Teaching Anal Sex As "Good" In Schools. Where Is This Heading & Why?

[Carla_Danger]

So, in 31 states, children can be encouraged in schools without parental input or oversight, by the LGBT cartel, to "try gay sex a few times (while you're impressionable and susceptible to sexual imprinting) to see if it suits you, then make up your "mind"...about your newly habituated orientation.."

Incorrect.

35 States allow for opt out, 3 states require parental approval (that's 38 right there) meaning only 12 do not allow input, oversight, or opt out.


State Policies on Sex Education in Schools

>>>>

Do you think Sil cares about the actual numbers? She's making this up as she goes along.

Yep, she's pulling it right out of her read end. Ooops, her secret is out.

 

[Silhouette]

On a Web site that’s recommended to teens by SIECUS, the former head of SIECUS’s board of directors tells teens, “The only way to know if you are gay or bisexual is to experience it and reflect carefully on the feelings that come up as a result of the experience.”

Read whole article here:

You're Teaching My Child What? The Truth About Sex Education

35 States allow for opt out, 3 states require parental approval (that's 38 right there) meaning only 12 do not allow input, oversight, or opt out.


State Policies on Sex Education in Schools

>>>>

So all the children in full 12 states will be told in school without any chance for parental protest of this de facto pedophile grooming: "you should try gay sex a couple of times at the threshold of experimental adolescence, while you're impressionable to imprinted behaviors, then "make up your mind" whether you are gay or not"

Check.

Got any numbers on how many millions of children thereby will be forced to endure the wooing of gay pedophiles inappropriately introducing such thoughts into the minds of youngsters in public schools?

 

[Carla_Danger]

Oh dear. It gets worse. Only 19 states require that:

"... if provided, sex education must be medically, factually or technically accurate. State definitions of “medically accurate" vary, from requiring that the department of health review curriculum for accuracy, to mandating that curriculum be based on information from “published authorities upon which medical professionals rely.”


State Policies on Sex Education in Schools

And that is acceptable only to a dingbat.

 

[Carla_Danger]

You're Teaching My Child What? The Truth About Sex Education
By Miriam Grossman, M.D.

The principles of sexual health education are not based on the hard sciences. Sex education is animated by a specific vision of how society must change, and because of this, sex ed curricula omit critical biological truths and endorse high-risk behaviors. The priority for SIECUS, Planned Parenthood, and Advocates for Youth is not the health and well-being of young people. These federally funded organizations are fighting “repression” and “intolerance,” not herpes or syphilis. But when sexual freedom reigns, sexual health suffers. Our children are being taught that you can play with fire, and we are obligated to inform them of the risks they face and to teach them biological truths, even when they are politically incorrect...

The principles of sexual health education are not based on the hard sciences. They don’t rest on what’s seen under the microscope. Sex education is animated by a dream, a specific vision of how society must change, and because of this, sex ed curricula omit critical biological truths and endorse high-risk behaviors...

I have read “Talk About Sex,” and in it there is no encouragement whatsoever to delay sexual behavior. It begins by informing kids that sexuality is a part of who you are and that everyone has their own way of expressing their sexuality. Then there are eight pages about sexual rights. Some quotes:

• “Every human being has basic rights. Still, adults may say and do say things that make young people feel they don’t have rights. It’s important for you to know your rights so that you can stand up for yourself when necessary.”
  
• “At every point in your life, you can choose if and how to express your sexuality.”
  
• “It is up to you to determine how much risk you are willing to take.”
  
• “Many teens choose to be sexually active, and many choose not to. You have the right to decide what behaviors, if any, you are comfortable participating in.”

On a Web site that’s recommended to teens by SIECUS, the former head of SIECUS’s board of directors tells teens, “The only way to know if you are gay or bisexual is to experience it and reflect carefully on the feelings that come up as a result of the experience.”

Read whole article here:

You're Teaching My Child What? The Truth About Sex Education

That's a biased opinion piece from an extremist right wing site. I'm going to print that and use it to line my bird cage.

