Today, Nine years ago

[Rat in the Hat]

 

[P F Tinmore]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z_Xnl9kkMfI]28 a Sleepless Gaza Jerusalem.divx - YouTube[/ame]

 

[docmauser1]

Rachel Corrie Memorial Website

And the Darwin Award goes to ... Rachel Corrie!!!!

 

[JStone]

Sleepless Jerusalem

Hebrew Bible, Book of Samuel: David Becomes King Over Israel And Jerusalem

All the tribes of Israel came to David at Hebron and said, “We are your own flesh and blood. In the past, while Saul was king over us, you were the one who led Israel on their military campaigns. And the LORD said to you, ‘You will shepherd my people Israel, and you will become their ruler.’”

When all the elders of Israel had come to King David at Hebron, the king made a covenant with them at Hebron before the LORD, and they anointed David king over Israel.

David was thirty years old when he became king, and he reigned forty years. In Hebron he reigned over Judah seven years and six months, and in Jerusalem he reigned over all Israel and Judah thirty-three years.

Eminent Historian Sir Martin Gilbert, Author of 3 Books on Jerusalem ...

Jerusalem became the capital of the first Jewish kingdom in 1004 BC, over 3000 years ago. With the brief exception of the Crusader period, no other non-Jewish ruling power of Jerusalem made the city a capital but it was consistently a capital for the Jews. Driven into partial exile by Nebuchadnezzar in 586 BC, the Jews returned fifty years later and rebuilt Jerusalem as their capital. It was their capital, too, under the Maccabees. The unity of the city achieved in 1967, then, was more than a quirk of military geography. It was the fulfillment of unbroken historical longings.

 

[JStone]

Are there 72 male whores in paradise to fuck the female jihadists like Rachel?

 

[Dot Com]

The israel- firsters are looking pretty bad in this thread laughing at the young ladies death. Not being indifferent, but actually getting joy out of the incident. Sad.

 

[JStone]

The israel- firsters are looking pretty bad in this thread laughing at the young ladies death. Not being indifferent, but actually getting joy out of the incident. Sad.

Jihadists dream of death. It's the only thing they live for allahu akbar.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Holy shit. YOu mean, in fighting back, sometimes civilians get hurt?

Who the fuck knew.

And, of course, the Palestinians (Hamas etc) would never TARGET civilians, right?

under international Law the zionist occupation of Palestine territory none of the "settlers" are civilians

Nonsense ^ from a lying sack of hack shit.

Jos is correct. Look it up.

 

[Liability]

The israel- firsters are looking pretty bad in this thread laughing at the young ladies death. Not being indifferent, but actually getting joy out of the incident. Sad.

No. Being highly indifferent in the face of mournful worship of that terrorist supporting dopey sow.

"I fought the bull dozer and the bull dozer won!"

Never saw that coming!

 

[Liability]

under international Law the zionist occupation of Palestine territory none of the "settlers" are civilians

Nonsense ^ from a lying sack of hack shit.

Jos is correct. Look it up.

No. Like you, Jos's flatly wrong. Plain and simple.

The fictional Palestinians fucks are attempting to occupy Israel. Under international law, the Israeli state need not put up with them and their terrorist ways.

 

[JStone]

under international Law the zionist occupation of Palestine territory none of the "settlers" are civilians

Nonsense ^ from a lying sack of hack shit.

Jos is correct. Look it up.

Jos cleans hotel rooms. PFucktard never went to college.

Eugene Rostow, Legal Scholar, Former Dean of the Yale Law School, Under Secretary of State in the Johnson administration, US State Dept Legal Advisor, Drafter of UN Res. 242 pertaining to Israeli land in the West Bank Eugene V. Rostow - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The British Mandate recognized the right of the Jewish people to "close settlement" in the whole of the Mandated territory [Palestine]. The Jewish right of settlement in Palestine west of the Jordan river, that is, in Israel, the West Bank, Jerusalem, and the Gaza Strip, was made unassailable. That right has never been terminated and cannot be terminated except by a recognized peace between Israel and its neighbors. And perhaps not even then, in view of Article 80 of the U.N. Charter, "the Palestine article," which provides that "nothing in the Charter shall be construed ... to alter in any manner the rights whatsoever of any states or any peoples or the terms of existing international instruments...."

The mandate implicitly denies Arab claims to national political rights in the area in favor of the Jews; the mandated territory was in effect reserved to the Jewish people for their self-determination and political development, in acknowledgment of the historic connection of the Jewish people to the land. Lord Curzon, who was then the British Foreign Minister, made this reading of the mandate explicit. There remains simply the theory that the Arab inhabitants of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip have an inherent 'natural law' claim to the area. Neither customary international law nor the United Nations Charter acknowledges that every group of people claiming to be a nation has the right to a state of its own."

Resolved: are the settlements legal? Israeli West Bank policies

 

[P F Tinmore]

Nonsense ^ from a lying sack of hack shit.

Jos is correct. Look it up.

No. Like you, Jos's flatly wrong. Plain and simple.

The fictional Palestinians fucks are attempting to occupy Israel. Under international law, the Israeli state need not put up with them and their terrorist ways.

Did you look it up?

I didn't think so.

 

[JStone]

Jos is correct. Look it up.

No. Like you, Jos's flatly wrong. Plain and simple.

