Trump wants to impose work requirement for food stamp users

Unfortunately it will not apply to welfare queens with dependent kids which just encourages black women to continue dropping bastards well into their 50s.!!!

http://nypost.com/2017/05/22/trump-wants-to-impose-work-requirement-for-food-stamp-users/

may 22 2017 The Trump administration wants to impose a work requirement on able-bodied adults who receive food stamps and force states to pick up some of the costs as part of a wider plan to slash spending by $3.6 trillion over the next decade.

Budget director Mick Mulvaney said that once states have “a little skin in the game,” they will be more inclined to root out abuses and waste in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)

Overall, the Trump administration wants to squeeze out about $193 billion from SNAP over 10 years.

To do so, President Trump wants able-bodied adults without dependent children to work for their food stamps, Mulvaney said.

.

the orange sociopath can't do that.... you can't require people to have jobs when there aren't any.

what a bunch of losers you are.

worry more about what Donald and his boys are stealing while they engage in shifting income to those that don't need it.

Actually the job market is now picking up and many are hiring.

The only answer to poverty is to stop the poor from having kids. But in america we do the opposite and pay poor black women to have kids!!! Many states have introduced family caps which prevent welfare queens from getting bigger welfare checks after a certain number of kids.
Great idea. Any more than two...you are on your own!

will that somehow help you pay for your trailer, white trash?

bet your ugly little tune would change if you knew that the largest group glomming welfare is single white mothers.... from y'all red states. :cuckoo:

Where'd you get that info? I had already posted on another thread, the demographics of welfare recipients and there is a much higher number Democrats
 
Don't confuse cash welfare recipients with food stamp recipients.

TANF already has a work requirement in order to receive benefits. If you don't comply, they will sanction/penalize you for non-compliance. And don't forget there is a lifetime 5-year limit to receive.

Most food stamp recipients already work and SNAP is to help supplement their income. The actual amounts they get is determined by how much they earn and certain household deductions.
 
I'm not an expert on this but it [sex education] usually is taught in school. However, the content is under assault by the religious right trying to deny comprehensive education and push an abstinence only approach in some regions.

And the left wrong has hijacked it to promote bizarre, immoral sexual perversions such as homosexuality and worse, and outright insanity, such as “transgenderism” and “gender fluidity”. What better way to create a generation that is completely confused about how sex and reproduction work, than letting LIbErals take control of such teaching?
 
Jeez
Having to work for your free stuff
Gonna be a lot of snowflakin' protestin'
 
SNAP is a federal program. States pay workers to determine eligibility in acvordancevwith federal regs.. Which includes participation in job programs. If you are between the ages of 16 and 60, and are not exempted, you are required to actively seek work, to NOT quit without goid cause, and to refrain from asking for fewer hours.

The states, such as Oregon...take a LOT of money from the feds to administer the programs....then they just...don't. They write administrative rules and train workers in practices that conflict with the federal policy.

There are exemptions from participation....if you have a child under six, you are exempted. If you are disabled or pregnant, exempted. If you are caring for a disabled relative, exempt. Homeless are exempt. Some counties are exempt because they are rural with no public transportation. High school students are exempted. People in treatment are exempted..

the point is...these requirements aren't new. The five year cutoff is totally theoretical. There are so many exceptions and exemptions that nobody ever times out.
 
Perhaps there could be Governmental Daycare for those who are finally getting off their asses and going to work menial jobs to qualify for the daycare. A parent should pay $10 a day for each child they send to daycare. Some of the former Snap Snatchers will be working in those day sites if they qualify. Perhaps the children will learn to talk properly.
Better yet, why not employ some of these breeders in child care facilities for the others who are working for their daily bread?
That is what I intended to say. Sorry I wasn't clear.
 
SNAP is a federal program. States pay workers to determine eligibility in acvordancevwith federal regs.. Which includes participation in job programs. If you are between the ages of 16 and 60, and are not exempted, you are required to actively seek work, to NOT quit without goid cause, and to refrain from asking for fewer hours.

The states, such as Oregon...take a LOT of money from the feds to administer the programs....then they just...don't. They write administrative rules and train workers in practices that conflict with the federal policy.

There are exemptions from participation....if you have a child under six, you are exempted. If you are disabled or pregnant, exempted. If you are caring for a disabled relative, exempt. Homeless are exempt. Some counties are exempt because they are rural with no public transportation. High school students are exempted. People in treatment are exempted..

the point is...these requirements aren't new. The five year cutoff is totally theoretical. There are so many exceptions and exemptions that nobody ever times out.