 

[Tilly]

Kansas Parents Are Outraged That A Middle School Sex Ed Poster References ‘Grinding’ And ‘Oral Sex’

BY TARA CULP-RESSLER JAN 21, 2014 11:17 AM

CREDIT: FOX NEWS

Kansas parent Mark Ellis and the sex ed poster that started it all

Share8,803
Tweet

Kansas parent Mark Ellis and the controversial sex ed poster

CREDIT: FOX NEWS

A middle school in Kansas has removed a poster that used to supplement some of the sex ed curricula for eighth graders, following complaints from one parent who took his case to the press. The poster, entitled “How Do People Express Their Sexual Feelings?”, lists various sexual activities like “grinding,” “oral sex,” “kissing,” and “sexual fantasy.” It sparked considerable controversy last week after one 13-year-old student snapped a photo of it and showed it to her father, who threatened to remove her from the sex ed class.

When Mark Ellis first saw his daughter’s photo, he initially thought the poster was a prank. But after he contacted officials in the Shawnee Mission School District, he learned that it was part of an approved human sexuality curriculum — and he was extremely upset that the material had gotten approval in the first place.

“You know this had to pass through enough hands that someone should have said, ‘Wait a minute, these are 13-year-old kids, we do not need to be this in-depth with this sexual education type of program,’ ” Ellis told a local Fox affiliate.

A spokeswoman for the Kansas school district, Leigh Anne Neal, explained that the poster is one small part of the school’s curriculum for middle schoolers — and it’s supposed to be part of a larger lesson, not a standalone resource. Neal pointed out that a teacher-led discussion about these type of sexual expressions would provide important context for the terms that appear on the poster.

That’s not good enough for Ellis, who wants the entire curriculum to be changed. “It makes me wonder what our country has come to when kids get something like this thrown in front of them,” he said in an interview with Fox News on Friday. “I couldn’t believe something like that was going on in school.”
...
Kansas Parents Are Outraged That A Middle School Sex Ed Poster References ‘Grinding’ And ‘Oral Sex’

 

[Skylar]

Kansas Parents Are Outraged That A Middle School Sex Ed Poster References ‘Grinding’ And ‘Oral Sex’

BY TARA CULP-RESSLER JAN 21, 2014 11:17 AM

CREDIT: FOX NEWS

Kansas parent Mark Ellis and the sex ed poster that started it all

Share8,803
Tweet

Kansas parent Mark Ellis and the controversial sex ed poster

CREDIT: FOX NEWS

A middle school in Kansas has removed a poster that used to supplement some of the sex ed curricula for eighth graders, following complaints from one parent who took his case to the press. The poster, entitled “How Do People Express Their Sexual Feelings?”, lists various sexual activities like “grinding,” “oral sex,” “kissing,” and “sexual fantasy.” It sparked considerable controversy last week after one 13-year-old student snapped a photo of it and showed it to her father, who threatened to remove her from the sex ed class.

When Mark Ellis first saw his daughter’s photo, he initially thought the poster was a prank. But after he contacted officials in the Shawnee Mission School District, he learned that it was part of an approved human sexuality curriculum — and he was extremely upset that the material had gotten approval in the first place.

“You know this had to pass through enough hands that someone should have said, ‘Wait a minute, these are 13-year-old kids, we do not need to be this in-depth with this sexual education type of program,’ ” Ellis told a local Fox affiliate.

A spokeswoman for the Kansas school district, Leigh Anne Neal, explained that the poster is one small part of the school’s curriculum for middle schoolers — and it’s supposed to be part of a larger lesson, not a standalone resource. Neal pointed out that a teacher-led discussion about these type of sexual expressions would provide important context for the terms that appear on the poster.

That’s not good enough for Ellis, who wants the entire curriculum to be changed. “It makes me wonder what our country has come to when kids get something like this thrown in front of them,” he said in an interview with Fox News on Friday. “I couldn’t believe something like that was going on in school.”
...
Kansas Parents Are Outraged That A Middle School Sex Ed Poster References ‘Grinding’ And ‘Oral Sex’

Why would you be outraged that the words 'oral sex' and 'grinding' were printed on a piece of paper?

