trump loses another one

[Curried Goats]

What if I was to tell you he dindu nuffin?

Then I'd laugh in your face and tell you I can't wait to see his defense in court.

 

[The Duke]

Then I'd laugh in your face and tell you I can't wait to see his defense in court.

What are the specific charges, cupcake?

 

[Curried Goats]

What are the specific charges, cupcake?

For which case? Your boy has got a lot of them.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Because I want to stop commie shitlords from going against The Constitution in MY country?!

No, commie shill shitlord.

There’s no right in the constitution to wage war on fellow Americans. You are the enemy of America.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Why are these people so goddamn eager to jump in and illustrate my points for me?

That Dunning-Kruger is a mofo.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

I didn't make that claim. But you claimed that no one from "Their world" could define it.

Your schtick is increasingly sad

Ok but how is that happening and by whom?

 

[SweetSue92]

Ok but how is that happening and by whom?

I'm not going to defend an argument I didn't even make. How crazy is that?

 

[d0gbreath]

Some more sparkly things to keep the lefties entertained:

Thanks, that's much more pleasant than The Duke running out of names to call everyone in this thread.
Don't tell him I said that, so he won't shoot me.

 

[surada]

"We're trained Marxists."
~ BLM

Trump is a loser in every aspect of his life. He's three kinds of heel and buried the mother of his children on a golf course... How cheap is that?

Ex-Aide Reveals What 'Humiliated' Melania Trump Did After Stormy Daniels News

Stephanie Grisham also explained why the ex-president is probably "quite worried" about his wife right now.

www.huffpost.com

Daniels claimed to have had an affair with Trump from 2006-2007, while Melania Trump was caring for the couple’s then-infant child. Grisham said separate allegations of an affair with Playboy Playmate Karen McDougal also led to tensions in the White House.

“We went to the State of the Union separately. She refused to walk out to Marine One with him because she didn’t want to be like Hillary Clinton and standing by her man,” said Grisham, who was chief of staff to the then-first lady before becoming White House press secretary under Donald Trump. “She’s a very independent and strong woman.”

 

[SeaMajor7]

Trump is a loser in every aspect of his life. He's three kinds of heel and buried the mother of his children on a golf course... How cheap is that?

Ex-Aide Reveals What 'Humiliated' Melania Trump Did After Stormy Daniels News

Stephanie Grisham also explained why the ex-president is probably "quite worried" about his wife right now.

www.huffpost.com

Daniels claimed to have had an affair with Trump from 2006-2007, while Melania Trump was caring for the couple’s then-infant child. Grisham said separate allegations of an affair with Playboy Playmate Karen McDougal also led to tensions in the White House.

“We went to the State of the Union separately. She refused to walk out to Marine One with him because she didn’t want to be like Hillary Clinton and standing by her man,” said Grisham, who was chief of staff to the then-first lady before becoming White House press secretary under Donald Trump. “She’s a very independent and strong woman.”

 

[Catsnmeters]

No, that was peaceful. Next time Democrats cheat like that, it will be war.

No need to go to the capital, unless you're already there to eradicate the vermin.

I'll tell you this right now: Democrats cannot cheat another election without there being massive violence your peabrain can't even fathom against them.

Seditious conspiracy is not peaceful.

 

[GMCGeneral]

Your inability to refute ANYTHING from what I posted is noted.
Here's some more REAL HISTORY that helped to scramble the minds of Americans throughout the 20th century.....
The Reality of Red Subversion

The Reality of Red Subversion
The Recent Confirmation of Soviet Espionage in America
STEPHEN J. SNIEGOSKI • SEPTEMBER 1, 2003

In an apparent effort to illustrate political simple-mindedness, Carroll Quigley derisively wrote in his noted (at least by the John Birch Society) Tragedy and Hope, that the “same groups who were howling about Soviet espionage in 1948-1955 were also claiming that President Roosevelt expected and wanted Pearl Harbor.”[1] In a previous contribution to The Occidental Quarterly, I dealt with the latter; here I will do some “howling” about the former. According to what until recently has passed as conventional wisdom for the liberal establishment, America in the late 1940s and early 1950s was gripped by a terrible Red scare, a period of anti-Communist hysteria and witch hunts. Malicious “red-baiters” slandered innocent liberals as Communists in order to destroy the reforms of the New Deal and impede peace with the Soviet Union. At most, some of the more “anti-Communist” liberals would concede that there may have been a few Communist subversives, but nothing to justify the terrible anti-Communist overreaction, above all the antics of the demagogic Joe McCarthy. From the 1960s through the 1980s, one of the strongest taboos in American political discourse was the subject of Soviet influence within the United States.

