? You posted it in post No. 75 without being prevented from doing so, false headline and all, didn't you? Who "silenced" what? I've read through all of the comments. They didn't involve silencing you. You got to speak your piece. You even got to liken me to a fascist, a communist, and a nazi, even though I never attempted to silence you.

"Treated what way? "


Let's check:

"At least five venues in the United Kingdom have cancelled events featuring Rev Franklin Graham after his Christian beliefs were deemed “discriminatory,” “repulsive” and “hateful”.

Life Site News reported that Graham’s plans to appear at ACC Liverpool stadium were overset after a group called the Liverpool Labour [Party] LGBT Network circulated a petition against his “platforming” and sent it to the Liverpool City Council.

The group objected to Graham’s Christian view of sexuality and claimed his “appearance may incite hateful mobilisation and risk the security of our LGBTQ+ community.” The petition gathered only 500 signatures."
Christianity BANNED in the United Kingdom · Caldron Pool



"....Graham’s Christian view of sexuality..."


His view....his opinion....his thoughts.....you Fascists can't allow that, huh?

He hasn't been denied free speech. He has simply been denied certain forums for exercising his rights because these venues don't want to assist him. He can perform in any venue that allows him to.

 

[PoliticalChic]

I'm made this point in a number of posts: Liberals like you believe in 'thought crimes'....any views contrary to theirs, the orthodoxy.


Conservatives don't demand uniform views.



Know who does?

Nazis.

Communists.

Fascists.

You.

Lysistrata is a leftist, not a liberal. Actual liberals believe in free speech. These extreme authoritarian leftists like her do not.

When have I interfered with anyone's free speech? Free speech involves the freedom to criticize the content of someone else's speech. Or does free speech require everyone else to applaud every comment made?

Free speech merely means there will be no laws limiting speech. It doesn't mean others must listen to you, or publish your views.

No one made such a claim.

It appears I've netted yet another Fascist who would rather alter the discussion rather than admitting is true nature.

Troll off.

"Truth is the mother of hatred."
By Ausonius


And another one bites the dust.

 

[dblack]

Lysistrata is a leftist, not a liberal. Actual liberals believe in free speech. These extreme authoritarian leftists like her do not.

When have I interfered with anyone's free speech? Free speech involves the freedom to criticize the content of someone else's speech. Or does free speech require everyone else to applaud every comment made?

Free speech merely means there will be no laws limiting speech. It doesn't mean others must listen to you, or publish your views.

No one made such a claim.

It appears I've netted yet another Fascist who would rather alter the discussion rather than admitting is true nature.

Troll off.

"Truth is the mother of hatred."
By Ausonius


And another one bites the dust.

Piss off, troll.