And if you can't think of any rational reason, perhaps you can cut and paste something for us.

 

[Tilly]

It's not perfectly normal: U.S. schools teach masturbation to 8-year-olds

Frances Stotter
Allvoices.com
Sat, 22 Feb 2014 06:57 UTC


US schools are teaching 8-year-olds how to masturbate, and parents are outraged. The controversy surrounds the textbook titled "It's Perfectly Normal," which contains graphic illustrations of naked people of all ages. Some drawings depict children and adults masturbating and having intercourse. Do-it-yourself instructions are included.

US Common Core standards now require sexuality education from kindergarten through grade 12. To qualify for federal grants from the US Department of Education, public schools must adopt Common Core standards. According to the independent Heartland Institute, the Affordable Care Act has budgeted $75 million for sexuality education. Much of that has been granted to Planned Parenthood. With these funds, Planned Parenthood has hired sexuality teachers for public schools.

This academic year, Common Core has endorsed "It's Perfectly Normal" for fourth-grade public schools. Parents and teachers in Tennessee have opposed it. Reporter Victoria Jackson discussed the Tennessee controversy on clashdaily.com.


Frankly, I thought the first story was a right-wing joke. Then, I discovered that earlier editions have graced library shelves for 10 years. "It's Perfectly Normal" is considered a health book for children. Planned Parenthood endorses it for ages 10 and up. Its author and other contributors are affiliated with Planned Parenthood.

This month, the controversy has spread across the US. Read here about what parents and educators in Alabama, Illinois, Colorado and South Dakota have to say. Readers can find hundreds more links about Common Core sexuality education.

The first public controversy began in 2007 in Texas, when Planned Parenthood distributed the book to young teens at its annual sex party. News of the book hit the media. The Catholic Church condemned it as an assault on children. Catholic Online reported that trailers for the book were removed from children's Internet networks. Other sites restricted the video to ages 18 and older. In Washington, the book promotion was deleted from a public agency fund-raiser because it was considered "sexually explicit" and "obscene."

In 2008, the American Life League exposed the contents of the book. In the video, the League described the book's content as violating the pornography laws of US states. It could also be considered "in some cases, child pornography." A second video produced by the league in 2012 revealed the updated illustrations in uncensored detail.

On the other hand, here's how Scholastic Books describes the latest edition of "It's Perfectly Normal":Alternately playful and realistic, Emberley's . . . art reinforces Harris's message that bodies come in all sizes, shapes, and colors -- and that each variation is 'perfectly normal." -- PUBLISHERS WEEKLY (starred review) ...IT'S PERFECTLY NORMAL marks its 10th anniversary with a thoroughly updated edition that includes the latest information on such topics as birth control, hepatitis, HIV and adoption, among others. This definitive new edition also reflects the recent input of parents, teachers, librarians, clergy, scientists, health professionals, and young readers themselves.Unfortunately, "among others" includes sexual practices that may defy the religious beliefs of many children's parents. The book also instructs children to disregard what their parents teach them. Instead, performing the illustrated sex acts is supposed to be perfectly normal. That means an 8-year-old having anal sex is normal? An 8-year-old having sex with an adult is normal? Teaching a child how to perform any sex act at home is normal?

Why are sexually explicit books used in fourth-grade classrooms? Common Core is supposed to set standards in math, science and language arts. Is the opposition a bunch of right-wing hype, or truthful?

Let's get more facts before we judge. With the help of a South Dakota reporter, I located the National Sexuality Education Standards, Core Content and Skills, K - 12. The curriculum looks simple and direct on the surface, but it's just a summary.