During the 1990s, the release of the Venona documents (see p. 49) by the U.S. government and the partial opening of the Soviet archives forced establishment minds to a reconsideration. Yes, Virginia, there really were Communist spies in the United States during the so-called “McCarthy era.” In fact, it now appears that even the slandered and smeared “red-baiters” of the period were unaware of just how far Soviet Communist subversion had penetrated. It must be added that even during the period of the so-called “witch hunt” there was more than enough evidence to prove the reality of Soviet Communist spying to any objective person. But, of course, if one is going to pass for an “educated,” “respectable” person, objective thinking must be eschewed—it’s simply not a Darwinian survival trait in modern America.

From Lenin onward Soviet Communist leaders have preached the necessity of underground activities, with foreign governments the key target for infiltration. The evidence for this from many countries is overwhelming. Communists in government engaged in espionage and acted to influence policy in a pro-Soviet direction. Many of the individuals engaged in these activities were Communist Party members; others were fellow travelers, who despite their lack of party discipline, sought to advance the interests of Soviet Communism.

Franklin Roosevelt’s diplomatic recognition of the Soviet Union in 1933 provided the Soviets with their first opportunity for effective penetration of the U.S. government. With diplomatic recognition, Soviet intelligence could function under legal cover through its embassy and consulates. The liberal New Deal agencies provided a fertile field for the recruitment of Soviet spies. Many of those who staffed these agencies sympathized with the government planning of the Soviet “experiment” and with Soviet opposition to fascism. This sympathy for Communism increased during World War II, when the Soviets could be seen as comrades-in-arms. That the Soviet Union was combating the great evil of Nazism has often been used to explain (and to justify) the disproportionate number of subversives of Jewish ethnicity.

Soviet intelligence benefited immensely from the support of the Communist Party of the United States, many of whose members acted as agents. Thus during the 1930s and 1940s, Communist subversives, under direct Soviet control, came to permeate key agencies of the federal government: the Treasury and State departments, the Office of Strategic Services (forerunner to the CIA), and even the White House itself.

Soviet intelligence consisted of three separate organizations: the KGB (NKVD or NKGB—the leading state security organ),[2] the GRU (military intelligence), and the U.S. Communist Party (technically, the Communist Party of the United States of America, or CPUSA), which was supervised by the Comintern (the Communist International, run by Stalin). The KGB and GRU ran parallel “legal” and “illegal” intelligence networks in the United States. “Legal” networks were run by intelligence officers working under legal, usually diplomatic, cover in “residencies” located clandestinely in Soviet diplomatic missions and other official organizations. “Illegal” networks, in contrast, were run by Soviet intelligence officers who used false identities and had no apparent connection to Soviet organizations.

President Roosevelt was oblivious to the danger of Soviet subversion. In 1939, Adolf A. Berle, Roosevelt’s assistant secretary of state and adviser on internal security, presented the President with a list of leading Soviet agents in the United States, including Alger Hiss and Harry Dexter White, after receiving this information from ex-Communist spy Whittaker Chambers. Roosevelt simply laughed this off as ridiculous....
______________________________________
During the 1990s, the release of the Venona documents (see p. 49) by the U.S. government and the partial opening of the Soviet archives forced establishment minds to a reconsideration.
Yes, Virginia, there really were Communist spies in the United States during the so-called “McCarthy era.” In fact, it now appears that even the slandered and smeared “red-baiters” of the period were unaware of just how far Soviet Communist subversion had penetrated. It must be added that even during the period of the so-called “witch hunt” there was more than enough evidence to prove the reality of Soviet Communist spying to any objective person.
_______________________________
And HERE WE ARE TODAY.......

Truman should've listened to Patton and nuked the Soviets after we took out Japan

 

[GMCGeneral]

I honestly hope you are stupid enough to try.

That'll send the GOP to the political wilderness for decades.

And get the far Left one party rule you want?

 

[JoeB131]

And get the far Left one party rule you want?

The GOP doesn't really deserve being part of the conversation after supporting Trump.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

I'm not going to defend an argument I didn't even make. How crazy is that?

Because there is no defense.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

And get the far Left one party rule you want?

Of course not. But when the GOP can't even get it's shit together enough to put up even the illusion of governing, what other option is there?

 

[GMCGeneral]

Of course not. But when the GOP can't even get it's shit together enough to put up even the illusion of governing, what other option is there?

"Of course not?" That's a laugh coming from a far Left shitbox like you.

 

[GMCGeneral]

The GOP doesn't really deserve being part of the conversation after supporting Trump.

Sure they do
You want the GOP to be the token " opposition" while you piles of dogshit ram your far Left agenda down our throats.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

"Of course not?" That's a laugh coming from a far Left shitbox like you.

Fail. NeverTrumper sure, but there's nothing 'far left' about my politics.

 

[GMCGeneral]

Fail. NeverTrumper sure, but there's nothing 'far left' about my politics.

Prove it. No Republican since Reagan had the balls to go against the Democrats