The fictional Palestinians fucks are attempting to occupy Israel. Under international law, the Israeli state need not put up with them and their terrorist ways.

Did you look it up?

I didn't think so.

Eugene Rostow, Legal Scholar, Former Dean of the Yale Law School, Under Secretary of State in the Johnson administration, US State Dept Legal Advisor, Drafter of UN Res. 242 pertaining to Israeli land in the West Bank...

The British Mandate recognized the right of the Jewish people to "close settlement" in the whole of the Mandated territory [Palestine]. The Jewish right of settlement in Palestine west of the Jordan river, that is, in Israel, the West Bank, Jerusalem, and the Gaza Strip, was made unassailable. That right has never been terminated and cannot be terminated except by a recognized peace between Israel and its neighbors. And perhaps not even then, in view of Article 80 of the U.N. Charter, "the Palestine article," which provides that "nothing in the Charter shall be construed ... to alter in any manner the rights whatsoever of any states or any peoples or the terms of existing international instruments...."

The mandate implicitly denies Arab claims to national political rights in the area in favor of the Jews; the mandated territory was in effect reserved to the Jewish people for their self-determination and political development, in acknowledgment of the historic connection of the Jewish people to the land. Lord Curzon, who was then the British Foreign Minister, made this reading of the mandate explicit. There remains simply the theory that the Arab inhabitants of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip have an inherent 'natural law' claim to the area. Neither customary international law nor the United Nations Charter acknowledges that every group of people claiming to be a nation has the right to a state of its own."

Resolved: are the settlements legal? Israeli West Bank policies

 

[Liability]

Jos is correct. Look it up.

No. Like you, Jos's flatly wrong. Plain and simple.

The fictional Palestinians fucks are attempting to occupy Israel. Under international law, the Israeli state need not put up with them and their terrorist ways.

Did you look it up?

I didn't think so.

There is nothing to look up. You and Jos make shit up. But the shit you make up out of whole clothe imposes no burden on anybody else. If you want to make these make-believe claims, the burden would be on you to prove it.

You can't, though.

There is no international law that says that the Israeli "occupation" of THEIR OWN LAND makes them anything other than civilians.

 

[P F Tinmore]

No. Like you, Jos's flatly wrong. Plain and simple.

The fictional Palestinians fucks are attempting to occupy Israel. Under international law, the Israeli state need not put up with them and their terrorist ways.

Did you look it up?

I didn't think so.

There is nothing to look up. You and Jos make shit up. But the shit you make up out of whole clothe imposes no burden on anybody else. If you want to make these make-believe claims, the burden would be on you to prove it.

You can't, though.

There is no international law that says that the Israeli "occupation" of THEIR OWN LAND makes them anything other than civilians.

Spoken like someone who didn't look it up.

 

[Liability]

Did you look it up?

I didn't think so.

There is nothing to look up. You and Jos make shit up. But the shit you make up out of whole clothe imposes no burden on anybody else. If you want to make these make-believe claims, the burden would be on you to prove it.

You can't, though.

There is no international law that says that the Israeli "occupation" of THEIR OWN LAND makes them anything other than civilians.

Spoken like someone who didn't look it up.

That's right. We all clearly see that you didn't. But that doesn't stop you from making claims you refuse to support. We understand. You don't because you realize you can't.

Israel does not "occupy" the fake Palestinian lands. Fake Palestinians attempt to occupy Israeli lands.

Israel is an actual sovereign state.

That fact offends you. Too bad.

 

[JStone]

Did you look it up?

I didn't think so.

There is nothing to look up. You and Jos make shit up. But the shit you make up out of whole clothe imposes no burden on anybody else. If you want to make these make-believe claims, the burden would be on you to prove it.

You can't, though.

There is no international law that says that the Israeli "occupation" of THEIR OWN LAND makes them anything other than civilians.

Spoken like someone who didn't look it up.

PFucktard



"Rep System Guidelines: Our reputation system is designed to provide a feedback and credibility mechanism."

P F Tinmore Rep Power: 0
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 12,512
"PF Tinmore is off the scale"


[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x4Vp642ERhM&feature=related]Sound-Effects - Crowd Laughing - YouTube[/ame]

 

[docmauser1]

The israel- firsters are looking pretty bad in this thread laughing at the young ladies death. Not being indifferent, but actually getting joy out of the incident. Sad.

She wasn't that different from the youtoob category of morons doing dangerously stupid stuff with everyone laughing, so, what sets that Darwin award winner aside?

 

[docmauser1]

under international Law the zionist occupation of Palestine territory none of the "settlers" are civilians

Funny, what might that "international law" be?

 

[Liability]

Israel's lackeys are peeved because 9 years later and she is still kicking Israel in the nuts.

No. She's not, you fucking imbecile. She's still quite dead.

Although, it would be accurate to say that there's no appreciable difference in her IQ.

**************************************
Lost the moral high ground fast didn't ya?
**************************************

No. Not in the slightest.

But thanks for asking.

Her death is very sad;

It's a little sad.

I do not see how she could have been seen, or known to be there. She erred because of her beliefs, which does not lessen the loss.

Yeah. It does lessen the loss. She was hatefully supporting a bunch of terrorist murdering scumbags.

She put herself in harm's way -- literally -- and was shocked to discover that mass and gravity and the inevitable laws of physics would not yield to her.