How the curriculum is applied, who teaches it, and the materials are not well-defined. Many parents demand to know exactly what the objectives mean. For example, "Guiding Principles" on Page 9 say:5. Students need opportunities to engage in cooperative and active learning strategies, and sufficient time must be allocated for students to practice skills relating to sexuality education.
8. Students need multiple opportunities and a variety of assessment strategies to determine their achievement of the sexuality education standards and performance indicators.Watchdog reporter Mary C. Tillotson also wrote:...some information is inappropriate to give earlier or ever in schools, said Abby Johnson, a former Planned Parenthood clinic director. "We saw in a couple different states last year that part of Planned Parenthood's curriculum is to demonstrate different sexual positions with stuffed animals to children in kindergarten," she said. At least one program linked on the federation's website suggests children ages 5 to 8 learn that "vaginal intercourse - when a penis is placed inside a vagina - is the most common way for a sperm and egg to join.Recent developments in Common Core sexuality standards give Allvoices readers much to consider. Unfortunately, many parents don't understand the curriculum. Some parents have just seen it here.

This month, US communities are discussing Common Core. Some groups suggest the curriculum violates their religious freedoms. They argue that sex education should be part of health science. Instead, science has been replaced by "sexuality" education that usurps the rights of parents to teach their children moral values.

In my opinion, the question is not whether children should learn about sex. All children will learn eventually. That should begin with their parents or guardians. The deeper issue is whether "sexuality" education imposes the philosophies of a select few educational decision-makers into the minds of young children, and attempts to override the values of American families.

 

[Iceweasel]

I said normalizing it, for the 50th time now. You keep dancing around it claiming it's just condom use and they're going to do it anyway. My point is not so much what they are doing but what they should be doing, teaching the hazards of things like anal sex. They won't get that online if they see porn.

And how are schools 'normalizing' anal and oral sex? By acknowledging they exist?

What schools are doing is teaching condom use so kids can better protect themselves. What about that do you oppose?

Post where I condemned condom education? You can't. That means you're a moron for repeating it. Schools just "acknowledge" other practices? You haven't read this thread or the others or you're just a filthy liar.

School Uses Planned Parenthood Curriculum to Teach Kids Oral Sex
Parents could tell something was wrong with the children when they came home from school. They were quiet and withdrawn, embarrassed, and didn’t want to talk about what had happened. When Curtis and Jean Pannkuk began questioning their young daughter, they discovered that her elementary school principal had instructed her that day in how to perform oral and anal sex. The traumatizing instruction was delivered as a part of state approved sex education that was orchestrated, developed, pushed, and policed by Planned Parenthood, NARAL Pro-Choice Washington, SIECUS, and a host of other agencies.

Though parents in the small town of Onalaska, Washington, are furious that their children have been violated and traumatized by the highly inappropriate sex instruction, the superintendent defended the principal’s delivery of graphic instruction in aberrant sex to the elementary school students, telling local media, “I think the principal handled it appropriately at the time; she only gave factual information, no demonstrations.” In another interview, he indicated that she “stuck to the curriculum.”

Your bullshit so-called news article is a lie. This is what they use in Washington, one of the few states that require sex ed to be medically accurate.

http://www.k12.wa.us/HIVSexualHealth/pubdocs/KNOWGrades5-6.pdf

You mean that Life News, an anti-abortion, fundamentalist Christian wordpress blog can't be trusted to be accurate?

Color me shocked.

Can you imagine having a sex ed class lead by Silly Sil, Weasel, or Tilly? You'd be better educated skipping the class.

I'd teach them the risks and dangers, like I said, Retardo.

 

[Tilly]

Sounds like legalised child abuse to me.

Missouri parents outraged over pornographic, pro-abortion sex ed book in school library

..."This booklet, endorsed by Planned Parenthood, is another example of over the top obscenity and child porn that schools recklessly expose ever-younger audiences, destroying innocence and modesty," Cosby told LifeSiteNews. "This booklet is beyond bad taste and offensive; it is pornographic and harmful to children. The words, acts and graphic pictures would be unlawful if anyone else distributed them to children."

"Nowhere in this book is the virtue of chastity and fidelity to a spouse celebrated as perfectly normal," concluded Cosby.

