True Israel of God

[Roudy]

The Haavara Agreement (Hebrew: הסכם העברה Translit.: heskem haavara Translated: "transfer agreement") was an agreement between Nazi Germany and Zionist German Jews signed on 25 August 1933. The agreement was finalized after three months of talks by the Zionist Federation of Germany, the Anglo-Palestine Bank (under the directive of the Jewish Agency) and the economic authorities of Nazi Germany.

The agreement was designed to enable Jews fleeing anti-Semitic persecution under the new Hitler regime to transfer some portion of their assets to their refuge in British Mandatory Palestine. It provided some relief for Jews fleeing by allowing them to recover some of the possessions and assets they were forced to surrender before departing.[1] A portion of those possessions could be re-obtained by transferring them to Palestine as German export goods.[2][3]

The agreement was controversial at the time, and was criticised by many Jewish leaders both within the Zionist movement (such as the Revisionist Zionist leader Vladimir Jabotinsky) and outside it.[4] For German Jews, the Agreement offered a way to leave an increasingly hostile environment in Nazi Germany; for the Yishuv, the new Jewish community in Palestine,
Haavara Agreement - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wrong again. You should know better when talking about Nazism.

Because, Palestinians are the bastard children of the marriage between Nazism and Arab Islamic nationalism.

Hitler's Mufti | Catholic Answers

Recent work by historians and apologists has revealed that an influential, international religious leader was also an ardent supporter of Adolf Hitler. His name was not Pope Pius XII but Hajj Amin al-Husseini. This Grand Mufti of Jerusalem recruited whole divisions of fanatics to fight and kill in the name of extremism.

Revered in some circles today as one of the fathers of modern radical Islam, al-Husseini has been the subject of a number of modern studies. Scholars such as David Dalin, John Rothmann, Chuck Morse, and others have courageously brought al-Husseini’s actions to light. "Hitler’s Mufti," as many have called him, had a direct hand in some of the darkest moments of the Holocaust, the slaughter of tens of thousands of Christians, and the formation of some of the most hate-filled generations of modern history. Al-Husseini is a testament to the way that evil finds evil.

 

[fanger]

The Palestine Jewish Colonization Association, commonly known by its Yiddish acronym PICA (Hebrew: פיק"א‎), was established in 1924 and played a major role in supporting the Yishuv in Mandatory Palestine and later the State of Israel until its disbandment in 1957.

The Jewish Colonization Association (JCA or ICA) was founded by Bavarian philanthropist Baron Maurice de Hirsch in 1891 to help Jews from Russia andRomania to settle in Argentina.[1][2] Baron de Hirsch died in 1896 and thereafter the JCA began to also assist the Palestinian colonies.[2] At the end of 1899Edmond James de Rothschild transferred title to his colonies in Palestine plus fifteen million francs to the JCA. In 1924 the JCA branch dealing with colonies in Palestine was reorganised by Baron de Rothschild as the Palestine Jewish Colonization Association,[1][3] under the direction of his son James Armand de Rothschild.[4]
Palestine Jewish Colonization Association - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[montelatici]

When did the Turks invade and colonize and from whom?

What "native inhabitants" of the geographic area called Pal'istan were dispossessed?

The inhabitants that the Covenant of the League of Nations promised "well-being" and protection.

"ARTICLE 22.
To those colonies and territories which as a consequence of the late war have ceased to be under the sovereignty of the States which formerly governed them and which are inhabited by peoples not yet able to stand by themselves under the strenuous conditions of the modern world, there should be applied the principle that the well-being and development of such peoples form a sacred trust of civilisation and that securities for the performance of this trust should be embodied in this Covenant."

Avalon Project - The Covenant of the League of Nations

"... which are inhabited by islamo-peoples not yet able and may not ever be able to stand by themselves ... (-.ed.)

Well no, a large minority were Christian at the time. Before the Jews threw them out.

And the Islamics eventually threw out the overwhelming majority of the non-islamics.

The "Islamics" threw no one out. The Christians became Islamics you idiot. How could they throw themselves out. LOL

 

[fanger]

Since June 1967 Israel has occupied the West Bank, in violation of international law. Anchored by over 400,000 Jewish settlers, this is a clear case of “white settler colonialism.”
Is Israel a Colonial Settler State?

 

[Hollie]

What "native inhabitants" of the geographic area called Pal'istan were dispossessed?

The inhabitants that the Covenant of the League of Nations promised "well-being" and protection.

