Woodznutz
Platinum Member
- Dec 9, 2021
- 18,147
- 8,578
- 473
The Bible will explain it to you better than I can.No. You're not making an argument. You just bring up something wishywashy and then tell me to go do your research for you.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The Bible will explain it to you better than I can.No. You're not making an argument. You just bring up something wishywashy and then tell me to go do your research for you.
Exactly! The Constitution shields the Church from government interference, not the government from Christian participationThere is no separation of church and state in any clause of the Constitution or in any amendment. There is protection of the people from the federal government forcing any religious practices or beliefs on them and prohibiting the government from interfering with the people's religious belief and practices and that there will be no religious test to hold any federal office. Otherwise the government and the people are allowed to be as religious or non religious as they choose to be.
The Founders pretty much every single one believed that the Constitution would work for only a religious and moral people and wouldn't work for any other. The Founders themselves held Christian worship services in the Chambers of Congress.
No, no, no.....The Constitution makes the government promote the Natural Theology and morals common to Biblical religion but forbidns the Federal government from favoring a denomination. And all this because it is Christian and Jewish teaching that coerced faith is NOT faith at all.Exactly! The Constitution shields the Church from government interference, not the government from Christian participation
That's not evidence.Lots of evidence in the scriptures if you know what to look for.
Critical thinking isn't limited to secular subjects.
Is this really the first time in your life you've asked these questions. Somebody says something and you act like a deaf muteThat's not evidence.
That's like saying that blueprints aren't evidence of a building being constructed.That's not evidence.
Excellent comment!Exactly! The Constitution shields the Church from government interference, not the government from Christian participation
*maybeScience tells us that there was nothing
Lie.He argues that there is 'design' --- he says so--- but that design can happen irrespective of a Designer.
Name one, instead of running your mouth.He says he is looking for rational evidence and he gives irrational causes to explain his own position
Another lie. I said virtually all. Of course even the smartest peope can be fooled into believing childish, magical nonsense.He perversely says that no smart rational educated folks disagree with him.
Also total crap. The values of our country come from secular ideas, like classical liberalism.No, no, no.....The Constitution makes the government promote the Natural Theology and morals common to Biblical religion but forbidns the Federal government from favoring a denomination. And all this because it is Christian and Jewish teaching that coerced faith is NOT faith at all.
The Bible will explain it to you better than I can.
Science tells us that there was nothing, then there was a big bang and then there was something.
The Dictators Made God in Their Own ImageAlso total crap. The values of our country come from secular ideas, like classical liberalism.
One strong clue: The bronze age book Of mythologies that we call the bible has been around for thousands of years. Yet no modern liberal democracy existed until two hundred fifty years ago quite in spite of religion.
Confirmation Bias Doesn't Connect the Dots; It Connects the DittosThe Bible will explain it to you better than I can.
That's what scientists do. They make up theories.That's not evidence.
The Bible will explain it to you better than I can.
Confirmation Bias Doesn't Connect the Dots; It Connects the Dittos
Regarding the thread topic I don't accept the scientific premise that design doesn't exist. Design in nature is obvious, therefore a designer is necessary. Things don't design themselves. The prima facie evidence belongs to purposeful design, not evolution.Confirmation Bias Doesn't Connect the Dots; It Connects the Dittos
That's what scientists do. They make up theories.