Missouri parents outraged over pornographic, pro-abortion sex ed book in school library

 

[Tilly]

And how are schools 'normalizing' anal and oral sex? By acknowledging they exist?

What schools are doing is teaching condom use so kids can better protect themselves. What about that do you oppose?

Post where I condemned condom education? You can't. That means you're a moron for repeating it. Schools just "acknowledge" other practices? You haven't read this thread or the others or you're just a filthy liar.

School Uses Planned Parenthood Curriculum to Teach Kids Oral Sex
Parents could tell something was wrong with the children when they came home from school. They were quiet and withdrawn, embarrassed, and didn’t want to talk about what had happened. When Curtis and Jean Pannkuk began questioning their young daughter, they discovered that her elementary school principal had instructed her that day in how to perform oral and anal sex. The traumatizing instruction was delivered as a part of state approved sex education that was orchestrated, developed, pushed, and policed by Planned Parenthood, NARAL Pro-Choice Washington, SIECUS, and a host of other agencies.

Though parents in the small town of Onalaska, Washington, are furious that their children have been violated and traumatized by the highly inappropriate sex instruction, the superintendent defended the principal’s delivery of graphic instruction in aberrant sex to the elementary school students, telling local media, “I think the principal handled it appropriately at the time; she only gave factual information, no demonstrations.” In another interview, he indicated that she “stuck to the curriculum.”

Your bullshit so-called news article is a lie. This is what they use in Washington, one of the few states that require sex ed to be medically accurate.

http://www.k12.wa.us/HIVSexualHealth/pubdocs/KNOWGrades5-6.pdf

You mean that Life News, an anti-abortion, fundamentalist Christian wordpress blog can't be trusted to be accurate?

Color me shocked.

Can you imagine having a sex ed class lead by Silly Sil, Weasel, or Tilly? You'd be better educated skipping the class.

I'd teach them the risks and dangers, like I said, Retardo.

They are wilfully ignoring what is actually said, as usual.

 

[Iceweasel]

Post where I condemned condom education? You can't. That means you're a moron for repeating it. Schools just "acknowledge" other practices? You haven't read this thread or the others or you're just a filthy liar.

School Uses Planned Parenthood Curriculum to Teach Kids Oral Sex
Parents could tell something was wrong with the children when they came home from school. They were quiet and withdrawn, embarrassed, and didn’t want to talk about what had happened. When Curtis and Jean Pannkuk began questioning their young daughter, they discovered that her elementary school principal had instructed her that day in how to perform oral and anal sex. The traumatizing instruction was delivered as a part of state approved sex education that was orchestrated, developed, pushed, and policed by Planned Parenthood, NARAL Pro-Choice Washington, SIECUS, and a host of other agencies.

Though parents in the small town of Onalaska, Washington, are furious that their children have been violated and traumatized by the highly inappropriate sex instruction, the superintendent defended the principal’s delivery of graphic instruction in aberrant sex to the elementary school students, telling local media, “I think the principal handled it appropriately at the time; she only gave factual information, no demonstrations.” In another interview, he indicated that she “stuck to the curriculum.”

Your bullshit so-called news article is a lie. This is what they use in Washington, one of the few states that require sex ed to be medically accurate.

http://www.k12.wa.us/HIVSexualHealth/pubdocs/KNOWGrades5-6.pdf

You mean that Life News, an anti-abortion, fundamentalist Christian wordpress blog can't be trusted to be accurate?

Color me shocked.

Can you imagine having a sex ed class lead by Silly Sil, Weasel, or Tilly? You'd be better educated skipping the class.

I'd teach them the risks and dangers, like I said, Retardo.

They are wilfully ignoring what is actually said, as usual.

Because they know they're full of shit. They want to corrupt the morals of kids so all sex is equal, girl/guy, guy/guy and they can't exactly admit it.

 

[Skylar]

Your bullshit so-called news article is a lie. This is what they use in Washington, one of the few states that require sex ed to be medically accurate.

http://www.k12.wa.us/HIVSexualHealth/pubdocs/KNOWGrades5-6.pdf

You mean that Life News, an anti-abortion, fundamentalist Christian wordpress blog can't be trusted to be accurate?