"ARTICLE 22.
To those colonies and territories which as a consequence of the late war have ceased to be under the sovereignty of the States which formerly governed them and which are inhabited by peoples not yet able to stand by themselves under the strenuous conditions of the modern world, there should be applied the principle that the well-being and development of such peoples form a sacred trust of civilisation and that securities for the performance of this trust should be embodied in this Covenant."

Avalon Project - The Covenant of the League of Nations

"... which are inhabited by islamo-peoples not yet able and may not ever be able to stand by themselves ... (-.ed.)

Well no, a large minority were Christian at the time. Before the Jews threw them out.

And the Islamics eventually threw out the overwhelming majority of the non-islamics.

The "Islamics" threw no one out. The Christians became Islamics you idiot. How could they throw themselves out. LOL

Such an angry Islamist.

However, if you look at the historical record, where islamics have gained strength of numbers, the minority religions have become endangered species.

Tell us about the decline of the Christian and Jewish population in the disputed territories occupied by Islamics.

 

[Roudy]

Since June 1967 Israel has occupied the West Bank, in violation of international law. Anchored by over 400,000 Jewish settlers, this is a clear case of “white settler colonialism.”
Is Israel a Colonial Settler State?

Which country is Israel a colony of? Try again.

Also, who's land was the "West Bank" before 1967? Since the Jordanians "occupied" it for 20 years from 1947 to 1967, should Israel give it back to the Jordanians? How come the Jordanians and those living in the West Bank (and Gaza) did not mention this mythical Palestine?

 

[montelatici]

The inhabitants that the Covenant of the League of Nations promised "well-being" and protection.

"ARTICLE 22.
To those colonies and territories which as a consequence of the late war have ceased to be under the sovereignty of the States which formerly governed them and which are inhabited by peoples not yet able to stand by themselves under the strenuous conditions of the modern world, there should be applied the principle that the well-being and development of such peoples form a sacred trust of civilisation and that securities for the performance of this trust should be embodied in this Covenant."

Avalon Project - The Covenant of the League of Nations

"... which are inhabited by islamo-peoples not yet able and may not ever be able to stand by themselves ... (-.ed.)

Well no, a large minority were Christian at the time. Before the Jews threw them out.

And the Islamics eventually threw out the overwhelming majority of the non-islamics.

The "Islamics" threw no one out. The Christians became Islamics you idiot. How could they throw themselves out. LOL

Such an angry Islamist.

However, if you look at the historical record, where islamics have gained strength of numbers, the minority religions have become endangered species.

Tell us about the decline of the Christian and Jewish population in the disputed territories occupied by Islamics.

If you mean the occupied territories, the Jewish colonist population has grown exponentially Hollow Hollie. There are close to half a million Jews there now.

 

[Roudy]

The inhabitants that the Covenant of the League of Nations promised "well-being" and protection.

"ARTICLE 22.
To those colonies and territories which as a consequence of the late war have ceased to be under the sovereignty of the States which formerly governed them and which are inhabited by peoples not yet able to stand by themselves under the strenuous conditions of the modern world, there should be applied the principle that the well-being and development of such peoples form a sacred trust of civilisation and that securities for the performance of this trust should be embodied in this Covenant."

Avalon Project - The Covenant of the League of Nations

"... which are inhabited by islamo-peoples not yet able and may not ever be able to stand by themselves ... (-.ed.)

Well no, a large minority were Christian at the time. Before the Jews threw them out.

And the Islamics eventually threw out the overwhelming majority of the non-islamics.

The "Islamics" threw no one out. The Christians became Islamics you idiot. How could they throw themselves out. LOL

Such an angry Islamist.

However, if you look at the historical record, where islamics have gained strength of numbers, the minority religions have become endangered species.

Tell us about the decline of the Christian and Jewish population in the disputed territories occupied by Islamics.

As we can clearly see, Islamists are genocidal maniacs who are good at ethnic cleansing. They can never be trusted. Anything they say or do is towards the eventual goal of Islamicizing the land. The Islamists ruling the Palestinians are no exception to this. They are no different than ISIS.

 

[fanger]

Hitler's Mufti | Catholic Answers

Recent work by historians and apologists has revealed that an influential, international religious leader was also an ardent supporter of Adolf Hitler. His name was not Pope Pius XII but Hajj Amin al-Husseini. This Grand Mufti of Jerusalem recruited whole divisions of fanatics to fight and kill in the name of extremism.

Revered in some circles today as one of the fathers of modern radical Islam, al-Husseini has been the subject of a number of modern studies. Scholars such as David Dalin, John Rothmann, Chuck Morse, and others have courageously brought al-Husseini’s actions to light. "Hitler’s Mufti," as many have called him, had a direct hand in some of the darkest moments of the Holocaust, the slaughter of tens of thousands of Christians, and the formation of some of the most hate-filled generations of modern history. Al-Husseini is a testament to the way that evil finds evil.

