Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
There have been other examples, I'm not scouring the internet so you can pretend it doesn't matter. They teach much more than just condom use, at this stage you're a goddamn liar.Because they know they're full of shit. They want to corrupt the morals of kids so all sex is equal, girl/guy, guy/guy and they can't exactly admit it.They are wilfully ignoring what is actually said, as usual.I'd teach them the risks and dangers, like I said, Retardo.
The totality of your examples, even your standards, consist of ONE principal at ONE school in ONE class answering a direct question from ONE student.
What is being taught to kids is condom use. And well it should be.
No matter what evidence is presented, Skylar and the eejit danger mouse will continue to pretend to think we've objected to teaching about condom use, and ignore or laugh at all the other stuff that has had parents up in arms.
If you're not in favour of stealing children's childhood and innocence, if you're not in favour of the education system straying from anatomy, physiology and facts, if you're not in favour of ensuring children don't have a chance to develop morality, if you're not in favour of children being shown near pornographic materials and being taught how to master ate, you're a retard. What's new? Lol.
Because they know they're full of shit. They want to corrupt the morals of kids so all sex is equal, girl/guy, guy/guy and they can't exactly admit it.They are wilfully ignoring what is actually said, as usual.I'd teach them the risks and dangers, like I said, Retardo.You mean that Life News, an anti-abortion, fundamentalist Christian wordpress blog can't be trusted to be accurate?
Color me shocked.
Can you imagine having a sex ed class lead by Silly Sil, Weasel, or Tilly? You'd be better educated skipping the class.
Poor kids. They are being desensitised so nothing will seem alarming or just plain wrong as they grow older. Its abuse, imho, and as the guy in the post above about the sex ed book, its porno and would be illegal in other settings. It's an outrage.
Because they know they're full of shit. They want to corrupt the morals of kids so all sex is equal, girl/guy, guy/guy and they can't exactly admit it.They are wilfully ignoring what is actually said, as usual.I'd teach them the risks and dangers, like I said, Retardo.Your bullshit so-called news article is a lie. This is what they use in Washington, one of the few states that require sex ed to be medically accurate.
http://www.k12.wa.us/HIVSexualHealth/pubdocs/KNOWGrades5-6.pdf
You mean that Life News, an anti-abortion, fundamentalist Christian wordpress blog can't be trusted to be accurate?
Color me shocked.
Can you imagine having a sex ed class lead by Silly Sil, Weasel, or Tilly? You'd be better educated skipping the class.
I'd teach them the risks and dangers, like I said, Retardo.Post where I condemned condom education? You can't. That means you're a moron for repeating it. Schools just "acknowledge" other practices? You haven't read this thread or the others or you're just a filthy liar.And how are schools 'normalizing' anal and oral sex? By acknowledging they exist?
What schools are doing is teaching condom use so kids can better protect themselves. What about that do you oppose?
School Uses Planned Parenthood Curriculum to Teach Kids Oral Sex
Parents could tell something was wrong with the children when they came home from school. They were quiet and withdrawn, embarrassed, and didn’t want to talk about what had happened. When Curtis and Jean Pannkuk began questioning their young daughter, they discovered that her elementary school principal had instructed her that day in how to perform oral and anal sex. The traumatizing instruction was delivered as a part of state approved sex education that was orchestrated, developed, pushed, and policed by Planned Parenthood, NARAL Pro-Choice Washington, SIECUS, and a host of other agencies.
Though parents in the small town of Onalaska, Washington, are furious that their children have been violated and traumatized by the highly inappropriate sex instruction, the superintendent defended the principal’s delivery of graphic instruction in aberrant sex to the elementary school students, telling local media, “I think the principal handled it appropriately at the time; she only gave factual information, no demonstrations.” In another interview, he indicated that she “stuck to the curriculum.”
Your bullshit so-called news article is a lie. This is what they use in Washington, one of the few states that require sex ed to be medically accurate.
http://www.k12.wa.us/HIVSexualHealth/pubdocs/KNOWGrades5-6.pdf
You mean that Life News, an anti-abortion, fundamentalist Christian wordpress blog can't be trusted to be accurate?
Color me shocked.
Can you imagine having a sex ed class lead by Silly Sil, Weasel, or Tilly? You'd be better educated skipping the class.
There have been other examples, I'm not scouring the internet so you can pretend it doesn't matter. They teach much more than just condom use, at this stage you're a goddamn liar.Because they know they're full of shit. They want to corrupt the morals of kids so all sex is equal, girl/guy, guy/guy and they can't exactly admit it.They are wilfully ignoring what is actually said, as usual.