Color me shocked.

Can you imagine having a sex ed class lead by Silly Sil, Weasel, or Tilly? You'd be better educated skipping the class.

I'd teach them the risks and dangers, like I said, Retardo.

They are wilfully ignoring what is actually said, as usual.

Because they know they're full of shit. They want to corrupt the morals of kids so all sex is equal, girl/guy, guy/guy and they can't exactly admit it.

The totality of your examples, even your standards, consist of ONE principal at ONE school in ONE class answering a direct question from ONE student.

What is being taught to kids is condom use. And well it should be.

 

[Skylar]

Sounds like legalised child abuse to me.

Missouri parents outraged over pornographic, pro-abortion sex ed book in school library

..."This booklet, endorsed by Planned Parenthood, is another example of over the top obscenity and child porn that schools recklessly expose ever-younger audiences, destroying innocence and modesty," Cosby told LifeSiteNews. "This booklet is beyond bad taste and offensive; it is pornographic and harmful to children. The words, acts and graphic pictures would be unlawful if anyone else distributed them to children."

"Nowhere in this book is the virtue of chastity and fidelity to a spouse celebrated as perfectly normal," concluded Cosby.

Missouri parents outraged over pornographic, pro-abortion sex ed book in school library

And by 'in the school library'.....you mean a pdf?

Here's the PDF. What about this do you find so wildly offensive? What is being depicted that you think kids should never learn about?

http://illinoisfamily.org/110files/uploads/2013/05/Its-Perfectly-Normal.pdf

 

[Iceweasel]

You mean that Life News, an anti-abortion, fundamentalist Christian wordpress blog can't be trusted to be accurate?

Color me shocked.

Can you imagine having a sex ed class lead by Silly Sil, Weasel, or Tilly? You'd be better educated skipping the class.

I'd teach them the risks and dangers, like I said, Retardo.

They are wilfully ignoring what is actually said, as usual.

Because they know they're full of shit. They want to corrupt the morals of kids so all sex is equal, girl/guy, guy/guy and they can't exactly admit it.

The totality of your examples, even your standards, consist of ONE principal at ONE school in ONE class answering a direct question from ONE student.

What is being taught to kids is condom use. And well it should be.

There have been other examples, I'm not scouring the internet so you can pretend it doesn't matter. They teach much more than just condom use, at this stage you're a goddamn liar.

 

[Tilly]

Your bullshit so-called news article is a lie. This is what they use in Washington, one of the few states that require sex ed to be medically accurate.

http://www.k12.wa.us/HIVSexualHealth/pubdocs/KNOWGrades5-6.pdf

You mean that Life News, an anti-abortion, fundamentalist Christian wordpress blog can't be trusted to be accurate?

Color me shocked.

Can you imagine having a sex ed class lead by Silly Sil, Weasel, or Tilly? You'd be better educated skipping the class.

I'd teach them the risks and dangers, like I said, Retardo.

They are wilfully ignoring what is actually said, as usual.

Because they know they're full of shit. They want to corrupt the morals of kids so all sex is equal, girl/guy, guy/guy and they can't exactly admit it.

Poor kids. They are being desensitised so nothing will seem alarming or just plain wrong as they grow older. Its abuse, imho, and as the guy in the post above about the sex ed book, its porno and would be illegal in other settings. It's an outrage.

 

[Skylar]

You mean that Life News, an anti-abortion, fundamentalist Christian wordpress blog can't be trusted to be accurate?

Color me shocked.

Can you imagine having a sex ed class lead by Silly Sil, Weasel, or Tilly? You'd be better educated skipping the class.

I'd teach them the risks and dangers, like I said, Retardo.

They are wilfully ignoring what is actually said, as usual.

Because they know they're full of shit. They want to corrupt the morals of kids so all sex is equal, girl/guy, guy/guy and they can't exactly admit it.

Poor kids. They are being desensitised so nothing will seem alarming or just plain wrong as they grow older.

