The American Dream disapears under Reaganism...wake up!

[The T]

The Reagan Years -

The BEST for the United States.

Then comes the adultering, intern-molesting, impeached, disbarred disgrace Hillbilly knuckle-dragging redneck, AKA - Dick, er.... Bill Clinton.

What a legacy.

Blue dresses and using perfectly good cigars for nefarious purposes...

 

[LoneLaugher]

The Takers are dangerously close to outnumbering the Producers/Givers. That's what's destroying America. We are very close to a tipping-point. Third World Misery may not be too far away.

There it is AGAIN.

How many takers are there? Paulie?

How many able bodied adult Americans are there who refuse to work and instead live off of taxpayer dollars provided by the producers/givers?

HOW FUCKING MANY?

 

[paulitician]

$16 Trillion in Debt, yet the Takers just keep on taking. Third World here we come.

 

[tjvh]

they cant cheat enough to win anymore.


the "I know you are but what am I" and "your a poopy pants" tactics have worn so thin it doesnt bing them any NEW voters.

There exsisting voter base is dying of old age.


Their going to get caught cheating BIG TIME pretty soon

Do you purposely ignore the "spellchecker" function, or are you just a complete moron?

 

[Truthmatters]

fuck you.

my spelling is not going to make these facts go away

 

[Black_Label]

The Reagan Years -

The BEST for the United States.

Then comes the adultering, intern-molesting, impeached, disbarred disgrace Hillbilly knuckle-dragging redneck, AKA - Dick, er.... Bill Clinton.

What a legacy.

I guess raising taxes more than any other president in history, insane spending, making illegal arms deals with Muslims in Iran, granting blanket amnesty to millions of illegals and stating while visiting with him in the white house:

It has become quite clear that being a far right wing nutcase and having a severe mental illness go hand in hand,..

 

[LoneLaugher]

Paulie. Are you trying to say that we are 16 trillion in debt because of welfare spending?

How much of our GDP is spent on welfare aimed at able bodied adults who refuse to work?

 

[tjvh]

1. WORKERS PRODUCE MORE BUT THE GAINS GO TO BUSINESS.

Over the past 63 years worker productivity has grown by 2.0% per year.

But after 1980, workers received a smaller share every year. Labor’s share of income (1992 = 100%):

1950 = 101%
1960 = 105%
1970 = 105%
1980 = 105% – Reagan
1990 = 100%
2000 = 96%
2007 = 92%

A 13% drop since 1980

2. THE TOP 10% GET A LARGER SHARE.

Share of National Income going to Top 10%:

1950 = 35%
1960 = 34%
1970 = 34%
1980 = 34% – Reagan
1990 = 40%
2000 = 47%
2007 = 50%

An increase of 16% since Reagan.

3. WORKERS COMPENSATED FOR THE LOSS OF INCOME BY SPENDING THEIR SAVINGS.

The savings Rose up to Reagan and fell during and after.

1950 = 6.0%
1960 = 7.0%
1970 = 8.5%
1980 = 10.0% – Reagan
1982 = 11.2% – Peak
1990 = 7.0%
2000 = 2.0%
2006 = -1.1% (Negative = withdrawing from savings)

A 12.3% drop after Reagan.

4. WORKERS ALSO BORROWED TO MAKE UP FOR THE LOSS.

Household Debt as percentage of GDP:

1965 = 46%
1970 = 45%
1980 = 50% – Reagan
1990 = 61%
2000 = 69%
2007 = 95%

A 45% increase after 1980.

5. SO THE GAP BETWEEN THE RICHEST AND THE POOREST HAS GROWN.

Gap Between the Share of Capital Income earned by the top 1%
and the bottom 80%:

1980 = 10%
2003 = 56%

A 5.6 times increase.

6. AND THE AMERICAN DREAM IS GONE.

The Probably of Moving Up from the Bottom 40% to the Top 40%:

1945 = 12%
1958 = 6%
1990 = 3%
2000 = 2%

A 10% Decrease.

The Demise of the American Middle Class In Numbers. | Fact Left

Not one of you can deflect these facts huh?

Why bother? It will never sink in... I'd rather have a discussion with someone who hasn't already drank the Kool-Aid... It's far more stimulating.

 

[Truthmatters]

jesus your an idiot

 

[tjvh]

fuck you.

my spelling is not going to make these facts go away

The same question applies... Do you purposely ignore it, or are you stupid? Which is it?

 

[The T]

fuck you.

my spelling is not going to make these facts go away

The same question applies... Do you purposely ignore it, or are you stupid? Which is it?

Love these Catch-22's.

 

[paulitician]

Paulie. Are you trying to say that we are 16 trillion in debt because of welfare spending?

How much of our GDP is spent on welfare aimed at able bodied adults who refuse to work?

The Entitlement/Takers are a very significant problem for our Nation. And when i say 'Takers', it includes Corporate Welfare idiots. The American Taxpayers can only handle so much. They're currently being used & abused. It's $16 Trillion and climbing. What an awful mess.

 

[The T]

Paulie. Are you trying to say that we are 16 trillion in debt because of welfare spending?

How much of our GDP is spent on welfare aimed at able bodied adults who refuse to work?

The Entitlement/Takers are a very significant problem for our Nation. And when i say 'Takers', it includes Corporate Welfare idiots. The American Taxpayers can only handle so much. They're currently being used & abused. It's $16 Trillion and climbing. What an awful mess.

DON'T forget the unfunded mandates that is far larger...what is it $116 T?