The totality of your examples, even your standards, consist of ONE principal at ONE school in ONE class answering a direct question from ONE student.
What is being taught to kids is condom use. And well it should be.
No matter what evidence is presented, Skylar and the eejit danger mouse will continue to pretend to think we've objected to teaching about condom use, and ignore or laugh at all the other stuff that has had parents up in arms.
I'm waiting for you to show me which page in that book will make a 10 year old lose the ability to tell right from wrong.
Just give me a page number.
If you're not in favour of stealing children's childhood and innocence, if you're not in favour of the education system straying from anatomy, physiology and facts, if you're not in favour of ensuring children don't have a chance to develop morality, if you're not in favour of children being shown near pornographic materials and being taught how to master ate, you're a retard. What's new? Lol.
A child's 'innocence' will be stolen by being told about masturbation or condom use? Is this before or after that picture robs them of the capacity to tell right from wrong?
Parents Outraged When Planned Parenthood Sent Instructors With Sketchy Backgrounds to Teach Sex Ed
BY NICK MORPUS (11 MONTHS AGO) | CULTURE, EDUCATION
A California high school has come under fire after some parents discovered who the school hired to teach sexual education to their children. The two instructors were a part of a partnership between Acalanes Union High School and the local Planned Parenthood.
These revelations came to light after parents demanded the curriculum be made available for their viewing and approval, as well as the employment histories of instructors who would be teaching the class. What the parents found shocked them.
The two instructors in question were found to have questionable side jobs: One led sex toy workshops at a local adult store, while the other was a self-described “pleasure activist,” who was known to visit sexuality conferences.
Local news station, CBS San Francisco, spoke with Camille Giglio, one of the parents.
“Planned Parenthood is a business. It’s a business that sells sex. It’s a way to get clientele and to sexualize young people and turn them into lifelong clients,” Giglio said.
Certain upset parents banded together to hire the Pacific Justice Institute, a conservative legal firm, to aid them in petitioning the school for a new sex-ed curriculum, according to Fox News.
“These are two representatives (who) happen to have a truly questionable background,” Brad Dacus of the Pacific Justice Institute, which made the initial inquiry with concerned parents, told FoxNews.com. “There has been outcry from the parents. This school district doesn’t seem to get it when it comes to the proper protection for the students.”
The school has released a statement which addresses the concerns of the parents, and have informed them that the two instructors will no longer be teaching the course. No word has been made as to who the replacements will be.
Parents Outraged When Planned Parenthood Sent Instructors With Sketchy Backgrounds to Teach Sex Ed
By Matt Vande Bunte | [email protected]
Follow on Twitter
on September 21, 2015 at 12:58 PM, updated September 21, 2015 at 10:24 PM
GRAND RAPIDS, MI – Planned Parenthood and any other organization "that provides abortion or abortion counseling" would be prohibited from teaching sex education in Michigan schools, per a bill introduced by state Rep. Tom Hooker, R-Byron Township.
The former teacher also wants to prevent schools from letting students practice using contraceptive devices such as condoms.
"It's illegal to hand out condoms to young people as they exit the class, but what they're doing is they're handing out the condoms in class. They're practicing on a cucumber or something similar, familiarizing themselves with the use, and then Planned Parenthood conveniently tells them they can get the devices at Planned Parenthood clinics and how easy it is to get them without the knowledge of parents," said Hooker, a third-term representative.
There's a perverse incentive for an organization like Planned Parenthood to get into the sex education business," Hooker said. "It's a conflict in that they give out or sell condoms, they offer pregnancy tests and (sexually transmitted disease) testing, and, obviously, if they're pregnant, they then would offer an abortion.
"It just seems like an awfully comfortable arrangement for Planned Parenthood to teach sex education."
Hooker wants Planned Parenthood, cucumbers out of sex education
"The only dealing that I did with birth control devices (when I was a teacher) was I gave the students the failure rates of all of them. The failure rate obviously tells you there is not safe sex except saved sex. To avoid sex is the only guarantee that you're not going to get pregnant."
Calif. parents are fuming over 'horrific' images used in 8th grade sex ed class
Parents of children who attend Pine Valley Middle School in California are livid over a slideshow presentation that was delivered to their 8th grade sons and daughters.
Calif. parents are fuming over 'horrific' images used in 8th grade sex ed class
But the most disgusting of them all is this – a man looking at us, with blood smeared all over his mouth and lips, with the caption: “A real man loves his woman every day of the month.” Really? Where is the pedagogical value in this nauseating message? Calif. parents are fuming over 'horrific' images used in 8th grade sex ed class
I wouldn't be surprised.Calif. parents are fuming over 'horrific' images used in 8th grade sex ed class
Parents of children who attend Pine Valley Middle School in California are livid over a slideshow presentation that was delivered to their 8th grade sons and daughters.
