MikeK
Gold Member
I'll start this response with a very basic question:WikiLeaks' newly-released Iraq war documents reveal that for years afterward, U.S. troops continued to find chemical weapons labs, encounter insurgent specialists in toxins and uncover weapons of mass destruction (emphasis added).[...]
If Saddam Hussein did in fact have the "weapons of mass destruction" referred to above, why did he not deploy them against our invading army? Do you think it's because he didn't want to make us mad at him? Or do you think it's because reports like the one posted above are all bullshit planted by the Bush Administration?
The most serious weapons the Iraqis were and have been able to effectively deploy against us were tons of their own artillery shells, many of which our military commanders were too stupid to destroy when they came upon them. Those (155mm) shells are what the IEDs are made with.
Before we continue, please tell us specifically what is meant by the term, "weapons of mass destruction."