Us Climate Conference Crumbling.... Those Not Attending Is Growing..

Billy_Bob

Diamond Member
Sep 4, 2014
30,837
20,604
1,945
Top Of The Great Divide
US CLIMATE CONFERENCE CRUMBLING.... Those NOT attending is growing..

Well the list is growing of those giving Obama and the UN communists the finger. China, Russia, Canada, Australia, India, New Zealand, and on and on... They are leaving in droves as global temperatures fall and CO2 is shown the fraud it has been from the start.

Chairman Ban:
“…even though the leaders from India, China and Russia will not be able to participate in the meeting, there are “other means of communications, ways and means of having their leadership demonstrated in the United Nations.”

The other language he is talking about must be sign language.. utterly no chance of any binding resolutions... Epic Fail!

Source 1
Source 2
 
US did not even send a delegate last year:boobies::coffee::boobies:.......probably not this year either.

The whole conference is a sham......they don't accomplish dick, as I have well documented in here last year and the year before.
 
Obama’s Lonely Climate Summit – world leaders are staying home

Eric Worrall writes: The imminent climate summit in New York is rapidly turning into an utter embarrassment for President Obama and UN Secretary General Bank Ki-Moon, in addition to becoming a bit of a punishment round for national deputy leaders.

Aussie PM Tony Abbott today defended his decision not to hop on an earlier flight to America, so he could attend the UN climate conference in New York, because he has more important matters to attend to, such as running the country.


Hey Obama and Ban, this ones for you.... :fu:
 
This thread is great........just more fodder proving that nobody cares about the science. In time, this whole last 20 years and "climate change" is going to be looked at as a fad.

LOL.....Obama standing up there with his thumb up his ass and nobody else around!!!

Funny as shit.........:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rock:


Have to laugh.....the AGW lunatics in here are always talking about how they are winning. OK.....but even SOCIALISTWORKER.COM says they are........well, losing.

The UN s dismal failure on climate change SocialistWorker.org
 
Last edited:

Every previous meeting has turned into a revolting display of begging and whining about what countries are "OWED" by the developed nations. TRUELY the reason that the UN is the leader of the GWarmer Church.

Why would ANY nation sit there and be insulted into a money for a new airport in the Maldives? Or water projects in the Khalihari Desert?

Not about EVALUATING the threat or even MITIGATING the threat, It's all about Global redistribution as it ever was..
 

Every previous meeting has turned into a revolting display of begging and whining about what countries are "OWED" by the developed nations. TRUELY the reason that the UN is the leader of the GWarmer Church.

Why would ANY nation sit there and be insulted into a money for a new airport in the Maldives? Or water projects in the Khalihari Desert?

Not about EVALUATING the threat or even MITIGATING the threat, It's all about Global redistribution as it ever was..

I remember vividly when these maniacs started ranting about "ecocide" and how corporations and countries had to pony up to developing nations.And that they could be put on trial by an international body.

:lol: They let the cat out of the bag big time that all along this scam was about global redistribution of wealth and punishing anyone and everyone in their path that opposed them.

Of course with the United Nations being the "distributor" of mega $$$$$ .
It's scary as hell that these crazy bastards have gotten as close as they have to pulling this off this scam.

Climate Craziness of the Week: British lawyer urges UN to accept ‘ecocide’ as international crime on par with genocide
Anthony Watts / April 11, 2010
Supporters of a new ecocide law also believe it could be used to prosecute “climate deniers”. Effort started by Club of Rome lawyer.

Excerpts from the Guardian article:

A campaign to declare the mass destruction of ecosystems an international crime against peace – alongside genocide and crimes against humanity – is being launched in the UK.

The proposal for the United Nations to accept “ecocide” as a fifth “crime against peace”, which could be tried at the International Criminal Court (ICC), is the brainchild of British lawyer-turned-campaigner Polly Higgins.

The radical idea would have a profound effect on industries blamed for widespread damage to the environment like fossil fuels, mining, agriculture, chemicals and forestry.

Supporters of a new ecocide law also believe it could be used to prosecute “climate deniers” who distort science and facts to discourage voters and politicians from taking action to tackle global warming and climate change.

Climate Craziness of the Week British lawyer urges UN to accept 8216 ecocide 8217 as international crime on par with genocide Watts Up With That
 

Every previous meeting has turned into a revolting display of begging and whining about what countries are "OWED" by the developed nations. TRUELY the reason that the UN is the leader of the GWarmer Church.

Why would ANY nation sit there and be insulted into a money for a new airport in the Maldives? Or water projects in the Khalihari Desert?

Not about EVALUATING the threat or even MITIGATING the threat, It's all about Global redistribution as it ever was..

I remember vividly when these maniacs started ranting about "ecocide" and how corporations and countries had to pony up to developing nations.And that they could be put on trial by an international body.

:lol: They let the cat out of the bag big time that all along this scam was about global redistribution of wealth and punishing anyone and everyone in their path that opposed them.