So if a 10 year old is shown this:

http://illinoisfamily.org/110files/uploads/2013/05/Its-Perfectly-Normal.pdf

Per you, they'll lose the ability to tell right and wrong? What image exactly will strip them of this capacity? Just give me the page number.

Its abuse, imho, and as the guy in the post above about the sex ed book, its porno and would be illegal in other settings. It's an outrage.

A book on sex and sex health having the most slow pitch, cartoon depictions of sex and sex health would be 'child abuse'?

 

[Skylar]

Can you imagine having a sex ed class lead by Silly Sil, Weasel, or Tilly? You'd be better educated skipping the class.

I'd teach them the risks and dangers, like I said, Retardo.

They are wilfully ignoring what is actually said, as usual.

Because they know they're full of shit. They want to corrupt the morals of kids so all sex is equal, girl/guy, guy/guy and they can't exactly admit it.

The totality of your examples, even your standards, consist of ONE principal at ONE school in ONE class answering a direct question from ONE student.

What is being taught to kids is condom use. And well it should be.

There have been other examples, I'm not scouring the internet so you can pretend it doesn't matter. They teach much more than just condom use, at this stage you're a goddamn liar.

So your complaint is that ONE Principal shouldn't have answered the ONE child's ONE question about sex in ONE sex ed class?

 

[Iceweasel]

I'd teach them the risks and dangers, like I said, Retardo.

They are wilfully ignoring what is actually said, as usual.

Because they know they're full of shit. They want to corrupt the morals of kids so all sex is equal, girl/guy, guy/guy and they can't exactly admit it.

The totality of your examples, even your standards, consist of ONE principal at ONE school in ONE class answering a direct question from ONE student.

What is being taught to kids is condom use. And well it should be.

There have been other examples, I'm not scouring the internet so you can pretend it doesn't matter. They teach much more than just condom use, at this stage you're a goddamn liar.

So your complaint is that ONE Principal shouldn't have answered the ONE child's ONE question about sex in ONE sex ed class?

No, I called you a liar for a reason.

 

[Skylar]

They are wilfully ignoring what is actually said, as usual.

Because they know they're full of shit. They want to corrupt the morals of kids so all sex is equal, girl/guy, guy/guy and they can't exactly admit it.

The totality of your examples, even your standards, consist of ONE principal at ONE school in ONE class answering a direct question from ONE student.

What is being taught to kids is condom use. And well it should be.

There have been other examples, I'm not scouring the internet so you can pretend it doesn't matter. They teach much more than just condom use, at this stage you're a goddamn liar.

So your complaint is that ONE Principal shouldn't have answered the ONE child's ONE question about sex in ONE sex ed class?

No, I called you a liar for a reason.

Then what is your complaint? Should the Principal have refused to answer the question about sex from a student in a sex ed class or not?

 

[Tilly]

Can you imagine having a sex ed class lead by Silly Sil, Weasel, or Tilly? You'd be better educated skipping the class.

I'd teach them the risks and dangers, like I said, Retardo.

They are wilfully ignoring what is actually said, as usual.

Because they know they're full of shit. They want to corrupt the morals of kids so all sex is equal, girl/guy, guy/guy and they can't exactly admit it.

The totality of your examples, even your standards, consist of ONE principal at ONE school in ONE class answering a direct question from ONE student.

What is being taught to kids is condom use. And well it should be.

There have been other examples, I'm not scouring the internet so you can pretend it doesn't matter. They teach much more than just condom use, at this stage you're a goddamn liar.

No matter what evidence is presented, Skylar and the eejit danger mouse will continue to pretend to think we've objected to teaching about condom use, and ignore or laugh at all the other stuff that has had parents up in arms. If you're not in favour of stealing children's childhood and innocence, if you're not in favour of the education system straying from anatomy, physiology and facts, if you're not in favour of ensuring children don't have a chance to develop morality, if you're not in favour of children being shown near pornographic materials and being taught how to masterbate, you're a retard. What's new? Lol.