The Next Michael Brown Story: Witnesses Say Utah Black Man Was Running Away When Police Fired

DigitalDrifter

Diamond Member
Feb 22, 2013
47,535
25,848
2,605
Oregon
Put your seat belts on, here we go again !

Witnesses say Utah man killed by police was running away, attorney says

No white boy with a little sword would they shoot while he's running away.

A 22-year-old black man with a sword may have been running away when Utah police fatally shot him "numerous" times from behind last week, an attorney for the man's family said over the weekend.
The attorney cited independent autopsy results on Darrien Hunt's body that appear to contradict investigators' account of what happened outside a Panda Express in Saratoga Springs on Wednesday morning.
Officials said Hunt had "lunged" at officers with the sword before they shot him. But the attorney for Hunt's family, Randall K. Edwards, said the autopsy results found that "none of these shots were from Darrien’s front."
Hunt's death is likely to draw extra public scrutiny in the wake of the fatal Aug. 9 police shooting of another young black man, 18-year-old Michael Brown, in Ferguson, Mo., which prompted protests there and around the country.
Saratoga Springs is about 35 miles south of Salt Lake City. With 22,749 residents, the town is almost the same size as Ferguson, but is 93% white, according to census statistics. Ferguson is about two-thirds African American.

Wednesday's incident began when officers were called to the restaurant after Hunt was seen walking around with a "samurai-type sword," according to a previous statement from the Utah County Attorney's Office. Hunt's family has described it as a harmless 3-foot souvenir sword with a rounded edge.
"When the officers made contact with Mr. Hunt, preliminary evidence suggests that Mr. Hunt brandished the sword and lunged toward the officers with the sword, at which time Mr. Hunt was shot," Utah County Chief Deputy Attorney Tim Taylor said in a statement.
But according to Edwards, an independent autopsy conducted Saturday at the behest of Hunt's family showed Hunt had been shot "numerous times," none from the front.
MORE: Witnesses say Utah man killed by police was running away attorney says - LA Times
 
This seems to be a reoccuring theme... that is, people complaining about people who are running away getting shot in the back. What 99% of people dont realize its ITS TOTALLY LEGAL! If you committed a felony and the officer believes you are a danger to him or the public, he can shoot you in the back. You cant attacka cop and then when the officer starts winning the fight and he gets his gun out, you cant just turn your back and say "im off limits now, my back is to you". It doesnt work that way, nor should it. It isnt a fucking playground and it isnt a game.

When you commit big boy crimes, expect a big boy response.
 
Oh wait, that's right, it's Utah, there hasn't been any rioting, thus why CNN isn't camped out on the streets waiting for action.
 
(1) Subject had mental problems and had a history with the police.

(2) Family and friends say he was afraid of police and would run away in any confrontation.

(3) Family says racialism entered into the problem, the police say 'no'.

(4) The man had a toy samurai sword that was clearly not a weapon; the police said they could not tell.

(5) The man turned to run and was shot.
 
It wasnt a toy sword. It was a real metal sword, but it was decorative, so the edges are rounded off so it isnt sharp. My buddy has a few swords like that, and if you think you cant kill someone with a single swing, you are wrong. Im certain I could take off someones head with one of those swords.
 
Good thing the cops stopped him before he hurt someone
 
Why would he lunge at an officer with a souvenir sword with no edge? Sounds like a lie to me.
Why dont you turn that around and ask "why would a cop just shoot an innocent person if they werent lunging at him?". What makes more sense to you... cop kills innocent man for the hell of it, or a man who is known to be crazy and troubled gets himself killed when he lunges at a cop?

Honestly, you guys really need to use your brains before you develope these bizarro world scenarios in your head.
 
Why would he lunge at an officer with a souvenir sword with no edge? Sounds like a lie to me.
Why dont you turn that around and ask "why would a cop just shoot an innocent person if they werent lunging at him?". What makes more sense to you... cop kills innocent man for the hell of it, or a man who is known to be crazy and troubled gets himself killed when he lunges at a cop?

Honestly, you guys really need to use your brains before you develope these bizarro world scenarios in your head.

Are you assuming he was violent or do you know it? Could be idk. It just doesn't add up IMO, but I don't know a lot about the case.
 
"According to the US Department of Justice, blacks [ who make up 14% of the total population ] accounted for 52.5% of homicide offenders from 1980 to 2008, with whites 45.3% and Native Americans and Asians 2.2%. The offending rate for blacks was almost 8 times higher than whites, and the victim rate 6 times higher. Most murders were intraracial, with 84% of white homicide victims murdered by whites, and 93% of black victims murdered by blacks."


Race and crime in the United States - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

93% of blacks are killed by other blacks.
So, 7% are killed by non-blacks.

Of that 7%, what % do you imagine are cops?
This is what all the Ferguson Etc Etc Etc Etc Hoopla is about. A fraction of a percent.

When 93% are killed by other blacks.
Not the cops, not the Klan.

Other blacks.
 
Last edited:
"According to the US Department of Justice, blacks [ who make up 14% of the total population ] accounted for 52.5% of homicide offenders from 1980 to 2008, with whites 45.3% and Native Americans and Asians 2.2%. The offending rate for blacks was almost 8 times higher than whites, and the victim rate 6 times higher. Most murders were intraracial, with 84% of white homicide victims murdered by whites, and 93% of black victims murdered by blacks."

Race and crime in the United States - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
Race and crime in the United States - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

93% of blacks are killed by other blacks.
So, 7% are killed by non-blacks.

Of that 7%, what % do you imagine are cops?
This is what all the Ferguson Etc Etc Etc Etc Hoopla is about. A fraction of a percent.

When 93% are killed by other blacks.
Not the cops, not the Klan.

Other blacks.

They're using this as they can't stop themselves from comitting crime. So they're trying to get an amnesty for breaking the law for just them.
 
Just about any excuse for killing a black kid is acceptable to today's conservatives. I think the old lynching rationale -- "he looked at me wrong" -- would be good enough for many.

I'd like to know more before accepting police accounts, just like Michael Brown's unnecessary shooting.
 
The fact that this is news shows that the black community is attempting to legalize crime. They're blaming us whites so we let them do what ever they wish.
They've already created a powerful lobby to bend the media to their will and get tax payer funded colleges to teach Critical Race Theory nonsense about how only white people kept slaves and are invariantly evil.

(Even though black people keep slaves *today*. Google: 'Modern Slavery Map')
This map shows where the world 8217 s 30 million slaves live. There are 60 000 in the U.S. - The Washington Post

Note: Liberia and Sierra Leon.

I had a CRT Am Hist prof in comm college say this about whites and slaves. I said, 'I thought black people kept slaves, too?'

'When they captured them they treated them like family though.'
Oohs and Ahhs from the crowd.

Later, as an aside, he was telling us that Egyptians were black. So...the pyramids were built by loving family members, I guess.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top