Of course with the United Nations being the "distributor" of mega $$$$$ .
It's scary as hell that these crazy bastards have gotten as close as they have to pulling this off this scam.

Climate Craziness of the Week: British lawyer urges UN to accept ‘ecocide’ as international crime on par with genocide
Anthony Watts / April 11, 2010
Supporters of a new ecocide law also believe it could be used to prosecute “climate deniers”. Effort started by Club of Rome lawyer.

Excerpts from the Guardian article:

A campaign to declare the mass destruction of ecosystems an international crime against peace – alongside genocide and crimes against humanity – is being launched in the UK.

The proposal for the United Nations to accept “ecocide” as a fifth “crime against peace”, which could be tried at the International Criminal Court (ICC), is the brainchild of British lawyer-turned-campaigner Polly Higgins.

The radical idea would have a profound effect on industries blamed for widespread damage to the environment like fossil fuels, mining, agriculture, chemicals and forestry.

Supporters of a new ecocide law also believe it could be used to prosecute “climate deniers” who distort science and facts to discourage voters and politicians from taking action to tackle global warming and climate change.

Climate Craziness of the Week British lawyer urges UN to accept 8216 ecocide 8217 as international crime on par with genocide Watts Up With That

Adolph Hitler did much the same thing only he called the deniers JEWS... This type of thing will not end well for millions of people if these people are not placed in check quickly.
 
Adolph Hitler did much the same thing only he called the deniers JEWS... This type of thing will not end well for millions of people if these people are not placed in check quickly.

Did he? I'd say YOU sound a hell of a lot more like a fascist bigot than anything anyone has said at a climate conference.

"If these people are not placed in check quickly". Now THAT sounds like Hitler talking about the Jews.

Asshole

--Abraham
 
Oh bite me. :lol: You need to get up to speed on what punishments have been called for anyone who has been a skeptic or a denier. And punishments that have already been dealt to skeptics.

Small sampling of threats, intimidation and censorship:

NASA’s James Hansen has called for trials of climate skeptics in 2008 for “high crimes against humanity.”

Environmentalist Robert F. Kennedy Jr. lashed out at skeptics in 2007, declaring “This is treason. And we need to start treating them as traitors”

In 2009, RFK, Jr. also called coal companies “criminal enterprises” and declared CEO’s ‘should be in jail… for all of eternity.”

In June 2009, former Clinton Administration official Joe Romm defended a comment on his Climate Progress website warning skeptics would be strangled in their beds.

“An entire generation will soon be ready to strangle you and your kind while you sleep in your beds,” stated the remarks, which Romm defended by calling them “not a threat, but a prediction.”

In 2006, the eco-magazine Grist called for Nuremberg-Style trials for skeptics.

In 2008, Canadian environmentalist David Suzuki called for government leaders skeptical of global warming to be thrown “into jail.”

In 2007, The Weather Channel’s climate expert called for withholding certification of skeptical meteorologists.

A 2008 report found that ‘climate blasphemy’ is replacing traditional religious blasphemy.

In addition, a July 2007 Senate report detailed how skeptical scientists have faced threats and intimidation.

In 2007, then EPA Chief Vowed to Probe E-mail Threatening to ‘Destroy’ Career of Climate Skeptic and dissenters of warming fears have been called ‘Climate Criminals’ who are committing ‘Terracide’ (killing of Planet Earth) (July 25, 2007)

In addition, in May 2009, Climate Depot Was Banned in Louisiana! See: State official sought to ‘shut down’ climate skeptic’s testimony at hearing.

Below are many more examples of the threats, name calling and intimidation skeptics have faced in recent times.

November 12, 2007: UN official warns ignoring warming would be ‘criminally irresponsible’ Excerpt: The U.N.’s top climate official warned policymakers and scientists trying to hammer out a landmark report on climate change that ignoring the urgency of global warming would be “criminally irresponsible.”

Yvo de Boer’s comments came at the opening of a weeklong conference that will complete a concise guide on the state of global warming and what can be done to stop the Earth from overheating.

September 29. 2007: VA State Climatologist skeptical of global warming loses job after clash with Governor: ‘I was told that I could not speak in public’

Excerpt: Michaels has argued that the climate is becoming warmer but that the consequences will not be as dire as others have predicted. Gov. Kaine had warned. Michaels not to use his official title in discussing his views.

“I resigned as Virginia state climatologist because I was told that I could not speak in public on my area of expertise, global warming, as state climatologist,” Michaels said in a statement this week provided by the libertarian Cato Institute, where he has been a fellow since 1992.

“It was impossible to maintain academic freedom with this speech restriction.” (LINK)

Skeptical State Climatologist in Oregon has title threatened by Governor (February 8, 2007) Excerpt: “[State Climatologist George Taylor] does not believe human activities are the main cause of global climate change…

So the [Oregon] governor wants to take that title from Taylor and make it a position that he would appoint. In an exclusive interview with KGW-TV, Governor Ted Kulongoski confirmed he wants to take that title from Taylor.