Who owns the site you are quoting from.....? www.catholic.com

 

[Roudy]

"... which are inhabited by islamo-peoples not yet able and may not ever be able to stand by themselves ... (-.ed.)

Well no, a large minority were Christian at the time. Before the Jews threw them out.

And the Islamics eventually threw out the overwhelming majority of the non-islamics.

The "Islamics" threw no one out. The Christians became Islamics you idiot. How could they throw themselves out. LOL

Such an angry Islamist.

However, if you look at the historical record, where islamics have gained strength of numbers, the minority religions have become endangered species.

Tell us about the decline of the Christian and Jewish population in the disputed territories occupied by Islamics.

If you mean the occupied territories, the Jewish colonist population has grown exponentially Hollow Hollie. There are close to half a million Jews there now.

Nothing wrong with Jews going back to Judeah and Samaria, their ancestral and religious homeland. In one or two generations Israel will annex it and change its name back to Judeah and Samaria, what it has been for 3000 years before the Arab invaders changed it in the 20th century.

 

[Roudy]

Hitler's Mufti | Catholic Answers

Recent work by historians and apologists has revealed that an influential, international religious leader was also an ardent supporter of Adolf Hitler. His name was not Pope Pius XII but Hajj Amin al-Husseini. This Grand Mufti of Jerusalem recruited whole divisions of fanatics to fight and kill in the name of extremism.

Revered in some circles today as one of the fathers of modern radical Islam, al-Husseini has been the subject of a number of modern studies. Scholars such as David Dalin, John Rothmann, Chuck Morse, and others have courageously brought al-Husseini’s actions to light. "Hitler’s Mufti," as many have called him, had a direct hand in some of the darkest moments of the Holocaust, the slaughter of tens of thousands of Christians, and the formation of some of the most hate-filled generations of modern history. Al-Husseini is a testament to the way that evil finds evil.

Who owns the site you are quoting from.....? www.catholic.com

Wait wait don't tell me.........THE JOOOOOOOS. Ha ha ha.

 

[fanger]

You quote from it but you don´t know who owns it?

Michael Galloway of Bakersfield, Calif., owns a high-traffic website that takes charitable donations, has a fleet of tech companies and is now the treasurer for a new super PAC called We Are America, according to FEC filings.

He also allegedly stole money from donors to his website, Catholic.org, and evaded taxes for years, federal prosecutors say.

“Doing business as Catholic Online, Galloway used the website to solicit donations for charitable causes, including disaster relief after Hurricane Katrina and the Indian Ocean Tsunami, and misused the donations for personal and other expenses,” the prosecutors wrote in a four-count indictment last May. Galloway was arrested and arraigned June 5, 2014.
New super PAC's treasurer under indictment for tax evasion

 

[Roudy]

You quote from it but you don´t know who owns it?

Michael Galloway of Bakersfield, Calif., owns a high-traffic website that takes charitable donations, has a fleet of tech companies and is now the treasurer for a new super PAC called We Are America, according to FEC filings.

He also allegedly stole money from donors to his website, Catholic.org, and evaded taxes for years, federal prosecutors say.

“Doing business as Catholic Online, Galloway used the website to solicit donations for charitable causes, including disaster relief after Hurricane Katrina and the Indian Ocean Tsunami, and misused the donations for personal and other expenses,” the prosecutors wrote in a four-count indictment last May. Galloway was arrested and arraigned June 5, 2014.
New super PAC's treasurer under indictment for tax evasion

Who? You lie again, Achmed. Catholic Answers is not Catholic Online.

MISSION STATEMENT
Catholic Answers is one of the nation’s largest lay-run apostolates of Catholic apologetics and evangelization. Its mission statement explains its purpose:

Catholic Answers is an apostolate dedicated to serving Christ by bringing the fullness of Catholic truth to the world. We help good Catholics become better Catholics, bring former Catholics “home,” and lead non-Catholics into the fullness of the faith.

BEGINNINGS
Catholic Answers began in 1979 after a Fundamentalist church in San Diego, California, decided to leaflet the cars at a local parish during Mass. The fliers attacked the Eucharist and were riddled with misinformation. Upon coming out of Mass and finding one on his car, attorney Karl Keating was annoyed and drove home with a modest goal: to draft a tract that would present basic Catholic beliefs and refute anti-Catholic charges. Keating signed the tract “Catholic Answers,” opened up a post office box in that name, and then placed his rebuttal on the windshields of cars in the Fundamentalist church’s lot.

