Fair and Impartial Trump Jury

[Fort Fun Indiana]

The trumpanzees talk about how the system is unfair.

But Any example they can give will be based on exonerating evidence coming to light later.

No such evidence will be forthcoming for the orange slob. So once again they have a useless and irrelevant talking point.

 

[rightwinger]

Not in a political persecution, you moron.

I’m not trying to, you scumbag.

Can you discuss the actual case and show where Trump did not falsify business expenses?

How was Stormy actually paid?

 

[BackAgain]

Can you discuss the actual case and show where Trump did not falsify business expenses?

I have repeatedly in the proper threads. And you vermin always ignore it.

You are the vermin with the burden of proof, by the way.

And, none of you has or ever can show how he did falsify any business records (even as a misdemeanor much less as the ridiculous felony).

 

[rightwinger]

I have repeatedly in the proper threads. And you vermin always ignore it.

You are the vermin with the burden of proof, by the way.

And, none of you has or ever can show how he did falsify any business records (even as a misdemeanor much less as the ridiculous felony).

Not an answer
Talk specifics of why Trump did not falsify business records

There is ample evidence of how Stormy was paid. Show how that is not falsifying business records as charged

 

[boevans]

I have repeatedly in the proper threads. And you vermin always ignore it.

You are the vermin with the burden of proof, by the way.

And, none of you has or ever can show how he did falsify any business records (even as a misdemeanor much less as the ridiculous felony).

Bragg will do it easily, and you will cry.

 

[dudmuck]

She can say anything she wants to about being fair — and that is often a key. But after expressing that personal disdain for his “persona,” it is absurd that the judge wouldn’t grant a defense application to strike that juror “for cause.”

I assume the worst with a deep blue cesspool Manhattan jury: a conviction without regard to the evidence or the law.
But, I believe this one could be a valid basis for a reversal.

each potential juror needs to answer a questionnaire. The answers establish whether the juror can be impartial. 44 percent of Manhattan is not democrat, and the questions filter them out.

 

[otto105]

Trump always claimed New Yorkers loved him and would cheer and applaud when they saw him. Now he says they hate him so much till he can't get a fair trial. I don't see how both can be true. Was he lying before, or is he lying now?

Lying all the time.

 

[BackAgain]

Not an answer

Yes. It is. Your opinion doesn’t make you factually correct. In this instance, you’re wrong again.

Talk specifics of why Trump did not falsify business records

No; you have the burden. Establish your own absurd proposition.

There is ample evidence of how Stormy was paid.

She did get paid for an NDA. So what?

Show how that is not falsifying business records as charged

No. You show that he falsified anything.

Step up and meet your own burden, turd.

 

[Papageorgio]

She declared she would be Fair and Impartial…

What more can you ask?

As fair and impartial as you?

 

[BackAgain]

each potential juror needs to answer a questionnaire.

That happens in lots of cases. And?

The answers establish whether the juror can be impartial.

No. They sure don’t.

44 percent of Manhattan is not democrat, and the questions filter them out.

No. It sure doesn’t.

 

[rightwinger]

Yes. It is. Your opinion doesn’t make you factually correct. In this instance, you’re wrong again.

No; you have the burden. Establish your own absurd proposition.

She did get paid for an NDA. So what?

No. You show that he falsified anything.

Step up and meet your own burden, turd.

You fail once again Skippy

You declare the trial a scam and political prosecution but you can’t discuss the specifics of the case and provide a defense that Trump did not falsify business records in paying off Stormy

Follow the money

It goes from a Trump business account to Cohen to Stormy

 

[otto105]

You fail once again Skippy

You declare the trial a scam and political prosecution but you can’t discuss the specifics of the case and provide a defense that Trump did not falsify business records in paying off Stormy

Follow the money

It goes from a Trump business account to Cohen to Stormy

And he reported payment as a campaign expense which is illegal.

 

[Care4all]

You would be disqualified to sit on a jury judging Trump for his actions on Jan 6.

I would be the first to say that silly one, and run as fast as I could when they release me from such... if I were in the pool of potential jurors!

BUT, if they did choose me, with all my baggage, I would and could honor the oath I take to make my decision based solely on the evidence presented in the trial and would convict only if the evidence was beyond a reasonable doubt!

I could also bet, all other jurors will do the same....it is an overwhelming responsibility having another person's life in your hands as a juror, you want to get it right!

 

[Care4all]

And he reported payment as a campaign expense which is illegal.

No. What was illegal was he DID NOT claim it as a campaign expense!!!

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

They believe everyone Is corrupt. Like their orange mangod.

That's what normalization is. We were warned.

Which is why it’s pointless to confront conservatives with facts and the truth.

Willfully ignorant, conservatives will believe everyone is corrupt and that we all exist in a realm of nefarious conspiracies.

 

[BackAgain]

You fail once again Skippy

You declare the trial a scam and political prosecution but you can’t discuss the specifics of the case and provide a defense that Trump did not falsify business records in paying off Stormy

Follow the money

It goes from a Trump business account to Cohen to Stormy

I seriously cannot fix your ignorance and retardation.

Your fail is perpetual.

 

[rightwinger]

I seriously cannot fix your ignorance and retardation.

Your fail is perpetual.

Once again, when given an opportunity to back up your claims with facts…..you run away

 

[frigidweirdo]

It looks like he NYC Jury will be fair and impartial in judging Trump

I don’t like his persona,” she said. “I don’t like some of my coworkers, but I don’t try to sabotage their work.”

“He just seems very selfish and self-serving so I don’t really appreciate that in any public servant, so I don’t know him as a person, so I don’t know how he is in terms of his integrity,” she added. “It’s just not my cup of tea.”

In denying Trump’s challenge, Merchan said it’s not enough that she doesn’t like his persona because she said she was certain she could set that aside to be fair and impartial.

https://www.cnn.com/2024/04/18/politics/takeaway-day-3-trump-hush-money-trial/index.html

Some people are capable of this.

The problem is Trump probably thinks it's not true and all Trump supporters and many Republicans and Democrats probably think it's not true either, because they're not capable of it.

 

[The Duke]

so you admit NYC juries are fair and impartial

You can’t have it both ways

We get it that that's the Democrat talking points for the day, but we just don't believe it, shitbird.

 

[rightwinger]

Some people are capable of this.

The problem is Trump probably thinks it's not true and all Trump supporters and many Republicans and Democrats probably think it's not true either, because they're not capable of it.

Trump and his followers are Crybaby Losers

Any time they lose, they claim they were cheated