Suspicion: Global Warming is Fraud (Hidden Agenda?)

[Big Fitz]

The globe is not warming, unfortunately.

Your proof of which is? Come on, you have repeatedly posted this nonsense, now show us some evidence.

The proof is on you Ole Crock. You are saying something is happening and mankind is the cause of it. Proof is on you to show how it is.

Too bad the Hadley CRU scandal destroyed all their credibility in fraud. Now you have to start over.

Till then, you have no right to demand changes on anything based on climatology or meteorology. Once you DO prove mankind is the cause of catastrophic changes, then steps can be taken. But till then, you may as well demand we implement global fascism because the 12th Imam or the Garuda Bird is returning.

They're just as real.

 

[Screaming Eagle]

Your proof of which is? Come on, you have repeatedly posted this nonsense, now show us some evidence.

You have yet to show any evidence to the contrary, which is impossible because any evidence to the contrary was pencil whipped.

Oh my, another conspiracy freak. In other words, all the governments on earth are in on a plot to fool you with false data. And all the scientific societies, all of the National Academies of Science, and all of the major universities.

Now who will you accept evidence from? NOAA? NASA? The ESA? Woods Hole Institute? How about Scripps?

They are all a bunch of liberals.

 

[Big Fitz]

In other words, all the governments on earth are in on a plot to fool you with false data.

No, just Fabian Socialist, Environazis and Neo-Feudalists that you love so.

It's also not a 'conspiracy' as in a nefarious secret society, but a collection of small conspiracies of personal and smaller group desires for power over those they don't like.

This is just the delivery system for controlling the world, and every one of them believes they will be on top and in charge and therefore immune from the horror they desire to release on the world for the 'sake of the planet'.

This is evil incarnate as expressed in a collection of small diabolic desires.

 

[FactFinder]

Another case of selling the Brooklyn Bridge.

Weren't the snake oil salesmen primarily from Tennesee? Probably Gore's forefathers.

 

[code1211]

Global warming on Mars, ice caps melting

Global warming on Mars, ice caps melting
Link to this pageThe skeptic argument..."Scientists are telling us Mars is experiencing its own planetary warming. NASA says the Martian South Pole's ice cap has been shrinking for three summers in a row. Maybe Mars got its fever from earth. If so, I guess Jupiter's caught the same cold, because it's warming up too, like Pluto. I wonder what all those planets, dwarf planets and moons in our SOLAR system have in common. Hmmmm. Solar?" (Fred Thompson).

What the science says...
Martian climate is primarily driven by dust and albedo and there is little empirical evidence that Mars is showing long term warming.


The primary empirical evidence for long term, global warming on Mars comes from Fenton 2007. Fenton compared a composite snapshot of Mars from 1977 taken by the Voyager spacecraft to a 1999 image compiled by the Mars Global Surveyor (referencing work from Geissler 2005). The 1977 snapshot showed a brighter planet. In 1999, the planet had a lower albedo, with prominent darker regions in the southern mid and high latitudes. Using the albedo changes in a general circulation model, Fenton calculated a 22 year global warming trend of 0.65°C.

And yet the CO2 on Mars is more dense than on Earth. Why is the controlling factor for their climate not CO2? There is much more of it on Mars than on Earth.

The atmospheric pressure on Mars is less than 1% that of Earth. You are mistaking composition for density. The Martian atmosphere is 95% CO2, but very, very tenuous.

I am not. The 95% of the Martian Atmosphere that is CO2 amounts to a consentration of CO2 that is more dense than the consentration on Earth. This a measure of molecules per cubic foot, not a percent of the atmosphere. If CO2 was a strong forcer, either there or here, why is it dominated by any ohter factor that occurs? Dominated either there or here?

 

[SpidermanTuba]

. . .

4. When human beings, animals and plants breathe, one of the by-products of respiration is CO2.

The carbon tax will be used to tax all life into oblivion. To enforce the tax, inspections and audits are required – forget personal freedom and privacy.

This shows what an idiot you are.


I'm just curious, does the AGW conspiracy go all the way back to 1896 when the theory was first proposed?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

. . .

4. When human beings, animals and plants breathe, one of the by-products of respiration is CO2.

The carbon tax will be used to tax all life into oblivion. To enforce the tax, inspections and audits are required – forget personal freedom and privacy.

This shows what an idiot you are.


I'm just curious, does the AGW conspiracy go all the way back to 1896 when the theory was first proposed?

Its starts when they called it "settled science"

 

[SpidermanTuba]

. . .

4. When human beings, animals and plants breathe, one of the by-products of respiration is CO2.

The carbon tax will be used to tax all life into oblivion. To enforce the tax, inspections and audits are required – forget personal freedom and privacy.

This shows what an idiot you are.


I'm just curious, does the AGW conspiracy go all the way back to 1896 when the theory was first proposed?

Its starts when they called it "settled science"

Who is "they" and link to them calling it that?

 

[PLYMCO_PILGRIM]

 

[PLYMCO_PILGRIM]

 

[CrusaderFrank]

This shows what an idiot you are.


I'm just curious, does the AGW conspiracy go all the way back to 1896 when the theory was first proposed?

Its starts when they called it "settled science"

Who is "they" and link to them calling it that?

Lazy fucking asshole. Get a fucking clue about what you're talking about

"the science is beyond dispute and the facts are clear" -- obama

President-elect Barack Obama proposes economic suicide for US - Telegraph

 

[PLYMCO_PILGRIM]

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nEiLgbBGKVk[/ame]

 

[SpidermanTuba]

Its starts when they called it "settled science"

Who is "they" and link to them calling it that?

Lazy fucking asshole. Get a fucking clue about what you're talking about

"the science is beyond dispute and the facts are clear" -- obama

President-elect Barack Obama proposes economic suicide for US - Telegraph

So are there any actual scientists who call it "settled science" - and if so, link please. If not, what is the scientific relevance of non-experts calling it anything?