That modest effort was Catholic Answers’ first publication. Much to his surprise, Keating soon found the post office box bulging with letters—some unquotable, others cheering him on and asking for other tracts. He obliged, writing 24 more tracts that comprised Catholic Answers’ total line of publications for several years.

He also wrote articles for the Catholic press about the clash between Fundamentalists and Catholics, drawing responses that convinced him there was a real need for information on Catholic apologetics—the study of how to explain and defend the faith. In 1986 he launched a monthly newsletter to help people keep abreast of what Catholic Answers was doing and learn more about the exciting field of apologetics.

In 1988 growing demand and his own burgeoning desire to commit himself to serving the faith led Keating to close his law practice and turn Catholic Answers into a full-time apostolate, with its first office and staff members.

The apostolate grew quickly, and in 1990 its original newsletter was replaced with This Rock, a 10-issue-a-year magazine that has become the nation’s premier journal of Catholic apologetics and evangelization.

VISION
Catholic Answers is one of the nation's largest lay-run apostolates of Catholic apologetics and evangelization. Catholic Answers' plan for the future will allow the apostolate to continue its ministries, both in ongoing operations and also with special projects to address new issues as they arise.

In the upcoming year, we will continue to strive to be faithful servants to God and his Church. To accomplish this, our focus will be to:

• Continue to seek improvements and efficiencies in our existing operations
• Develop new campaigns to address important topical issues as they arise
• Help good Catholics become better Catholics
• Help bring former Catholics "home"
• Help lead non-Catholics into the fullness of the faith
• Continue as good stewards to the financial resources entrusted to us by our supporters.

 

[Phoenall]

'Jews' were welcome in North America. There were no significant problems for them in Canada and the U.S. Everyone would have been and would be much better off if the move had been there instead of to a self-inflicted ghetto surrounded by uncertain friends and very hostile enemies. Zionism was a mistake.

In 1950 Jews were still being denied entry to the USA, just because they were Jews. They were being driven out of Europe and had nowhere else to go but Palestine, and then the very people tasked with keeping them safe turned on them and started to kill them on droves, all for the sake of the west's new god OIL. The arab's hoped to find oil all over the M.E. so did not want the Jews taking up residence on a paltry 0,01% of the land. The LoN followed by the UN could have instigated a series of attacks on the arab's to curb the violence in line with the LoN mandate and the UN charter

 

[Phoenall]

"Declassified UK reports document build-up of conflict, Jewish public's endorsement of their leaders' pro-terrorist stance and declare armies of Arab states were Palestinians' 'only hope'...

Sneaking an emotionally charged term in devalues that whole guardian blah, not that I read it anyway. hehe It's like the jewish Haaretz - a stinking pile of the leftist shitt, but may be good for a litter box, or a cage liner.

It was the text of a British intelligence report that was recently de-classified. Nothing to do with the Guardian's editorializing.

Oh, really?! hehe Then show us where in those "declassified documents" of yore are arabs being called "palestinians".

Don't need declassified reports for that.

PALESTINE.

CORRESPONDENCE
WITH THE
PALESTINE ARAB DELEGATION
AND THE
ZIONIST ORGANISATION.

Presented to Parliament by Command of His Majesty.
JUNE, 1922.
LONDON:​

No. 1.
The Palestine Arab Delegation to the Secretary of State for the Colonies.


HOTEL CECIL,
London, W.C.,
February 21st, 1922.

Sir,

We wish to express our thanks to the Right Honourable the Secretary of State for the Colonies, for his courtesy in allowing us to see the draft of a proposed Palestine Order in Council embodying a scheme of Government for Palestine, and to discuss the same in our capacity of representatives of the Arab People of Palestine.​

• 
  
  We would, therefore, submit the following observations:—

Whilst the position in Palestine is, as it stands to-day, with the British Government holding authority by an occupying force, and using that authority to impose upon the people against their wishes a great immigration of alien Jews, many of them of a Bolshevik revolutionary type, no constitution which would fall short of giving the People of Palestine full control of their own affairs could be acceptable.

No. 2.



The Colonial Office to the Palestine Arab Delegation.


DOWNING STREET,
1st March, 1922.

​

SIR,

I am directed by Mr. Secretary Churchill to acknowledge receipt of your letter of the 21st February on the subject of the draft Orders in Council providing for the Constitution of Palestine. Mr. Churchill has carefully considered this letter and has instructed me to offer the following observations upon it:.............​

It is with the object of providing the people of Palestine with a constitutional channel for the expression of their opinions and wishes that the draft constitution has been framed.

