The Market Wants More Stimulus

Currency can be pegged or it can float, but either way I won't pay more than one Euro for Greek good, hence exports stay identical. No free liberal lunch.


Devaluing the currency allows one euro to buy more greek labor than previously. How dont you get that? Greek labor becomes cheaper. One euro buys more greek labor.

Arent conservatives always yelling about china devaluing its currency and making its labor more competitive? From what i can tell, your position is that this isnt even possible.
 
Last edited:
Currency can be pegged or it can float, but either way I won't pay more than one Euro for Greek good, hence exports stay identical. No free liberal lunch.


Devaluing the currency allows one euro to buy more greek labor than previously. How dont you get that? Greek labor becomes cheaper. One euro buys more.

Agreeing to devalue or agreeing to lower your prices accomplish the same thing. Both make you more competitive. Neither is a magic liberal bullet and both require the same decision.
 
Agreeing to devalue or agreeing to lower your prices accomplish the same thing. Both make you more competitive. Neither is a magic liberal bullet and both require the same decision.

Cbirch2 said:
a return to the drachma brings a decrease in the standard of living necessary to make greeks more competitive. You could also get there through austerity and staying with the euro but thats going to cause much more social pain, much more riots.

So why the fuck are you arguing with me!? You accuse me of subscribing to some sort of liberal magic bullet philosophy when im saying the exact same thing as you!

Greece can become more competitive by either lowering wages and prices, or by devaluation. The first will cause the riots weve seen for the past 3 years.
 
Last edited:
Agreeing to devalue or agreeing to lower your prices accomplish the same thing. Both make you more competitive. Neither is a magic liberal bullet and both require the same decision.

Cbirch2 said:
a return to the drachma brings a decrease in the standard of living necessary to make greeks more competitive. You could also get there through austerity and staying with the euro but thats going to cause much more social pain, much more riots.

So why the fuck are you arguing with me!? You accuse me of subscribing to some sort of liberal magic bullet philosophy when im saying the exact same thing as you!

oh come on, you've been on your high horse all day about how important it was for liberal government action to save the day by making the Greeks more competitive.
 
Agreeing to devalue or agreeing to lower your prices accomplish the same thing. Both make you more competitive. Neither is a magic liberal bullet and both require the same decision.

Cbirch2 said:
a return to the drachma brings a decrease in the standard of living necessary to make greeks more competitive. You could also get there through austerity and staying with the euro but thats going to cause much more social pain, much more riots.

So why the fuck are you arguing with me!? You accuse me of subscribing to some sort of liberal magic bullet philosophy when im saying the exact same thing as you!

oh come on, you've been on your high horse all day about how important it was for liberal government action to save the day by making the Greeks more competitive.

wtf!?!

the entire time all ive said is that the route of devaluation would cause a lot less social pain the the austerity route. One is prolonged recession until it becomes competitive, the other is an immediate decrease in wealth and a near immediate return to full employment. The amount by which greek wealth shrinks during the devaluation would match the amount it would shrink if theyd have chosen the alternate path. the difference is that the economy returns to full employment much, much faster.
 
"Ultimately,” he added, “Greeks would face reductions in their standards of living upwards to 50 percent, perhaps more, to generate the exports necessary to pay off foreign creditors. If everything goes as planned, Athens will still be saddled with a debt that is 120 percent of their GDP a decade from now. Everything hardly ever goes exactly as planned, and 120 percent of GDP is an amount most economists believe is unworkable. Hence, the Greeks may bleed a lot for no real purpose than to sustain a failed experiment in a single currency, and the odds are steep against the plan succeeding.”"

Leave euro:


"The alternative, as Professor Morici proposed, is for Greece to be “given the option of staying in the EU but dropping the euro — essentially the status the UK enjoys.” He added, crucially, “By readopting the drachma, re-marking sovereign and private debt to the reinstituted national currency, and letting the value of the drachma fall to levels consistent with a trade surplus that permits Greece to service its debts, Greece’s economy would begin growing again, and many of Greece’s army of unemployed would be put back to work.”

