- Nov 28, 2011
- 42,865
- 16,030
- 2,250
His position is that he fears a bunch of rednecks with guns, so he tries to tie this fear into the shooting, and so he does this so he can de-gun these rednecks in which he fears.... Never let a huge crisis go to waste right?A law that would make the sale, manufacture and distribution of assault weapons to private citizens also effects the criminal's access to them.The fact criminals have them? Unless you'd PREFER to be at a disadvantage against armed criminals, which would be rather odd choice I think.
More justification? Okay. I hunt with AR15 rifles. Perfect for hogs and varmints.
Even more justification? Sure. It's a bill of rights, not a bill of needs.
And just how does that happen genius? The criminals obey the laws?
I don't know how things work on your planet, but on this planet the military will always have them and that means opposing militaries will also have them and some countries are lax in enforcing their existing laws and other countries who have militaries and arms manufacturers are corrupt and will sell them to anyone no matter the law. When a criminal or a criminal organization wants a high-capacity assault weapon, they will have no trouble getting one.
And were there no wold boar killed before the invention of the assault rifle?
Yes they were, but rarely and at great peril to the hunters.
And you have no "right" to one either. They are weapons built for war. The second amendment protects you from tyranny by calling loudly for a WELL REGULATED MILITIA. Not your drinking buddies, a couple of pick up trucks and AR-15s.
And then there's this hackneyed and much debunked argument.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.....................