UK correspondence with Palestine Arab Delegation and Zionist Organization/British policy in Palestine: "Churchill White Paper" - UK documentation Cmd. 1700/Non-UN document (excerpts) (1 July 1922)





​

Why do you never post the reply


I am to point out in the first place that, while your Delegation is recognised by Mr. Churchill as representing a large section of the Moslem and Christian inhabitants of Palestine, and while the Secretary of State is anxious to discuss his present proposals informally with recognised representatives, such as yourselves, of any important section of the community, he is not in a position to negotiate officially with you or with any other body which claims to represent the whole or, part of the people of Palestine, since no official machinery for representation has as yet been constituted. It is with the object of providing the people of Palestine with a constitutional channel for the expression of their opinions and wishes that the draft constitution has been framed.

3. Mr. Churchill regrets to observe that his personal explanations have apparently failed to convince your Delegation that His Majesty's Government have no intention "of repudiating the obligations into which they have entered towards the Jewish people. He has informed you on more than one occasion that he cannot discuss the future of Palestine upon any other basis than that of the letter addressed by the Right Honourable A. J. Balfour to Lord Rothschild on the 2nd November, 1917, commonly known as the "Balfour Declaration." You state in your letter that the people of Palestine cannot accept this Declaration as a basis for discussion. Mr. Churchill is unable for the reasons stated above to regard your Delegation as officially representing the People of Palestine. He presumes that your statement is not in any case intended to apply to the existing Jewish population of Palestine, which, so far as he is aware, your Delegation makes no claim to represent.

4. With regard to Article 22 of the Covenant of the League of Nations, I am to observe that this Article, in so far as it applies to territories severed from the Ottoman Empire, has been interpreted by the Principal Allied Powers in Articles 94 to 97 of the Treaty of Sevres, Syria and Iraq are explicitly referred to in Article 94 of that Treaty as having been provisionally recognised as Independent States, in accordance with the fourth paragraph of Article 22 of the Covenant of the League of Nations. Article 95, on the other hand, makes no such reference to Palestine. The reason for this is that, as stated in that Article, the Mandatory is to be responsible for putting into effect the Declaration originally made on the 2nd November, 1917, by the British Government, and adopted by the other Allied Powers, in favour of the establishment in Palestine of a National Home for the Jewish people, it being clearly understood that nothing should be done which might prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, and the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country. There is no question of treating the people of Palestine as less advanced than their neighbours in Iraq and Syria; the position is that His Majesty's Government are bound by a pledge which is antecedent to the Covenant of the League of Nations, and they cannot allow a constitutional position to develop in a country for which they have accepted responsibility to the Principal Allied Powers, which may make it impracticable to carry into effect a solemn undertaking given by themselves and their Allies.

 

[Phoenall]

You quote from it but you don´t know who owns it?

Michael Galloway of Bakersfield, Calif., owns a high-traffic website that takes charitable donations, has a fleet of tech companies and is now the treasurer for a new super PAC called We Are America, according to FEC filings.

He also allegedly stole money from donors to his website, Catholic.org, and evaded taxes for years, federal prosecutors say.

“Doing business as Catholic Online, Galloway used the website to solicit donations for charitable causes, including disaster relief after Hurricane Katrina and the Indian Ocean Tsunami, and misused the donations for personal and other expenses,” the prosecutors wrote in a four-count indictment last May. Galloway was arrested and arraigned June 5, 2014.
New super PAC's treasurer under indictment for tax evasion

OF TOPIC DEFLECTION AGAIN BECAUSE TEAM PALESTINE HAS LOST THE ARGUMENT

 

[Phoenall]

Does that mean that because the Muslims and Christians have never ruled the land they must be ruled by Jews forever? Just wondering what that means to you.

Does it also mean that the first Nations people who owned the land for millennia before the Catholics invaded will have to be abused and ruled by the Catholic for ever ?

If the arab muslims have been evicted twice from the land then how can they claim ownership when none existed for 1000 years

 

[Phoenall]

Thank you. And the tolerance and love for Jews is just oozing out of you 24/7.

When have I ever said anything intolerant about Jews? Stating historical fact with source documentation has nothing to do with tolerance.

I have no particular love or hate for Jews or Muslims as individuals.

I dislike both Islam and Judaism, both are equally unpleasant and aggressive cults.

And you would not know source documentation if it bit you on the nose

 

[gt1085]

The real israelites are black , not white

 

[Roudy]

The real israelites are black , not white