There is a massive difference

Before the tea party created a army of zombie conservatives that say whatever fits the situation, i would never have expected a conservative to claim that a country giving up its sovereign currency would have no net effect.

I've heard commentators insist that Greece would be better off with the austerity route. Is there any rationale for that?

re-marking sovereign and private debt to the reinstituted national currency, .

Sorry, no free lunches, "remarking" is just another way to say defaulting. It does not make them one bit richer or more competitive.
As I said competitive comes from a better mouse trap, not economic games.

What is wrong with defaulting, Ed? It seems to have worked for Donald Trump.

wow. that post was just someone making up economics.The real reason is that southern europe was vastly different from northern europe at the creation of the euro. The single currency provided the illusion to investors that the entire area was fairly homogeneous, that was the point of its creation! Investors that normally would have invested in northern european countries now saw no difference between investing in southern european states. So capital going to northern countries decreases, while capital going to southern countries increases.

Should Greece have been allowed to join the EU and switch to the Euro?

Have you heard of this book?

[ame=http://www.amazon.com/Debt-First-5-000-Years/dp/1933633867]Amazon.com: Debt: The First 5,000 Years (9781933633862): David Graeber: Books[/ame]
 
Last edited:
Neither the DEFICIT nor the NATIONAL DEBT caused the economic meltdown.

True enough, it was largely caused by the liberals desire to subvert the free market in order to get houses for those denied such by the free market.

A liberal lacks the wisdom to understand the free market so thinks nothing of manipulating it to suit what he mistakenly sees as morally superior objectives.
 
What is wrong with defaulting, Ed? It seems to have worked for Donald Trump.

and that means it works??????????????? Generally speaking, if you default on $1 million you then pay $1 million in higher interest. There is no free lunch.
 
Anyone that thinks the grek's debt problem is simply due to greek over spending needs to go read "This time is different". The point of the paper is actualy to prove the opposite: that this is just the countinuation of a long macroeconomic cycle. It examines economic trends back to about 1800

"Also consonant with the modern theory of crises is the striking correlation between freer capital mobility and the incidence of banking crises, as illustrated in Figure 3. Periods of high international capital mobility have repeatedly produced international banking crises, not only famously as they did in the 1990s, but historically."

Figure 3:
image_34.png





Basically greece and other periphery countries are the victim of increasing capital flowing into their country after the creation of the euro.

moz-screenshot.png
moz-screenshot-1.png
moz-screenshot-2.png
 
The point of the paper is actualy to prove the opposite: that this is just the countinuation of a long macroeconomic cycle.

Why cut and paste what as a liberal you cant understand. Greece is in debt because they are very very liberal and so very very irresponsible. They simply spend more than they have. Its as simple as that and "This time is Different" does not contradict that. Sorry
 
Anyone that thinks the grek's debt problem is simply due to greek over spending needs to go read "This time is different". The point of the paper is actualy to prove the opposite: that this is just the countinuation of a long macroeconomic cycle. It examines economic trends back to about 1800

"Also consonant with the modern theory of crises is the striking correlation between freer capital mobility and the incidence of banking crises, as illustrated in Figure 3. Periods of high international capital mobility have repeatedly produced international banking crises, not only famously as they did in the 1990s, but historically."

Figure 3:
image_34.png





Basically greece and other periphery countries are the victim of increasing capital flowing into their country after the creation of the euro.

moz-screenshot.png
moz-screenshot-1.png
moz-screenshot-2.png

What? So failed Progressive economic theory is because of stuff that happened in the 1800's?
 
What? So failed Progressive economic theory is because of stuff that happened in the 1800's?

he's taken to cutting and pasting from economics books to seem intelligent but he doesn't know enough about economics to understand what he's cutting and pasting.
 
Last edited:
Not understanding...that would be your problem. He's head and shoulders above the discussion.
 
Maybe he doesn't have time to keep tutoring you.

Whether one agrees with him or not, he's knows what he's talking about.
 

Forum List

Back
Top