Skeptical State Climatologist in Delaware silenced by Governor (May 2, 2007) Excerpt: Legates is a state climatologist in Delaware, and he teaches at the university. He`s not part of the mythical climate consensus.

In fact, Legates believes that we oversimplify climate by just blaming greenhouse gases. One day he received a letter from the governor, saying his views do not concur with those of the administration, so if he wants to speak out, it must be as an individual, not as a state climatologist.

So essentially, you can have the title of state climatologist unless he`s talking about his views on climate?

October 28, 2008: License to dissent: ‘Internet should be nationalized as a public utility’ to combat global warming skepticism – Australian Herald Sun – Excerpt: British journalism lecturer and warming alarmist Alex Lockwood says my blog is a menace to the planet. Skeptical bloggers like me need bringing into line, and Lockwood tells a journalism seminar of some options:

There is clearly a need for research into the ways in which climate skepticism online is free to contest scientific fact. But there is enough here already to put forward some of the ideas in circulation. One of the founders of the Internet Vint Cerf, and lead for Google’s Internet for Everyone project, made a recent suggestion that the Internet should be nationalized as a public utility.

As tech policy blogger Jim Harper argues, “giving power over the Internet to well-heeled interests and self-interested politicians” is, and I quote, “a bad idea.” Or in the UK every new online publication could be required to register with the recently announced Internet watchdog…

November 5, 2008: UK Scientist: ‘BBC SHUNNED ME FOR DENYING CLIMATE CHANGE’ – UK Daily Express

Excerpt: FOR YEARS David Bellamy was one of the best known faces on TV. A respected botanist and the author of 35 books, he had presented around 400 programmes over the years and was appreciated by audiences for his boundless enthusiasm. Yet for more than 10 years he has been out of the limelight, shunned by bosses at the BBC where he made his name, as well as fellow scientists and environmentalists.

His crime? Bellamy says he doesn’t believe in man-made global warming. Here he reveals why – and the price he has paid for not toeing the orthodox line on climate change.

U.N. official says it’s ‘completely immoral’ to doubt global warming fears (May 10, 2007)

Excerpt: UN special climate envoy Dr. Gro Harlem Brundtland declared “it’s completely immoral, even, to question” the UN’s scientific “consensus.”

Former US Vice President Al Gore compared global warming skeptics to people who ‘believe the moon landing was actually staged in a movie lot in Arizona’ (June 20, 2006)

Gore Refuses to Hear Skeptical Global Warming Views (Video)

UK environment secretary David Miliband said ‘those who deny [climate change] are the flat-Earthers of the twenty-first century’ (October 6, 2006)

Weather Channel Climate Expert Calls for Decertifying Global Warming Skeptics (January 17, 2007) Excerpt: The Weather Channel’s most prominent climatologist is advocating that broadcast meteorologists be stripped of their scientific certification if they express skepticism about predictions of manmade catastrophic global warming.

This latest call to silence skeptics follows a year (2006) in which skeptics were compared to “Holocaust Deniers” and Nuremberg-style war crimes trials were advocated by several climate alarmists.

Barone: Warmists have ‘a desire to kill heretics’ — Calls for capital punishment for ‘global warming deniers’ – DC Examiner – June 9, 2009

Strangle Skeptics in Bed! ‘An entire generation will soon be ready to strangle you and your kind while you sleep in your beds’ – June 5, 2009

8216 Execute 8217 Skeptics Shock Call To Action 8216 At what point do we jail or execute global warming deniers 8217 8212 8216 Shouldn 8217 t we start punishing them now 8217 Climate Depot
 
Last edited:
And I agree with every one of them.


Of course you do. You're a murderous swine who will kill anyone who disagrees with your religion like all religious nutcases.
 
And I agree with every one of them.

And you still had the balls to say this?

Did he? I'd say YOU sound a hell of a lot more like a fascist bigot than anything anyone has said at a climate conference.

"If these people are not placed in check quickly". Now THAT sounds like Hitler talking about the Jews.

Asshole

--Abraham
 
Adolph Hitler did much the same thing only he called the deniers JEWS... This type of thing will not end well for millions of people if these people are not placed in check quickly.

Did he? I'd say YOU sound a hell of a lot more like a fascist bigot than anything anyone has said at a climate conference.

"If these people are not placed in check quickly". Now THAT sounds like Hitler talking about the Jews.

Asshole

--Abraham


Placed in check is hardly the same thing as your final solution...Take another look at my sig line and tell me who really sounds like a fascist...."more effective to off the deniers" ...now that's fascist speak if there ever was fascist speak.
 
And I agree with every one of them.

Of course you do....because at heart, you are a socialist fascist...you made your position clear when you voiced the opinion that simply killing off deniers would be the most effective action. When you have no actual argument, how else can those who do be silenced?
 
And what else could you POSSIBLY have been expected to say?

Not a damn thing.

Shame there's no penalty for willful stupidity.
 

Forum List

Back
Top