skookerasbil
Platinum Member
That was some top-quality "taking a lot of space to say very little", but it failed to address my point. It just rehashed what I've been pointing out was a fallacy.
Try doing the liberal thing. You know, be concise, logical and non-emotional. State a point directly, then support the point briefly and clearly.
My first point is that natural cycles happening the past do not mandate that the current warming is a natural cycle. Your senseless logic is like saying "forest fires have happened naturally, so humans can't cause forest fires". Or "extinctions have happened naturally, so humans can't cause extinctions."
Second, the global energy flux measurements demonstrate it isn't a natural cycle. More energy comes in than goes out, because outgoing IR is squeezing down around the CO2 absorption bands. It's absurd to say it's a natural cycle when the evidence says it's not.
LMAO.........liberal logic has been fucking the nation for decades.
Why?
Because for liberals, it is never about the results. Results dont matter. If the intentions are good and it sounds clever, you go do it. This is exactly the sentiment of the modern liberal intellectual. Except theres a problem = in their thinking, these people never assess the costs or compared to what factor. These knuckleheads, if they had their way, would blast off head long into spending 76 trilion dollars to go all green......as if there were no tradeoffs.
Thankfully, far left thinking is fringe ( except to them) and having zero effect on public policy here in America as applied to climate change.
But keep up the angry bitter laced threads/posts. I wouldnt be in this forum without them!!!