Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
oh dear Lord I just gave you the list: police courts laws regulations etc.
You may not realize it, but "etc" is not a specific term.
why be so afraid to go with the first four terms???? Do you have any idea what point you are trying to make? Why not just admit you cant explain how a liberal stimulus would help people and then become a Republicans.
Of course Obama would want another stimulus, without all this fake money floating the markets we would see the economy for what it is, true shit.
What's the real value of a dollar?
You may not realize it, but "etc" is not a specific term.
why be so afraid to go with the first four terms???? Do you have any idea what point you are trying to make? Why not just admit you cant explain how a liberal stimulus would help people and then become a Republicans.
I'm trying to figure out what you're advocating. So many on the right talk about the free market. When you point out the downside of the free market, they immediately start carrying on about how they didn't mean this and they didn't mean that.
IOW, you're one of many.
The Market Wants More Stimulus: Why Oh Why Can't We Have a Better Press Corps?: Yes, Rita Nazareth of Bloomberg News, We Are Looking at You Funny Because We Know You Can Do Better Department
But if you read the Bloomberg piece carefully, what it actually says is that market players fear that the absence of a debt deal means no stimulus. So the actual fear is not that spending wont be cut enough, it is that it will be cut too much which actually makes sense, and is consistent with the action in stock and bond markets.
But how many readers will get that? The way its presented reinforces the false notion that the deficit is the problem.
More at the link.
why be so afraid to go with the first four terms???? Do you have any idea what point you are trying to make? Why not just admit you cant explain how a liberal stimulus would help people and then become a Republicans.
I'm trying to figure out what you're advocating. So many on the right talk about the free market. When you point out the downside of the free market, they immediately start carrying on about how they didn't mean this and they didn't mean that.
IOW, you're one of many.
If freedom has a downside please explain what it is. Also when will you finally explain how a liberal stimulus can help people.
I'm trying to figure out what you're advocating. So many on the right talk about the free market. When you point out the downside of the free market, they immediately start carrying on about how they didn't mean this and they didn't mean that.
IOW, you're one of many.
If freedom has a downside please explain what it is. Also when will you finally explain how a liberal stimulus can help people.
No sidetracks. I want you folks to explain what you want the US government's role in the economy to be.
All money is fake.
The Titanic wants more icebergs
If freedom has a downside please explain what it is. Also when will you finally explain how a liberal stimulus can help people.
No sidetracks. I want you folks to explain what you want the US government's role in the economy to be.
Depends on the state... But in all to make sure the laws are being upheld. Stimulus and Bail-outs are not laws, they are unfair and massivly destructive.
why be so afraid to go with the first four terms???? Do you have any idea what point you are trying to make? Why not just admit you cant explain how a liberal stimulus would help people and then become a Republicans.
I'm trying to figure out what you're advocating. So many on the right talk about the free market. When you point out the downside of the free market, they immediately start carrying on about how they didn't mean this and they didn't mean that.
IOW, you're one of many.
If freedom has a downside please explain what it is. Also when will you finally explain how a liberal stimulus can help people.
Bailouts are massively destructive?
So somehow letting AIG, goldman sachs, GE, JP morgan, BoA, CitiGroup, american express, GM, chrysler, and discover card all fail would have been constructive? because without TARP thats what would have happened. With Federal Reserve lending, that list grows to include companies like mcdonalds.
If the government hadnt bailed out those companies the entire world would be in a depression right now.
As for stimulus, your just wrong. Government should always pursue countercyclical fiscal policy in a depression, that is econ 101. Look at what we see now. Governments that practice austerity (ours included) harm the economy, basic fact. Greeces debt to GDP ratio has actually gotten worse since they cut spending.
Freedom does have downsides. Do you think the freedom to sell meth on street corners would have a slight downside??
How can liberal stimulus help people? Regardless of whether its a good idea, the government could borrow enough money to employ every unemployed person repairing and building things.
Do you somehow doubt that the government could hire the unemployed?
But of course the markets want stimulus, and dont care about our debt atm.
If the markets were concerned about debt you would see the following:
Interest rates climb as our borrowers became less willing to lend, and stocks would fall as interest rates constrain growth.
But what we see is that interest rates and stocks are low. Suggesting interest rates are being driven down by people that would rather invest in low yielding bonds than in risky equities.
In short we should spend to full employment, or until we become constrained by the bond market.
BTW, nice krugman copy-pasta. Half of the people here will crucify you for citing him, the other half think hes a brilliant economist. Count me in with the latter.
The Titanic wants more icebergs
Try to get more than a 1st grade understanding of economics.
No sidetracks. I want you folks to explain what you want the US government's role in the economy to be.
Depends on the state... But in all to make sure the laws are being upheld. Stimulus and Bail-outs are not laws, they are unfair and massivly destructive.
Bailouts are massively destructive?
So somehow letting AIG, goldman sachs, GE, JP morgan, BoA, CitiGroup, american express, GM, chrysler, and discover card all fail would have been constructive? because without TARP thats what would have happened. With Federal Reserve lending, that list grows to include companies like mcdonalds.
If the government hadnt bailed out those companies the entire world would be in a depression right now.
As for stimulus, your just wrong. Government should always pursue countercyclical fiscal policy in a depression, that is econ 101. Look at what we see now. Governments that practice austerity (ours included) harm the economy, basic fact. Greeces debt to GDP ratio has actually gotten worse since they cut spending.
But of course the markets want stimulus, and dont care about our debt atm.
If the markets were concerned about debt you would see the following:
Interest rates climb as our borrowers became less willing to lend, and stocks would fall as interest rates constrain growth.
But what we see is that interest rates and stocks are low. Suggesting interest rates are being driven down by people that would rather invest in low yielding bonds than in risky equities.
In short we should spend to full employment, or until we become constrained by the bond market.
BTW, nice krugman copy-pasta. Half of the people here will crucify you for citing him, the other half think hes a brilliant economist. Count me in with the latter.
Krugman is dumber than you are.
The Markets are huge flight to safety right now. They care about debt that's why Greece and Italy are junk and Germany couldn't find buyers for their bonds; the USA is still the safest place to park money. That's why our rates are so low.
