The 12-Steps of Avoiding LGBT Blackmail & Career Destruction

Perry and fellow Lone Star State Republicans have already faced scrutiny for adopting a platform at their annual convention this month which endorses the voluntary use of reparative therapy—a widely discredited practice in which counselors try to turn gays and lesbians straight. Though Texas Republicans favor its use, other states have started to ban such practices. http://www.dailydot.com/politics/rick-perry-homosexuality-alcoholism/ [/quote]

Hmmmm...let's see. That was June 2014...then this...

Perry’s legal battle is complex, but basically it amounts to this: The Democratic Travis County district attorney, Rosemary Lehmberg, had an ugly, videotaped confrontation with police when she was arrested last year on drunk-driving charges. Lehmberg oversees the county's Office of Public Integrity, which has statewide jurisdiction. Perry threatened to veto $7.5 million in funding for the unit, which investigates public officials, unless she stepped down...

..

And this:

Lesbian Travis County District Attorney Rosemary Lehmberg was arrested over the weekend for driving while intoxicated after drivers reported her swerving into multiple lanes of traffic.
Sheriff deputies arrested her in a church parking lot early Saturday morning after she refused breath and field sobriety tests. Deputies found an open vodka bottle in her front passenger seat and she allegedly admitted to having two vodka drinks earlier in the evening, KHOU reports.

Perry announces he embraces reparative therapy in June. So a lesbian gets a DUI and brings shame to her office. Perry insists she resign. She refuses. Perry witholds funding from the office for reasons of keeping shame from the District Attorney's office and "a watchdog group" files a lawsuit?

This may belong in this thread or get its own thread. Stay tuned...
 
So your reply to California being cheated out of the democracy Utah enjoys in the interim is "shut the fuck up"? Nothing like fascism to brighten your day.
Once again this nation isn't a democracy.
It is when it comes to regulating behaviors.
No it isn't. It's still a constitutional republic on all matters
Nope. Behaviors are regulated by local penal and civil codes. Are you suggesting that behaviors are protected by the US Constitution and that all locally enacted laws by democratic vote are null and void if the person feels like they're being oppressed for not being allowed to express any behavior any time no matter how repugnant to the majority?
 
So your reply to California being cheated out of the democracy Utah enjoys in the interim is "shut the fuck up"? Nothing like fascism to brighten your day.
Once again this nation isn't a democracy.
It is when it comes to regulating behaviors.
No it isn't. It's still a constitutional republic on all matters
Nope. Behaviors are regulated by local penal and civil codes. Are you suggesting that behaviors are protected by the US Constitution and that all locally enacted laws by democratic vote are null and void if the person feels like they're being oppressed for not being allowed to express any behavior any time no matter how repugnant to the majority?
define repugnant?
 
So your reply to California being cheated out of the democracy Utah enjoys in the interim is "shut the fuck up"? Nothing like fascism to brighten your day.
Once again this nation isn't a democracy.
It is when it comes to regulating behaviors.
No it isn't. It's still a constitutional republic on all matters
Nope. Behaviors are regulated by local penal and civil codes. Are you suggesting that behaviors are protected by the US Constitution and that all locally enacted laws by democratic vote are null and void if the person feels like they're being oppressed for not being allowed to express any behavior any time no matter how repugnant to the majority?
define repugnant?
A behavior that the majority objects to trying to pass itself off as "married"...
 
So your reply to California being cheated out of the democracy Utah enjoys in the interim is "shut the fuck up"? Nothing like fascism to brighten your day.
Once again this nation isn't a democracy.
It is when it comes to regulating behaviors.
No it isn't. It's still a constitutional republic on all matters
Nope. Behaviors are regulated by local penal and civil codes. Are you suggesting that behaviors are protected by the US Constitution and that all locally enacted laws by democratic vote are null and void if the person feels like they're being oppressed for not being allowed to express any behavior any time no matter how repugnant to the majority?
define repugnant?
A behavior that the majority objects to trying to pass itself off as "married"...
not even close O desperate one!
 
So your reply to California being cheated out of the democracy Utah enjoys in the interim is "shut the fuck up"? Nothing like fascism to brighten your day.
Once again this nation isn't a democracy.
It is when it comes to regulating behaviors.
No it isn't. It's still a constitutional republic on all matters
Nope. Behaviors are regulated by local penal and civil codes. Are you suggesting that behaviors are protected by the US Constitution and that all locally enacted laws by democratic vote are null and void if the person feels like they're being oppressed for not being allowed to express any behavior any time no matter how repugnant to the majority?
Yes. The USA isn't a democracy. Many behaviors are protected by the constitution. Why don't you try reading it just once.
 
So your reply to California being cheated out of the democracy Utah enjoys in the interim is "shut the fuck up"? Nothing like fascism to brighten your day.
Once again this nation isn't a democracy.
It is when it comes to regulating behaviors.
No it isn't. It's still a constitutional republic on all matters
Nope. Behaviors are regulated by local penal and civil codes. Are you suggesting that behaviors are protected by the US Constitution and that all locally enacted laws by democratic vote are null and void if the person feels like they're being oppressed for not being allowed to express any behavior any time no matter how repugnant to the majority?
define repugnant?
A behavior that the majority objects to trying to pass itself off as "married"...
The majority can go suck an egg, this nation isn't majority ruled. That's called a tyranny
 
A behavior that the majority objects to trying to pass itself off as "married"...


What's repugnant is your ignorance, hate, and contempt for the Constitution and its case law, where you seek to violate the civil liberties of gay Americans solely for being who they are.
 
A behavior that the majority objects to trying to pass itself off as "married"...


What's repugnant is your ignorance, hate, and contempt for the Constitution and its case law, where you seek to violate the civil liberties of gay Americans solely for being who they are.
That damned constitution.
 
The majority can go suck an egg, this nation isn't majority ruled. That's called a tyranny

Well the latest court ruling on the world stage has determined that the majority of any of the 49 discreet communities [countries] under its jurisdiction can say no to gay marriage finally and definitively without gays being able to appeal that majority-rule. Most of those 49 countries are our closest allies. So....
 
The majority can go suck an egg, this nation isn't majority ruled. That's called a tyranny

Well the latest court ruling on the world stage has determined that the majority of any of the 49 discreet communities [countries] under its jurisdiction can say no to gay marriage finally and definitively without gays being able to appeal that majority-rule. Most of those 49 countries are our closest allies. So....
THEY WON'T AND YOU'LL BE FUCKED.
 
The majority can go suck an egg, this nation isn't majority ruled. That's called a tyranny

Well the latest court ruling on the world stage has determined that the majority of any of the 49 discreet communities [countries] under its jurisdiction can say no to gay marriage finally and definitively without gays being able to appeal that majority-rule. Most of those 49 countries are our closest allies. So....
Don't give a shit, USA is a sovereign nation.
 
The majority can go suck an egg, this nation isn't majority ruled. That's called a tyranny

Well the latest court ruling on the world stage has determined that the majority of any of the 49 discreet communities [countries] under its jurisdiction can say no to gay marriage finally and definitively without gays being able to appeal that majority-rule. Most of those 49 countries are our closest allies. So....
THEY WON'T AND YOU'LL BE FUCKED.
Life's a bitch when you only focus on others and controlling them.
 

Forum List

Back
Top