True...except all those regulations & requirements are for cash benefits. So far, food stamps or SNAP hasn't had those requirements and has only been based on income vs deductions


eta......cash & food stamps have different rules and always have
 
As for having more kids or not.......Medicaid doesn't pay for birth control or abortions, but it does pay DR & hospital to have babies
 
i spent my day explaining to p
SNAP is a federal program. States pay workers to determine eligibility in acvordancevwith federal regs.. Which includes participation in job programs. If you are between the ages of 16 and 60, and are not exempted, you are required to actively seek work, to NOT quit without goid cause, and to refrain from asking for fewer hours.

The states, such as Oregon...take a LOT of money from the feds to administer the programs....then they just...don't. They write administrative rules and train workers in practices that conflict with the federal policy.

There are exemptions from participation....if you have a child under six, you are exempted. If you are disabled or pregnant, exempted. If you are caring for a disabled relative, exempt. Homeless are exempt. Some counties are exempt because they are rural with no public transportation. High school students are exempted. People in treatment are exempted..

the point is...these requirements aren't new. The five year cutoff is totally theoretical. There are so many exceptions and exemptions that nobody ever times out.

True...except all those regulations & requirements are for cash benefits. So far, food stamps or SNAP hasn't had those requirements and has only been based on income vs deductions


eta......cash & food stamps have different rules and always have
nope. You are wrong. There are work programs for tang...and there is a federal program called ofset for snap. Ppl who have quit a job within 30 days of applying or recertifying for snap are penalized. We pay contractors to administer the programs which will dole our a tiny non renewing stipend for gas money to look for work. Work registrants are required to participate, as I said, unless they are exempted.
 
i spent my day explaining to p
SNAP is a federal program. States pay workers to determine eligibility in acvordancevwith federal regs.. Which includes participation in job programs. If you are between the ages of 16 and 60, and are not exempted, you are required to actively seek work, to NOT quit without goid cause, and to refrain from asking for fewer hours.

The states, such as Oregon...take a LOT of money from the feds to administer the programs....then they just...don't. They write administrative rules and train workers in practices that conflict with the federal policy.

There are exemptions from participation....if you have a child under six, you are exempted. If you are disabled or pregnant, exempted. If you are caring for a disabled relative, exempt. Homeless are exempt. Some counties are exempt because they are rural with no public transportation. High school students are exempted. People in treatment are exempted..

the point is...these requirements aren't new. The five year cutoff is totally theoretical. There are so many exceptions and exemptions that nobody ever times out.

True...except all those regulations & requirements are for cash benefits. So far, food stamps or SNAP hasn't had those requirements and has only been based on income vs deductions


eta......cash & food stamps have different rules and always have
nope. You are wrong. There are work programs for tang...and there is a federal program called ofset for snap. Ppl who have quit a job within 30 days of applying or recertifying for snap are penalized. We pay contractors to administer the programs which will dole our a tiny non renewing stipend for gas money to look for work. Work registrants are required to participate, as I said, unless they are exempted.

That I wasn't aware of.....unless it's a state mandate :dunno:
 
its a federal mandate that states are supposed to, and are given fed money to, adhere to. They take the money, then ignore it.
 
Trump also wants to increase the make-jobs-welfare-program for defense contractors, the largest welfare taker in the country. How convenient to shovel billions in taxpayer's money to wealthy contractors while cutting health programs for those very taxpayers.

Stockholm Syndrome.
 
- Trump wants to impose work requirement for food stamp users -



In all honesty that doesn't sound unreasonable to me :dunno:
 
Trump also wants to increase the make-jobs-welfare-program for defense contractors, the largest welfare taker in the country. How convenient to shovel billions in taxpayer's money to wealthy contractors while cutting health programs for those very taxpayers.

Stockholm Syndrome.
you are right. You suffer from it. You have been brainwashed to love the chains of welfare. Abject devotion to the engine that has captured you.
 
btw, yes there are more whites than blacks on welfare. But, as with crime, the stats are disproportionate to the percentages. That's what happens when you let progs fix things. They fixed the Indians to death. They've done the same to the blacks...their reservations are projects.
 
https://apps.state.or.us/Forms/Served/de7280f.pdf

Required notification that is provided to every snap household telling them they're supposed to work, or can lose their benefits.

So it is a state requirement.

Feds provide welfare funds in block grants to the states with certain regulations/requirements to the programs and then each state determines how those funds are administered and each have their own laws & requirements
 
https://apps.state.or.us/Forms/Served/de7280f.pdf

Required notification that is provided to every snap household telling them they're supposed to work, or can lose their benefits.

So it is a state requirement.

Feds provide welfare funds in block grants to the states with certain regulations/requirements to the programs and then each state determines how those funds are administered and each have their own laws & requirements
no, its not a state requirement. The requirement is federal. They give us money to use to contract ppl to do it. The program looks different state to state. But it is mandated by the feds.Eligibility | Food and Nutrition Service
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top