Calif. parents are fuming over 'horrific' images used in 8th grade sex ed class
From that link on Pine Valley school:
But the most disgusting of them all is this – a man looking at us, with blood smeared all over his mouth and lips, with the caption: “A real man loves his woman every day of the month.” Really? Where is the pedagogical value in this nauseating message? Calif. parents are fuming over 'horrific' images used in 8th grade sex ed class
The pedagogical value is in turning the stomachs of boys looking at the image. The idea to impart, methinks, is that "sex with women is bloody disgusting". Implied to the boys: "You should try sex with men instead...no blood..."
In fact, the image of a woman riding on a man's back to boys equals "women will dominate you".
The image of boys being called "douche bags" has the same nauseating effect; the imagery is all of "the negative aspects of having sex with filthy domineering women". The images were pro gay sex for boys.
Follow on Twitter
on September 21, 2015 at 12:58 PM, updated September 21, 2015 at 10:24 PM
GRAND RAPIDS, MI – Planned Parenthood and any other organization "that provides abortion or abortion counseling" would be prohibited from teaching sex education in Michigan schools, per a bill introduced by state Rep. Tom Hooker, R-Byron Township.
The former teacher also wants to prevent schools from letting students practice using contraceptive devices such as condoms.
"It's illegal to hand out condoms to young people as they exit the class, but what they're doing is they're handing out the condoms in class. They're practicing on a cucumber or something similar, familiarizing themselves with the use, and then Planned Parenthood conveniently tells them they can get the devices at Planned Parenthood clinics and how easy it is to get them without the knowledge of parents," said Hooker, a third-term representative.
There's a perverse incentive for an organization like Planned Parenthood to get into the sex education business," Hooker said. "It's a conflict in that they give out or sell condoms, they offer pregnancy tests and (sexually transmitted disease) testing, and, obviously, if they're pregnant, they then would offer an abortion.
"It just seems like an awfully comfortable arrangement for Planned Parenthood to teach sex education."
Hooker wants Planned Parenthood, cucumbers out of sex education
And what exactly did the kids learn that you object to?
Oh, and I love your source:
"The only dealing that I did with birth control devices (when I was a teacher) was I gave the students the failure rates of all of them. The failure rate obviously tells you there is not safe sex except saved sex. To avoid sex is the only guarantee that you're not going to get pregnant."
But you're NOT arguing against teaching kids condom use, huh?
Calif. parents are fuming over 'horrific' images used in 8th grade sex ed class
Parents of children who attend Pine Valley Middle School in California are livid over a slideshow presentation that was delivered to their 8th grade sons and daughters.
Calif. parents are fuming over 'horrific' images used in 8th grade sex ed class
From that link on Pine Valley school:
But the most disgusting of them all is this – a man looking at us, with blood smeared all over his mouth and lips, with the caption: “A real man loves his woman every day of the month.” Really? Where is the pedagogical value in this nauseating message? Calif. parents are fuming over 'horrific' images used in 8th grade sex ed class
The pedagogical value is in turning the stomachs of boys looking at the image. The idea to impart, methinks, is that "sex with women is bloody disgusting". Implied to the boys: "You should try sex with men instead...no blood..."
I wouldn't be surprised.
I wouldn't be surprised.
What else would the producer of those images be after evoking in boys looking on? Nothing but disgust and disdain for the female body and the female persona in general. 1. a female dominating a male. 2. females cleaning filth out from their vaginas (the purpose of douche bags). 3. Sex with females = menstrual blood all over your face... The only goal of those three images shown to boys in Pine Valley CA, boys who are already somewhat fearful of approaching girls for sex at that young age, would be to create a visceral disgust in those boys for women in general.
It was gay promotion. You can bet the house on it..
You're Teaching My Child What? The Truth About Sex Education
By Miriam Grossman, M.D.
I have read “Talk About Sex,” and in it there is no encouragement whatsoever to delay sexual behavior.
I post links, you do not.
I wouldn't be surprised.
What else would the producer of those images be after evoking in boys looking on? Nothing but disgust and disdain for the female body and the female persona in general. 1. a female dominating a male. 2. females cleaning filth out from their vaginas (the purpose of douche bags). 3. Sex with females = menstrual blood all over your face... The only goal of those three images shown to boys in Pine Valley CA, boys who are already somewhat fearful of approaching girls for sex at that young age, would be to create a visceral disgust in those boys for women in general; and sexually specifically..
It was gay promotion. You can bet the house on it..
