Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
They were going to create a formal advisory committee but they would have been subject to pesky things like public oversight, representative membership, FOA requests, you know, all the things we use to keep government honest. Which should tell you they aren't planning on being honest.The White House plans to create an ad hoc group of select federal scientists to reassess the government’s analysis of climate science and counter conclusions that the continued burning of fossil fuels is harming the planet, according to three administration officials.
The National Security Council initiative would include scientists who question the severity of climate impacts and the extent to which humans contribute to the problem, according to these individuals, who asked for anonymity to discuss internal deliberations.
The group would not be subject to the same level of public disclosure as a formal advisory committee.
Which should tell you they aren't planning on being honest.
Alternative ScienceThey were going to create a formal advisory committee but they would have been subject to pesky things like public oversight, representative membership, FOA requests, you know, all the things we use to keep government honest. Which should tell you they aren't planning on being honest.The White House plans to create an ad hoc group of select federal scientists to reassess the government’s analysis of climate science and counter conclusions that the continued burning of fossil fuels is harming the planet, according to three administration officials.
The National Security Council initiative would include scientists who question the severity of climate impacts and the extent to which humans contribute to the problem, according to these individuals, who asked for anonymity to discuss internal deliberations.
The group would not be subject to the same level of public disclosure as a formal advisory committee.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/nati...cd0a84-37dd-11e9-af5b-b51b7ff322e9_story.html
Like to see how they are stacking the committeeW.H. to create climate denier group.
Liar!!
tRump W.H. to create climate denier group
Alternative ScienceThey were going to create a formal advisory committee but they would have been subject to pesky things like public oversight, representative membership, FOA requests, you know, all the things we use to keep government honest. Which should tell you they aren't planning on being honest.The White House plans to create an ad hoc group of select federal scientists to reassess the government’s analysis of climate science and counter conclusions that the continued burning of fossil fuels is harming the planet, according to three administration officials.
The National Security Council initiative would include scientists who question the severity of climate impacts and the extent to which humans contribute to the problem, according to these individuals, who asked for anonymity to discuss internal deliberations.
The group would not be subject to the same level of public disclosure as a formal advisory committee.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/nati...cd0a84-37dd-11e9-af5b-b51b7ff322e9_story.html
Nope, he's spot on.W.H. to create climate denier group.
Liar!!
Nope, he's spot on.W.H. to create climate denier group.
Liar!!
The problem is that Trump has to find an "alternative" to what the global scientific community is saying. So this is a scam from the start.Nope, he's spot on.W.H. to create climate denier group.
Liar!!
If true, what exactly is the problem?
The problem is that Trump has to find an "alternative" to what the global scientific community is saying. So this is a scam from the start.Nope, he's spot on.W.H. to create climate denier group.
Liar!!
If true, what exactly is the problem?
Already answered. Please pay attention.How’s it a scam?
Show us some scientific papers to give us a clue as to what you're talking about.I mean just look at what the so called experts used to tells us peons about nutrition not too long ago.
Already answered. Please pay attention.How’s it a scam?
They were going to create a formal advisory committee but they would have been subject to pesky things like public oversight, representative membership, FOA requests, you know, all the things we use to keep government honest. Which should tell you they aren't planning on being honest.The White House plans to create an ad hoc group of select federal scientists to reassess the government’s analysis of climate science and counter conclusions that the continued burning of fossil fuels is harming the planet, according to three administration officials.
The National Security Council initiative would include scientists who question the severity of climate impacts and the extent to which humans contribute to the problem, according to these individuals, who asked for anonymity to discuss internal deliberations.
The group would not be subject to the same level of public disclosure as a formal advisory committee.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/nati...cd0a84-37dd-11e9-af5b-b51b7ff322e9_story.html
Which makes it a scam. Period. Trump has to go select outliers, as the overwhelming consensus and finding of the scientists he has at his disposal simply don't agree with his embarrassingly fucking ignorant climate science denial. Don't try to read too far into it.You said it’s a alternative to what the scientific community is saying.
Which makes it a scam. Period. Trump has to go select outliers, as the overwhelming consensus and finding of the scientists he has at his disposal simply don't agree with his embarrassingly fucking ignorant climate science denial. Don't try to read too far into it.You said it’s a alternative to what the scientific community is saying.
sorry, stupid analogy. They did not arrive at that conclusion using the scientific method. Furthermore, we discovered the earth was NOT flat by using the scientific method... not by sitting around and vomiting opinions.The scientific community used to think the world was flat, too.