 

[tjvh]

fuck you.

my spelling is not going to make these facts go away

The same question applies... Do you purposely ignore it, or are you stupid? Which is it?

Love these Catch-22's.

Conundrum.

 

[Gideonprime]

Now that is too true we are hadning good money after bad to agrobusiness and oil companies while they are reaping record profits.

COrporate welfare is a huge problem.

Notthat personal welfare is nothing but in comparison . . . pennies to the money we waste stationing troops around the world to maintain our empire.

 

[The T]

The same question applies... Do you purposely ignore it, or are you stupid? Which is it?

Love these Catch-22's.

Conundrum.

Indeed. Either answer of run like a scalded dawg.

 

[Google]

1. WORKERS PRODUCE MORE BUT THE GAINS GO TO BUSINESS.

Over the past 63 years worker productivity has grown by 2.0% per year.

But after 1980, workers received a smaller share every year. Labor’s share of income (1992 = 100%):

1950 = 101%
1960 = 105%
1970 = 105%
1980 = 105% – Reagan
1990 = 100%
2000 = 96%
2007 = 92%

A 13% drop since 1980

2. THE TOP 10% GET A LARGER SHARE.

Share of National Income going to Top 10%:

1950 = 35%
1960 = 34%
1970 = 34%
1980 = 34% – Reagan
1990 = 40%
2000 = 47%
2007 = 50%

An increase of 16% since Reagan.

3. WORKERS COMPENSATED FOR THE LOSS OF INCOME BY SPENDING THEIR SAVINGS.

The savings Rose up to Reagan and fell during and after.

1950 = 6.0%
1960 = 7.0%
1970 = 8.5%
1980 = 10.0% – Reagan
1982 = 11.2% – Peak
1990 = 7.0%
2000 = 2.0%
2006 = -1.1% (Negative = withdrawing from savings)

A 12.3% drop after Reagan.

4. WORKERS ALSO BORROWED TO MAKE UP FOR THE LOSS.

Household Debt as percentage of GDP:

1965 = 46%
1970 = 45%
1980 = 50% – Reagan
1990 = 61%
2000 = 69%
2007 = 95%

A 45% increase after 1980.

5. SO THE GAP BETWEEN THE RICHEST AND THE POOREST HAS GROWN.

Gap Between the Share of Capital Income earned by the top 1%
and the bottom 80%:

1980 = 10%
2003 = 56%

A 5.6 times increase.

6. AND THE AMERICAN DREAM IS GONE.

The Probably of Moving Up from the Bottom 40% to the Top 40%:

1945 = 12%
1958 = 6%
1990 = 3%
2000 = 2%

A 10% Decrease.

The Demise of the American Middle Class In Numbers. | Fact Left

At what pace did the GDP grow each year Reagan was in office?

How many jobs were added under the entire eight years of Reagan's administration?

Why was Reagan elected by sweeping majorities and landslides if the economy and the working class were in such hardship?

The left is perpetually engaging in revisionist history. The fact is Reagan was beloved by a overwhelming majority of Americans and compared to Reagan Obama is a joke.

 

[Google]

When President Reagan entered office in 1981, he faced actually much worse economic problems than President Obama faced in 2009. Three worsening recessions starting in 1969 were about to culminate in the worst of all in 1981-1982, with unemployment soaring into double digits at a peak of 10.8%. At the same time America suffered roaring double-digit inflation, with the CPI registering at 11.3% in 1979 and 13.5% in 1980 (25% in two years). The Washington establishment at the time argued that this inflation was now endemic to the American economy, and could not be stopped, at least not without a calamitous economic collapse.


All of the above was accompanied by double -igit interest rates, with the prime rate peaking at 21.5% in 1980. The poverty rate started increasing in 1978, eventually climbing by an astounding 33%, from 11.4% to 15.2%. A fall in real median family income that began in 1978 snowballed to a decline of almost 10% by 1982. In addition, from 1968 to 1982, the Dow Jones industrial average lost 70% of its real value, reflecting an overall collapse of stocks.



These economic policies amounted to the most successful economic experiment in world history. The Reagan recovery started in official records in November 1982, and lasted 92 months without a recession until July 1990, when the tax increases of the 1990 budget deal killed it. This set a new record for the longest peacetime expansion ever, the previous high in peacetime being 58 months.



During this seven-year recovery, the economy grew by almost one-third, the equivalent of adding the entire economy of West Germany, the third-largest in the world at the time, to the U.S. economy. In 1984 alone real economic growth boomed by 6.8%, the highest in 50 years. Nearly 20 million new jobs were created during the recovery, increasing U.S. civilian employment by almost 20%. Unemployment fell to 5.3% by 1989.


Reaganomics Vs. Obamanomics: Facts And Figures - Forbes

 

[Warrior102]

What a legacy.

I guess raising taxes more than any other president in history, insane spending, making illegal arms deals with Muslims in Iran, granting blanket amnesty to millions of illegals and stating while visiting with him in the white house:

.[/QUOTE]

Actually - largest tax increase in history came under Clinton.

There.

You're corrected.

 

[thanatos144]

So you retards show numbers about business making profits ..........LMAO this is bad why again? What the workers didnt get as much of the owner???? No shit retards if they want more they need to become a owner. They dont even show numbers like how many were employed during the Reagan years and how much the GDP rose......This as normal is just dishonest spin from the commie progressive liberal left...And you all who believe this crap? Stop eating paint chips.